request for TB
Karkadinn
>
>TB *NEVER* answers my e-mails. NEVER. I'll send him the message twice
>to get his attention.
God in heaven, you are a moron. TB NEVER ANSWERS *ANYONE'S* E-MAILS, YOU
MISERABLE WASTE OF FLESH, BLOOD, AND BONE! HE GETS TOO MUCH MAIL TO BOTHER
REPLYING, AND SENDING HIM MAIL TWICE JUST FURTHER CLOGS UP HIS MAILBOX WITH
USELESS CRAP HE DOESN'T NEED TO BE DEALING WITH!
>BTW, why do all of you phreaks go and hurt an
>11-year old child's (me) feelings so deeply? Do you not respect
>children?
Oh hoh. Hurt your feelings... your poor, poor child. I am SO sorry to have
damaged your self-esteem. I'm sure that you'll never recover. No, wait, I'm
not.
There are often people who like to compare themselves to animals... I've always
thought of myself as being somewhat cat-like. And now that I think of it,
you're a lot like a lemming. With a brain the size of a peanut, if it is even
existent, you march cheerfully, with a stupid little grin on your face,
straight to the sea. And you taste that saltwater, and think to yourself, "My!
How yummy that is! I think I shall walk in some more and drown in this
delicious liquid refreshment!" And so you march, and the waves get higher.
Only, I'm afraid that the metaphor fails here, as you have yet to drown. Which
is truly a great pity, as your transformation to a bloated corpse would
considerably reduce your general level of annoyance to TB and the various
posters of this newsgroup.
I don't CARE about your feelings, you miserable little pissant, because you
have shown no effort whatsoever to care about anyone else's feelings, despite
the great laxness that has been shown towards you.
In conclusion: Go self-procreate with a giant rusty fishhook, get the tool
lodged firmly up your anus, and die screaming in agony.
You have a nice day, now.
Stephen White
> TB *NEVER* answers my e-mails. NEVER. I'll send him the message twice
> to get his attention. BTW, why do all of you phreaks go and hurt an
> 11-year old child's (me) feelings so deeply? Do you not respect
> children?
Mike, I've tollerated your stupidity in the past, but I've had
enough. I don't care if you are 11 or 111, you are a brainless
prick and this newsgroup would be a much nicer place if you had
never posted here. Please leave? Pretty please with sugar on top?
Come back when you learn some common sense.
--
NOTE : The FROM email address of this message is used for SPAM ONLY.
Mail sent to this address will remain unread.
Toni Ilo
>
> TB *NEVER* answers my e-mails. NEVER. I'll send him the message twice
> to get his attention. BTW, why do all of you phreaks go and hurt an
> 11-year old child's (me) feelings so deeply? Do you not respect
> children?
This little man has sense of humor of Andy Kaufman.
Right now we may feel like flaming him, or ignoring his
post trough killfiling, but it is a thing which I strongly
discourage.
It may seem that Mike3 is just acting out of sheer
ignorance and lack of comprehension due his young age,
but I assure you could not possibly be more wrong,
as here is my proof and thesis concerning these postings:
What is going on right now is something which I might categorize
under terms of "contemporary and abstract lingual art", as
also belonging to the extensive field of conceptual arts.
This is because all these posting which create interaction
between us and the creator of this whole performance, Mike3,
are also creating metaconsepts and debate, which could be
either seen as an individual object and goal or as an absolute
value in itself.
From my point of view, I bet this whole thing goes very very deep in
intellectual level, in where is happening something more then we are
able to see right now. This whole thing must have a transparent
level of hidden satire, something that creates meanings and sub contexts
as it lives on and progresses through this news group. As I am merely
a freelancer writer, and I hold no valid academic training
in this field, please feel free to argue about my writings if you
possess more knowledge on this field.
