NFL 1999 playoffs.
Tampa +11 WIN v Rams (oh my god they r so good!)
Titans +7 PUSH v Rams in bowl
Miami +8 v Jax 52 or 62-7 LOSS
took some time off in early 2000.
nothing applied in the summer, this doesn't work on baseball
NFL 2000
Steelers +8.5 v Jets WIN
Steelers +5.5 v Ravens WIN
Saints +13.5 v Rams WIN
Saints +6.5 v Rams WIN
One loss on Saints(last game of season) - forgot spread LOSS
Ravens mid-season slide (a few games ATS) WIN
Jets entire Demise WIN
Steelers Uprise WIN
Saints +8 v Minny LOSS
Minny v NYG LOSS
Ravens in the Bowl WIN (several times over, was all over the Ravens)
Entire NHL season picking small underdogs WIN (altho I fanned on some
other NHL bets my dogs were usually very live and won)
NHL Series Picks WIN (in the positive)
If I counted right that's 11-4-1
There might have been 1-3 instances I left out. that would make it at
worst 11-7-1.
Note that some of the "wins" are on entire Multigame situations, which
means the Record is MORE positive than it looks.
The intention of this is to promote the idea that the Avs will beat the
Devils via my logic. Anyone in on this secret will be a winner. I am
very confident on this one, like I was on the 16 picks/situations I
called. I left out the Anti-Redskin system of last NFL season. That was
also very similar to this Devils bullshit.
So for the last time, the Devils are a glorified Washington Capitals.
The Penguins really blew a golden shot at the Cup by playing like total
idiots(How many times can you try a centering feed when 16,000 previous
centering feeds were knocked aside and many lead to goals??). The
Avalanche has a real fully developed hockey team together that does not
go through much streaky play and does not need the oddman break and the
trap to win it. PLUS, there is something about Home Ice, Thin Air, and
Ray Borque never getting the Cup (yet) involved here.
Don't listen to washed up hockey players and coaches. Follow your own
mind.
>NFL 1999 playoffs.
>
>Tampa +11 WIN v Rams (oh my god they r so good!)
>
>Titans +7 PUSH v Rams in bowl
>
>Miami +8 v Jax 52 or 62-7 LOSS
>
>took some time off in early 2000.
You are a fucking legend. Is that what you expected to hear?
>Don't listen to washed up hockey players and coaches. Follow your own
>mind.
Didn't you just tout 17 or so unrelated games in order to get us to follow you?
Phoq
-Your best strategy is not to open any post appearing to be a horse racing
post, if you have no interest.
-Until I either get tired of posting here or someone with the capabilities can
lock me out, I am here. Deal with it.
~Valupix (TJ)