Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

LSJ- VHQ ref/polact?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Talonz

unread,
Sep 26, 2002, 2:40:50 PM9/26/02
to
I noticed that the text for Ventrue HQ has changed slightly;

"During a referendum, you may tap this card to gain 3 votes."

So presumably this could give you votes during a bloodhunt?

If so, what about other vote locations like the city gangrel
connections that by their old text still refer to the pol action? Can
these be presumed to refer to a referendum instead as well or are they
hosed?

T

LSJ

unread,
Sep 26, 2002, 2:49:56 PM9/26/02
to
Talonz wrote:
>
> I noticed that the text for Ventrue HQ has changed slightly;
>
> "During a referendum, you may tap this card to gain 3 votes."
>
> So presumably this could give you votes during a bloodhunt?

Yes. This is not a functional change. Ventrue HQ has always been
able to supply votes in a bloodhunt.

> If so, what about other vote locations like the city gangrel
> connections that by their old text still refer to the pol action? Can
> these be presumed to refer to a referendum instead as well or are they
> hosed?

The ones that restrict themselves to political actions cannot be used
during a bloodhunt referendum, since that is not a political action.

--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

reyda

unread,
Sep 26, 2002, 4:07:22 PM9/26/02
to
LSJ wrote:
> Talonz wrote:
>>
>> I noticed that the text for Ventrue HQ has changed slightly;
>>
>> "During a referendum, you may tap this card to gain 3 votes."
>>
>> So presumably this could give you votes during a bloodhunt?
>
> Yes. This is not a functional change. Ventrue HQ has always been
> able to supply votes in a bloodhunt.

LSJ !
Just one more question : are the votes indivisibles ?
can i gain 3 votes from HQ and only put 1 in favor so the vote passes but
the meth whose minion called the vote cannot gain more than one pool from
Voter captivation ?

reyda


skippy

unread,
Sep 26, 2002, 4:14:21 PM9/26/02
to

"reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d9369b9$0$24635$79c1...@nan-newsreader-03.noos.net...

my guess is that you could put 2 votes for and 1 against. the effect you
were going for but using all 3 votes.


--
Oscar Garza
Prince of College Station
The Crazy Aggie


Joshua Duffin

unread,
Sep 26, 2002, 5:25:16 PM9/26/02
to

"reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d9369b9$0$24635$79c1...@nan-newsreader-03.noos.net...

No. That is, they are indivisible (cannot be divided).

From the Camarilla Edition rulebook, [6.3.3] "Gaining Votes":

"Each vote cast is cast either "for" or "against" the referendum, and
a Methuselah may cast some of her votes in favor and some against, as
she chooses, with the restriction that ***all of the votes from each given
vampire or other source must be cast in agreement as a group.***"

(emphasis added.)


Josh

i pledge allegiance to the ventrue...

LSJ

unread,
Sep 27, 2002, 7:36:34 AM9/27/02
to

Correct.

Shankar Gupta

unread,
Sep 27, 2002, 11:13:35 PM9/27/02
to
What about Dread Gaze? Is that usable during a blood hunt vote?

~Shankar Gupta
Prince Of New York

"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message
news:3D9442C2...@white-wolf.com...

reyda

unread,
Sep 28, 2002, 9:07:47 AM9/28/02
to
Shankar Gupta wrote:
:: What about Dread Gaze? Is that usable during a blood hunt vote?

No !


Darky

unread,
Sep 28, 2002, 10:27:58 PM9/28/02
to
"reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3d95a9b4$0$26407$79c1...@nan-newsreader-01.noos.net>...

> Shankar Gupta wrote:
> :: What about Dread Gaze? Is that usable during a blood hunt vote?
>
> No !

fyi, this is because reactions need an action to react on (just
thought i'd mention it :P)

0 new messages