Sam Sloan Home Page
http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com
(always accessible via
http://www.archive.org)
JESSICA RIP branded her father SAM SLOAN a molester, pervert - and worse.
On February 18, 2012 at 6:47 am samsloan <
samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote in
rec.games.chess.politics in message
news:b3d9facc-b475-49d0...@vh10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>
> It is beneath contempt that the Fake Sam Sloan and various other
> seriously ill demented people and imposters have been saying that my
> daughter Jessica committed suicide or was raped or murdered etc.
Don't recall anyone alleging rape or murder, but then I don't read all
your fake forgeries, Sloan. But the other..... I have lovingly attached to
this posting the Court extract (FAMILY COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
(CITY OF NEW YORK, QUEENS COUNTY) Dockets V-11657/05 and O-18182/05,
October 6, 2005) to show what Jessica actually thought of her father Sam
Sloan.
Jessica Sloan warned her younger half-sister Anusha that you posed a grave
danger to their sexual safety and well-being. And the Court found the
evidence more than credible, as they banned you from further access, and
branded you a liar. You had tried to steal a girl from her mother by lying
that the mother was using drugs and consorting with criminals. The judge
found there was only one criminal involved, and that was Sam Sloan.
Any doubters about Sloan, just read this.
There's much worse. In April 2008, Jessica had tried to commit suicide.
This because she had earlier, much earlier, been ***ed - by you, Sam
Sloan, her bio dad.
Of course you see no connection, because, established child pornographer
and kiddie-fucker (proof at
http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com ) that you
are, Sloan, like your bosom buddy college day Jefferson Poland ("clitlick"
on Twitter), consider molesting a teenage
daughter quite "normal".
Jessica's boyfriend was certain Jessica had committed suicide (yes, we
spoke to Leon Ward a lot -- surprised, Sloan?), as Jessica's recurring
nightmares over what you, her father who was supposed to have protected
her, had done to her when she was a teenager were only getting worse.
It was because of Leon's repeated pleading that the Manhattan OCME spent
so much time examining suicide as the COD. Jessica was receiving regular
treatment, mainly medication, for depression at the Metropolitan Hospital
and you Sam Sloan are the cause.
If not for Anda (your long-suffering first wife), we have no doubts you
Sam Sloan would have gone on to ***e your first daughter Mary, instead
of merely molesting her. Smart lady, Anda, who kicked you out as soon as
she saw the early signs of your kiddie-fucking.
http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com
So MARY SLOAN escaped, thanks to mom.
You Sam Sloan then went on to have four more daughters born to three/four
retarded imported extremely young bride "wives", that is, four we know
about. All have been severely molested by you, physically and mentally.
SHAMEMA HONZAGOOL SLOAN
JESSICA VITHANAGE SLOAN
ANUSHA RANKOTH SLOAN
None of these three will even speak to Sam Sloan again, because of what
Sam Sloan did to each of them. Nor will their mothers. Honzagool escaped
back to Chitral in Pakistan, and the other two Sri Lankans sheltered by
Sanctuary for Families. Jessica's voice has been silenced forever.
Sadly, Sam still "accesses" the infant
SANDRA KIMURA SLOAN
Have you ***ed SANDRA as yet, Sam?
http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com
> This is a family tragedy and for that reason I have never even mentioned
> it here
But you mentioned Kayo's abortion. Why?
> However, now I feel I can remain silent no longer.
> None of this is true.
Liar.
> My daughter Jessica Vithanage Sloan died on December 18, 2010 of
> Neisseria Meningitidis.
>
> This is the finding of the New York Medical Examiners Office and Dr.
> Jason K. Graham.
>
> The official autopsy report was issued by:
> Jason K. Graham, MD
> Chief Medical Examiner, Manhattan
> Office of Chief Medical Examiner
> 520 First Avenue
> New York, NY 10016
>
> This autopsy report ruled out all other possible causes of death such
> as suicide or anorexia. Dr. Graham states that he spent a lot of time
> on this and he checked these possibilities carefully.
Yeah, the reason he checked carefully on suicide was because of the
on-going treatment for Jessica's depression, and her previous suicide
attempt which was attributed to what you fucking jerk had done to her.
You do not want that known because you fucking piece of shit is trying
to get money from the Metropolitan Hospital for causing Jessica's death.
There is no depth to which you will not sink, is there, Sloan?
