Five Star Sports Comp Line...
Brian P. Blume
*****************************************************************
******** F I V E S T A R S P O R T S S E R V I C E *********
*****************************************************************
***************** 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 5 5 - W I N S *******************
*****************************************************************
Plays Monitored by "The Sports Monitor"
5621 NW 82nd St Oklahoma City, OK 73132
*****************************************************************
Ranked 5th in the Country overall in College Football & NFL
College Football Record 14-5 thru September 9th, 1995
*****************************************************************
You could have over $2,000 more in your pocket
had you called Five Star Sports this weekend!
*****************************************************************
Overall this weekend we went 22-5-1
8-3-1 in Baseball & 14-2 in Football
We won 5 of 6 top plays including a 5 Star winner
in our "Platinum Report" where we went 8-0!
*****************************************************************
D O N ' T M I S S O U T T H I S W E E K E N D
*****************************************************************
FOR A MERE $20 A CALL WE'LL GIVE YOU OUR TOP RATED
PLAYS IN BOTH BASEBALL & FOOTBALL WHEN YOU CALL
1-900-773-3130 SATURDAY & SUNDAY FOR THE WINNERS
*****************************************************************
MONDAY THRU FRIDAY CALL 1-900-288-1115 FOR OUR BASEBALL PLAYS
(FOOTBALL PLAYS ALSO ON MONDAY'S & THURSDAY'S) ONLY $10 A CALL
*****************************************************************
Try us out...Call Toll Free daily for our
Complimentary Play at 1-800-455-WINS
*****************************************************************
Weekly & Monthly specials now available or
sign up through the Super Bowl and save BIG!
Call our offices Toll Free at 1-800-455-WINS for details
*****************************************************************
"PICKING WINNERS IS OUR ONLY BUSINESS"
*****************************************************************
spor...@nerdshack.com
> Plays Monitored by "The Sports Monitor"
> 5621 NW 82nd St Oklahoma City, OK 73132
A few years ago Sports Illustrated did a story on tout services and they
reported that the Sports Monitor is a shill which,for a fee,will "verify" any
claims that a sports service makes.
JW
I have heard that there are 2 "Sports Monitors", one based in Illinois I
believe (known to be totally bogus) and the one in Oklahoma City. I have
heard that the one in OK city is for real, but keep hearing conflicting
reports. Perhaps they are being mixed up. Can anyone clear up the
legitimatcy of the Sports Monitor in Oklahoma City?
JW
spor...@nerdshack.com
> reports. Perhaps they are being mixed up. Can anyone clear up the
> legitimatcy of the Sports Monitor in Oklahoma City?
The Sports Illustrated story referred to the scammers on Oklahoma City.
John Chandler
<spor...@Nerdshack.com> wrote, without checking his facts:
>
> > reports. Perhaps they are being mixed up. Can anyone clear up the
> > legitimatcy of the Sports Monitor in Oklahoma City?
>
> The Sports Illustrated story referred to the scammers on Oklahoma City.
Wrong, "sportsfan".
What SI (November 18, 1991) actually said (on page 118) was
"Duffy, who operates out of Massapequa, Long Island,
also claimed to be no worse than 75% right, ever.
Yet when his picks were audited by the Sports Monitor
of Oklahoma City, one of the rare legitimate monitors
(among the dozens of such outfits that purport to keep
tabs on the performance of tout services),
he never fared better than 58.8% in any regular football
season between 1985 and '88, and he sank as low as 39.7%
for his college picks in '87. Eventually the Sports Monitor
refused to monitor Duffy because of his "deceptive ad
practices"."
"... one of the rare legitimate monitors..."
^^^^^^^^^^
If you have a later SI quote, let's see it.
Now apparently it is true that SM is run by Ruth Glasgow,
sister of Gary London, owner of National Sports Wire in Edmond, OK,
so I might take an SM rating of London with a grain of salt.
However, London has a reputation as a competent and reasonably
honest tout.
Plus, "i m 20% johnson" doesn't like London at all;
can anyone imagine a stronger POSITIVE recommendation?
Gosh, I can't.
