Methuselah A's minion calls a Kine Resources Contested, allocating one point
to himself and 3 points to his prey, Methuselah B, who has no votes on the
table, nor any in his hand. Methuselah A plays a bribes, gaining one pool
immediately. The vote passes, and Methuselah B must burn three pool, and is
ousted. Methuselah A is triumphant.
The question is whether or not the KRC is a legal play, since the total pool
on the table is 3, and the number of points allocated is 4. Methuselah B
argued that since there are not 4 pool on the table, KRC does not have
enough legal targets to be played. I argued (and ruled) that KRC doesn't
count pool, it counts points, and there is no limit on the number of points
given to a Metheuselah (other than the limits imposed by the card), and the
number of points only matters when the vote is resolved. Was my ruling
correct?
~Shankar Gupta
Prince of New York
Sounds good and all.
>The question is whether or not the KRC is a legal play, since the total pool
>on the table is 3, and the number of points allocated is 4. Methuselah B
>argued that since there are not 4 pool on the table, KRC does not have
>enough legal targets to be played. I argued (and ruled) that KRC doesn't
>count pool, it counts points, and there is no limit on the number of points
>given to a Metheuselah (other than the limits imposed by the card), and the
>number of points only matters when the vote is resolved. Was my ruling
>correct?
You are correct. KRC allocates points and does not count (or target) pool.
Similarly, you can bleed someone for 10 even if they have only 1 pool.
Halcyan 2
Correct.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/