Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The 2009 Interactive Fiction Competition is Underway

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Stephen Granade

unread,
Oct 1, 2009, 11:59:43 PM10/1/09
to
You know what would enliven this October? Playing the IF Competition
games, that's what! All information is available at
http://ifcomp.org/. You may download the games from
http://ifcomp.org/comp09/download.html and record your votes at
http://ifcomp.org/vote/

Stephen

--
Stephen Granade
stephen...@granades.com

Boluc Papuccuoglu

unread,
Oct 2, 2009, 3:56:15 AM10/2/09
to
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:59:43 -0500, Stephen Granade
<stephen...@granades.com> wrote:

>You know what would enliven this October? Playing the IF Competition
>games, that's what! All information is available at
>http://ifcomp.org/. You may download the games from
>http://ifcomp.org/comp09/download.html and record your votes at
>http://ifcomp.org/vote/
>
>Stephen

Is the Comp09 and the ifarchive page incomplete or are there NO TADS
games this year? Was there a boycott? A strike? Did I miss something?
(haven't been reading the newsgroups the past few months)

Boluc

Stephen Granade

unread,
Oct 2, 2009, 9:42:33 AM10/2/09
to
Boluc Papuccuoglu <bolucPERIOD...@REMOVETHISaknet.com.tr>
writes:

There were no TADS games entered. There were several planned, judging
from the information entered ahead of time, but none were uploaded
before the deadline.

Conrad

unread,
Oct 3, 2009, 4:42:08 AM10/3/09
to
On Oct 2, 9:42 am, Stephen Granade <stephen-use...@granades.com>
wrote:
> Boluc Papuccuoglu <bolucPERIODpapuccuo...@REMOVETHISaknet.com.tr>

> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:59:43 -0500, Stephen Granade
> > <stephen-use...@granades.com> wrote:
>
> >>You know what would enliven this October? Playing the IF Competition
> >>games, that's what! All information is available at
> >>http://ifcomp.org/. You may download the games from
> >>http://ifcomp.org/comp09/download.htmland record your votes at

> >>http://ifcomp.org/vote/
>
> >>Stephen
>
> > Is the Comp09 and the ifarchive page incomplete or are there NO TADS
> > games this year? Was there a boycott? A strike? Did I miss something?
> > (haven't been reading the newsgroups the past few months)
>
> There were no TADS games entered. There were several planned, judging
> from the information entered ahead of time, but none were uploaded
> before the deadline.

Yeah, it's a tricky language. I like it; but it's not simple.


Conrad.

kabusho_mus...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 3, 2009, 7:43:34 AM10/3/09
to
On 2 Oct, 04:59, Stephen Granade <stephen-use...@granades.com> wrote:
> You know what would enliven this October? Playing the IF Competition
> games, that's what! All information is available athttp://ifcomp.org/. You may download the games fromhttp://ifcomp.org/comp09/download.htmland record your votes athttp://ifcomp.org/vote/
>
> Stephen
>
> --
> Stephen Granade
> stephen-use...@granades.com

Interestingly, there are only 24 games this year, the lowest since the
first competition in '95. Doesn't seem like a good sign.

Conrad

unread,
Oct 3, 2009, 11:54:43 PM10/3/09
to
On Oct 3, 6:43 pm, "chephren.mans...@googlemail.com"

>
> Interestingly, there are only 24 games this year, the lowest since the
> first competition in '95. Doesn't seem like a good sign.

480 hours of IF isnt enough for you?

Ye-Gods..

C.

Mike Snyder

unread,
Oct 4, 2009, 12:47:54 AM10/4/09
to
"Conrad" <conra...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6b85cc50-13f9-4e28...@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com...

> C.

I think you mean 48. :)

And that assumes every game pushes the limit. I'm finding, so far, that many
don't.

--- Mike.


dott.Piergiorgio

unread,
Oct 4, 2009, 5:37:39 AM10/4/09
to
chephren...@googlemail.com ha scritto:

> Interestingly, there are only 24 games this year, the lowest since the
> first competition in '95. Doesn't seem like a good sign.

Well, IMVHO what really count is the average vote, not the numbers of IF
in competition (sadly some earlier IFComp has their fair share of shoddy
& badly designed IF, and I can count at least a pair of cases of
intentionally bad IF and surely an illegal abuse (that .z5 whose print
the source code of a DRM crack)

Personally, I have chosen to not partecipate to the IFComp in all these
years, at least not until I have at least publicly released something
outside the various Comps.

my 2 �c, of course, and

Best regards from Italy,
Dott. Piergiorgio.

Poster

unread,
Oct 5, 2009, 7:08:23 AM10/5/09
to
In article <E1_xm.4875$Rt2....@tornado.fastwebnet.it>,
"dott.Piergiorgio" <dott.Pierg...@KAIGUN.fastwebnet.it> wrote:

> chephren...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
>
> > Interestingly, there are only 24 games this year, the lowest since the
> > first competition in '95. Doesn't seem like a good sign.
>
> Well, IMVHO what really count is the average vote, not the numbers of IF
> in competition (sadly some earlier IFComp has their fair share of shoddy
> & badly designed IF, and I can count at least a pair of cases of
> intentionally bad IF and surely an illegal abuse (that .z5 whose print
> the source code of a DRM crack)

I agree with the above statement. The IF Comp has been a magnet for all
kinds of trash IF. That we see less of it is a good thing.

Also, quite a few major games have been released outside of the comp,
such as Blue Lacuna, Inside Woman, and so on. There was a thread about
this a few months ago. I don't think it's true that interest in IF
itself has decreased, but if it had, # of games submitted to the IF Comp
isn't enough to conclude that.

The IF Comp is largely a popularity contest for short to medium-sized
games. Maybe people got tired of trying to win a popularity contest?

--
Poster

www.intaligo.com I6 libraries, doom metal, Building
sturmdrangif.wordpress.com Game development blog / IF commentary
Seasons: fall '09 -- One-man projects are prone to delays.

Conrad

unread,
Oct 5, 2009, 8:48:33 AM10/5/09
to
On Oct 4, 12:47 am, "Mike Snyder" <wy...@prowler-pro.com> wrote:
> "Conrad" <conradc...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Yes indeed.

C.

Conrad

unread,
Oct 5, 2009, 8:52:00 AM10/5/09
to
On Oct 5, 7:08 am, Poster <pos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> In article <E1_xm.4875$Rt2.2...@tornado.fastwebnet.it>,
>
>  "dott.Piergiorgio" <dott.PiergiorgioNI...@KAIGUN.fastwebnet.it> wrote:
> > chephren.mans...@googlemail.com ha scritto:

>
> > > Interestingly, there are only 24 games this year, the lowest since the
> > > first competition in '95. Doesn't seem like a good sign.
>
> > Well, IMVHO what really count is the average vote, not the numbers of IF
> > in competition (sadly some earlier IFComp has their fair share of shoddy
> > & badly designed IF, and I can count at least a pair of cases of
> > intentionally bad IF and surely an illegal abuse (that .z5 whose print
> > the source code of a DRM crack)
>
> I agree with the above statement. The IF Comp has been a magnet for all
> kinds of trash IF. That we see less of it is a good thing.

As the proud author of one of last year's trash entries in the IF
Comp, I take great exception to your tone.


Conrad.


Message has been deleted
0 new messages