Alive and living in Oregon
Chess...@yahoo.com
to do some research for my book.
Among other things, I found this:
Mr. Frank Niro (Chess Safari)
Address for legal service available from:
http://www.blogger.com/profile/11858781138703849298
Last online: Saturday, January 19, 2008
Online activity indicator (last 90 days): 23/90
Email address: <withheld>
Would anyone be surprised that Mr. Niro has been very easily
contactable
at all times since he was discharged from hospital? Even Yahoo
correctly
lists his current address in Oregon City. Not locatable? Think again.
Want a copy of Mr. Niro's December mail to PR? Reply here to ask.
Think Bill G. did not have this address during the last 2 months?
Think
again. Think I cannot prove this? Think again.
Mr. Niro should never have been named in this suit. It is shameful he
was
dragged in. I know why the mistatements were made. To protect
innocents.
Similarly all should understand why the FSS statements were made.
To protect innocents.
I'm not hiding from anything or anyone. I can be reached at:
Frank Niro
1114 Washington Street
Oregon City, Oregon 97045
Chess Saf...@yahoo.com
Recently I published my resignation letter (that supposedly doesn't
exist) in my Archives Blog.
Go here to see it--->
http://csarchives.blogspot.com/2008/01/my-resignation-letter.html
Also, please visit my regular blog at:
http:www.twchesssafari.blogspot.com
As for my laptop, it was reasonable compensation (worth about $500 at
the time) for the time I wrked without pay (December 2001 to August
2002). It was taken by Susan and Paul, with permission, at my request.
In any case, it had a hard drive crash in June 2005 and was replaced.
I kept nothing related to USCF business...except the Starategic Vision
outline presented at Cherry Hill in 2002 and my resignation letter.
As for the Sloan suit, I'm available to anyone who needs me. Since I
am a life USCF member, the office has continuously had my address. My
copy of Chess Life comes every month in the mail.
Best wishes,
Frank Niro
samsloan
Great.
Now just return the laptop computer (which you state is worthless
anyway) and our Internet experts will try to recover it.
We would also like for you to explain in detail why you feel that
taking the USCF's laptop computer was "reasonable compensation". Also,
kindly explain why you wrote a check for $3,000 to yourself your last
day on the job and why you did not tell the USCF Board that you were
not coming to the 2003 US Open in Los Angeles. Also, explain under
what theory you get to decide what your "reasonable compensation" was
for the volunteer work you supposedly did.
You should be sure to contact your assigned counsel, Jeremy Brown at
Proskauer Rose, right away, as he has been searching for you.
Sam Sloan
Chess...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Right, Sam. Give me a call some time and we'll chat. Same for Jeremy.
Send me a private e-mail and I'll send my cell phone number.
Reasonable compensation...hmm. $500 for 2,000 hours is about 40 cents
an hour. In any case, that decision was made in 2002 by Board
leadership when they purchased the laptop for me.
I never wrote a check to myself. Maybe Linda did to reimburse me for
actual expenses. I never received anything without proper
documentation. And when I left I had about $8,000 in unreimbursed
travel expenses which I never submitted for reimbursement.
I made the decision not to go to L.A. at the last moment based on
Doctor's orders (and the advice of Board member Dr. Wagner, who I
confided in about my health...he even suggested a specific procedure
that I should have before I could consider flying). Out of respect for
physician-patient confidentiality, I presume, he never publicly
revelaed his knowledge of my specific health situation. I have always
appreciated that courtesy. Shawn Pealor came to pick me up and take me
to the airport on the day we were supposed to depart for L.A. Sadly, I
wrote a resignation letter while he waited and he took it, along with
my envelope of USCF papers, with him to L.A. while I stayed in NY with
my unused ticket.
The resignation was entirely related to my health, not USCF finances.
The audit results surprised me, too. The multi-year membership issue
was new and there were a number of accounting errors that were
reversed the following year. I was even more shocked when the new
Board members (Schultz, Marinello and Hanke), all people I respected
very much, decided to push the situation out of control for political
leverage. Such is the legacy of USCF politics.
