if a vampire has 0 blood it have to hunt as first action or he can
hunt after another minion/s action?
if a vampire has 0 blood and hunts, is blocked and plays a combat ends
and untap, he needs to hunt again, but it can't make the same action
again, what occurs then?
can be various equal unique master in play at the same time? for
example, various path of metamorphosis.
if a vampire inflicts succesfully aggravated and no-aggravated damage
in combat to a minion can this minion select what kind of damage
absorvs first? for example 2 aggravated and 2 non-aggravated, i play a
skin of rock to absorv the 2 aggravated and only lost 2 blood from the
normal one.
bye!!!
Geb
Mandatory actions must be taken first. [LSJ 11-27-2000]
If at any time during your minion phase you have an untapped minion
with no blood, your next action must be for that vampire to hunt.
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=698219373
> if a vampire has 0 blood and hunts, is blocked and plays a combat ends
> and untap, he needs to hunt again, but it can't make the same action
> again, what occurs then?
He stays untapped and is unable to take any actions that minion phase.
At this point, the rest of your minions may act.
> can be various equal unique master in play at the same time? for
> example, various path of metamorphosis.
No.
Unique means Unique.
Only one copy of any unique card may be in play at a time.
See the rulebook, page 8, 13, 19.
See also 1.6.1.4
"Uniqueness: If a card is identified as 砥nique," then only
one copy of that card can be in play at a time. If a second copy
is brought into play, the copies will be contested (and out of
play) until all but one is yielded (see Contested Cards, sec.
4.1)."
http://lasombra.tripod.com/rulebook.htm#page_13
> if a vampire inflicts succesfully aggravated and no-aggravated damage
> in combat to a minion can this minion select what kind of damage
> absorvs first? for example 2 aggravated and 2 non-aggravated, i play a
> skin of rock to absorv the 2 aggravated and only lost 2 blood from the
> normal one.
All of the damage resolves at the same time, with non-aggravated
damage applied first to maximize the chances of burning the vampire.
You may prevent any of the damage with appropriate cards, you do not
have to prevent the non-aggravated damage before the aggravated damage.
See 6.4.6 of the rulebook and page 42:
http://lasombra.tripod.com/rulebook.htm#6.4.6
Carpe Noctem.
Lasombra
http://lasombra.tripod.com
http://legbiter.tripod.com
http://vekn_clans.tripod.com
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
My group has been playing since the beginning and we were under the
impression that regular damage had to be healed first before aggravated
damage was healed..
maybe we should get out more :)
> > if a vampire inflicts succesfully aggravated and no-aggravated damage
> > in combat to a minion can this minion select what kind of damage
> > absorvs first? for example 2 aggravated and 2 non-aggravated, i play a
> > skin of rock to absorv the 2 aggravated and only lost 2 blood from the
> > normal one.
>
> All of the damage resolves at the same time, with non-aggravated
> damage applied first to maximize the chances of burning the vampire.
> You may prevent any of the damage with appropriate cards, you do not
> have to prevent the non-aggravated damage before the aggravated damage.
>
Jason
Maybe you're new here, so listen: when The Lasombra or LSJ say something, no
need for further confirmation.
We all trust them.
Aggravated damage cannot be healed.
Damage sone simultaneously may be prevented in any order.
Damage not prevented is handled by first handling normal
damage (burning blood to heal or become wounded) and then
by handling the aggravated damage (becoming wounded and,
if wounded already, burning a blood to prevent destruction
or be burned).
> maybe we should get out more :)
>
> > > if a vampire inflicts succesfully aggravated and no-aggravated damage
> > > in combat to a minion can this minion select what kind of damage
> > > absorvs first? for example 2 aggravated and 2 non-aggravated, i play a
> > > skin of rock to absorv the 2 aggravated and only lost 2 blood from the
> > > normal one.
> >
> > All of the damage resolves at the same time, with non-aggravated
> > damage applied first to maximize the chances of burning the vampire.
> > You may prevent any of the damage with appropriate cards, you do not
> > have to prevent the non-aggravated damage before the aggravated damage.
> >
>
> Jason
>
>
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
Of course.
See the LSJ quoted here:
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=665991807
"> as far as the agg/regular question, normal damage is handled first
> when you're actually TAKING the damage, but when you're preventing it
> you can choose to prevent whichever you want. If you have a FoM in
> play, I suspect you actually could choose to take the 1 normal
> instead.
Correct.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/"
and here:
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=611152426
"The only restriction on damage prevention is that you can't play it
unless you have (preventable) damage left to prevent.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.geocities.com/vtesrep"
But perhaps most relevantly, the LSJ quoted here:
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=577886426
"> In this case, can the vampire first prevent agg. damage?
In any case, if the vampire can prevent damage, he is free to prevent
whichever point(s) of damage he chooses. But the prevention is handled
before the healing or burning blood to prevent destruction.
--
LSJ (vte...@wizards.com) V:TES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.wizards.com/VTES/rules.asp"
> My group has been playing since the beginning and we were under the
> impression that regular damage had to be healed first before
> aggravated damage was healed..
Sorry you had the wrong impression.
> > > if a vampire inflicts succesfully aggravated and no-aggravated
> > > damage in combat to a minion can this minion select what kind
> > > of damage absorvs first? for example 2 aggravated and 2 non-
> > > aggravated, i play a skin of rock to absorv the 2 aggravated
> > > and only lost 2 blood from the normal one.
> >
> > All of the damage resolves at the same time, with non-aggravated
> > damage applied first to maximize the chances of burning the vampire.
> > You may prevent any of the damage with appropriate cards, you do
> > not have to prevent the non-aggravated damage before the
> > aggravated damage.
Not only is The Lasombra, and LSJ's word gospel, it's actually stated
in the rulebook.
6.4.6
...
"If a vampire recieves both regular and aggravated damage at the same
time, regular damage is handled first."
Note that when it says at the same time, all damage from all sources
during the current strike are applied at the same time in the strike
resolution phase.
> > My group has been playing since the beginning and we were under the
> > impression that regular damage had to be healed first before
aggravated
> > damage was healed..
> >
> > maybe we should get out more :)
> >
> > > > if a vampire inflicts succesfully aggravated and no-aggravated
damage
> > > > in combat to a minion can this minion select what kind of damage
> > > > absorvs first? for example 2 aggravated and 2 non-aggravated, i
play a
> > > > skin of rock to absorv the 2 aggravated and only lost 2 blood
from the
> > > > normal one.
> > >
> > > All of the damage resolves at the same time, with non-aggravated
> > > damage applied first to maximize the chances of burning the
vampire.
> > > You may prevent any of the damage with appropriate cards, you do
not
> > > have to prevent the non-aggravated damage before the aggravated
damage.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >
>
>