Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

IRS- Shulman's Easter Egg Rolling Adventures

20 views
Skip to first unread message

Travel

unread,
May 31, 2013, 3:48:29 AM5/31/13
to
THe head of the Obama IRS, Shulman, visited the White House 157 (one hundred and fifty seven) times. That is, that we know about so far. That's roughly once every nine days on average.

How many times did the head of the IRS visit the Bush White House?

(Wait for it.)

ONCE!

Here's what veteran of the Clinton White House, Dick Morris, has to say:

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/morris-obama-irs-scandal/2013/05/30/id/507260



And let me save Risky Biz some typing:

"Quaaarrrk! quark! quark! quark! fat Dick Morris with cellulite, fired by FOX! Quaaarrrk! quark! quark quark!

Doesn't Risky Biz remind you of "The Penguin"?

risky biz

unread,
May 31, 2013, 11:25:26 AM5/31/13
to
It looks to me like the Obama White House improperly used the IRS to
suppress it's political enemies. Unlike you, I am capable of a principled
position.

For example: you being unable to admit that Michelle Bachmann was backing
out of a re-election run because she was doomed to defeat. You probably
have a worshipful fixation on her because she looks like an old
transvestite.

Travel A

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 12:08:47 AM6/1/13
to


Chortle, the only one who would think that Michele Bachmann looks like a
guy, it the gay Risky Biz.

Travel A

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 12:09:43 AM6/1/13
to




On May 29 2013 4:01 AM, Travel wrote:

Running for President again? Minnesota senate or governor?



Risky Biz blithered:
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/bachmann-re-election-wont-run/2013/05/29/id/506777
She's not running again because no one expects her to win:

I wrote:
No. That's a dumb comment.
She won this time, numbnuts. She's not going to announce that she's not
running again with two whole years until reelecton. She can announce
she's not running again at any time. There's something else going on
with her.

She's probably going to run for the Republican presidential nomination
again, but early and full-time, without the distraction of her
congressional office and House voting, etc. There won't be another
"Romney who's been running for five years and with big bucks" out there
this time around. She probably figures that she knows the mistakes she
made last time, and "won't do it again."

If she's out of congress in 2014, she starts right in campaigning for
the 2016 Republican presidential primaries; getting on all the ballots,
setting-up fund raising; sucking-up to the Tea Party.

It is highly doubtful that she could win statewide in blue-state
Minnesota, for senator the governorship.

Risky Biz:
"Mrs. Bachmann spent heavily in her last Congressional campaign and eked
out a victory by less than two percentage points.

I wrote:
Uh, she won.

Risky Biz:
Her opponent in that race had already declared his intention to run
against her again in 2014.

I wrote:
She addressed that in her video, Risky Forec. She said that's not the
reason and it's only the line put out by the left wing media. If she
runs again, she'd have the power of incumbancy against an opponent she
already beat. Why would she announce she's not running, two-years-out,
because of this loser?

Risky Biz (further quotes):
And so far this year her fund-raising has been paltry.

I wrote:
"So far THIS year"? Duh, the election is over, she won.

She had huge money from campaign fund raising for that election.

Risky Bizblithered:
Mrs. Bachmann raised less than $700,000 during the first three months of
the year, according to the most recent federal disclosures. That is less
than half of what she raised during the same period in 2011."
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/30/us/politics/michele-bachmann-wont-seek-re-election-next-year.html?_r=0

I wrote:
"So far THIS year"? Duh, the election is over, she won. In 2011? She was
also running for president, duh.

Also, a congressperson raising 700,000 in the three months after an
election is huge.

Risky Biz blithered:
Expect her to be shooting off her stupid mouth on talk radio or Fox
where she'll have a guaranteed audience of fantasy political junkies
like Travel.

I wrote:
Well, chortle, you were just shooting off your stupid mouth, above, and
got your ass kicked.

Also, I'm against Bachmann; note the thread title, dumbass (she's just a
phony opportunist, who would "deal" with the left; not a real
conservative). So, you don't get any satisfaction there, either. You
pretty much wasted your time, with only another humiliating ass-kicking
to show for it.




Travel A

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 12:14:46 AM6/1/13
to



The head of the Obama IRS, Shulman, visited the White House 157 (one

Travel A

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 12:13:16 AM6/1/13
to



On May 29 2013 6:01 AM, Travel wrote:
Running for President again? Minnesota senate or governor?

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/bachmann-re-election-wont-run/2013/05/29/id/506777



Doggstyle blithered:
another righty stunt cunt bites the dust


I wrote:
Uh, she won her reelection. How is that biting the dust? Her Democrat
opponent bit the dust.

halfpastdead

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 10:47:43 AM6/1/13
to
On May 31 2013 2:48 AM, Travel wrote:

> THe head of the Obama IRS, Shulman, visited the White House 157 (one hundred
and fifty seven) times.
> That is, that we know about so far. That's roughly once every nine days on
average.
>
> How many times did the head of the IRS visit the Bush White House?
>
> (Wait for it.)
>
> ONCE!
>
> Here's what veteran of the Clinton White House, Dick Morris, has to say:


DICK MORRIS.. Now there is a pillar of integrity and accuracy
>
>
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/morris-obama-irs-scandal/2013/05/30/id/507260
>
>
>
> And let me save Risky Biz some typing:
>
> "Quaaarrrk! quark! quark! quark! fat Dick Morris with cellulite, fired by
FOX! Quaaarrrk! quark!
> quark quark!
>
> Doesn't Risky Biz remind you of "The Penguin"?


*****************************************

I saw a bumper sticker about six months ago. It said: "Don't Mex with
Tejas".

---------------------------------------------------------------

Travel A

unread,
Jun 2, 2013, 12:57:45 AM6/2/13
to
We guess Doggystyle thinks Shulman's 157 visits to the White House is
inaccurate. There was some righty stunt cunt in the White House logging
in phony visits.

foldem

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 5:02:52 PM6/17/13
to
On Fri, 31 May 2013 00:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Travel
<trave...@gmail.com> wrote:

>THe head of the Obama IRS, Shulman, visited the White House 157 (one hundred and fifty seven) times. That is, that we know about so far. That's roughly once every nine days on average.
>

The IRS director was *scheduled* to attend meetings related to the ACA
implementation. He actually visited the WH 11 times in a 3 year
period.

Don't just puppet what Fox says - check it out before you complain.

Best,

Peter
--
"There are no strangers at BARGE, just friends you haven't met yet."
www.barge.org

Travel A

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 3:45:13 PM6/19/13
to


As an imbecile, you of course don't even understand the the issue.

The Issue: Shulman was asked by congress if he had ever discussed the
"IRS targeting of conservatives" with anyone in the White House. He
said that he didn't remember (words to that effect).

The point: if he had been to the White House 157 times, or if he had
been to the White House for a meeting eight and a half times, it
stretches credibility that the "IRS targeting" was never once discussed
or even mentioned to anyone in the White House.

The Bush administration's IRS director was at the White House a total of
once.

Also, it's your "information" about the number of Shulmn's visits that's
bogus. Shulman hasn't denied he had all those visits to the White House.
How could he, there are White House log-books. It Obviously doesn't
matter what the stated reason for the visits were; Obamacare, whatever,
there could be various, different subjects discussed at any meeting.

How could he deny discussing the IRS targeting of conservatives if that
was the stated reason for the visit in the White House log-books, duh.

There isn't going to be an official record stating "White House meeting:
to discuss the targeting of conservatives @ 2pm."

That's why congress wanted Shulman's personal statements about the
meetings on an official congressional investigation committee record.



If you don't know, don't post.





0 new messages