Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

combar cards q (lsj)

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Geb

unread,
Feb 24, 2001, 9:27:03 AM2/24/01
to
Hello

i want to confirm one thing, if i play a terror fenzy at superior the
opositing minion burns an additional blood when playing a combat card,
it includes damage prevention? if he cannot burn blood can he play
combat cards? (i thought yes and no, but want confirmation :) )

another one, if minion A diablerize minion B and A plays a reform body
the diablerie is committed?, did the oppositing minion gain something?
can be burned in a blood hunt?

bye!!

Geb
asking always asking

James Coupe

unread,
Feb 24, 2001, 10:18:23 AM2/24/01
to
1gan...@teleline.es (Geb) writes:

> Hello
>
> i want to confirm one thing, if i play a terror fenzy at superior the
> opositing minion burns an additional blood when playing a combat card,
> it includes damage prevention?

It includes all cards, yes.

> if he cannot burn blood can he play
> combat cards?

Yes, he can.

The burning blood is simply something that happens at the same time as
playing the card. It's not something that has to be done in order to
play the card. (That is, it's an effect, not a cost).

> another one, if minion A diablerize minion B and A plays a reform body
> the diablerie is committed?, did the oppositing minion gain something?
> can be burned in a blood hunt?

If the vampire playing Reform Body was being diablerized, but saved
himself with Reform Body, the diablerie is considered
unsuccessful. The diablerist gets nothing from the victim, and no
Blood/Wild Hunt can be called. [LSJ 19970224]


No real benefit, but you know a reform body has just bit the dust
(which might be a reason to be joyous).

--
James Coupe | PGP Key 0x5D623D5D
"Definitely a woman" - www.thespark.com/
Standard disclaimers apply to this post. Full written details
available upon request. Your statutory rights are not affected.

LSJ

unread,
Feb 24, 2001, 7:12:28 PM2/24/01
to
James Coupe wrote:

> 1gan...@teleline.es (Geb) writes:
>> i want to confirm one thing, if i play a terror fenzy at superior the
>> opositing minion burns an additional blood when playing a combat card,
>> it includes damage prevention?
> It includes all cards, yes.
>
>> if he cannot burn blood can he play
>> combat cards?
> Yes, he can.
>
> The burning blood is simply something that happens at the same time as
> playing the card. It's not something that has to be done in order to
> play the card. (That is, it's an effect, not a cost).

Correct.

--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

Geb

unread,
Feb 25, 2001, 6:44:44 AM2/25/01
to
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:12:28 -0500, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com>
wrote:

>James Coupe wrote:
>> 1gan...@teleline.es (Geb) writes:
>>> i want to confirm one thing, if i play a terror fenzy at superior the
>>> opositing minion burns an additional blood when playing a combat card,
>>> it includes damage prevention?
>> It includes all cards, yes.
>>
>>> if he cannot burn blood can he play
>>> combat cards?
>> Yes, he can.
>>
>> The burning blood is simply something that happens at the same time as
>> playing the card. It's not something that has to be done in order to
>> play the card. (That is, it's an effect, not a cost).
>Correct.

and the other part of the question?

what happens if one minion diablerizes another and this plays reform
body? is the action canceled (he didin't gains nothing from the
torporized minion)?

Geb

LSJ

unread,
Feb 25, 2001, 8:45:46 AM2/25/01
to
Geb wrote:

As per the ruling from the WW web site's ruling list that Mr. Coupe
quoted in its entirety. With a complete reference like that, it didn't
seem necessary to tack a "correct" on there.

James Coupe

unread,
Feb 25, 2001, 6:20:04 PM2/25/01
to
LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> writes:

> As per the ruling from the WW web site's ruling list that Mr. Coupe

Eep, what is this with not being referred to as "James" recently?

(It's been happening on a number of newsgroups. Don't ask me why.)

Gomi no Sensei

unread,
Feb 26, 2001, 1:16:25 AM2/26/01
to
In article <2wlmqu9...@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>,
James Coupe <jr...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:

>Eep, what is this with not being referred to as "James" recently?

>(It's been happening on a number of newsgroups. Don't ask me why.)

It's your statesmanlike aura. We all cower in quiet awe.

gomi
--
Individually, I love you all with affection unspeakable; but, collectively,
I look upon you with a disgust that amounts to absolute detestation.
- Gilbert and Sullivan, 'Pirates of Penzance'

0 new messages