In trying to understand more of this criticized field of arts and
Mike3, try reading following sites:
http://www.karataniforum.org/ ;has large amounts of theory
and debate launched by the writings
and works of Karatani Kojin,
a Japanese theorist and literary critic.
http://www.aesthetics-online.org/ ;"for anyone interested in the arts,
art criticism or theory, or the
philosophy of art."
And of course all the movies and writings by Pier Paolo Pasolini, a great
and disputed director and poet, who also has written great essays
concerning the theory and state of (post)modern arts.
> ---
> Mike "I'm an innocent child" 3
Who could be more pure and innocent in his deeds
than a soul who seeks the meaning and truth
behind all that we see?
Toni
--
One fond to intellectual riddles.
Markus Persson
Toni Ilo <ton...@btk.utu.fi> wrote in message
news:3BB196F1...@btk.utu.fi...
> mike3 wrote:
> >
> > TB *NEVER* answers my e-mails. NEVER. I'll send him the message twice
> > to get his attention. BTW, why do all of you phreaks go and hurt an
> > 11-year old child's (me) feelings so deeply? Do you not respect
> > children?
>
No, it's just a normal troll. If he's real or not doesn't matter.
rachel walmsley
> 11-year old child's (me) feelings so deeply? Do you not respect
> children?
Entirely as a matter of academic interest, does aybody know if
eithe google groups or yahoo have a rule whereby all their members
must be at least 13 or however old it is?
This troll is begining to get really tedious, despite being
killfiled.
rw
--
\\\\\ http://www.quoth.org.uk/ - Quoth the Rachel...
\\\\\\\__o , Bringing giant hedgehogs to the
__\\\\\\\`/__O=O common steamroller since 2K1
John Rowat
> It may seem that Mike3 is just acting out of sheer
> ignorance and lack of comprehension due his young age,
> but I assure you could not possibly be more wrong,
> as here is my proof and thesis concerning these postings:
<snip "It's usenet performance art!">
I'm not here for the aethestics of stupidity. I'm here for entertainment,
predominately MY entertainment, and "art" composed of being more stupid
than everyone else around in the hopes of getting a response doesn't
entertain me.
So, for me own personal benefit, I'd like to ask that people stop
responding to trolls, or, at least, stop quoting them. People who
continue to respond consistently to trolls will join the trolls in my
killfile, because I derive less benefit from your posts than I do from not
seeing stupid people's posts when you quote them.
-John
--
"He passed away during an important civic function held in his honor
when the platform upon which he was standing collapsed."
"I thought he was hanged?" "That's what I said, isn't it?"
-Seen in the signature of Paul Tomblin, unattributed.
Fireborne
"mike3" <mike...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1d54b7e4.01092...@posting.google.com...
> TB *NEVER* answers my e-mails. NEVER. I'll send him the message twice
> to get his attention. BTW, why do all of you phreaks go and hurt an
> children?
>
> Mike "I'm an innocent child" 3
Twat
"Eloquent Lurker" Lonie
Matt Leduc
mike3 wrote:
> TB *NEVER* answers my e-mails. NEVER. I'll send him the message twice
> to get his attention. BTW, why do all of you phreaks go and hurt an
> 11-year old child's (me) feelings so deeply? Do you not respect
> children?
>
> ---
> Mike "I'm an innocent child" 3
I don't believe that any of us are going out of our way to stomp on 11
year olds (that shouldn't be using the internet unsupervised, by the
way).
However, in your case, i'm sure many of us will go out of our way to do
it.
ah well, at least it's entertaining
Lorrill Buyens
rec.games.roguelike.adom pizza with extra cheese, but got this
instead:
>And now that I think of it,
>you're a lot like a lemming. With a brain the size of a peanut, if it is even
>existent, you march cheerfully, with a stupid little grin on your face,
>straight to the sea. And you taste that saltwater, and think to yourself, "My!
> How yummy that is! I think I shall walk in some more and drown in this
>delicious liquid refreshment!" And so you march, and the waves get higher.