I will not get in a debate with you over these things, Sam, especially
with potential litigation in the works. I would appreciate it,
however, if you would remove me from your current fishing expedition
(i.e. legal complaint). My days in chess politics are over.
My wife and I will be in Dallas for the US Open...but only as a player
and old friend to some. Thanks for being the first to respond.
Best wishes,
Frank
Offramp
Chess One
I never liked you.
I never thought you did anything amiss with the stupid lap-top.
Such is the sometimes void of comprehension between how it must be to the
person in the driving seat, and how others [passengers and voyeurs]
celebrate how you 'seem', or rather, how they wish to portray you. USCF is
not working on this problem, since it is a useful one to them still to sac
their Ex Dir, for the non-initiative.
Have a good tournament in Dallas, and do not play the KID against any GMs!
;)
Phil Innes
<Chess...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2d3c2a79-e000-496b...@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
samsloan
Mr Niro,
There is absolutely no chance, none whatever, that I will drop the
lawsuit against you. In fact, I have been trying and will continue to
try to have you, Polgar and Truong arrested for the criminal theft of
the laptop. You would be well advised to start taking this matter
seriously by returning the laptop (which I notice that you have not
offered to return).
Every member of the 2002 and 2003 boards has been asked about this and
they all say that the USCF's laptop did not belong to you and you had
no right to take it.
Since the matter is public and is on the Federal Pacer website, I will
now inform you of the name, address and telephone number of your
attorney, who has been diligently searching for you for the past four
months. I think that you need to get in contact with him.
He is:
Jeremy Brown
Attorney for USCF and Frank Niro defendants
Proskauer Rose LLP
One Newark Center
Newark NJ 07102-5211
973-274-3205
jbrown @ proskauer.com
Sam Sloan
jeremy.p...@vanderbilt.edu
Do you seriously think that a laptop from that time period is worth
more than the time and legal fees required to sue for it? You have to
resist the urge to file lawsuits for the thrill of it, and restrict
yourself to cases where there is a serious and rectifiable grievance.
If you would limit yourself to pursuing Truong, you would get much
more support and sympathy.
Jerry Spinrad
jkh...@aim.com
That part of Sloan's lawsuit is a joke. Well, I think the whole thing
is a joke, but the inclusion of Frank Niro is particularly idiotic.
Even Sloan hasn't come up with any theory under which Frank had any
connection to the "Fake Sam Sloan" posts. As for the laptop, even if
the USCF had some claim on it (which it almost certainly has not),
Sloan has absolutely no standing in the matter. And has Sloan ever
bothered to make proper service? He's getting close to the statutory
limit.
Chess One
<jkh...@aim.com> wrote in message
news:e720f6c8-4345-4f0d...@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
jeremy.p...@vanderbilt.edu wrote:
> Sam,
>
> Do you seriously think that a laptop from that time period is worth
> more than the time and legal fees required to sue for it? You have to
> resist the urge to file lawsuits for the thrill of it, and restrict
> yourself to cases where there is a serious and rectifiable grievance.
> If you would limit yourself to pursuing Truong, you would get much
> more support and sympathy.
>
> Jerry Spinrad
>
** I do not often agree with the previous speaker, [maybe never before on
any topic], though I must remark in his support that his concluding remark
is one I too sense is at a level of absurdity so as to wonder if Sloan's
venal nature [albeit, not for money, but for momentary celebrity, and
thereby to some remuneration...] by way of hurting other people in chess by
scandalizing them, has not rendered his judgment now utterly insensible.
** Who at all thinks Sloan deserves any benefit of any doubt on any issue?
Meanwhile he has issued a 1,000 issues, all of which he has done nothing
about other than grandstand his perceived sense of ill.
** I have asked Sloan previously if it is the material on the laptop that is
of any value, and how come there is no USCF record or duplicate of whatever
it contains? Or is it the value of the cpu, now perhaps worth a try at $7.50
if one attempted to tax deduct it to the Smithsonian?
** Of course, he does not answer, because he answers nothing of consequence
to the issues he raises, yet suggests the imminent fall of Metropolis as we
know it, or all of chess in the country, and only Super-Sloan can save us!
