Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

minor question:slave&CI

1 view
Skip to first unread message

spinney99

unread,
Mar 4, 2002, 12:44:17 AM3/4/02
to
my guess is that if Saxum changes to a ventrue via Clan Impersonation,
he still retains being a tremere slave due to card text. most things
work that way, but assamites lose the blood curse if they CI any other
clan. i think this is because it's actually listed in the rulebook
(6.5.5) that the condition is clan-based. and many times, the
bloodlines Additional Rules for VTES implies that only gargoyles can
be slaves (3.9) making that condition clan-based as well. And the
question... UH... howzitgo?
thanks,
sppiiinnnnnneyyyyeyyeyyeyeyyyeyeyeeeyyy
($6 apportation? and i'm not selling... Mariel told me not to....)
"the blood of these whores is killing me"..v-v.. andy warhol's dracula

LSJ

unread,
Mar 4, 2002, 6:21:23 AM3/4/02
to
spinney99 wrote:
>
> my guess is that if Saxum changes to a ventrue via Clan Impersonation,
> he still retains being a tremere slave due to card text.

Correct.

> most things
> work that way, but assamites lose the blood curse if they CI any other
> clan. i think this is because it's actually listed in the rulebook
> (6.5.5) that the condition is clan-based.

Correct.

> and many times, the
> bloodlines Additional Rules for VTES implies that only gargoyles can
> be slaves (3.9) making that condition clan-based as well. And the
> question... UH... howzitgo?

Only Gargoyles get to interpose for their masters.
But slave vampires are limited to undirected action without their masters.
Per BL 3.9

--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

0 new messages