(Joshua Duffin) wrote:
>Does "immune to non-aggravated damage" beat "damage
>cannot be prevented"? This is important to, for example,
>the Ex Nihilo/Weather Control concept.
The two are not at odds, no. The damage is unpreventable and is not
prevented. It is then ignored.
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: