I found what he "didn't" admit to, much more telling. Like whether he
graduated from college, or from what college.
He is legally stateless. And a permanent resident of the US. So?
Do tell, why is this important?
Mr. Sloan believes Mr. Truong can be deported.
I am not certain whether he can be deported back to Vietnam.
That is probably the reason why he does not feel in any danger.
Sam Sloan
> > Mr. Sloan believes Mr. Truong can be deported.
>
> I am not certain whether he can be deported back to Vietnam.
They could deport home to North Vietnam. The north is under Communist
control.
This is significant information. I doubt that he is truly stateless as a
matter of international law. In all probability he is a citizen of the
successor nation to S. Vietnam. Some of his alleged activities could
impact his resident status in the US if there are trials and findings
against him. If Mr. Truong should be indicted for a felony(s) and
convicted, I think it is it is possible for him to lose his resident
status and be deported. More facts as to his exact status are needed to
make that determination. IIRC, Mr. Alexander has been indicted and faces
trial on 34 felony counts. From the questioning of Truong by Mr.
Huttenbach, it appears there is evidence somewhere that may implicate
Mr. Truong in Mr. Alexander's criminal activity. That would be
potentially devastating to Mr. Truong.
So is the south, east and west. There is no longer a division
between North and South Vietnam. There is just Vietnam, officially the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam. They had a war to settle that issue.
Ended over 30 years ago. The whole country is under Communist Party
control.
They can revoke his residence status and tell him to get his ass out
of Dodge.
You are thinking of North and South Rhodesia, which are now Namibia
and Congo..
No, you are thinking of North and South America, which used to be
entirely separate continents but recently developed a land bridge
between them. ;-)
Wrong on both counts. Namibia was formerly South West Africa. I
forget whether North Rhodesia or South Rhodesia is now Zimbabwe.
David Ames
> > You are thinking of North and South Rhodesia, which are now Namibia
> > and Congo..
>
> Wrong on both counts. Namibia was formerly South West Africa. I
> forget whether North Rhodesia or South Rhodesia is now Zimbabwe.
The country which used to have just the name "Rhodesia" (the
southernmost of the two, but not called "South Rhodesia") is now
called "Zimbabwe." What used to be called "Northern Rhodesia" is now
called "Zambia."
I've been in very few countries in Africa, but one of them is Zambia.
--
Ken Blake
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
How the hell did Colonel Kurtz manage to sail all the way from
Cambodia to Zimbabwe?
> The country which used to have just the name "Rhodesia" (the
> southernmost of the two, but not called "South Rhodesia") is now
> called "Zimbabwe." What used to be called "Northern Rhodesia" is now
> called "Zambia."
"I'm an Octal!"
I have no opinions either way on this issue, and I suppose the more I
think about it, you should be able to declare some form of bankruptcy
anywhere you can own a home or earn money..... kinda strange how you
have to think about law to understand it, sort of like chess.... Phil
and Sam, we've identified your deficit........