I'm going to say yes, because it would be downright unfair if
Venenation became a "This Block Fails" card for him. He's already
enough of an @$$ with that card disallowing future block attempts.
Also, Venenation is only usable when a minion "is blocked", so
hopefully the granting of the block by Big N's controller moves the
action to resolution, which is the combat. Man, I hope so. I'm in a
Starter league with a guy playing the new FoS deck...
I would combat occurs because the block was legal at the time Venenation was
played.
Sorrow
--
David Cherryholmes
Yes that is possible. For example: Meth A has a minion (MA) has a
temptation (from Meth B) with enough counters to take control over it.
Meth B bleeds Meth A, A attempts to block with MA, in response Meth B
takes control of MA and the acting minion continues with his action as
though unblocked.
But this is something different the the above situation. The action is
surely blocked else venenation couldn't be played. So I think that
there is a combat, since that is part of the block.
Correct, for the latter reason.
The block succeeds, then Venenation is played.
Akaif- the target must be a valid target at the time of declaring the nose
of the hound
If it manages to untap later is irrilevant
best
Emiliano
>Akaif- the target must be a valid target at the time of declaring the nose
>of the hound
>If it manages to untap later is irrilevant
Wrong.
Nose of the Hound cannot be used to enter combat with an untapped
minion. If the target is untapped, then the target is no longer a
valid target and, if the action isn't blocked, it will fizzle at
resolution (that is, the "enter combat with a tapped minion" will not
occur).
See Absence of Legal Target.
LSJ Jul 25 2002, 7:42 am
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/bb46ca056521778a
See also: Sho-Fizzle
LSJ Oct 4 2004, 2:37 pm
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/c3788873e0058947
Thanks for the clarifications ;-)
Lazy to look around eh blue? I asked this exact same question here few
weeks back. ;)
Well, I wasn't going to bother to point it out, but actually that was
another one of our players posting under my account by accident.
--
David Cherryholmes