6/1 2/1 is correct.
The large number of gammons we get when we escape are a huge factor.
On a slow day for combinatorial game theory, I could easily imagine Tim
doing a ton of variantizing by lessening and increasing the gammonability
to change the play.
The escape play might seem correct as a gamble on your opponent not rolling a 2.
But your opponent's 2s will lose some gammons. There's a lot of value in taking away
all of your opponent's gammons by closing out.
After closing out, we win immediately with 51 and any 6 except 61.
This is 11/36. If we don't get such a roll we can hope to escape before the opponent enters.
Am I confident?
Recently, I went to spectate a tennis tournament which officially had no spectators. However,
there was a way of getting in which was to meet a competitor and ask to be on their guest list
to gain entrance as a competitor's guest.
I am as confident in my solution, as I was when asking players to sign me in as their guest.
Paul