info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Why liberals and conservatives will never agree on anything
64 views
Skip to first unread message
Bill Vanek
Oct 20, 2021, 9:53:53 PM10/20/21
to
It’s easy. They don’t argue with what you say. They instead know what you
really meant, and argue with that. And what they know you meant is *always*
something they passionately disagree with. So Dutch can call Brian an
anti-vaxxer based not on what he said, but on what Dutch knows he really
meant. And when I post the simple, direct statement that there are studies
claiming that most studies are bogus, Tim argues with me over whether most
studies are bogus, which is not what I claimed at all. So don’t ever claim
that there are research papers claiming that Hitler wasn’t all that bad,
because Tim will then claim that you are an apologist for Hitler.
It really is mental illness.
really meant, and argue with that. And what they know you meant is *always*
something they passionately disagree with. So Dutch can call Brian an
anti-vaxxer based not on what he said, but on what Dutch knows he really
meant. And when I post the simple, direct statement that there are studies
claiming that most studies are bogus, Tim argues with me over whether most
studies are bogus, which is not what I claimed at all. So don’t ever claim
that there are research papers claiming that Hitler wasn’t all that bad,
because Tim will then claim that you are an apologist for Hitler.
It really is mental illness.
Dutch
Oct 21, 2021, 12:14:36 AM10/21/21
to
On 2021-10-20 6:53 p.m., Bill Vanek wrote:
>> And when I post the simple, direct statement that there are studies
> claiming that most studies are bogus, Tim argues with me over whether most
> studies are bogus, which is not what I claimed at all.
Why did you post that article?
>> And when I post the simple, direct statement that there are studies
> claiming that most studies are bogus, Tim argues with me over whether most
> studies are bogus, which is not what I claimed at all.
BTSinAustin
Oct 21, 2021, 11:45:02 AM10/21/21
to
VegasJerry
Oct 21, 2021, 2:12:48 PM10/21/21
to
On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 at 6:53:53 PM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> It’s easy. They don’t argue with what you say.
Because you can't. We prove you have bad information, and you
> It’s easy. They don’t argue with what you say.
can't respond or answer, you Run & Hide and start a new thread.
//NEXT Troll//
VegasJerry
Oct 21, 2021, 2:16:11 PM10/21/21
to
On Thursday, October 21, 2021 at 8:45:02 AM UTC-7, BTSinAustin wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 at 9:53:53 PM UTC-4, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > It’s easy. They don’t argue with what you say. They instead know what you
> > really meant, and argue with that. And what they know you meant is *always*
> > something they passionately disagree with. So Dutch can call Brian an
> > anti-vaxxer based not on what he said, but on what Dutch knows he really
> > meant. And when I post the simple, direct statement that there are studies
> > claiming that most studies are bogus, Tim argues with me over whether most
> > studies are bogus, which is not what I claimed at all. So don’t ever claim
> > that there are research papers claiming that Hitler wasn’t all that bad,
> > because Tim will then claim that you are an apologist for Hitler.
> >
> > It really is mental illness.
> The reason is that we have been sold a ton of bullshit.
What bullshit?
> On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 at 9:53:53 PM UTC-4, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > It’s easy. They don’t argue with what you say. They instead know what you
> > really meant, and argue with that. And what they know you meant is *always*
> > something they passionately disagree with. So Dutch can call Brian an
> > anti-vaxxer based not on what he said, but on what Dutch knows he really
> > meant. And when I post the simple, direct statement that there are studies
> > claiming that most studies are bogus, Tim argues with me over whether most
> > studies are bogus, which is not what I claimed at all. So don’t ever claim
> > that there are research papers claiming that Hitler wasn’t all that bad,
> > because Tim will then claim that you are an apologist for Hitler.
> >
> > It really is mental illness.
> The reason is that we have been sold a ton of bullshit.
> The divide and conquer plan is alive and better than ever.
(And in confidence admit their fear of trump).
> No one can even debate anymore.
