UniVBE 5.3 !!!!!!
Don Olson
On 14 Nov 1996 09:55:10 GMT, "Guillermo Duran"
<Jus...@mad.servicom.es> wrote:
>Please send me any crack or a reg #generetor for SciTech UniVBE 5.3....
Actually, it's just better if you pay them for it.
- Ingrate -
ps - I think you missed a couple groups.
Mike Sheen
You gotta be kidding......... people like you are the reason we pay as much
as we do for software.
Guillermo Duran <Jus...@mad.servicom.es> wrote in article
<01bbd210$383f41c0$LocalHost@d9r7n1>...
> Please send me any crack or a reg #generetor for SciTech UniVBE 5.3....
>
>
> --
> WiLdFiRe
> Jus...@mad.servicom.es
>
Damian Wegner
In article <01bbd5c7$f3a4e9a0$0400000a@sheeny>, Mi...@MicroSL.com.au
says...
Just pay for it! Its worth the effort some guy out into it!!
Psycho
>>
jl
Damian Wegner <dwe...@powerup.com.au> wrote in article
<56sgge$b...@grissom.powerup.com.au>...
no its not! SciTech's piece of shit, display doctor, is the worst prog
ever written. If you havent found that out yet, you will, I guarantee it.
BTW, I have a question:
I have a cirrus logic video card 2mb with built in vesa support. Every
prog I have detects the vesa except quake, I wonder why?
Christopher A. Kalin
In article <01bbd75f$b9068da0$3d38b8ce@default>, jl <si...@castles.com> wrote:
>no its not! SciTech's piece of shit, display doctor, is the worst prog
>ever written. If you havent found that out yet, you will, I guarantee it.
>BTW, I have a question:
>
>I have a cirrus logic video card 2mb with built in vesa support. Every
>prog I have detects the vesa except quake, I wonder why?
Probably because the VESA support in your card is 1.2, and Quake wants
VESA 2.0 compatible cards/drivers to run. THAT's why UniVBE is worth it,
not just for Quake, but for other games already out or coming out that
want the nicer VESA 2.0 features.
So until Cirrus Logic releases a 2.0 update BIOS for your card (good
luck), looks like you're stuck with UniVBE.
BTW, I've been using UniVBE with my S3 card for many months now, without a
problem. Perhaps you're having problems because you've got one of the
cheapest and crappiest video cards known to mankind?
Chris Kalin
Ismail Saeed
I had one of those (Cirrus Logic with 1 mb and vesa 1.2 support) and
although I could "do" vesa alright, this new computer does vesa a heck
of a lot better.
SciTech updated the OEM of my old cirrus to 2.0 vesa, and quake got the
additional vesa modes as a result. Aside from some small improvement in
low-res modes graphically, it didn't affect much else that I had, except
that the fullscreen AVI player was welcome because I had no AVI players
at the time.
Now, I use this P166. I have tried SciTech on this, and I haven't
noticed anything new enough to actually bother with waiting thru the nag
period at startup as far as performance, plus my card on this has some
pretty cool vesa support and power management and stuff on its own.
So, I don't really use it anymore.
What about AVI? I actually use media player for that now.
Slipgate
Jeff
On 21 Nov 1996 16:13:31 GMT, c...@axis.axisnet.net (Christopher A.
Kalin) wrote:
>In article <01bbd75f$b9068da0$3d38b8ce@default>, jl <si...@castles.com> wrote:
>
>>no its not! SciTech's piece of shit, display doctor, is the worst prog
>>ever written. If you havent found that out yet, you will, I guarantee it.
>>BTW, I have a question:
>>
>>I have a cirrus logic video card 2mb with built in vesa support. Every
>>prog I have detects the vesa except quake, I wonder why?
>
>Probably because the VESA support in your card is 1.2, and Quake wants
>VESA 2.0 compatible cards/drivers to run. THAT's why UniVBE is worth it,
>not just for Quake, but for other games already out or coming out that
>want the nicer VESA 2.0 features.
>
>So until Cirrus Logic releases a 2.0 update BIOS for your card (good
>luck), looks like you're stuck with UniVBE.
