On December 11, 2021 at 2:04:17 PM UTC-7,
ra...@clara.co.uk wrote:
> Has anyone read Dirk Schiemann's new book,
> The Theory of Backgammon? .... If this has been
> done well, it will be a tremendous achievement.
Ignoring that you must be his advertising agent
here, my first reaction was "Oh, no! Not another
BG book by another mathematician gambler!" :(
This one only half qualifies though, because he
is not a math PHD but just studied math (took
101 and 102??)... I don't know which ones are
actually more destructive?
This reminds me of my long time wondering what
attracts "mathematicians" to gambling, whether
playing poker, backgammon, etc...??
Except for a few who actually make "a good living"
by beeing "professional gamblers", most whos see
themselves as such never make more money per
hour of their lives spent on it than teenagers who
mow lawns and deliver newspapers for minimum
wage.
Surely they can make more money and live as more
respectable people using their "math skills" in other
ways. So, why?
There are numerous novels, movies about "scientists"
who ruined their lives by being addcited gamblers. A
few years ago, I had seen a sad one about a math PHD
who. His mother was disgusted with him but supported
his addiction, as mothers love their childrens even if
they murder their wives and sell their daughters for
gamling money... :(
Anyway, any statistics on what percentage of gamblers
are mayhematician in all games? Just in backgammon?
Among all gamblegammon player of all levels? Among
just the "giants" of gamblegammon? Among bg book
or bot peddlers??
Would anyone in the circuits be willing to help tabulate
this kind of info?
I would expect that "mathematician gamblers" should do
this eagerly just to brag about themselves... ;)
Oh, BTW, the book you publish may be better if paperback.
Just in case it's shoved up your mathematician/amateur
gambles asses, hard-cover would hurt more... :))
MK