Covax test (NEW RESULTS)
Covax
CSTal v.268 (K6/200) - 5
Ferret v.281 (P6/200) - 4
Diep 1.57.20 (Pentium 133) - 4
Crafty 12.8 (K6/233) - 4
M-Chess Pro 6 (486) - 3 (new)
Goliath chess 1.1 (K5/133) - 2
Rebel 8.0 (Pentium 120) - 2
Fritz 5.0 (Pentium 166) - 2
Virtual chess 1.02 (Pentium 150) - 2
Gromit 1.2 (486/100) - 2
Phalanx V (P6/200) - 2
Hiarcs 6.0 (Pentium 133) - 1
Crafty 12.7 (Pentium 120) - 1
MacChess 3.0 (7300/180) - 1
Knowchess 7.23.97 (Cyrix P166) - 0
Dusan Dobes
Covax wrote:
: CSTal v.268 (K6/200) - 5
Phalanx VI (P6/200, 6M hash) - 4
Here is the log (correct solutions only):
r1b1k2r/2qpbp2/p3p3/1p2Pp1p/3Q1P2/2N5/PPP1B1PP/3R1R1K w kq - bm=c3d5;
3. 119 0 922 Be2-f3 Bc8-b7 Bf3-e2
3. 120 0 1755 Rd1-d3 !
3. 120 0 2080 Rd1-d3 Be7-c5
3 -> 0:00.19 5050
4. 120 0 5403 Rd1-d3 ??
4. 11 0 6431 Rd1-d3 Be7-c5 Nc3-d5 Pe6xd5 Qd4xd5
4. 12 0 6626 Be2-f3 !
4. 110 0 7407 Be2-f3 Bc8-b7 Bf3xb7 Qc7xb7 Rf1-f2
4 -> 0:00.55 18716
5. 90 0 23354 Be2-f3 Bc8-b7 Qd4-d3 Bb7xf3
5. 91 1 40285 Qd4-e3 !
5. 124 1 48300 Qd4-e3 Pb5-b4 Be2-f3 Bc8-b7 Nc3-e2
5. 125 1 58785 Qd4-d3 !
5. 130 1 62179 Qd4-d3 Pb5-b4 Nc3-a4 Bc8-b7
5 -> 0:02.54 87860
6. 102 3 122421 Qd4-d3 Ph5-h4 Be2-f3 Bc8-b7 Bf3xb7 Qc7xb7
Qd3-f3 Qb7xf3 Rf1xf3
6. 103 3 133344 Be2-f3 !
6. 113 4 142832 Be2-f3 Bc8-b7 Bf3xb7 Qc7xb7 Rd1-d2 Ra8-c8
Rf1-d1
6 -> 0:06.73 230444
7. 85 10 337008 Be2-f3 Bc8-b7 Pa2-a4 Bb7xf3 Rf1xf3 Pb5-b4
Nc3-e2 Pd7-d5
7. 86 10 349549 Qd4-d3 !
7. 86 14 466916 Qd4-d3 Bc8-b7
7. 87 18 626460 Rd1-d2 !
7. 100 23 767410 Rd1-d2 Bc8-b7 Rf1-d1 Ra8-d8 Be2-d3 Be7-c5
7 -> 0:35.36 1122194
8. 85 44 1390027 Rd1-d2 Bc8-b7 Rf1-d1 Ra8-d8 Qd4-f2 Pd7-d5
8. 86 46 1458444 Qd4-d3 !
8. 97 52 1643729 Qd4-d3 Bc8-b7 Be2-f3 Ph5-h4 Bf3xb7 Qc7xb7
Qd3-f3 Qb7xf3 Rf1xf3 Pf7-f6 Rf3-d3 Pf6xe5
Pf4xe5
8. 98 53 1697364 Be2-f3 !
8. 114 67 2122128 Be2-f3 Ra8-b8 Rd1-d2
8 -> 1:22.08 2636727
9. 77 167 5322567 Be2-f3 Bc8-b7 Pa2-a4 Bb7xf3
9. 78 199 6191592 Rd1-d2 !
9. 79 240 7405648 Rd1-d2 Bc8-b7 Rf1-d1 Ra8-d8
9. 80 556 16666178 Nc3-d5 !