>Only, I'm afraid that the metaphor fails here, as you have yet to drown.
The "march to the sea" on lemmings' part is total myth:
http://www.snopes2.com/disney/films/lemmings.htm
--
Lorrill Buyens
"`Here's a nice piece of ass. Please don't kill us,' useful though
it may be in some circumstances, is not going to get you halfway
across a continent."
- Cindy Kandolf, pointing out the drawbacks of barter in AFU
Support the Jayne Hitchcock HELP Fund
http://www.geocities.com/hollywood/6172/helpjane.htm
Leon Planken
> On 26 Sep 2001 05:27:41 GMT, kark...@aol.com (Karkadinn) ordered a
> rec.games.roguelike.adom pizza with extra cheese, but got this
> instead:
>
> >And now that I think of it,
> >you're a lot like a lemming. With a brain the size of a peanut, if it is even
> >existent, you march cheerfully, with a stupid little grin on your face,
> >straight to the sea. And you taste that saltwater, and think to yourself, "My!
> > How yummy that is! I think I shall walk in some more and drown in this
> >delicious liquid refreshment!" And so you march, and the waves get higher.
> >Only, I'm afraid that the metaphor fails here, as you have yet to drown.
>
> The "march to the sea" on lemmings' part is total myth:
>
> http://www.snopes2.com/disney/films/lemmings.htm
Perhaps so, but it's a nice myth, especially on occasions like this :-)
Leon
-------------------------
I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did
the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of
course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the
century was going to end. -- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Leon Planken
ICQ UIN: 20517300
sqweek
>Mike3 said:
>
>>
>>TB *NEVER* answers my e-mails. NEVER. I'll send him the message twice
>>to get his attention.
>
>God in heaven, you are a moron. TB NEVER ANSWERS *ANYONE'S* E-MAILS, YOU
>MISERABLE WASTE OF FLESH, BLOOD, AND BONE! HE GETS TOO MUCH MAIL TO BOTHER
>REPLYING, AND SENDING HIM MAIL TWICE JUST FURTHER CLOGS UP HIS MAILBOX WITH
>USELESS CRAP HE DOESN'T NEED TO BE DEALING WITH!
Obvious enough not to be stated... Or, if you thought that perhaps
mike3 didn't realise this, your message probably would have been more
effective if said politely
>>BTW, why do all of you phreaks go and hurt an
>>11-year old child's (me) feelings so deeply? Do you not respect
>>children?
<snip Karkadinn's rantings>
OK, I'll try and get across what I think mike3's point is... Is this
how you would treat a child in real life Karkadinn?
Think of a child asking for candy in a shop (for a random
[stereo]typical situation)... When they persist whining (similar to
sending two e-mails), would you yell at them? Do you think that would
help them develop? If you would treat him differently in Real Life,
why is that?
Oh, and congratulations mike3 on your 11 year old imitation, it's
pretty good.
PS. I am not accusing you of being a bad person or anything of the
sort, Karkadinn, you just gave me the rant...
Karkadinn
>The "march to the sea" on lemmings' part is total myth:
>
>http://www.snopes2.com/disney/films/lemmings.htm
::sniffle::
But... but... what happens to my perfectly good rant? ;_;
--
Signing off as Stephen Mackey, the Multi-Threaded RFE Database Liaison.
"Sore wa himitsu desu."
Karkadinn
>Obvious enough not to be stated... Or, if you thought that perhaps
>mike3 didn't realise this, your message probably would have been more
>effective if said politely
I've been polite and forgiving before. It had no noticeable effect on his
behavior.
>OK, I'll try and get across what I think mike3's point is... Is this
>how you would treat a child in real life Karkadinn?
>Think of a child asking for candy in a shop (for a random
>[stereo]typical situation)... When they persist whining (similar to
>sending two e-mails), would you yell at them? Do you think that would
>help them develop? If you would treat him differently in Real Life,
>why is that?