... what a farce of a person he has become - and his meanness towards chess
is so evident toward anyone else who promotes it, there is scarcely need for
further comment except that I understand he now has 3 zip codes - one for
him, one for his ego, and the last one for his disappointments in life, in
not successfully courting the woman of his dreams.
** One does not need a grey beard and to have come from Vienna to grok the
Sloan.
Phil Innes
Chess...@yahoo.com
I am not your enemy. I put my address here so that you or anyone else
that has a need to can properly
contact (or serve) me.
The USCF has continually had my address, so how can someone be
searching for me for four months? If you search my name on Google, it
brings you immediately to my blog. Such has been the case for two
years, at least.
Furthermore, my book is not yet finished so anything can still be
revised.
Finally, if anyone at USCF thinks I owe them money for the laptop or
anything else, just send me a bill and I will pay it as soon as I can.
The laptop is long ago dead and had no files on it in any event that
would be of interest to anyone but me. I can't understand why you
would think otherwise.
Note to Phil: I always have respected you, despite our disagreement
over certain matters, long forgotten by me.
Best wishes to all,
Frank
Chess One
<Chess...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f59e1aeb-d5b9-4d60...@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> Sam,
> Note to Phil: I always have respected you, despite our disagreement
> over certain matters, long forgotten by me.
Never mind them bananas, Frank. Concentrate on your opening prep, and your
play OTB. If we need to raise $7.50 for the computer, I volunteer the first
50 cents! which is erm, a certain percentage of the whole, though
psychologically the first penny is the greatest, no? I know 2 people you
also know willing to come up with the other 7 bucks.
And one other thing, why don't you stop respecting me and instead write for
Chessville about the gig? We should like a reporter on the scene to give it
some color. Let me know, publisher would we happy to feature your report -
and I will inform him of his opinion.
We are pretty much at Chessville about chess as it exists, rather than what
cudda been, or what shudda been. Though we err towards what aughta, which,
imo, is betta.
Cordially, Phil
samsloan
<jeremy.p.spin...@vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
> Sam,
>
> Do you seriously think that a laptop from that time period is worth
> more than the time and legal fees required to sue for it? You have to
> resist the urge to file lawsuits for the thrill of it, and restrict
> yourself to cases where there is a serious and rectifiable grievance.
> If you would limit yourself to pursuing Truong, you would get much
> more support and sympathy.
>
> Jerry Spinrad
Absolutely, if you had read the court pleadings, you would know how
tremendously important that laptop is.
In August, 1999 the USCF had $2 million (two million dollars) in the
LMA account with the Oberweis Fund. That was when George DeFeis took
over as Executive Director.
By August 2003 that $2 million was completely gone, lost, misplaced or
perhaps stolen. That was when Frank Niro abruptly left and
disappeared.
That laptop should be able to tell us or at least to give us some
information what happened to the $2 million.
Another issue concerns Truong and Polgar. It seems that while he was
Executive Director, Frank Niro was extremely generous with Truong and
Polgar. They wound up getting about $50,000 out of the USCF at a time
when the USCF was broke, insolvent and virtually bankrupt. This money
comes from both cash money Frank Niro gave them while Executive
Director, and contracts they claimed to have made with Frank Niro
while he was Executive Director, plus contracts Truong and Polgar
claimed to have made with Frank Niro representing the USCF while he
was Executive Director. There is also the question of the Susan Polgar
Foundation which Frank Niro secretly founded and established while he
was Executive Director, without the knowledge of the USCF Board. Also,
the so-called Four-Way Contract which according Truong and Polgar
required the USCF to pay them $50,000 for training the US Woman's
Olympiad Team was secretly signed by Frank Niro. The USCF Board did
not find out about it until after Frank Niro had disappeared.
There is also the invoice dated October, 2003 from Truong and Polgar
to the USCF demanding payment of $17,000 for appearance fees for
attending the 2003 US Open in Los Angeles and a few other events. They
claimed that Frank Niro had agreed to pay this amount. That
information too would be found on that laptop. That was the invoice
that Bill Goichberg wound up paying $13,358.56 on in November 2003.
Even the article that appears in the February 2008 Chess Life by Susan
Polgar for which she is paid at least $500 is based on one of these
secret contracts with Frank Niro.