9. 89 566 16986140 Nc3-d5 Pe6xd5 Pe5-e6 Rh8-h7 Qd4xd5 Qc7-c6
Qd5xf5 Qc6xe6 Qf5xh7 Qe6xe2
9 -> 9:33.59 17247758
10. 100 599 18016726 Nc3-d5 Pe6xd5 Pe5-e6 Pf7-f6 Qd4xd5
Depth=10, Value=100, Time=600.03, Last turn=556.15, Nodes=18024387, N/s=30039
PV = Nc3-d5 Pe6xd5 Pe5-e6 Pf7-f6 Qd4xd5
[ Solution correct 16.66%, 1/6 ]
rn1q1rk1/pbpnbpp1/1p2p2p/4N3/2BP3B/1QN1P3/PP3PPP/R3K2R w KQ - bm=e5f7;
3. 43 0 1927 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7 O-O Nd7xe5 Pd4xe5
3 -> 0:00.21 5916
4. -2 0 10153 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7 O-O Nd7xe5 Pd4xe5 Nb8-d7
4 -> 0:00.72 24359
5. 24 1 36521 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7 Ne5xd7 Nb8xd7 O-O Qe7-d6
Qb3-b5
5 -> 0:03.03 94183
6. 9 4 153435 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7 Ne5xd7 Nb8xd7 O-O Pe6-e5
Pd4-d5 Qe7-h4
6 -> 0:09.80 288514
7. 11 14 454052 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7 Ne5xd7 Nb8xd7 O-O Pc7-c5
Ra1-d1 Pc5xd4 Rd1xd4 Ra8-c8
7. 12 21 616713 Ne5xf7 !
7. 25 36 977431 Ne5xf7 Kg8xf7 Bc4xe6 Kf7-e8 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7
O-O Bb7-a6 Qb3-d5 Ba6xf1 Qd5xa8 Qe7xe6
Ra1xf1
7 -> 0:43.34 1234389
8. 8 96 2632469 Ne5xf7 Kg8xf7 Bc4xe6 Kf7-e8 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7
O-O Nb8-c6 Nc3-b5 Ra8-c8 Pd4-d5 Nc6-a5
8. 9 98 2691184 Bh4xe7 !
8. 16 124 3488430 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7 Ne5xd7 Nb8xd7 O-O Qe7-h4
Qb3-a4 Nd7-f6 Pf2-f3 Nf6-d5 Bc4xd5 Pe6xd5
8 -> 2:21.45 4084728
9. 20 211 6250733 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7 Ne5xd7 Nb8xd7 O-O Qe7-g5
Pe3-e4 Pe6-e5 Ra1-d1 Pe5xd4 Rd1xd4 Ra8-d8
9. 21 238 6921386 Ne5xf7 !
9. 29 418 11370557 Ne5xf7 Kg8xf7 Bc4xe6 Kf7-e8 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7
O-O Nb8-c6 Pd4-d5 Nc6-d8 Ra1-d1 Nd8xe6
Pd5xe6 Nd7-f6
9 -> 8:18.68 14051424
Depth=10, Value=29, Time=600.03, Last turn=238.52, Nodes=16657753, N/s=27761
PV = Ne5xf7 Kg8xf7 Bc4xe6 Kf7-e8 Bh4xe7 Qd8xe7 O-O Nb8-c6
Pd4-d5 Nc6-d8 Ra1-d1 Nd8xe6 Pd5xe6 Nd7-f6
[ Solution correct 20.00%, 2/10 ]
r4rk1/1pp2ppp/2n5/p1b1p3/2N1P3/1BP1Bq2/PPQ2P1K/R4R2 b - - bm=a8a6;
3. -1 0 3004 Bc5xe3 Nc4xe3 Qf3-h5 Kh2-g1 Qh5-g5 Ne3-g2
Ra8-d8
3. 0 0 3123 Qf3-h5 !
3. 55 0 9854 Qf3-h5 Kh2-g2 Qh5-g4 Kg2-h2 Qg4-h4 Kh2-g2
Qh4-g4
3 -> 0:00.55 13176
4. 54 0 22742 Qf3-h5 Kh2-g2 Qh5-g4 Kg2-h2 Qg4-h4 Kh2-g2
Qh4-g4
4 -> 0:01.42 36628
5. 49 11 293724 Qf3-h5 Kh2-g3 Pa5-a4 Bb3xa4 Qh5-g6 Kg3-h2
Qg6-h5
5 -> 0:14.91 392325
6. 49 28 735372 Qf3-h5 Kh2-g3 Qh5-g6 Kg3-h2
6 -> 0:45.53 1189087
7. 49 92 2344601 Qf3-h5 Kh2-g3 Qh5-g6 Kg3-h2 Pa5-a4 Bb3xa4
Qg6-h5 Kh2-g3
7. 50 148 3826028 Ra8-a6 !