> As to how Jessica got this disease most often found in sub-Saharan
> Africa, one week before her death, Jessica went to the Emergency Room
> of Metropolitan Hospital located at 1901 First Avenue, New York NY
> 10029 for a routine matter.
Yes, the routine matter being depression caused by what you did to her
when she was a kid, you fucking hypocritical lying piece of shit, Sloan.
> Three days before she died, I published
> a new introduction by Jessica.
You aren't content with stealing the I.P. of Peter, are you, Sloan?
http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com
> Sam Sloan
Sloan, if you think that your attempt to extort money from Metropolitan
Hospital have any chance of success, you are even more deluded than we
think. But please persevere, because it may just trigger enough higher-up
interest to have your kiddie-fucking activities put under the microscope,
after which you'll be swallowing nigger-cum in jail for the rest of your
days.
Blaskowitz
>(
http://chesswhore.blogspot.com )<
Summary of case report that follows is this - Sam Sloan's minor daughter
ANUSHA SLOAN testified via her law guardian that she was terrified of
being molested by Sam, partly because of warnings she had received from
her elder sister JESSICA SLOAN (the dead one) on the basis of what Sam had
already done to Jessica. Anusha also testified that all Sam's allegations
about the maternal home were lies and she wanted nothing at all to ever do
with Sam Sloan. The Court believed her and took her side.
FAMILY COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
CITY OF NEW YORK, QUEENS COUNTY
In the matters of:
Docket # V-11657/05
SAMUEL SLOAN, Petitioner,
against
DAYAWATHIE RANKOTH, Respondent.
Docket # O-18182/05
DAYAWATHIE RANKOTH, Petitioner,
against
SAMUEL SLOAN, Respondent.
HELD: October 6, 2005
BEFORE: DOUGLAS S. WONG, Judge
APPEARANCES:
Dayawathie Rankoth
Sanctuary for Families
67 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005
BY: ALEXANDER KARAM, ESQ.
Law Guardian for the Child [Anusha Rankoth]
VLADIMIR CADET, ESQ.
Assigned pursuant to 18-b
Transcript Excerpts
THE COURT: Mr. Sloan, I just want to warn you, you're in a courtroom
in a court of law, and you're going to act in an appropriate manner in
terms of listening to court officers' directions and not arguing. If
there is a problem with you, then, I can sanction you, which means
putting you in jail. So, there better not be any problems with you in
this courtroom.
MR. SLOAN: Your Honor, may I be heard?
THE COURT: No. Okay. As to Mr. Sloan's custody petition against Ms.
Rankoth, I understand she's going to accept service and jurisdiction
of the court, is that correct?
MR. KARAM: Yes, your Honor.
THE COURT: Even though Mr. Sloan doesn't have an affidavit.
MR. KARAM: Yes, your Honor. Service wasn't timely, but she will accept
service, yes.
THE COURT: Respondent accepts service and jurisdiction. Issue is
joined.
Now, this was already discussed with you with my court attorney. It's
the same thing I just discussed with Ms. Rankoth. She filed a petition
today for an order of protection. Normally, you could either wait to
be served with the paperwork by her, and she would have to bring back
an affidavit of service, Mr. Sloan. However, if you want to, you can
agree to service and jurisdiction of the court on that case today so
that both cases can proceed ahead. That's up to you. Do you want to
wait to be served with the paperwork by Ms. Rankoth, or do you want to
accept service and jurisdiction?
MR. SLOAN: I will accept service, but I want to speak to the issue.
THE COURT: I'm not dealing with the issue now. I want to know --
MR. SLOAN: I'm trying to move to disqualify this attorney because I
have had conflicts with his law firm for fourteen years.
THE COURT: Any motion has to be in writing.
..
MR. SLOAN: Your Honor, she has two methyl amphetamine addicts living
in her home.
THE COURT: Okay, sir. I just warned you about interrupting me, and I'm
not going to warn you again. All those issues that you're presenting,
you should save those for the hearing in front of a judge. I'm not
interested in those issues at this time.
MR. SLOAN: I would like to be heard.
THE COURT: The incident with the order of protection from October 3,
did your client report that to the police?
MR. KARAM: She did not, your Honor. Other than the contact and the
threatening words spoken, there was nothing else related to it. She
conveyed that to me, as well as the incidents that happened a week
before when Mr. Sloan appeared at the apartment and banged on the
door.
THE COURT: What about these allegations from 1988?
