It is important to realize that even though Nimzo 3.5 does not
score at the top for any individual category, it does so many things so
well
for the serious chess student, that it rates No. 1 overall.
--
Komputer Korner
The komputer that kouldn't keep a password safe from
prying eyes, kouldn't kompute the square root of 36^n,
kouldn't find the real motive in ChessBase and missed
the real learning feature of Nimzo.
Jouni Uski
I know. I know. It is hard to keep the programmers happy but at the
same time let the consumer know what is good and what isn't. I am
slowly losing a little of my professed love for Nimzo even though
it has a lot of good features. The real difficulty is trying to
slot a good program that doesn't win outright any individual
category. However even if it ever would end up as a different
category for each good program, that wouldn't be so bad. The
consumer would know what each program specializes in. The Awards
so far have been remarkably free from criticism, so I guess that
means they are reasonably accurate as to what the best programs are.
The only place you will get into trouble with your awards is when you
pick an "overall winner." :) Different people want different things in
a program. Some want a nice gui, some want overnight analysis of their
games, some want the strongest possible engine, some want the best
engine/database integration, etc. Giving the best in each category is
a great idea. Giving an "overall" winner is a pig that won't fly... :)