7. 58 156 4030430 Ra8-a6 Qc2-d1 Qf3xe4 Be3xc5 Qe4-h4 Kh2-g2
Qh4-g5 Kg2-h3 Qg5-h6 Kh3-g2 Qh6-g5
7 -> 3:02.82 4744781
8. 56 208 5428635 Ra8-a6 Qc2-d1 Qf3xe4 Be3xc5 Qe4-h4 Kh2-g2
Qh4-g5 Kg2-h3 Qg5-h6 Kh3-g2 Qh6-g5
Depth=8, Value=56, Time=600.02, Last turn=148.59, Nodes=15202677, N/s=25336
PV = Ra8-a6 Qc2-d1 Qf3xe4 Be3xc5 Qe4-h4 Kh2-g2 Qh4-g5 Kg2-h3
Qg5-h6 Kh3-g2 Qh6-g5
[ Solution correct 16.66%, 3/18 ]
4rrk1/1bp1q1pp/1p1pp3/pP3p2/2PPn1n1/3N2P1/PBQ1PPBP/2RR2K1 b - - bm=f5f4;
3. -31 0 997 Pe6-e5 Ph2-h3 Ng4-f6
3. -30 0 2267 Pc7-c5 !
3. -30 0 2849 Pc7-c5 Ph2-h3
3 -> 0:00.19 4705
4. -45 0 7089 Pc7-c5 Pb5xc6 Bb7xc6
4. -44 0 9526 Ne4xf2 !
4. 30 0 11429 Ne4xf2 !!
4. 82 0 13716 Ne4xf2 Bg2xb7 Ng4-e3 Nd3xf2 Ne3xc2 Rc1xc2
4 -> 0:00.46 14916
5. 82 0 24985 Ne4xf2 Bg2xb7 Ng4-e3 Nd3xf2 Ne3xc2 Rc1xc2
5 -> 0:00.87 28997
6. 122 1 54849 Ne4xf2 Bg2xb7 Ng4-e3 Nd3xf2 Ne3xc2 Rc1xc2
Pc7-c5
6 -> 0:01.92 70003
7. 122 2 85995 Ne4xf2 ??
7. 62 3 126203 Ne4xf2
7 -> 0:08.81 278168
8. 50 21 698382 Ne4xf2 Bg2xb7 Ng4-e3 Nd3xf2 Ne3xc2 Rc1xc2
Pf5-f4 Bb7-c6 Re8-d8
8. 51 146 4121016 Pf5-f4 !
8. 61 190 5324713 Pf5-f4 Nd3xf4 Ne4xf2 Bg2xb7 Rf8xf4 Bb7-c6
Nf2-h3 Kg1-g2 Ng4-e3 Kg2xh3 Ne3xc2 Pg3xf4
8 -> 3:13.60 5408806
9. 99 349 9650232 Pf5-f4 Nd3xf4 Rf8xf4 Ph2-h3 Ne4xf2 Pg3xf4
Ng4-e3 Qc2-d2 Ne3xd1 Bg2xb7 Nf2xh3 Kg1-h2
9 -> 6:38.04 11097503
Depth=10, Value=99, Time=600.04, Last turn=146.31, Nodes=16596809, N/s=27659
PV = Pf5-f4 Nd3xf4 Rf8xf4 Ph2-h3 Ne4xf2 Pg3xf4 Ng4-e3 Qc2-d2
Ne3xd1 Bg2xb7 Nf2xh3 Kg1-h2
[ Solution correct 18.18%, 4/22 ]
Covax
CSTal v.268 (K6/200) - 5
Ferret v.281 (P6/200) - 4
Diep 1.57.20 (Pentium 133) - 4
Crafty 12.8 (K6/233) - 4
M-Chess Pro 6 (486) - 3
Harald
quoting a mail from covax@.uucp
> CSTal v.268 (K6/200) - 5
> Ferret v.281 (P6/200) - 4
> Diep 1.57.20 (Pentium 133) - 4
> Crafty 12.8 (K6/233) - 4
> M-Chess Pro 6 (486) - 3 (new)
Interesting. Which ones? Mine solves only 2 on P133/30MB hash.