MR. KARAM: At the time, the parties were living in Abu Dhabi in the
United Arab Emirates.
MR. SLOAN: Your Honor, may I be heard?
THE COURT: No. I did receive this answer to the custody petition and
counterclaim. Once again, I'm putting that in the file for the judge
who conducts the hearing, but I have reviewed it and informed ACS of
the allegations.
ACS will be doing a full investigation of this matter and reporting
their findings back to the Court. Both sides have to cooperate with
the Administration for Child Services' investigation and report.
How old is the child here?
MR. KARAM: There are five children living -in the home. The child in
question is going to turn fourteen next month.
THE COURT: Are the children all with your client at the current time?
MR. KARAM: Yes. Three of them she has in common with Mr. Sloan. Two
are not related to Mr. Sloan.
THE COURT: Okay, and Mr. Cadet, do you have a report for the Court?
MR. CADET: Yes, Judge. I did have an opportunity to speak with my
client ANUSHA RANKOTH (SLOAN). She denied all of the allegations in
Mr. Sloan's custody petition alleging drug use in the home. She
indicated there is no problem in the home.
She also indicated she wanted no contact with her father. I asked her
why. She expressed to me concerns that her older sibling (JESSICA SLOAN)
had told her when she was younger Mr. Sloan would often walk into the
bathroom when she was bathing, just open the door. She's afraid about
that, and also that she was aware that allegedly in the past, Mr. Sloan
had abducted two of her siblings (SHAMEMA SLOAN was kidnapped to the
U.A.E., where kiddie-fucking is judicially sanctioned, much earlier, this
is not a reference to that) and went to California.
MR. SLOAN: May I address this, your Honor?
THE COURT: No. As I indicated, you'll be able to address all these
issues at the hearing.
MR. SLOAN: Well, especially the part about the police coming to her house
THE COURT: Just get out your calendars.
MR. SLOAN: I would like to address
COURT OFFICER: Quiet.
THE COURT: Sir, I'm not going to warn you again about interrupting me
and talking out of turn. If you do that again, you're going to be held
in contempt of court and you're going to be incarcerated.
..
THE COURT: I will be granting your client, on her petition, the order of
protection.
MR. SLOAN: Your Honor, may I address that?
THE COURT: Mr. Sloan is not to commit any criminal offense against
her, and this includes the children; not to assault, harass, threaten
or menace her or the children. He has to stay away from her and the
children at all times.
MR. SLOAN: Your Honor, I need to speak.
THE COURT: If you violate the order of protection, after being served
with the order, then, you'll be arrested for violating the order of
protection.
Also, there will be no communication or have anybody else contact her
on your behalf.
MR. SLOAN: I need to address the Court on this.
THE COURT: Part 9, November 28, for the hearing. Thank you. Just wait
outside.
MR. SLOAN: I'm making a complaint against you. You did not allow me to
speak.
THE COURT: Step out, sir.
COURT OFFICER: Let's go, sir. Step out.
Certified to be a true and accurate transcript.
STEPHEN E. GENDEL, Official Court Reporter
Gendel was contacted by phone after JESSICA's suicide attempt and said (re
ANUSHA) "In my days as a court reporter, I've met many repulsive jerks.
Sam Sloan was not the worst of them. But he was close."
http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com
On June 28, 1993, Judge Marilyn Dolan Go wrote:
" [...]
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The facts giving rise to plaintiff's [i.e., Sloan's] claims are set
forth in a 316-paragraph, 50 page, seven-count complaint. Construing
the allegations in the complaint liberally (particularly because
plaintiff is pro se), McNeil v. United States, 113 S. Ct. 1980, 1984
(1993), and accepting them as true, Kossick v. United Fruit Co., 365
U.S. 731 (1961), the pertinent facts may be distilled to the following
sequence of events:
Dispute over Custody of Shamema Honzagool Sloan
Plaintiff has made a career as a chess manager, author, journalist,
and securities dealer. pp. 43, 110. His daughter, Shamema Honzagool
Sloan, was born on October 15, 1981 in New York City to his wife,
Honzagool, a native of Pakistan. pp. 44. Honzagool was awarded custody
of Shamema in May 1982 by the Bronx Supreme Court; in August of that
year Honzagool returned to Pakistan, where she has apparently
remained, leaving Shamema in the United States. par. 49. Plaintiff
placed Shamema in the care of Shelby Roberts of Madison Heights,
Virginia from November 1982 to August 1986, paying her $110 per week.
pp. 50-51. Plaintiff alleges that he had to hide Shamema in Virginia
because he feared the Black Muslim Underground Militant Organization
from Pakistan would try to kidnap her. par. 50.
