info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
LSJ: Ex Nihilo q.
27 views
Skip to first unread message
Joshua Duffin
Jun 29, 2001, 11:55:15 AM6/29/01
to
Does "immune to non-aggravated damage" beat "damage
cannot be prevented"? This is important to, for example,
the Ex Nihilo/Weather Control concept.
cannot be prevented"? This is important to, for example,
the Ex Nihilo/Weather Control concept.
thanks,
Josh
the can't think of everything at once prince of washington dc
LSJ
Jun 29, 2001, 1:17:52 PM6/29/01
to
duff...@bls.gov (Joshua Duffin) wrote:
>Does "immune to non-aggravated damage" beat "damage
>cannot be prevented"? This is important to, for example,
>the Ex Nihilo/Weather Control concept.
>Does "immune to non-aggravated damage" beat "damage
>cannot be prevented"? This is important to, for example,
>the Ex Nihilo/Weather Control concept.
The two are not at odds, no. The damage is unpreventable and is not
prevented. It is then ignored.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
0 new messages