Dutch
Oct 21, 2021, 5:00:17 PM10/21/21
to
2020 US election is Biden won, Trump lost, period. Everything else is
noise. The facts about vaccines are that fully vaccinated people are
nearly 100% protected against serious illness and death. If everybody
got vaccinated we could return to normal immediately. Everything else is
noise. Where am I wrong?
BTSinAustin
Oct 21, 2021, 5:09:29 PM10/21/21
to
On Thursday, October 21, 2021 at 5:00:17 PM UTC-4, Dutch wrote:
> On 2021-10-21 8:44 a.m., BTSinAustin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 at 9:53:53 PM UTC-4, Bill Vanek wrote:
> >> It’s easy. They don’t argue with what you say. They instead know what you
> >> really meant, and argue with that. And what they know you meant is *always*
> >> something they passionately disagree with. So Dutch can call Brian an
> >> anti-vaxxer based not on what he said, but on what Dutch knows he really
> >> meant. And when I post the simple, direct statement that there are studies
> >> claiming that most studies are bogus, Tim argues with me over whether most
> >> studies are bogus, which is not what I claimed at all. So don’t ever claim
> >> that there are research papers claiming that Hitler wasn’t all that bad,
> >> because Tim will then claim that you are an apologist for Hitler.
> >>
> >> It really is mental illness.
> >
> >
> > The reason is that we have been sold a ton of bullshit. The divide and conquer plan is alive and better than ever. No one can even debate anymore. Ask a question and you're an anti-vaxxer or a socialist depending on which side of the 50-yard line you are on. All people can do is spout talking points. Sad but true.
> If you stick to the facts you can get through it. The fact about the
> 2020 US election is Biden won, Trump lost, period. Everything else is
> noise.
True
> On 2021-10-21 8:44 a.m., BTSinAustin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 at 9:53:53 PM UTC-4, Bill Vanek wrote:
> >> It’s easy. They don’t argue with what you say. They instead know what you
> >> really meant, and argue with that. And what they know you meant is *always*
> >> something they passionately disagree with. So Dutch can call Brian an
> >> anti-vaxxer based not on what he said, but on what Dutch knows he really
> >> meant. And when I post the simple, direct statement that there are studies
> >> claiming that most studies are bogus, Tim argues with me over whether most
> >> studies are bogus, which is not what I claimed at all. So don’t ever claim
> >> that there are research papers claiming that Hitler wasn’t all that bad,
> >> because Tim will then claim that you are an apologist for Hitler.
> >>
> >> It really is mental illness.
> >
> >
> > The reason is that we have been sold a ton of bullshit. The divide and conquer plan is alive and better than ever. No one can even debate anymore. Ask a question and you're an anti-vaxxer or a socialist depending on which side of the 50-yard line you are on. All people can do is spout talking points. Sad but true.
> If you stick to the facts you can get through it. The fact about the
> 2020 US election is Biden won, Trump lost, period. Everything else is
> noise.
The facts about vaccines are that fully vaccinated people are
> nearly 100% protected against serious illness and death. If everybody
> got vaccinated we could return to normal immediately. Everything else is
> noise.
Dutch
Oct 21, 2021, 5:49:19 PM10/21/21
to
from emerging is also the vaccine. I just got an email from one of my
poker buddies who wants me to resume hosting home games. It kills me to
say I'm not ready, and that is in large part due to the fact that Canada
has its share of knuckleheads.
VegasJerry
Oct 21, 2021, 7:52:29 PM10/21/21
to
part of his statement:
> Where am I wrong?
Care to answer?
Care to discuss?
Care to respond?
Tim Norfolk
Oct 21, 2021, 8:23:29 PM10/21/21
to
On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 at 9:53:53 PM UTC-4, Bill Vanek wrote:
I actually asked why you had talked about "you can find studies which say anything..." when I referred to a specific set of studies on a specific condition?
If you believe that those numbers are incorrect, you should be able to show it. Otherwise, you are simply trying to distract.
BTSinAustin
Oct 22, 2021, 11:43:04 AM10/22/21
to
VegasJerry
Oct 22, 2021, 3:58:31 PM10/22/21
to
0 new messages