On Friday, November 21, 2014 12:50:27 PM UTC-7,
michae...@gmail.com wrote:
> ASProtect is a really strong protection costs about $100 but
> is not as strong as Armadillo costing 3 times as much. If you
> were the developer of XG (making all that assumed huge money)
> which of the two would you choose? ;-)
I wouldn't use any protection. I don't think it achieves
anything beyond mildly inconveniencing / annoying users,
and turning off potential purchasers. (If that's what a
developer wants, it can be done in other ways for free,
like Bgblits does for example).
I think the need for developers of so-called "world class
bots" to use copy protection probably comes from the fact
that they are targeting mostly mentally sick gamblers who
are very commonly cheaters. I think it's the same need as
for using cheat proof dice cups, etc.
The only people who would want a legal license for those
bots are probably the few dozen "experts" who comment on
bot play publicly and/or know the developers personally.
Even so, some of them may be given free licenses in return
for promoting those bots. Aside from them, I can't see any
wannabe gambler being eager to pay for bots when they can
just keep trying them forever... :)
Besides, why would anybody really even bother with trying
to use those bots for free by defeating copy protections,
when there is the gnubg for free..??
A bigger revenue may come from the online gambling sites
that bot developers operate or associate with. But even
then, it may not be much more than the same money going
around and around, among a very small incestuous circle
of sick gamblers, slowly trickling up into the hands of
a few who waste their lives at being "professional gamblers"...
MK