Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

MacMahon and Swiss Tournaments

76 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert Jasiek

unread,
Oct 21, 1996, 3:00:00 AM10/21/96
to

In the td mailing list information about MacMahon has been asked for, so:
From my experience of having visited many European tournaments
and seen different programs I can give some useful information
about McMahon (MM).

McMahon features:
- tournament with an announced number of R rounds (generally fixed)
- the average player is expected to participate in more than R/2
- according to announcement or check of present players before first
round a minimal valid rank (e. g. 25kyu) is set equal to a MM-value of
zero, Z
- according to announcement or check of present players before first
round a maximal valid rank, called MM-bar, B, is set for distinguishing
all players who should have a realistic chance to win the tournament;
e. g. 3dan; the MM-bar should not exclude too many players from the
top and not include too many players what could lead to awful
opponents' scores
- all players of rank that equals Z or is lower get Z as their value
- each rank greater than Z gets a MM-value that increases by 1 each
rank until B
- all ranks over B become B
- each player gets his proper starting MM-value before the first round
- the Swiss system is a special case of MM with B=Z=0 and useful for
tournaments with full handicaps or for some championships that
cannot be played as round-robin (e. g. WAGC or a local blitz
tournament)
- after each round for each player his MM-value is increased by 1 or
0.5 or 0 if he wins, ties / misses, loses
- before the first round pairing parameters are fixed: in decreasing
order of importance MM-value, second value, third value
- useful second and third values for not too small tournaments are
SOS, SODOS
- SOS = sum of opponents' scores, where score = current MM-value
- SODOS = sum of defeated opponents' scores
- further criteria may be: B/W choice, not same opponent again, not
same city
- each critirion may have a corresponding probability value
- not all criteria for all players can be fit
- an algorithm (in a program) chooses a proper pairing for all players
- in tournaments up to 30 persons hand draw might be enough

MM result:
- before the tournament criteria for determining a winner are set
- useful are in decreasing order: points, second value, third value
- points = win and tie points
- second value, third value: as used in pairing algorithm, e.g.
SOS, SODOS
- for a single player the element of luck of draw is rather high as
to values of decreasing importance; it may be wise to ignore a
third value and have more than one winner or second place getter
- it may be a good idea to spend prices on players under B with a
sufficiently high points value

Handicaps:
- normally none
- maybe only below some rank used
- often reduced handicap as to MM-value difference, e. g. difference
minus 2

Algorithms:
- a pairing needs to be fair, i.e. especially to avoid one player to be
paired too often to players with greatly differing MM-values
- not all players can be paired optimally in all rounds
- Christoph Gerlach (Germany) has proved in his diploma (which
can be obtained from him as a manuscript) that a global optimum
for all players and all rounds exists and can be detected by a
proper algorithm

Program:
- I strongly recommand to use "MacMahon" by Christoph Gerlach.
It implements an algorithm for a global optimum of a pairing, has
many criteria options and a documentation. It runs with windows.
A 386+ is recommanded, at least 8MB are very useful for quick
pairings (a few minutes for a few hundred people). I do not know
whether it is free or currently has a tax of about 0.5DM per player.
I do not know whether it is available in the net . His address:
Christoph Gerlach, Lange Laube 24, D - 30159 Hannover
(Germany). The program has been used for many German and
several European tournaments including EGC.

SuperMM:
- in a championship that needs to determine the true champion
a MM tournament might have a super MM group if too many
strong players participate and cannot be distinguished in too few
rounds
- super MM is B+1 and donated too a seeded part of all B players
- seeding is always questionable, but sometimes more than 10
rounds or so is not enough with many strong players


--------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Jasiek
jas...@berlin.snafu.de
--------------------------------------------------------------


0 new messages