Taylor,
Please don't feed the trolls.
K
Assuming you are not trolling...
He went to no college. He didn't even graduate from High School; he
dropped out.
--
Ken Blake
=============================
Fischer did not go to college. Nevertheless, may I recommend Georgia
Tech as the best bargain among the engineering schools.
OldHaasie
Go back to sleep Hassie.
My nephew, from Quincy, Massachusetts, enrolled in a graduate
engineering program at Georgia Tech. He was made to feel like an
outsider and he came back home. You wouldn't know about things like
that, Haasie.
An interesting thought. Certainly some of the WCC's were brainier than
others. No one can argue Lasker's erudition, but Alekhine comes off as
a pretty thick drunk. Capa knew enough to tip the waiters well, and he
wouldn't argue that that was all he DID need to know.
Moving on up, I haven't heard anyone make great claims for Karpov
killing at Trivial Pursuit, and Kasparov is too mired in the theory of
alternate chronology to take seriously as a thinker on anything other
than the the Ruy Lopez. The vast middle...Botvinnik, Smyslov, Tal,
Petrosian, Spassky...they all seem interchangeable on the brain game,
although I think Tal was the most FUN of the group. You get a lot of
points for that...unfun smarties are the most unfun kind of person
there is.
Bobby...he had some native brains, but then got sick (or sicker), and
deteriorated quickly. He's probably damaged the public perception of
chess as much as he enhanced it...the Fischer legacy is finally a
draw. What a case study he became, not just for the head-shrinkers,
but for any student of the nutty, enclosed world of professional chess
and its sycophants, many of who propped (and keep propping) the
Fischer madness.
Speaking of madness, I hope to see some you wankers at the Midwest
Class this weekend. The Bish is buying.
TMB
TMB, I know you're writing with tongue in cheek here, but I feel
obliged to make a few factual corrections:
> An interesting thought. Certainly some of the WCC's were brainier than
> others. No one can argue Lasker's erudition, but Alekhine comes off as
> a pretty thick drunk.
Alekhine was actually a very intelligent man with some good cultural
and intellectual attainments to his credit, for example he spoke
several languages and went far in law studies (though his degree is
open to question). While his chess obsession was nearly as great as
Fischer's he did not confine himself solely to chess.
> Capa knew enough to tip the waiters well, and he
> wouldn't argue that that was all he DID need to know.
If I had my choice of being any of the world champions, I'd probably
pick Capa. The guy had a way with the ladies no other WCh has come
close to. He was highly cultured. Also very intelligent and could have
gone far in some field other than chess, but he lacked the motivation.
> Moving on up, I haven't heard anyone make great claims for Karpov
> killing at Trivial Pursuit, and Kasparov is too mired in the theory of
> alternate chronology to take seriously as a thinker on anything other
> than the the Ruy Lopez. The vast middle...Botvinnik, Smyslov, Tal,
> Petrosian, Spassky...they all seem interchangeable on the brain game,
You seem to be neglecting Botvinnik's doctorate in electrical
engineering.
However, The Oxford Companion (first edition) says: "Although
universally admired, Capablance was not especially liked by other
player, from whom he seemed to stand at a distance. The leading
simultaneous player of his time, he visited many clubs to play his
games, collect his fee, and depart without stopping to talk to the
players as Lasker or Alekhine might have done..."
> > Moving on up, I haven't heard anyone make great claims for Karpov
> > killing at Trivial Pursuit, and Kasparov is too mired in the theory of
> > alternate chronology to take seriously as a thinker on anything other
> > than the the Ruy Lopez. The vast middle...Botvinnik, Smyslov, Tal,
> > Petrosian, Spassky...they all seem interchangeable on the brain game,
>
> You seem to be neglecting Botvinnik's doctorate in electrical
> engineering.
Also, Tal went to university at 15 to study Russian language and
literature, so was presumably pretty bright.
Alekhine was a drunken anti-Semite. Hard to place him in the "really
smart guy" slot.
Capa was a brilliant chessplayer. As far as I know, he never uttered
or wrote anything else that could be conceived as fabulously brainy.
Yeah, that's why everyone has a Ph.D.
> Alekhine was a drunken anti-Semite.
At times, yes.
> Hard to place him in the "really smart guy" slot.
Not if you know enough about him.
> Capa was a brilliant chessplayer. As far as I know, he never uttered
> or wrote anything else that could be conceived as fabulously brainy.
I'm not arguing that Capablanca was "fabulously brainy," but he
certainly does not deserve your slur that all he knew was how to tip
waiters. Neither he nor Alekhine was any Einstein, but both were well
above average in intelligence and culture. Here's an article that
might increase your respect for Capa:
http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/capablancaolga.html
Great Minds, as history has them, tend to be a little more rounded
than the kind of people you find obsessing at the chess table. I know
this has been our group-armor, the great excuse on why the babes avoid
our scene like they would a leper colony, because we are brainy nerds,
but it's not true...being a good or great chess player doesn't mean
anything other than you're a good or great chess player. A nerd,
yes...brainy, maybe.
What I DO know is despite all their doctorates and languages spoken
and middle-game combinations and fanboy flummery...our Chess Hall of
Fame has not done ANYTHING for the advancement of world knowledge or
the improvement of our species, other than win chess games.
Nothing. Zilch. Nichts. Maybe Lasker wrote a math essay once. These so-
called geniuses were not geniuses about anything other than wood-
pushing.
No-one is living larger today because of ground-breaking engineering
discoveries by Botvinnik. Schoolchildren are not reassessing history
or philosophy because of any published writings by Alekhine or
Karpov. Thomas Jefferson was a great mind who changed our lives. So
was Albert Einstein, and Charles Dickens, and a few women I'm too ill-
educated to remember right now.
But not Vassily Smyslov. Or Mikhail Tal, or Jose "Pass the rum shaker"
Capablanca.
Alekhine...Indiana, let it go. He drifts farther down both the chess
and esteem lists every year. And I don't care how good at chess he
was, or checkers, or Monopoly...anyone who publishes racist rants gets
an auto-eject from the Mind Pool. You can't take the stage and play
gorgeous violin while farting loudly at the same time...it matters.