On Mar 23, 11:58 pm, "
BettorOffSin...@aol.com"
<
BettorOffSin...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > Also, the NNTP posting date is correct:
>
> > > ***Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:55:59 +0100***
>
> > > > Answer: it's a forgery.
>
> > > Which still leaves open the question of who was using the IP address
> > > in question, who logged into the Google Groups account to post (and
> > > then delete the message), and who this imposter really is.
>
> > > Surely you would like to find this out as much as me! I'm on it!
>
> > Good luck finding it out. I know it wasn't me, so keep me posted when
> > you find out who it was. I'd love to find out, but my life is packed
> > with other stuff that unfortunately rises above it. I really wish I
> > knew - really ! That said, I just don't have the time to find out,
> > but I know that if somebody suggests it is me, I will find the time to
> > prove it was not
>
> All you'd have to do is hire an attorney to find out. Are you too
> busy to do that as well? Your not doing this leaves most the work,
> and expense, of this, to me. Neverthless, I can relate to a desire
> not to make attorneys wealthier.
>
> Your message seems to indicate that you are too busy to sue someone
> who impersonated you directly, yet would find the time to take action
> against someone who suggested that the posts came from you. I suppose
> I can relate to that as well.
>
> Either way, I will get to the bottom of this, but it will take some
> time. Prefiling discovery is a bit protracted. I do have one
> advantage over you in that I do not have to pay an attorney to do
> this, so that does make it easier for me than for others to get the
> truth.
>
> Once I uncover whomever posted the messages in question, I am sure you
> will be among the first to know. As I am finishing a landmark book
> right now, my schedule is also tight, but I'll find a day or two to
> take care of this.
>
> I feel for anyone who has been targeted in this manner. It's awful.
>
> Ray Gordon- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Isn't it odd that this person would CHANGE the Trace dates to be the
same? That would be a silly thing to do, right? I mean, that would
suggest a forgery, right? it just seems to me that this thing hasn't
already been dismissed. I mean, come on - if you accept that the
person wasn't smart enough to use a remailer, it is kind of hard to
say that they also did the opposite of making something anonymous -
they intentionally made the Trace dates the same. I mean, come on,
how is this a realistic approach?