Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ring of the Mouse?

904 views
Skip to first unread message

~Nytngale (aka k-8)

unread,
Jan 23, 2010, 11:02:32 PM1/23/10
to
Ok so I found "an Alexandrite Ring of the Mouse" (+0 -9) (+3)

I take it that it generally sucks?
Thanks

Kate

pete m

unread,
Jan 24, 2010, 1:29:44 AM1/24/10
to
Yes, it is junk. So is ring of the dog.

Wally the Grey

unread,
Jan 24, 2010, 3:10:14 AM1/24/10
to
pete m wrote:
> On Jan 23, 8:02 pm, "~Nytngale (aka k-8)" <k...@afaproject.org> wrote:
>> Ok so I found "an Alexandrite Ring of the Mouse" (+0 -9) (+3)
>>
>> I take it that it generally sucks?
> Yes, it is junk. So is ring of the dog.

I'm not familiar with most variants, or the new items in newer versions
of V, but ...

If the +3 is to speed, and you're not a melee character, then it would
depend on if it had any additional malus not shown here. If the only
malus were the -9 to damage then it's potentially quite interesting.

If the +3 is to stealth, it still might be interesting to a non-melee
character, but given that most Angband characters use melee at least a
little, it's probably junk anyway.

I think full casters should have bigger mana pools and arrows should
break less often. Then full casters and rangers could viably accept a
to-dam malus and full casters a to-hit malus.

The foo bolt spells should maybe be a bit more damaging too, though not
*too* much.

0 new messages