>Oh, and congratulations mike3 on your 11 year old imitation, it's
>pretty good.
There gets a point when you need to just spank the damn kid to teach him some
manners.
And you are happily ignoring the fact that it has NOT just been two e-mails.
It's been two e-mails (the second one sent in more or less blatant disregard of
information provided in the Adom FAQ...), and post after post after post....
Sam Blanning
"sqweek" <sqwee...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3bb37e51...@news.uwa.edu.au...
>
> >>BTW, why do all of you phreaks go and hurt an
> >>11-year old child's (me) feelings so deeply? Do you not respect
> >>children?
> <snip Karkadinn's rantings>
>
> OK, I'll try and get across what I think mike3's point is... Is this
> how you would treat a child in real life Karkadinn?
> Think of a child asking for candy in a shop (for a random
> [stereo]typical situation)... When they persist whining (similar to
> sending two e-mails), would you yell at them?
Personally, at first I would tell them it's not nice. But if they persisted
about 10 times on separate occasions, and then came into the shop wearing a
false moustache, claiming to be their father and threatening to sue me,
*then* I would feel justified in losing my temper.
rachel walmsley
>
> OK, I'll try and get across what I think mike3's point is... Is this
> how you would treat a child in real life Karkadinn?
Yes. It is.
Up until a couple of years ago I was at a school with 11 year olds
at the lower age range. At that age kids are perfectly capable of
knowing what's going on and how to behave and also capable of
being selfish, unpleasant and other such things. A lot of them
need teaching that the world is not their playground and they
can't just do whatever they want.
We've given him more than a fair chance to be nice. Consider a kid
who was walking along behind you and kicking at your heels. The first
few times you might politely ask him to stop, but after a while you
would get pissed off, and rightly so, and if the kid doesn't like it
then it's his own damn fault.
Now can we stop defending the troll please?
Greg Howard
"Karkadinn" <kark...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20010927160752...@mb-fn.aol.com...
> Lorril Buyens said:
>
> >The "march to the sea" on lemmings' part is total myth:
> >
> >http://www.snopes2.com/disney/films/lemmings.htm
>
> ::sniffle::
> But... but... what happens to my perfectly good rant? ;_;
>
still have a copy and think that Mike3 might look like the caracture lemming
on the cover.
Greg Howard
5YQ
Sam Blanning
"Greg Howard" <fly...@flyhook.com> wrote in message
news:__Gt7.28300$QJ3.9...@sjcpnn01.usenetserver.com...
>
> >
> > >The "march to the sea" on lemmings' part is total myth:
> > >
> > >http://www.snopes2.com/disney/films/lemmings.htm
> >
> > ::sniffle::
> > But... but... what happens to my perfectly good rant? ;_;
> >
> There's always the mindless wandering of the lemmings in the old PC game.
I
> still have a copy and think that Mike3 might look like the caracture
lemming
> on the cover.
Nah. 'Lemmings' lemmings have enough intelligence to perform around 50
different jobs or whatever it was (at least in Lemmings 2).
Juho Julkunen
kirjoitti
> > There's always the mindless wandering of the lemmings in the old PC
game.
> I
> > still have a copy and think that Mike3 might look like the caracture
> lemming
> > on the cover.
>
> Nah. 'Lemmings' lemmings have enough intelligence to perform around 50
> different jobs or whatever it was (at least in Lemmings 2).
But isn't that just one job for a single lemming? I'm sure he could
perform the task of running to a wall loaded with explosives, for
example.
Hmm... someone should research that.
--
The Outsider
It's our last, best hope for peace? We're *so* screwed.
Sam Blanning
"Juho Julkunen" <giao...@hotmail.fi> wrote in message
news:9p85ev$har45$1...@ID-100965.news.dfncis.de...