--
John Chandler
j...@a.cs.okstate.edu
Peter Nassar
that's im 70% johnson to you FOOL
if you go against us as we recommended that you do since you don't realize
the quality of our work it's possible for you to hit 20%, since the past
NBA regular season was 72% for our clientele
our free phone is at 58% for the season and the 900-860-3600 is at 66% this
year and no lies that you propogate can change that..doesn't it frost your
tiny cojenes that we are what we say we are and our name says it all
WEWINMONEY chumpler
btw friday free parlays now 3 of the last 4 your simple mind can't
comprehend truth can it ?????????????????
send SASE ( if you can afford the 64 cents to IM Johnson Sports
5642 Bonita Vista Way Suite 30 Tampa FL 33617 and read what the Las Vegas
REview Journal has to say about our record on Sportsradio in Vegas where we
posted a 57-15 ( that's 79.16%
chumpler ) on picks given out on the radio
when we got to vegas we saw all the lies about high percentage winners
being spewed by you friends Duffy and Allen et al and decided we would
assume the name Isaiah Moses " I.M. 70% " Johnson because we wanted to
prove our ability in a public forum where the people could judge our work
and not be misled by some lying monitor,....we think that's VERY GOOD WORK
in re your lies i was told about we have never been written up in the
Gambling Times...The Tampa Tribune has done stories about our work....we
are in the Playbook published by Marc Lawrence,
a nationally known and well -respected handicapper ...did you read our
article in the Secrets of Handicapping there...or the descrition of our
work on the page,,,do you infer that Mr. Lawrence would publish that if it
were not TRUE take your lies and...well youu know what the rest is
chumpler
TO THE REST OF YOU HERE
call our FREE PICK PHONE today 813-273-8128
get quality picks ands hear our comments on CHUMPLER i mean
chandler
im johnson
gary_s._best
> sister of National Sports Wire owner Gary London,
> and is highly biased.
>
> So now I have a slightly _more_ favorable opinion of SM...
>>>>
The Sports Monitor out of OK is run by Ruth Glasgow, but I have no idea of her family
background.
Gary S. Best
"CompuPick - Artificial Intelligence: Knowing the TRUE Line"
g...@shore.net
gary_s._best
[semi-coherent babble removed]
> im johnson
>>>>
Blah, blah, blah.
OK, here's the deal. ANY service that claims even a moderately high success rate
without being monitored either publicly through this forum or privately through
one of the monitoring services (primarily either The Sports Monitor out of OK or
Sports Watch out of LV) is suspect. Period.
This is an educated audience. We are aware of the touts' tricks. We demand proof
of winning percentage.
And while the monitors may not be 100% accurate, there is no way they would say that
a service that paid to be monitored got *less* games correct than it did. That's what
lawsuits are for. My point being that if a monitor's highest ranking service scored
67.5% (as did Wildcat Sports, no affiliation, in 1994 NFL per SM), then I am confident
that NO service scored above that percentage unless similarly monitored and documented.
If they were that accurate, they would be eager to be monitored and prove it to the
world.
So here's the deal: get documented. Either through a monitor or some other public
forum. Submit your picks confidentially to Lvbob. Post them in a newsgroup or
website. Whatever.
If you refuse, it will become painfully obvious to all subscribers of this newsgroup
that you are a phony and your 70% winning percentages are as well. It's up to you.
In other words, put up or shut up!
Gary S. Best
"CompuPick - Artificial Intelligence: Knowing the TRUE Line"
g...@shore.net
P.S. That goes for the rest of you touts as well. You know who you are. And rest
assured, we do too.
Mark Barnes
>
>> wewin...@usa.pipeline.com(Peter Nassar) writes:
>
>[semi-coherent babble removed]
>
>> im johnson
>>>>>
>
>Blah, blah, blah.
>
>OK, here's the deal. ANY service that claims even a moderately high
success rate
>without being monitored either publicly through this forum or
privately through
>one of the monitoring services (primarily either The Sports Monitor
out of OK or
>Sports Watch out of LV) is suspect. Period.
>
>This is an educated audience. We are aware of the touts' tricks. We
demand proof
>of winning percentage.