>
>BTW, I've been using UniVBE with my S3 card for many months now, without a
>problem. Perhaps you're having problems because you've got one of the
>cheapest and crappiest video cards known to mankind?
>
>Chris Kalin
>
>
<Warez and other unrelated groups trimmed>
Why are you using UniVBE for your S3 card. Get the free S3 driver from
http://wwwmath.uni-muenster.de/~mesched/. It works and I could detect
no performance difference between the free driver and UniVBE on my
system.
--
"It's funny that pirates were always going around
searching for treasure, and they never realized that
the real treasure was the fond memories they were
creating." - Deep Thoughts by Jack Handey
Benedikt Laube
It happened on 19 Nov 1996 03:15:21 GMT, that "Mike Sheen"
<Mi...@MicroSL.com.au> wrote:
>You gotta be kidding......... people like you are the reason we pay as much
>as we do for software.
That is what the software companies tell you. That they have to sell
the software for so much money, because of this bad, dangerous piracy.
Now, obviously there's people who believe this crap, and _that's_ why
the software is that expensive.
bye
|_ 1983 Undisputed 'Dig-Dug®' World Champion
|_ la...@hrz.uni-kassel.de
|_ bene...@central.de
|_ http://www.central.de/~benedikt/
Sung Kyun Im
Excerpts from netnews.rec.games.computer.quake.servers: 22-Nov-96 Re:
UniVBE 5.3 !!!!!! by Benedikt La...@hrz.uni-k
> >You gotta be kidding......... people like you are the reason we pay as much
> >as we do for software.
>
> That is what the software companies tell you. That they have to sell
> the software for so much money, because of this bad, dangerous piracy.
>
> Now, obviously there's people who believe this crap, and _that's_ why
> the software is that expensive.
Wow, you are stupid. Wake up and get out of that little shell you've
built for yourself. And stop posting from your dad's account.
sung.michael.im
si...@andrew.cmu.edu
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~sim
bb
Benedikt Laube <la...@hrz.uni-kassel.de> wrote in article
<32971b13...@news.hrz.uni-kassel.de>...
> It happened on 19 Nov 1996 03:15:21 GMT, that "Mike Sheen"
> <Mi...@MicroSL.com.au> wrote:
>
> >You gotta be kidding......... people like you are the reason we pay as
much
> >as we do for software.
>
> That is what the software companies tell you. That they have to sell
> the software for so much money, because of this bad, dangerous piracy.
>
> Now, obviously there's people who believe this crap, and _that's_ why
> the software is that expensive.
>
>
> bye
> |_ 1983 Undisputed 'Dig-Dug®' World Champion
> |_ la...@hrz.uni-kassel.de
> |_ bene...@central.de
> |_ http://www.central.de/~benedikt/
>
I couldn't agree with this more. How do the software companies know who
has pirated versions of their programs? They charge so much for software
because their a bunch of profitary scam artists. Anyone have Duke Nukem
3D? I played a shareware version of this Apogee game, that came on the
Duke CD. They are charging like $20 for the reg'd version of a 2D bullshit
game where this jackshit runs around and gets killed after the first 5
seconds of play. Bull shit!!
The other thing that I disagree with is this image of the SPA. Everyone
thinks they're gonna shoot anyone who pirates a program. They aren't
looking for one person who has pirated version of a program! They would
spend more $ on all the crap they would have to go through to catch the
person then the actual program would cost. They are looking for
businesses that sell pirated software to hundreds of people, and offer the
software on warez FTP sites. If they went out and busted everyone who has
pirated software on their PC, they would bust probably 90% of all computer
owners. More bull shit! Don't get me wrong, I am not supporting software
piracy or anything.
bb
Kevin Podszebka
> pirated software on their PC, they would bust probably 90% of all computer
> owners. More bull shit! Don't get me wrong, I am not supporting software
> piracy or anything.
>
> bb
Hey, maybe they could gather all these PC and sell them at below worth
so we could get the US out of debt! And we could all buy newer machines
for less while supporting this movement.
:)