Simply stated, a lot of money has been lost and if Frank Niro cannot
produce that laptop, he should be looking at jail time.
Sam Sloan
jkh...@aim.com
Sheer Sloonacy. All those payments were explained to you repeatedly
during your misbegotten term on the Board, and the fact fact that you
are an innumerate who can't read a balance sheet is your problem, not
ours. The famous laptop will not tell anyone anything, since the hard
drive has long since been trashed. If you were really concerned about
the USCF's finances (rather than harassing those, like Polgar, who
view you with well-justified contempt), you would stop enriching the
USCF's lawyers and go back to driving a cab. Oh, I forgot, you were
disqualified from that.
samsloan
Mr. Niro,
We are not interested in receiving $500 from you. We are demanding the
return of the USCF's laptop computer that you stole.
That computer contains corporate files and records. It may contain
information concerning the two million dollars that is missing, lost
or stolen. If you do not return that computer, you are facing serious
jail time.
The computer is to be delivered to the USCF's Internet Attorney at the
following address:
Karl Kronenberger
150 Post Street, Suite 520
San Francisco, CA 94108-4707
415-955-1155 ext. 114
karl @ kronenbergerlaw.com
http://www.kronenbergerlaw.com/karl_kronenberger_profile.html
Under no circumstances is this laptop computer to be given to Bill
Hall. Bill Hall is dishonest, unreliable, lies all the time, and is
almost as bad and possibly even worse than you were.
The destruction of corporate records is a crime. If you have trashed
that computer you have committed a crime. Since you state that you
needed that computer to write your book, nobody will believe that you
threw it away.
By the way, if you need a publisher for your book, I will be happy to
publish it for you. I have published 30 books in the past year. My
latest book "The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess" will be out in
about ten days. My most recent previous book came out last week:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0923891900
Sam Sloan
jkh...@aim.com
Who is "we," Sam? You have no standing. You are not an officer of the
USCF, having been utterly rejected by the voters last year. Nor are
you a law-enforcement officer (able to prosecute crimes), or an
attorney (with the slightest notion of what the term "corporate
records" actually means). Why don't you crawl back in your hole and
stop embarrassing us all? You're a superannuated buffoon, Sam. Live
with it.
samsloan
still a delegate and thus have standing. Even if I were not a delegate
I am still a USCF member and thus have standing.
Frank Niro needs to return that laptop that he had stolen from the
USCF's office in New Windsor, New York on August 20, 2003 or else face
arrest and criminal prosecution for this theft.
Sam Sloan
Chess One
"samsloan" <samh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f3eebaf5-ae0a-41fa...@c33g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>> Finally, if anyone at USCF thinks I owe them money for the laptop or
>> anything else, just send me a bill and I will pay it as soon as I can.
>>
>> The laptop is long ago dead and had no files on it in any event that
>> would be of interest to anyone but me. I can't understand why you
>> would think otherwise.
>>
>> Note to Phil: I always have respected you, despite our disagreement
>> over certain matters, long forgotten by me.
>>
>> Best wishes to all,
>> Frank
>
> Mr. Niro,
>
> We are not interested in receiving $500 from you. We are demanding the
> return of the USCF's laptop computer that you stole.
Earth to Slone Ranger - who is 'we' white man?
What I would like to know about this issue is what the CPA said. After all,
he cannot sign-off on accounts when assets are missing, and if there was no
questioning of it, or of any datum [what an inane idea that some two million
of money should be located digitally on just one laptop!! no paper records,
really?]
So who is this 'we'? All I see is Sloan alone raising an issue when all
others seem to have said there is not any issue.
> That computer contains corporate files and records. It may contain
> information concerning the two million dollars that is missing, lost
> or stolen.
Surely it might!! But so might the wharehouse where the moudering mess of
the US Archive is currently located. When Super-Sloan raised /that/ issue, I
said at the time, 'go in there and index it'. He didn't.
What I read above is speculation of what may be. When Super-Sloan was on the
board he coulda actually done something himself, like look in the
wharehouse! But he didn't.
And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what CPA? What
audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material? What?
