Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Illuminati:NWO

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Mr Blue76

unread,
Jan 6, 1995, 10:06:30 AM1/6/95
to
has anyone played this game? looked pretty interesting, but I have yet to
try it out...please give comments

Steve Barrera

unread,
Jan 6, 1995, 11:23:04 AM1/6/95
to
In article <3ejm9m$o...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> Mr Blue76, mrbl...@aol.com
writes:

> has anyone played this game? looked pretty interesting, but I have yet
to
>try it out...please give comments

I just played it last night for the first time. It's pretty cool,
different from the original (e.g. there are no "MegaBucks"), but
retaining its feel quite well. But ya know, it's not a Deckmaster(TM)
game. Is there a better forum to discuss it?

Steve Barrera

Chrome Sync

unread,
Jan 6, 1995, 2:34:38 PM1/6/95
to
Mr Blue76 (mrbl...@aol.com) wrote:
: has anyone played this game? looked pretty interesting, but I have yet to

: try it out...please give comments

Played the original (and most every add-on: Exp. 1, 2, 3, Space Gamer
adds, original gaming group creations, &tc.).

Played INWO.

Love 'em both.

About the only downside is ability for a "built" deck to trample
one composed from the two "starters". Moreso than Magic.
But the play, the intrigue, &tc. is still all there.

E-mail if you want more feedback ...

Best,
-CS

Rich Shipley

unread,
Jan 6, 1995, 5:27:10 PM1/6/95
to
Steve Barrera (bar...@vt.edu) wrote:

: I just played it last night for the first time. It's pretty cool,


: different from the original (e.g. there are no "MegaBucks"), but
: retaining its feel quite well. But ya know, it's not a Deckmaster(TM)
: game. Is there a better forum to discuss it?

rec.games.trading-cards.misc would be the best place for INWO discussion.
If you can get that one, you should probably check out the
rec.games.trading-cards.magic.* groups for Magic.

Rich

0 new messages