>
[mike3 = Lemming]
> >
> > Nah. 'Lemmings' lemmings have enough intelligence to perform around 50
> > different jobs or whatever it was (at least in Lemmings 2).
>
> But isn't that just one job for a single lemming? I'm sure he could
> perform the task of running to a wall loaded with explosives, for
> example.
No. Sure, they could only do one job at a time, but can you mine a straight
tunnel while floating up on a balloon playing the bagpipes? Unless you gave
them a job that got them completely stuck (Bomber, Blocker in the original
Lemmings unless you mined under them), a single lemming could do every
single job you had available in the level.
Passenger Pigeon
kark...@aol.com (Karkadinn) wrote:
> There gets a point when you need to just spank the damn kid to teach him
> some
> manners.
Maybe in reality.
This is not reality.
You can "kill" him without him even noticing.
Why don't you?
--
William Burke, passenge...@hotmail.com contrariwise
Before you presume my rationality, I'm a Theatre major, Music minor.
I don't represent UCSC; it represents me. Go Slugs!
http://www.passengerpigeon.net (not com, not org)
Karkadinn
>Maybe in reality.
>
>This is not reality.
So we let people get off with being assholes because it's typed words instead
of spoken? Sure, whatever.
>You can "kill" him without him even noticing.
>
>
>Why don't you?
Up till now, I was foolishly optimistic and hoped he would reform himself.
Please note the phrase "Up till now".
Passenger Pigeon
kark...@aol.com (Karkadinn) wrote:
> So we let people get off with being assholes because it's typed words
> instead
> of spoken? Sure, whatever.
Well, we certainly allow the regulars free reign of terror, generally
along that very same principle.
David Chapman
news:passenger_pigeon-15...@news.la.sbcglobal.net...
> In article <20010927170254...@mb-fn.aol.com>,
> kark...@aol.com (Karkadinn) wrote:
>
> > There gets a point when you need to just spank the damn kid to teach him
> > some
> > manners.
>
> Maybe in reality.
>
> This is not reality.
>
> You can "kill" him without him even noticing.
Mikey 3 is full of shite
We gotta kick teenagers through the night
Mine's Brannalbin's Cloak of Defence...
--
Maybe we can change the world, it might just take a while
If we're going to fight our corner, we're gonna do it with style
'Cause you've got the beauty and you've got the heart
And that is as good a place as any to start
Sam Blanning
>
> > So we let people get off with being assholes because it's typed words
instead
> > of spoken? Sure, whatever.
>
> Well, we certainly allow the regulars free reign of terror, generally
> along that very same principle.
Not a single regular here comes even close to being as consistently annoying
as Mike3.
Olli "Shader" Juhala
<enqu...@nationalcoursingclub.freeserve.co.uk> wrote
Though sometimes Juuso makes a *really* good effort. (Points back to the
now infamous "Why America is stupid" conversation)
--
Olli "Shader" Juhala
War is for the vengeful,
Famine for the poor,
Pestilence for the weak,
but Death is for us all.
sha...@SPAMNOT.surffi.net, ICQ# 81231128
Juuso Heimonen
news:fdijrt89sf77k9f6f...@4ax.com...
: >Not a single regular here comes even close to being as consistently annoying
: >as Mike3.
:
: Though sometimes Juuso makes a *really* good effort. (Points back to the
: now infamous "Why America is stupid" conversation)
But the difference is that I don't try to be. The other regulars just find my
points of view inappropriate
--
Juuso "Praise to the RNG" Heimonen
Why do Vulcans have pointed ears?
So they can count to twelve.
-- "Mad Magazine"
***
juuso.h...@mail.wwnet.fi
http://wwnet.fi/users/heimonen
34867436
Ilya K. Shumov
Ough, c'mon, guys, this is you who are annoying, your wailing. This little sucker haven't
posted anything at least for a week, TB blacklisted him (i hope so), so, you see, there is
no spoon ;)
--
chmod a+x /bin/laden