But hey - the renewed solo-Sloan has returned to demanding something on
behalf of 'we' that 'may' have something to do with what is 'maybe' missing.
And why not ask for the impossible - a dead computer from a guy who had a
heart attack?
What could be more fun than that?
But solo-Sloan should not write 'we' to his re-invigorated MacCarthy-ite
tactics, because he is in some danger of confusing that 'we' with 'us'. That
is, we the chess public.
>If you do not return that computer, you are facing serious
> jail time.
Look around you Kemo-Sloan, how come everyone else look heap-um like Tonto?
Cordially Sniffs-with-Skunks
samsloan
> "samsloan" <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> So who is this 'we'? All I see is Sloan alone raising an issue when all
> others seem to have said there is not any issue.
>
> > That computer contains corporate files and records. It may contain
> > information concerning the two million dollars that is missing, lost
> > or stolen.
>
> Surely it might!! But so might the wharehouse where the moudering mess of
> the US Archive is currently located. When Super-Sloan raised /that/ issue, I
> said at the time, 'go in there and index it'. He didn't.
>
> What I read above is speculation of what may be. When Super-Sloan was on the
> board he coulda actually done something himself, like look in the
> wharehouse! But he didn't.
>
> And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what CPA? What
> audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material? What?
Your spell checker is not working. It is whorehouse, not wharehouse.
I did everything I possibly could about this issue when I was on the
board. In the first place, it was I who discovered on Frank Niro's
website chesssafari.com (that he quickly took down after I pointed
this out) that Susan Polgar and Paul Truong had stolen the laptop
computer on August 20, 2003 by entering the USCF's offices just as
Mike Nolan was leaving to return to Nebraska and only a few minutes
later when the newly elected officers Beatriz Marinello and Tim Hanke
arrived to take over the operation, the laptop computer had gone
missing.
Later, Susan Polgar and Paul Truong admitted here that they had taken
the laptop.
All discussion of this subject was banned on the USCF Forums by
Goichberg who was at that time supporting Truong and Polgar for
election. Had the electorate known that Truong and Polgar stole the
laptop computer, Truong certainly would not have been elected and
Polgar might not have been elected either in spite of being a self-
made celebrity.
Thus, Goichberg is also guilty of covering up the theft of the
computer.
As for the "moudering mess of the USCF Archive" (you need to use a
spell-checker) it is still not known what records are in the storage
bin and what has been trashed. Bill Hall was told be the board to
index it all back in September 2006 but of course he has not even
begun to do so so we do not know what is there.
Sam Sloan
Chess One
> On Feb 21, 10:45 am, "Chess One" <OneCh...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> "samsloan" <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> So who is this 'we'? All I see is Sloan alone raising an issue when all
>> others seem to have said there is not any issue.
>>
>> > That computer contains corporate files and records. It may contain
>> > information concerning the two million dollars that is missing, lost
>> > or stolen.
>>
>> Surely it might!! But so might the wharehouse where the moudering mess of
>> the US Archive is currently located. When Super-Sloan raised /that/
>> issue, I
>> said at the time, 'go in there and index it'. He didn't.
>>
>> What I read above is speculation of what may be. When Super-Sloan was on
>> the
>> board he coulda actually done something himself, like look in the
>> wharehouse! But he didn't.
>>
>> And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what CPA?
>> What
>> audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material? What?
>
> Your spell checker is not working. It is whorehouse, not wharehouse.
Charming! Had a good morning?
> I did everything I possibly could about this issue when I was on the
> board. In the first place, it was I who discovered on Frank Niro's
> website chesssafari.com (that he quickly took down after I pointed
> this out) that Susan Polgar and Paul Truong had stolen the laptop
Wait wait wait! Your mind is back in the whorehouse! None of these answer
what I asked - its just the usual rant, sort of pro-forma hate and
disparagement. Let me just speed-read the rest and see if there are any
facts in it in response to my questions...
> computer on August 20, 2003 by entering the USCF's offices just as
> Mike Nolan was leaving to return to Nebraska and only a few minutes
> later when the newly elected officers Beatriz Marinello and Tim Hanke
> arrived to take over the operation, the laptop computer had gone
> missing.
