Question on Brinkmanship...
Kulaid
player b still in the game, but just walling up...
player c too strong in the game...
Player d out of cards and crippled beyond believe...
Player c tells player d, that'll he'll let player d withdraw from the
game...
What would happen if player d successfully withdrew?
1.) player a is ousted and player c gets 6 pool...
2.) player a is ousted at the same time as player d withdraws so nobody
get's the 6 pool...
3.) Player a starts throwing things at player c; cups, pennies,
counters, beer cans, etc...
4.) player b laugh hystically...
5.) Never would happen, would have broke the deal anyways.
If you attempt to withdraw, then brinkmanship was called and passed...
Are you subject to the same condition? From the text, only Methuselah
forced to withdraw from the game by the card will get ousted by it...
--
Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com
http://web2news.com/?rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
LSJ
> player a has a Brinkmanship in play, and very healthy
> player b still in the game, but just walling up...
> player c too strong in the game...
> Player d out of cards and crippled beyond believe...
>
> 1.) player a is ousted and player c gets 6 pool...
... and a VP (for ousting a), correct.
> If you attempt to withdraw, then brinkmanship was called and passed...
> Are you subject to the same condition? From the text, only Methuselah
> forced to withdraw from the game by the card will get ousted by it...
Correct.
Although if that current attempt to withdraw succeeds, the brinksmanship
will still oust its controller.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
Jon Stahler
"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message
news:3EDE328E...@white-wolf.com...
> Kulaid wrote:
> > player a has a Brinkmanship in play, and very healthy
> > player b still in the game, but just walling up...
> > player c too strong in the game...
> > Player d out of cards and crippled beyond believe...
> >
> > What would happen if player d successfully withdrew?
> > 1.) player a is ousted and player c gets 6 pool...
>
> ... and a VP (for ousting a), correct.
>
> > If you attempt to withdraw, then brinkmanship was called and passed...
> > Are you subject to the same condition? From the text, only Methuselah
> > forced to withdraw from the game by the card will get ousted by it...
>
> Correct.
>
> Although if that current attempt to withdraw succeeds, the brinksmanship
> will still oust its controller.
But the withdrawal is successful first, right? It has to be in order for
the condition of Brinksmanship to fire off. So you successfully withdraw
and then the Brinksmanship ousts the controller of the brinksmanship, who
has already withdrawn, so it should be a moot point.
LSJ
>>>If you attempt to withdraw, then brinkmanship was called and passed...
>>>Are you subject to the same condition? From the text, only Methuselah
>>>forced to withdraw from the game by the card will get ousted by it...
>>
>>Correct.
>>
>>Although if that current attempt to withdraw succeeds, the brinksmanship
>>will still oust its controller.
>
> But the withdrawal is successful first, right? It has to be in order for
> the condition of Brinksmanship to fire off. So you successfully withdraw
> and then the Brinksmanship ousts the controller of the brinksmanship, who
> has already withdrawn, so it should be a moot point.
?
If the Brinks's controller has already withdrawn, Brinks is no longer
in play, and there is nothing to answer.
The question was:
If A attempts to withdraw and then on B's turn, B puts Brinks in play,
what happens when A's turn rolls around again?
Answer:
If A fails to withdraw: nothing. A simply takes his turn as normal.
If A succeeds in withdrawing: B is ousted.
Charles Lechasseur
wrote:
>> If you attempt to withdraw, then brinkmanship was called and passed...
>> Are you subject to the same condition? From the text, only Methuselah
>> forced to withdraw from the game by the card will get ousted by it...
>
>Correct.
>
>Although if that current attempt to withdraw succeeds, the brinksmanship
>will still oust its controller.
does this mean that when Brinksmanship is in play and I begin my turn with
less than a full hand, I can simply choose to withdraw on my own instead
of being forced to do so by the Brinksmanship, and thus not be subject to
its effect?
--
charles lechasseur - bunsen...@yahoo.com
LSJ
> does this mean that when Brinksmanship is in play and I begin my turn with
> less than a full hand, I can simply choose to withdraw on my own instead
> of being forced to do so by the Brinksmanship, and thus not be subject to
> its effect?
No. It means that if Brinksmanship is NOT in play and you begin your turn
with less than a full hand, you can simply choose to withdraw on your own
instead of being forced to do so by the Brinksmanship, and thus not be
subject to its effect even if it is put into play before your next untap.
Jon Stahler
Timlagor
>
> If A attempts to withdraw and then on B's turn, B puts Brinks in play,
> what happens when A's turn rolls around again?
>
> Answer:
> If A fails to withdraw: nothing. A simply takes his turn as normal.
... and A must attempt to withdraw again (and succeed or be ousted
unless Brinkmanship is somehow removed).