Plaintiff filed a petition for custody of Shamema before Lynchburg
Family Court in September 1983 and alleges that Judge Dale Harris
"refused to set that matter down for a hearing." par. 98. On January
13, 1986, plaintiff filed a petition for custody of Shamema in the
Amherst county Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. par. 100. On
April 2, 1986, after hearing, Judge Lawrence Janow entered an order
granting temporary legal custody to plaintiff and temporary physical
custody to the present custodians, Charles and Shelby Roberts, unnamed
in the order. The plaintiff was given visitation rights provided that
he not take Shamema out of state without a court order. The case was
continued until August 25.
[footnote 1] Although plaintiff does not specifically refer to this
hearing and resulting order in the complaint, he subsequently
submitted a copy of the order to this court.
On August 25, 1986, Judge Janow held a conference attended by the
Roberts, their attorney, Frank Davidson III, the plaintiff and his
attorney Stephen Martin, and J. Thompson Shrader, the court-appointed
guardian litem for Shamema. That day, Judge Janow issued a decision
awarding physical custody of Shamema to the plaintiff effective
September 7, 1986, and allowing the Roberts, "reasonable overnight
visitation" rights "as Counsel agrees". The order provided for
maintenance of the status quo and allowed Shamema to be enrolled at
the Temple Baptist school, where she had been enrolled before, rather
than public school. par. 106; see also order dated August 25, 1986, a
copy of which was submitted with plaintiff's letter of April 18, 1993.
Plaintiff states that he, a converted, practicing Muslim, did not want
his daughter to attend a Christian school. par. 108. Apparently for
that reason, plaintiff left Virginia with his mother and Shamema that
night and, a few weeks later, flew to Argentina where plaintiff
attended a chess tournament. pp. 51, 3.07-110. The plaintiff, his
mother, and his daughter eventually settled for the next four years in
the United Arab Emirates, where plaintiff worked as a columnist for a
local newspaper.
Charles Roberts, through his attorney, Frank Davidson III, filed a
custody Petition an August 27, 1986. par. 52. Since plaintiff had
already left the state, Roberts never personally served plaintiff with
the papers, and, instead, obtained leave to publish a notice of
service in the Amherst New Era Progress, a local county weekly. pp.
143, 227. On September 4, the court rescinded that portion of the
August 25 order that gave physical custody of Shamema to plaintiff
effective September 7 and left physical custody either with the
Roberts after that date, or with the Amherst County Department of
Social Services with leave to place the child "with any suitable
persons, including Charles and Shelby Roberts." Plaintiff's removal of
Shamema from the Commonwealth of Virginia in violation of the April 2
order resulted in his arrest twice on the basis of a federal
kidnapping warrant, once in Guam, and once in Hawaii, but the charge
was dropped after Lynchburg officials refused to pay the cost of
extradition from these locations. pp. 17, 20-21, 128-29, 130-31. Judge
Janow also issued a nationwide detention order for Shamema. par. 146.
[...]
Return to the United States
Plaintiff alleges that the Roberts also hired Boonchoo Yensabai to
track down and return Shamema to Virginia. par. 192. Plaintiff claims
that Mr. Yensabai threatened and coerced Vithanage Shanthilatha
("Shanti"), his wife and the mother of Jessica Sloan, to assist him in
returning Shamema from the United Arab Emirates to the United States.
par. 196. On October 7, 1990, Shanti took Shamema, Jessica, and
Michael to Abu Dhabi and picked up airline tickets to the United
States that had been sent by the Roberts. pp. 199, 202-204. On October
9, Shanti, Shamema, and Jessica arrived in Washington, D.C., where
they were met by the Roberts taken to Virginia. par. 205. Michael was
left behind with a stranger and eventually returned to plaintiff. pp.
202, 206.