>
> Later, Susan Polgar and Paul Truong admitted here that they had taken
> the laptop.
>
> All discussion of this subject was banned on the USCF Forums by
> Goichberg who was at that time supporting Truong and Polgar for
> election. Had the electorate known that Truong and Polgar stole the
> laptop computer, Truong certainly would not have been elected and
> Polgar might not have been elected either in spite of being a self-
> made celebrity.
>
> Thus, Goichberg is also guilty of covering up the theft of the
> computer.
>
> As for the "moudering mess of the USCF Archive" (you need to use a
> spell-checker) it is still not known what records are in the storage
> bin and what has been trashed. Bill Hall was told be the board to
> index it all back in September 2006 but of course he has not even
> begun to do so so we do not know what is there.
>
> Sam Sloan
Nothing there!
This is going to be some tough case to prosecute - in response to Defense
attorney Innes's questions on the charges:-
And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what CPA?
What
audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material?
What?
Prosecutor replied at some length, none of which constituted an Answer to
why all had gathered in the courtroom.
Innes then moved that the case be thrown out, and the Judge, rising from his
seat, said, "Belay! I'll throw it out myself! Case dismissed."
PI
samsloan
> And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what CPA?
> What audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material?
The $2 million dollars was in cash or cash equivalents.
Since you are not a USCF member you cannot see the audited reports
that are online.
The losses are shown. However, they do not show what happened to the
money. That is why we need the laptop computer that Frank Niro took.
Sam Sloan
Chess One
> On Feb 21, 1:02 pm, "Chess One" <OneCh...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what
>> CPA?
>> What audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material?
>
> The $2 million dollars was in cash or cash equivalents.
>
> Since you are not a USCF member you cannot see the audited reports
> that are online.
So tell us about them!
How come your representation seems to indicate that someone or other made
off with $2million cash or 'equivalents' but no-one seems to give a damn?
ROFL!!
By referencing material that others can't see, including in all the no-doubt
fascinated lawyers at misc.legal, are you not in some danger of appearing
nutz? That is a psychological term, and I apologise to alt.lawyers for using
it - my ignorance extends to not knowing their own term for your
presentation.
> The losses are shown.
$2million of cash or equivalent loses are shown but no one raises an eyebrow
but you?
> However, they do not show what happened to the
> money.
What did happen to what money?
> That is why we need the laptop computer that Frank Niro took.
That is why you want it. First though, I think you must explain why an
organisation that traded at $6million gross in its best year, and more
typically $5M, could have amassed a couple of million cash or fungible
items, then not noticed that someome had dissapeared it.
Otherwise you risk appearing daft in front of the good lawyers, raising
their own self-esteem, which I think is itself a crime!
Please elaborate rather than prognosticate. But I don't think you will since
you do not cite your references in terms of my questions; for the 4th time?
And the 'missing' $2 million dollars is missing according to what CPA?
What audited records? Is it in cash or in kind, in depreciated material?
Did you answer any of these yet except to say 'cash or equivalent'. What
does that mean, 7 bucks of cash and $1,999,993 of equivalent?
Perhaps the lawyer folks are wondering 2 things? (a) If you can have a
couple million of fungible assets just boogaloo out of there without any CPA
or anyone else noticing, no second signature or anything like that, and (b)
your vague references to the matter which upon investigating get vaguer, as
if you were just, you know, blowing smoke - I use that anodyne term since
the usual man-to-man verbalisation may shock some alt.lawyers.
Phil Innes
> Sam Sloan
samsloan
> As for the Sloan suit, I'm available to anyone who needs me. Since I
> am a life USCF member, the office has continuously had my address. My
> copy of Chess Life comes every month in the mail.
>
> Best wishes,
> Frank Niro
Do not be surprised if Frank Niro disappears again.
He has done this once before, pretending to come out and say, as
Napoleon did at Grenoble on 7 March 1815, "If anybody wants to shoot
me, here I am", only to disappear again.
Sam Sloan
jkh...@aim.com
Sam, how long are you going to keep this up? Even if the laptop is
still around, the data is long gone. I realize you're a technical
ignoramus, but this is so obvious that it's hard to believe even you
are serious.