Go Gary, Go!! How true, how true.
>In other words, put up or shut up!
>Gary S. Best
>"CompuPick - Artificial Intelligence: Knowing the TRUE Line"
>g...@shore.net
>
>P.S. That goes for the rest of you touts as well. You know who you
are. And rest
>assured, we do too.
>
>
Again, Gary hits the nail on the head. While I consider myself a
novice sports bettor, I REFUSE-- REFUSE-- to accept the undocumented
claims of persons on this news group that constantly claim some ungodly
winning percentage AFTER the fact. If you are so sure that you can
consistently beat the spread, submit your picks to one of the mentioned
monitoring services. Believe me, if you beat the spread consistently
and are monitored while doing so, you will be UNABLE to handle the
business that is generated afterwards.
I, for one, will not respond to the tons of "CALL FOR MY 5-STAR PLAYS"
advertisements that are all over this newsgroup. Most people with
average intelligence will not call either. However, if you document
your claims through an independent source, you tend to prove your
claims.
Just my 2 cents worth, as an average reader of this newsgroup.
Regards,
Mark.
Jim Bromley
>Again, Gary hits the nail on the head. While I consider myself a
>novice sports bettor, I REFUSE-- REFUSE-- to accept the undocumented
>claims of persons on this news group that constantly claim some ungodly
>winning percentage AFTER the fact. If you are so sure that you can
>consistently beat the spread, submit your picks to one of the mentioned
>monitoring services. Believe me, if you beat the spread consistently
>and are monitored while doing so, you will be UNABLE to handle the
>business that is generated afterwards.
>
>I, for one, will not respond to the tons of "CALL FOR MY 5-STAR PLAYS"
>advertisements that are all over this newsgroup. Most people with
>average intelligence will not call either. However, if you document
>your claims through an independent source, you tend to prove your
>claims.
>
>
>Just my 2 cents worth, as an average reader of this newsgroup.
>
>Regards,
>
> Mark.
>
I am behind you Mark....
Well said.
BROMLEY.
JJLEE
I AM GOING TO TH MEDITERREAN FOR A YEAR AND HOPEFULLY WHEN I RETURN YOU
MOTHERFUCKERS WILL BE BROKE AND OFFLINE
JJ LEE NOT ANYONE ELSE YOU IGNORANT SONS OF BITCHES
spor...@nerdshack.com
> picks and hit almost 80% and thank him again here for that great
> handicapping. Haven't seen much like that from other guys who said
> they
> were real good. As soon as I can find a bookie I will win some more
> with
> the guy.
One more Johnson fan posting from AOL. With an 80 percent record I would be
living in Vegas with the legal books.
Perhaps you are unable to find a bookie bacause you never paid off your guy
after following I.M.s 20 percert winning rate.
BettingFan
im johnson sports
thanking me for the freebies in Vegas and it is always appreciated
here...good luck
I Thought You Were Dead...
>From: spor...@Nerdshack.com
>Subject: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO jpCHUMPler A MUST READ
>Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 18:07:02 -0700
> > picks and hit almost 80% and thank him again here for that great
> > handicapping. Haven't seen much like that from other guys who said
> > they
> > were real good. As soon as I can find a bookie I will win some more
> > with
> > the guy.
> One more Johnson fan posting from AOL. With an 80 percent record I would be
>living in Vegas with the legal books.
> Perhaps you are unable to find a bookie bacause you never paid off your guy
>after following I.M.s 20 percert winning rate.
I don't want to get in on this flame party, but isn't it odd that all of I.M.
Johnson's 'fans' are from AOL?
-pliskin
John Chandler
And none of them capitalize.
And they all have the same restricted vocabulary.
And they all make the same errors in grammar.
And none of them, until today, knew how to quote a previous post.
And several of them post the same sort of obscenities.
And they will send you obscene e-mail if you flame johnson.
AND NONE of them has ever posted ANYTHING on ANY topic
EXCEPT johnson!!
"Well, hello dere, Perfect Stranger!!"
-- The Amos 'n Andy Show
--
John Chandler
j...@a.cs.okstate.edu
Bonnie M Seidl
But we get your point.