> Goliath chess 1.1 (K5/133) - 2
> Rebel 8.0 (Pentium 120) - 2
> Fritz 5.0 (Pentium 166) - 2
> Virtual chess 1.02 (Pentium 150) - 2
> Gromit 1.2 (486/100) - 2
> Phalanx V (P6/200) - 2
> Hiarcs 6.0 (Pentium 133) - 1
> Crafty 12.7 (Pentium 120) - 1
> MacChess 3.0 (7300/180) - 1
> Knowchess 7.23.97 (Cyrix P166) - 0
Harald Faber
AMIR BAN
Covax wrote:
>
> CSTal v.268 (K6/200) - 5
> Ferret v.281 (P6/200) - 4
> Diep 1.57.20 (Pentium 133) - 4
> Crafty 12.8 (K6/233) - 4
> Rebel 8.0 (Pentium 120) - 2
> Fritz 5.0 (Pentium 166) - 2
> Virtual chess 1.02 (Pentium 150) - 2
> Gromit 1.2 (486/100) - 2
> Phalanx V (P6/200) - 2
> Hiarcs 6.0 (Pentium 133) - 1
> Crafty 12.7 (Pentium 120) - 1
> MacChess 3.0 (7300/180) - 1
> Knowchess 7.23.97 (Cyrix P166) - 0
Results for Junior (version 4.3V, Pentium 166):
6/25:
3. d4d5 95 sec
10. e5f7 325 sec
21. g5g4 70 sec
22. f5f4 485 sec
24. g4e6 275 sec
25. e5e6 16 sec
Amir
Robert Hyatt
Harald (dirty...@sensecom.de) wrote:
: quoting a mail from covax@.uucp
: > CSTal v.268 (K6/200) - 5
: > Ferret v.281 (P6/200) - 4
: > Diep 1.57.20 (Pentium 133) - 4
: > Crafty 12.8 (K6/233) - 4
: > M-Chess Pro 6 (486) - 3 (new)
: Interesting. Which ones? Mine solves only 2 on P133/30MB hash.
This is mostly random noise anyway. What probably happened is that
Mchess liked the right move for a while, but then changes its mind.
On a slower machine, it doesn't have time to change, but on your
faster P5/133 it does.
Crafty is very similar. it likes several of the right moves at *very*
shallow depths, but changes to something else at deeper depths. It is
likely that if you ran crafty on a 8088/4.77 it might do better than it
did on the K6. :)
: > Goliath chess 1.1 (K5/133) - 2
: > Rebel 8.0 (Pentium 120) - 2
: > Fritz 5.0 (Pentium 166) - 2
: > Virtual chess 1.02 (Pentium 150) - 2
: > Gromit 1.2 (486/100) - 2
: > Phalanx V (P6/200) - 2
: > Hiarcs 6.0 (Pentium 133) - 1
: > Crafty 12.7 (Pentium 120) - 1
: > MacChess 3.0 (7300/180) - 1
: > Knowchess 7.23.97 (Cyrix P166) - 0
: Harald Faber
mclane
AMIR BAN <ms...@ibm.net> wrote:
>Results for Junior (version 4.3V, Pentium 166):
>6/25:
>3. d4d5 95 sec
>10. e5f7 325 sec
>21. g5g4 70 sec
>22. f5f4 485 sec
>24. g4e6 275 sec
>25. e5e6 16 sec
>Amir
Congratulations for the new leader !!
Hope to meet you in Paris.
John Michael Sauder
>> CSTal v.268 (K6/200) - 5
>> Ferret v.281 (P6/200) - 4
>> Diep 1.57.20 (Pentium 133) - 4
>> Crafty 12.8 (K6/233) - 4
Crafty 11.21 (SGI O2 R10k/150) - 0
total nodes searched.............. 547,249,626
average search depth.............. 11.2
nodes per second.................. 36,436
Harald
quoting a mail from hy...@crafty.cis.uab.edu
> : > CSTal v.268 (K6/200) - 5
> : > Ferret v.281 (P6/200) - 4
> : > Diep 1.57.20 (Pentium 133) - 4
> : > Crafty 12.8 (K6/233) - 4
> : > M-Chess Pro 6 (486) - 3 (new)
>
> : Interesting. Which ones? Mine solves only 2 on P133/30MB hash.
>
> This is mostly random noise anyway. What probably happened is that
> Mchess liked the right move for a while, but then changes its mind.
> On a slower machine, it doesn't have time to change, but on your
> faster P5/133 it does.
Hmm, I didn't have a closer look at the times so you may be right. But
this test is not my favorite one, I prefer the Howard-Exner-test-suite.
Most test-suites are stressed on tactics. That alone is not what I want to
test, a positional test in addiction to it is absolutely necessairy.
I'll have a closer look at the Reiter-test if this is again a tactics-test-
suite. If not it should be worth been taken into everyone's own tesing-
positioncollection.
> Crafty is very similar. it likes several of the right moves at *very*
> shallow depths, but changes to something else at deeper depths. It is
> likely that if you ran crafty on a 8088/4.77 it might do better than it
> did on the K6. :)
Tja, one point against test-suites. :-)
In the Reiter-test position #3 seems not to be clear i.e., MCP6 prefers
Qf3 instead of Qh3 and evaluates at about +2.9 so this move won't be bad
either.
Harald Faber