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"
> Sam, how long are you going to keep this up? Even if the laptop is
> still around, the data is long gone. I realize you're a technical
> ignoramus, but this is so obvious that it's hard to believe even you
> are serious.
I'd like to see this laptop for myself.
If the evidence on it was "lost" that could have meaning as well.
I'd also like to know where the $2 million from the LMA went.
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy
Ray's new "Project 5000" is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/project-5000
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
no longer work.
Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
Chess...@yahoo.com
I'm not going anywhere, Sam, until the Lord takes me home.
I'll be glad to talk with you personally, my friend, at any time. I am
not now and never will be your enemy.
I gave up two years of my life for chess. They were two years that I
could've been collecting a full salary on disability. But, instead, I
had a lapse in judgment. I admit it. Other than that, I did the best I
could. Nothing more, nothing less.
Best wishes,
Frank
samsloan
Have you contacted Jeremy Brown at Proskauer Rose yet?
He is a top notch lawyer at one of the leading law firms in the USA,
and he has been assigned to represent you FREE OF CHARGE. All you have
to do is call him.
If you do not contact him we will assume that you are still hiding
from the long arm of the law.
Sam Sloan
Chess...@yahoo.com
> On Feb 28, 8:38 pm, ChessSaf...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 22, 7:29 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 20, 1:57 pm, ChessSaf...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > > As for the Sloan suit, I'm available to anyone who needs me. Since I
> > > > am a life USCF member, the office has continuously had my address. My
> > > > copy of Chess Life comes every month in the mail.
>
> > > > Best wishes,
> > > >FrankNiro
>
>
> > > He has done this once before, pretending to come out and say, as
> > > Napoleon did at Grenoble on 7 March 1815, "If anybody wants to shoot
> > > me, here I am", only to disappear again.
>
> > > Sam Sloan
>
> > I'm not going anywhere, Sam, until the Lord takes me home.
>
> > I'll be glad to talk with you personally, my friend, at any time. I am
> > not now and never will be your enemy.
>
> > I gave up two years of my life for chess. They were two years that I
> > could've been collecting a full salary on disability. But, instead, I
> > had a lapse in judgment. I admit it. Other than that, I did the best I
> > could. Nothing more, nothing less.
>
> > Best wishes,
> >Frank
>
> Have you contacted Jeremy Brown at Proskauer Rose yet?
>
> He is a top notch lawyer at one of the leading law firms in the USA,
> and he has been assigned to represent you FREE OF CHARGE. All you have
> to do is call him.
>
> If you do not contact him we will assume that you are still hiding
> from the long arm of the law.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Cut the hiding crap, Sam. People who are hiding don't post on public
blogs with their contact information in plain view. People in hiding
don't allow a radio personaily with 9 million listeners to speak about
him and his wife frequently and to mention him by name in an USA Today
article.
Oh, you didn't know about that, Sam? Go here and refresh your memory:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.chess.politics/browse_thread/thread/e6b61b30f9243074/eb40162206864e25?lnk=gst&q=Frank+Niro+%2B+Delilah#eb40162206864e25
Someone else must've been using your name that day.
Best wishes,
Frank
Rob
>
> Someone else must've been using your name that day.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> - Show quoted text -
LOL
Good one Frank!
Chess...@yahoo.com
the
record straight.
I will also respond to any questions under oath at any time. As a
matter
of fact, I would be glad to have a candid one-on-one conversation
with
you.
There's another side of the story about my life. You have perused my
web site and my blogs, obviously. Why haven't you mentioned this, for
example?
http://twchesssafari.blogspot.com/2007/11/eddie-heads-back-to-nc.html
Does that sound like a crook?
How about this one?
http://chesssafari.blogspot.com/2006_08_01_archive.html
Or this?
http://chesssafari.blogspot.com/2005_09_01_archive.html
Why must you go around causing havoc? Why must your every word be a
lie? You probably don't know either.
Best wishes always,
Frank
samsloan
Two days ago, I was talking to a long-time USCF insider and your name
came up.
He said, and I quote exactly, "Don't talk to me about Frank Niro.
