> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:46:14 +0100, in rec.games.frp.dnd, JG
> wrote:
>
>>I always assumed basilisks were... larger. Maybe cow sized?
>>
>>
>>But I have this project of getting all the monsters from the
>>manual as miniatures, and lately I found a few of the crop of
>>official DnD minis on clearance.
>>
>>...making those nearly the only 5th ed things I have bought so
>>far...
>>
>>In any case I was quite happy with their looks, until I got to
>>the basilisk. Which is absolutely tiny.
>>Here's someone's comparison picture.
>>
https://maledrakh.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/200925-nolzurs-w11-
>>basilisk-conan.jpg
>>
>>This lead to me frantically leafing through a few books and
>>figuring out that
>>
>>a. this thing is still too small
>>b. basilisks actually aren't that much bigger in the actual
>>rules (their main body without tail should be man-sized)
>>
>>But how big are they in your head?
>
> About the size of an ottoman.
>
Depends on teh ottoman. If it were the size of the Ottoman
*Empire*, for instance . . .