On 25/11/2020 11:03, Martin Brown wrote:
> On 24/11/2020 22:07, Hans wrote:
>> The better chess programs are hard to beat today. But they all have their
>> own particular strengs and weaknesses, I guess. How do the top programs
>> differ in their style of play? Does anyone know anything about this?
>
> It is so long since there was any on topic postings here I think this
> deserves a reply. They are all basically supergrandmaster strength and
> can only be beaten by specific and near perfect anti-computer play.
>
> However, computer guided by a reasonable human player is stronger.
>
> My personal favourite is Shredder because of its more human like play at
> club level. Bitbases for perfect endgames being much smaller and faster
> than Nalimov. The difference is less now SSDs are so cheap and fast.
>
> Fritz is the oldest of the serious commercial chess programs in
> continuous development. Fat Fritz the latest from that stable uses AI
> and subverts the graphics card for computation. I don't have it (yet).
>
> Be interested to know what people think of it.
Why not use the original? LC0 is open source and stronger. Fat Fritz is
just a rip-off. However, a fast graphics card (GTX 2000-class or better)
is highly recommended.
> Shredder has fallen by the wayside a little bit with no recent versions
> since 13.
It is obsolete by now.
> Of the free ones Crafty has the longest lineage and Stockfish and Komodo
> are two of the strongest. Latest Komodo is no longer free.
Stockfish has been the strongest engine for many years now, and they
made a big jump 3 months ago by implementing NN technology. Only Lc0 can
catch up with them.
Crafty is all but dead. Komodo has always been commercial after v. 1
(they give away the next to last version for free). With Dragon, their
latest offering, they jumped on the NN bandwagon.
> It is interesting sometimes to see how their analyses of a position
> differs and what things they can miss due to pruning heuristics.
> Assuming here you are looking to perfect anti-computer play.
For analysing, there's hardly any need for anything but Stockfish.
For playing against engines, there's Lucas Chess. It's not the most
accessible program, but it's the most feature-rich and it's free.
Why should anybody be interested in perfect anti-computer play? That's
like searching for the best way to outpace a motorbike.
> Freezerchess is also an interesting program if you are interested in
> theory of endgame play and have time and disk space to use it.
>
>
http://www.freezerchess.com
This is 15 years old and completely outdated. Who knows if it even runs
under Windows 10.
Yep. It's chiefly a place for programmers and enthusiasts but also a
good newscast.
Cheers,
Rainer