Everybody agrees that he is a crook."
That is your reputation. You have burned too many people. Perhaps your
sob stories will convince others who do not have experience dealing
with you, but those of us who know you all say that you are a con-man.
Sam Sloan
Chess One
I object to your message in three respects.
a) I never like those who can't write their own name to comment on others
with names - in a word, this is moral cowardice.
b) I dislike your admonition that this sort of material need be contested,
since in order to do so, is it not necessary to produce someone influenced
by it? In effect, someone who would aver a form of McCarthy-ite
investigation as being their own? And despite these claims of 'everyone' by
Sloan, I wish only to understand who 'anyone' is.
c) and finally of all [as Bill Clinton used to say] if you say you know
Frank, then the support you offer him is hardly in the spirit [certainly not
the language] of the man himself - no? I remember as illustration of this
point what Dr. Max Euwe said about supporting the re-entry of Alekhine after
WWII - when challenged to why he did that, replied, "my humanity is the best
revenge".
Thank you for reading these comments, and thank you also for allowing them
to permeate your own sense of affairs, since like unto Frank, neither is it
necessary for the perceptive mind to play the game of the opponent. That
game has an appetite not satiated by feeding it.
I hope you accept each these criticisms of your message as inhibitions of
your better sense, not as disparaging your evident acuity.
Cordially, Phil Innes
"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:07cb62f645cbde02...@dizum.com...
> samsloan <samh...@gmail.com> wrote in news:
>>
>> Sorry, but I have to give it to you straight.
>>
>> Two days ago, I was talking to a long-time USCF insider
>
> That long-time USCF insider being "Sanm Sloan" himself, I guess? Or,
> was it the gibbering loon Ambassador-At-War VP Marcus Roberts? Even
> Oxley via your ouija?
> Name your source, you f*cking dog, or retract your libelous smear.
>
>> and your name came up.
>>
>> He said, and I quote exactly, "Don't talk to me about Frank Niro.
>> Everybody agrees that he is a crook."
>
> Frank, speak to your appointed attorney. He has already been reminded
> about the criminal libel statute on Oregon's books (no briefing needed).
> While it isn't in his remit to attack, just defend, listen to what he
> says and listen good. Attack like in chess often is the best defense.
> Frank, you are a man of great principles. You have the tools to bring to
> an end the career of this shameless terrier. Just do it, sir. To rely on
> the good sense, fairness or reasonableness of the cur is insensible. He
> can understand only one language and he won't stop until he is stopped.
> Think what your great grandkids will think when they read what the dog
> has written about you, is that the legacy you wish to leave? You won't
> be there to defend or explain yourself then. You must rectify NOW, get
> justice, and remove the menace. Or curse your own progenies to live
> an ancestor branded as a thief, "con-man", coward, hider and liar who
> never even obtained compensation from or revenge against their author?
> They will not know Sloan's fine reputation when they read cur's slurs.
> There is an old saying about people like him. Sanm is truly dog. If dog
> sees something he first tries to f*ck it. If he cannot f*ck it he tries
> to eat it. If he cannot f*ck it or eat it he will piss over it. That is
> the nature of the dog-person who (BELIEVE ME) is your mortal enemy.
> You must wake up, time is running out or evil can prevail!!
> There is another way to deal with a nuisance dog which is more extreme.
> Eventually someone can be provoke to do this! So though he won't thank
> you for it using the less extreme, humane legal way to silence barking,
> you are saving the dog from a worse final retribution or punishment.
> Sir, others are relying on you. You must not speak to the dog because
> he will only misquote and lie about your words. Just get the convicted
> felon prosecuted and others will take from him everything he loves.
>
>> That is your reputation. You have burned too many people. Perhaps your
>> sob stories will convince others who do not have experience dealing
>> with you, but those of us who know you all say that you are a con-man.
>
> Sloan, you f*cking vagrant, that is a lie. I know Frank AND have
> experiences of dealing with him and I know he is not at all a conman.
> How dare you try to speak on behalf of others, you fraudster?
>
>> Sam Sloan
>
> "What Sam Sloan doesn't know, can hurt you."
>