Plaintiff and Michael returned to the United States on November 9,
1990. par. 216. on November 13, plaintiff went to the Amherst County
Department of Social Services to meet case worker Richard Groff, who
told him he could see Shamema. pp. 220, 224 . Upon his arrival he was
arrested and subsequently charged with contempt for disobeying Judge
Janow's August 25, 1986 court order and for failing to appear in court
on September 8, 1986. par. 22, 224-229. Mr. Groff also presented him
with an order dated October 24, 1990 enjoining plaintiff from having
any contact with Shamema. pp. 224, 226. That evening, plaintiff was
brought before Judge Janow, who stated that the Amherst County
Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court had continuing jurisdiction over
Shamema's custody proceeding and raised plaintiff's bail from $1,000
to $10,000. pp. 231-33. While he was in jail, plaintiff was served
with custody petitions for Jessica and Michael Sloan. pp. 236. Also,
while he was in jail, plaintiff claims that Officer McFarland allowed
Sharon Haberer, whom plaintiff describes as a "co-religionist of
Charles Roberts,- par. 237, to take his son, Michael, from the home of
plaintiff's friend. pp. 31-32, 225, 239. She then brought Michael to
New York City. par. 240. Later that month, plaintiff traveled to Far
Rockaway to talk to Sharon and David Haberer. pp. 243-44. He was
arrested on charges of "aggravated harassment" of Sharon Haberer and
her husband. par. 246. These charges were later dropped. par. 248.
In early 1991, plaintiff got in touch with his wife Rankoth Pedigedera
Dayawathie, the mother of Michael and George, who was staying with the
Haberers and the two boys. Plaintiff picked the three of them up in
New York City and drove them back to his mother's house in Lynchburg.
par. 249. Soon thereafter, he also got in touch with Shanti, who had
been staying with the Roberts along with her daughter, Jessica, and
Shamema. par. 251-53. Shanti and Jessica stayed in the Lynchburg house
for a few days, then left and later moved to Oakland, California. pp.
23, 254.
In July of 1991, the Amherst County Juvenile and Domestic Relations
Court awarded sole custody of Shamema to the Roberts and directed that
plaintiff could visit her only under the supervision of the Amherst
County Department of Social Services. pp. 257, 265-66. On September 4,
1991, during a supervised visit, plaintiff was arrested on charges of
the attempted kidnapping of Shamema. pp. 24, 267. This act as the
basis for his recent conviction for attempted abduction."
-------------------
On October 19, 1993, the Virginia Court of Appeals issued the
following order:
In The Court of Appeals of Virginia on Tuesday the 19th day of October,
1993.
M. Ismail Sloan, a/k/a Samuel Howard Sloan, Appellant,
against
Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee.
Record No. 0934-93-3 Circuit Court Nos. CR91003195-00 and CR92003936-01
>From the Circuit Court of the City of Lynchburg
Before Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis
...
The remainder of the petition for appeal is denied for the following
reason:
"When considering the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal of a
criminal conviction, we must view all the evidence in the light most
favorable to the Commonwealth and accord to the evidence all
reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom." Traverso v.
Commonwealth, 6 Va. App. 172, 176, 366 S.E.2d 719, 721 (1988).
An order of the circuit court awarded custody of appellant's daughter,
Shamema Honzagool Sloan, to Mr. and Ms. Roberts. On September 5, 1991,
appellant visited with his daughter at the home of appellant's mother.
Richard Groff, who was present to supervise the visit, testified that
appellant took his daughter to an awaiting rental car. After appellant
started the car, Groff opened the door and grabbed the steering wheel.
Appellant accelerated, dragging Groff approximately 100 yards, and
attempted to push Groff away from the car. After a struggle ensued,
Groff broke the key in the ignition, and Groff removed the daughter
from appellant's rental car.
The evidence further proved that appellant had rented a car using the
name Richard Bozulich. The rental was for a one-way trip from
Lynchburg, Virginia to Greenville, South Carolina. Among the documents
found in appellant's possession on September 5, 1991, were two airline
tickets for travel from Greenville, South Carolina to the Orient and
back. The tickets were in the names of Richard Bozulich and S.
Honzagool. Appellant also had in his possession his passport, his
daughter's passport, and his daughter's birth certificate. Appellant
mentioned he had a suitcase in the trunk of the car on that day.
The jury believed the testimony of the Commonwealth's witnesses. "The
weight which should be given to the evidence and whether the testimony
of a witness is credible are questions which the fact finder must
decide." Bridgeman v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 523, 528, 351 S.E.2d
598, 601 (1986). The testimony of the Commonwealth's witnesses was not
inherently incredible or unreliable. This evidence proved beyond a
reasonable doubt that appellant intended to remove his daughter from
the Commonwealth of Virginia on September 5, 1991.
--
http://direkickfeud.blogspot.com