Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

KoT is out and still no page on the WW site

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Anthony Coleman

unread,
Nov 19, 2008, 8:15:55 AM11/19/08
to
I can't believe I'm making a whinging post.. but I think this really
is quite shocking.

How on earth has it happened that there the latest V;tES product is
released and there is _STILL_ fark all about it on the WW site. The
KoT picture goes to an old LoB article..

Who should have done something about this? Who can do something about
it now?

Anthony

Anthony Coleman

unread,
Nov 19, 2008, 8:25:08 AM11/19/08
to

Man, first I post whinging on a NG, and now I'm replying to myself -
not good :O)

This was being discussed on #vtes and a very good suggestion was made
- why not use some of the volunteer NERDPOWER resource that there is
in vtes if the reason for above is truly that no one had the time (I
find that _VERY_ hard to believe though - right up there with lost in
the mail). I'm sure its not impossible to give someone access to get
this stuff done.

Cheers,
Antthony

Jazzbeaux

unread,
Nov 19, 2008, 8:38:43 AM11/19/08
to
> > How on earth has it happened that there the latest V;tES product is
> > released and there is _STILL_ fark all about it on the WW site. The
> > KoT picture goes to an old LoB article..
>
> > Who should have done something about this? Who can do something about
> > it now?

It certainly is quite poor. If you are looking for information on
anything most people would go to the most relevant website - so White
Wolf for Vtes news.
The links should work, there should be information on cards, there
definitely should have been some promotion of the fact it was coming
out.

> This was being discussed on #vtes and a very good suggestion was made
> - why not use some of the volunteer NERDPOWER resource that there is
> in vtes if the reason for above is truly that no one had the time (I
> find that _VERY_ hard to believe though - right up there with lost in
> the mail). I'm sure its not impossible to give someone access to get
> this stuff done.

Anything would be better than the nothing that is currently happening.

Sam

Anthony Coleman

unread,
Nov 19, 2008, 8:39:45 AM11/19/08
to
On 19 Nov, 13:15, Anthony Coleman <Buntina...@gmail.com> wrote:

OK - Since checking at work yesterday now it points to the cataloge
entry for KoT - an improvement I guess but still pretty lame :O)

Orpheus

unread,
Nov 19, 2008, 10:35:24 AM11/19/08
to

It's pretty weird.

WW, should we be worrying ? Is the ship going down ? Or at least one person
leaving the boat ? Or are you busy buying Heroclix from Topps ?
--
Orpheus
--
"Cynicism isn't maturity. Callousness isn't strength. Pretending you
don't care so you don't have to try isn't "winning" What you do with
your life matters."

Luther Manning.


Screaming Vermillian

unread,
Nov 19, 2008, 11:44:21 AM11/19/08
to
On Nov 19, 10:35 am, "Orpheus" <orpheus...@NOSPAMfree.fr> wrote:
> Anthony Coleman wrote:
> > On 19 Nov, 13:15, Anthony Coleman <Buntina...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I can't believe I'm making a whinging post.. but I think this really
> >> is quite shocking.
>
> >> How on earth has it happened that there the latest V;tES product is
> >> released and there is _STILL_ fark all about it on the WW site. The
> >> KoT picture goes to an old LoB article..
>
> >> Who should have done something about this? Who can do something about
> >> it now?
>
> >> Anthony
>
> > OK - Since checking at work yesterday now it points to the cataloge
> > entry for KoT - an improvement I guess but still pretty lame :O)
>
> It's pretty weird.
>
> WW, should we be worrying ? Is the ship going down ? Or at least one person
> leaving the boat ? Or are you busy buying Heroclix from Topps ?


lol!

3rdshiftr

unread,
Nov 20, 2008, 2:16:56 PM11/20/08
to
WW, are we such a small percentage of your customer base that we
don't merit a preview? Is it really asking that much?


3rdshiftr

unread,
Nov 20, 2008, 2:19:01 PM11/20/08
to
On Nov 20, 11:16 am, 3rdshiftr <pacificamer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  WW, are we such a small percentage of your customer base that we
> don't merit a preview? Is it really asking that much?

spoke too soon! thanks

0 new messages