REply to Graham Douglass

Randy Muller

unread,

Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97

to

Komputer Korner wrote:
[an unthreaded reply to Graham Douglass]

Why are you making all these unthreaded replies to these articles? It
makes your replies harder to understand in context, and it makes your
replies harder to find.

Komputer Korner

unread,

Sep 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/18/97

to

Of all your posts on new ideas for how to produce a better computer
chess program, this one is the first one in my opinion that seems to have
promise. It would take a lot of work to produce the data and to fine tune
it though. I hope you follow through on this one.
Good Luck.

--
- -
Komputer Korner

The inkompetent komputer

If you see a 1 in my email address, take it out before replying.
Please do not email both me and the r.g.c.c. at the same time. I read all
the postings on r.g.c.c.

Carl Tillotson

unread,

Sep 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/19/97

to

In article <342189...@nsosi.com>, Randy Muller wrote:

> Why are you making all these unthreaded replies to these articles? It
> makes your replies harder to understand in context, and it makes your
> replies harder to find.

I think KK persists in using some Micro$oft product for his Usenet access,
and it causes him problems :-)

Causes me problems, because threading is up the spout, although I can
manually shift them on my news database.

Carlos
******
Email Reply : Change "carl.tillotson" to "lca"
Lancashire Chess Association Homepage
http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~lca/index.htm

Message Written Offline with Virtual Access 4.0 Thu, 18 Sep 1997 23:41 +0100

Rolf Tueschen

unread,

Sep 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/19/97

to

"Komputer Korner" <kor...@netcom.ca> wrote to Graham Douglass Sirk:

>Of all your posts on new ideas for how to produce a better computer
>chess program, this one is the first one in my opinion that seems to have
>promise. It would take a lot of work to produce the data and to fine tune
>it though. I hope you follow through on this one.
>Good Luck.

For this post I dedicate the PLUMCAKE of this week for best satirical
reply. As usual KK is very progredient in misunderstanding the rationale
of an author's theses. By his deep and blue digging in the author's
philosophical kernel, Korner demonstrated high-classed step-dance
tradition.

BTW the Pope still searches for friendly members of the group who should
give us a correct listing of all the thousand posts KK publishes in a
usual week. "KK's list of postings to RGCC"... It's a bibliographically
and encyclopedically promissing task with possibilities for social
climbers. Send you invoice to the Popes letter box-office. Pace. (in
popular english: 'peace!')

The Pope of RGCC, the ever so kind Rolfieje the XXII.

brucemo

unread,

Sep 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/19/97

to

Carl Tillotson wrote:
>
> In article <342189...@nsosi.com>, Randy Muller wrote:
>
> > Why are you making all these unthreaded replies to these articles? It
> > makes your replies harder to understand in context, and it makes your
> > replies harder to find.
>
> I think KK persists in using some Micro$oft product for his Usenet access,
> and it causes him problems :-)
>
> Causes me problems, because threading is up the spout, although I can
> manually shift them on my news database.

Yes, I really wish he would go back to whatever he had that worked, or
figure out how to make his current stuff work.

Just because his news reader can't do threaded discussions, doesn't mean he
should destroy this feature for the rest of us.

bruce

Komputer Korner

unread,

Sep 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/20/97

to

I resolved the problem. Sorry guys. Everything should work now.

--
- -
Komputer Korner

The inkompetent komputer

If you see a 1 in my email address, take it out before replying.
Please do not email both me and the r.g.c.c. at the same time. I read all
the postings on r.g.c.c.

brucemo <bru...@seanet.com> wrote in article <3422C3...@seanet.com>...