Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

LSJ Fourth Cycle

21 views
Skip to first unread message

pispas

unread,
May 21, 2009, 6:10:54 AM5/21/09
to
I have a question about how this event interacts with other events,
specially with wormwood.

When do you resolve both effects of this card?

Are both effects simultanious, or you first resolve the burning of all
Gehenna cards and conviction and then you send vampires with capacity
3 or less in torpor?

If both effects are not simultaneous, what's the correct order ? Can
the metuselah playing the cards order the effects as he wishes?

It's important to know for decks that try to reduce capacity by using
wormwood and lots of gehenna events... If someone manages to reduce
the maximun capacity of all vampires to 3 or less, depending of the
order he could be making a mega baltimore purge...

The Fourth Cycle
Cardtype: Event
Requires at least two other Gehenna cards in play.
When this card is played, burn all Gehenna cards and conviction cards,
and send all vampires with capacity 3 or less in torpor. No Gehenna
cards may be played while this card remains in play.

P.D.: Please forgive my pretty crappy english

LSJ

unread,
May 21, 2009, 6:33:18 AM5/21/09
to
pispas wrote:
> I have a question about how this event interacts with other events,
> specially with wormwood.
>
> When do you resolve both effects of this card?
>
> Are both effects simultanious, or you first resolve the burning of all
> Gehenna cards and conviction and then you send vampires with capacity
> 3 or less in torpor?

The latter.

pispas

unread,
May 21, 2009, 6:44:57 AM5/21/09
to
On 21 mayo, 12:33, LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote:
> pispas wrote:
> > I have a question about how this event interacts with other events,
> > specially with wormwood.
>
> > When do you resolve both effects of this card?
>
> > Are both effects simultanious, or you first resolve the burning of all
> > Gehenna cards and conviction and then you send vampires with capacity
> > 3 or less in torpor?
>
> The latter.
>
>
>

What a pity!!... Thanks for the really quick answer, thought!!!

0 new messages