Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

USCF has no problems with child abusers

0 views
Skip to first unread message

RayGordon

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 10:14:51 PM11/18/09
to
Polgar and Truong (before the internet scandal) was one example. The
New York family court ORDERED them to STOP "hotsaucing" her children
(not his) for not studying chess, an order obviously made necessary by
what led up to it.

There are, however, OTHER child abusers that USCF has embraced. In
general, they turn a blind eye, even when those in power know, out of
fear of rocking the boat.

Look at how many in chess who defend Polgar and Truong won't even
address the court order, or act like it just came out of thin air,
rather than the conduct which led up to it.

Given the pair's involvement in SCHOLASTIC chess, this is definitely
relevant information for any parent, but it seems USCF isn't in a
hurry to publicize it, nor is Texas Tech University.

It's time to root ALL child abusers out of organized chess, and it's
time to start doing so now.

Ray Gordon

Teddybear

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 12:32:45 AM11/19/09
to

"RayGordon" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:ae069982-f13b-4d74...@m35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
I wonder what the GYMNASTICS people that you trolled for years would have to
say about child abuse? Does Amanda Borden or GYMCATS ring a bell there
gordo? I wonder what all those mothers would say about you preaching to
people about cleaning up child abuse in chess? Pot, meet kettle....


RayGordon

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 1:29:30 AM11/19/09
to
On Nov 19, 12:32 am, "Teddybear" <teddyb...@gmx.us> wrote:

> I have met IKillion (in another post, which means he's known to some of the people involved in the Polgar mess, apparently).

As for the PREVIOUS post,

Say, is "Teddybear" claiming to speak for celebrities now? Trying to
deflect a COURT-DOCUMENTED case of child abuse with internet hearsay
hat was originally designed to COVER UP child abuse?

That's the problem witht hese anonymous internet cockroaches. They
want to hide their agenda, yet do so while pretending to be
credibgle. The louder he gest, the louder I get, and the more what
he seems to hate me saying will just be repeated.

Not a fucking THING he can do about it either except pretend that his
trolling USENET (even when I'm not here; been writing for a few weeks)
is some form of "internet cool."

Wait until he sees all the screenshots about a certain seduction guru
who was making death threats against me, using a "Sodini" like
ffollower.

Turth is stronger than he'll ever be, and I am eternally patient.
WHEN I win my current lawsuit, why, he'll just flip his lid, make all
kinds of noise, and absolutely, positively NOTHING will change.

Then again, maybe this is his way of saying that CHILD ABUSERS like
Truong and Polgar (as PROVEN by the courts) have no business in
scholastic chess.

Now if he doesn't speak for any gymnasts, he'd be the one "stalking"
them, whether he realizes it or not.

Ray Gordon

jkh001

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 4:36:06 AM11/19/09
to


We really ought to take up a collection to refill Parker's
antipsychotic prescription. It would probably be cheaper in the long
run than letting him howl.

RayGordon

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 8:02:38 AM11/19/09
to
>
> We really ought to take up a collection to refill Parker's
> antipsychotic prescription. It would probably be cheaper in the long
> run than letting him howl.- Hide quoted text -

Wow, defamation and a ahate-crime all in on9e from someone who has
threatened me previously.

Don't do the crime if you can't do the tiem, or cahn't handle a
lawsuit.

Your day in court will comne. You've let whatever issues make a bully
out of you get the best of your sanity. Truong and Polgar made the
same mistake before.

I am VERY patient when it comes to bringing people to justice.

Teddybear

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 8:19:47 AM11/19/09
to
> Say, is "Teddybear" claiming to speak for celebrities now? Trying to
> deflect a COURT-DOCUMENTED case of child abuse with internet hearsay
> hat was originally designed to COVER UP child abuse?

Nope, just pointing out your hypocracy. Are you speaking for loonies now?

Show us where the Court has documented that this activity was actually
occuring. If you have such information, post it so we can see it. I'm not
defending the dynamic duo, I'm simply pointing out that you lack any
documentation for your statements, and you are way out of bounds. Something
I'm sure will crop up in your feeble lawsuit at some point. Assuming you
can ever get it past the point where actually have a lawsuit. Right now you
have some paper, searching for the proper place where it can be dismissed
for any of a number of very good reasons.
\
<snip>

> Wait until he sees all the screenshots about a certain seduction guru
> who was making death threats against me, using a "Sodini" like
> ffollower.

What makes you think I care about any "seduction guru"? What makes you
think I care if someone "threatens" you? Every time you have whined about
it your threats just aren't anything more than cries for attention. Who
cares?

> Turth is stronger than he'll ever be, and I am eternally patient.
> WHEN I win my current lawsuit, why, he'll just flip his lid, make all
> kinds of noise, and absolutely, positively NOTHING will change.

I'll wait until after you have won. Counting your chickens, before they are
hatched, can be very frustrating...LOL I won't hold my breath waiting for
you to collect your M(B)illions.

> Then again, maybe this is his way of saying that CHILD ABUSERS like
> Truong and Polgar (as PROVEN by the courts) have no business in
> scholastic chess.

I don't believe that the Court has proven anything. I have seen quotes
where one of them was ordered not to "hot sauce" the children, however that
is not PROOF, that they did so. Or are you capable of knowing the
differance? You have in fact, committed Defamation Per Se, which any
attorney will use to defeat your claims and leave you with nothing but more
egg on your face. Sticking your nose in someone's divorce action is unwise,
even for a judgment proof asshole like yourself.

Any lawyer would tear you up in a deposition on that point alone. I'm sure
when it happens, it will be posted for all of us to laugh at you. Probably
along with your photograph. I would love to see what you actually look
like. That will happen the very first time you show up at Court I'm sure.

> Now if he doesn't speak for any gymnasts, he'd be the one "stalking"
> them, whether he realizes it or not.

Your greatest accomplishment in the gymnastics group was to drive them all
into a moderated group where you can't follow them. I'm really surprised
that some of the moms and dads of those little girls you verbally abused
didn't come after you. That just proves that you aren't worth the trouble,
even back then. And of course your big mouth and abusive posts drove
everyone off alt.seduction.fast and alt.hypnosis too didn't they? Does that
make you proud? Or are you just starved for your narcissistic supply now
and have to blowtorch this group now?

> Ray Gordon

Why do you continue to call yourself Ray Gordon, a name you stole from a
writer of erotic fiction?


0 new messages