OT: Palin Family versus Kardashian Family

[da pickle no spam]

It looks like Sarah and the Palin clan are no match for Kris Jenner
and the Kardashian family. Bristol Palin’s new reality TV show has
flopped big time. But don’t worry Palin Freaks, it was just announced
that Sarah’s husband Todd is going to be in an upcoming reality show
on NBC. Is a Sarah Palin career boosting sex tape coming soon? It’s
sad to think that Sarah Palin once ran for Vice President of the
United States.

FROM THE BALTIMORE SUN
--------------------------------------------
“Ratings for Bristol's new show suggest Palins are reality-TV
roadkill. Looks like Lifetime Channel bet on a loser.

I don't care about the Palin's ignorance and screwed-up values
anymore. And judging from the overall lack of interest in Sarah
Palin's red-meat speech over the weekend, the rest of the media does
not care much either.

The Palins are finished - kaput. And I think what finally did Sarah
Palin and her family in was HBO's "Game Change." She will never be
taken seriously by anyone of the millions who saw that film. Let's
hear it for HBO.

The teen mom’s new reality effort on Lifetime just flopped out of the
gate. 'Bristol Palin: Life’s a Tripp' opened to a mere 726,000 viewers
and an anemic 0.2 rating among adults 18-49."
----------------------------
source link:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/tv/z-on-tv-blog/bal-ratings-bristol-palin-reality-tv-lifetime-20120620,0,3844949.story



FROM THE WASHINGTON POST
-------------------------------------------------
“Sarah Palin’s husband, Todd, is among those competing in NBC’s new
reality series “Stars Earn Stripes,” the network revealed Tuesday.

When ‘Stars Earn Stripes’ debuts in August, Todd will be part of a
lineup of “celebrities,” many of whom are serial reality-series
participants: boxing royalty Laila Ali, actor Dean Cain, former NFL
player Terry Crews, singer Nick Lachey, Olympic gold medalist Picabo
Street, NBC’s “The Biggest Loser” trainer Dolvett Quince and WWE star
Eve Torres.”
----------------------------
source link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/tv-todd-palin-to-be-on-stars-earn-stripes/2012/06/19/gJQAD79uoV_story.html

[Pepe Papon]

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:44:34 -0700 (PDT), da pickle no spam
<jcpi...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>It looks like Sarah and the Palin clan are no match for Kris Jenner
>and the Kardashian family. Bristol Palin’s new reality TV show has
>flopped big time.

But Bristol is hotter than any of the Kardashians.

> It’s
>sad to think that Sarah Palin once ran for Vice President of the
>United States.

Just wait till she announces that she's running for president!

--

Pepe "The Revelation" Papon

[brewmaster]

Travel already told us that if she had chosen to run she would have easily
won the nomination, and the whitehouse, but she prefers to be a king
maker. I believe Travel, he's one of the rgp "never wrong" crowd.

>
> --
>
> Pepe "The Revelation" Papon

--
Alan "The Hope" Gilbert

[Travel A]

No, I'm in the "if I'm wrong, I'm the first to admit it crowd." It's a
crowd of one: named, me.

Unlike you, and so many others, I only post when I'm right.

A Risky Biz or Turd will deliberately post only when they lie, for
example. It's as if they're trying to master their own, total lack of
character.

I think she may very well have won the nomination if she ran.

And she most definitely is a"king maker" if there ever was one. Sarah
Palin is far and away, light-years beyond anyone who has ever come
before in being directly responsible for putting candidates in office.
No contest, not even close.

However, I do believe that she "went for the money" over what would
obviously be a brutal fight to become President.

As far as Bristol Palin, I think she should achieve something on her
own, like get a job or go beyond a high school education. I posted a
long time ago that I thought that the pumping-up of Bristol Palin was a
bit unseemly, but if it helped with the "youth vote," then, well, okay.
But Sarah didn't even run.

I didn't watch the HBO movie. I don't need to to know that Schimdt and
Wallace are lying pondscum.

I'm not interested in, or watching the Bristol Palin show, either, btw.
But I'm sure they already paid her, and who cares if it tanks.

Bottom line, any blatant self-promotion for money by the Palins, is
nothing compared to the vicious scum of the left wing, anti-America
communists.

Most (the 75% conservative Republican electorate) understand all this,
and you can best believe they're still greatly influenced by Sarah
Palin's endorsements, and will so remain. Just check the on-going
elections.

She can well gloat, now, in that her enemies made her rich. I'm good
with that.

Brewmaster is in the RGP, "if it's too complicated, it makes my head
hurt," crowd.

[arseniccollection]

On 6/24/2012 15:35, Pepe Papon wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:44:34 -0700 (PDT), da pickle no spam
> <jcpi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It looks like Sarah and the Palin clan are no match for Kris Jenner
>> and the Kardashian family. Bristol Palin’s new reality TV show has
>> flopped big time.
>
> But Bristol is hotter than any of the Kardashians.

None of them are "hot". Bristol is well on her way to obesity, and she
wasn't a natural beauty to begin with.

>> It’s
>> sad to think that Sarah Palin once ran for Vice President of the
>> United States.
>
> Just wait till she announces that she's running for president!

I just watched "Game Change", the movie, and it (and SNL) basically
killed any future political-office opportunities for her.

[brewmaster]

Not really, I'm more in the "I just don't give a shit" crowd. I'm voting
for Romney, obviously. I said many months ago he'd win the nomination,
and I hope he wins the election.

[Travel A]

I'm voting for Romney, too. And if you said many months ago that Romney
would win the nomination, it was based on pure, obviously biased
speculation with zero substantive assessment of the situation to back it
up.

[Travel A]

Arsenholecollection blithered:

"I just watched "Game Change", the movie, and it (and SNL) basically
killed any future political-office opportunities for her."

I wrote:
You mean, in California. Actually, Carly took a good run at senator
there and, hypothetically, Sarah would have won it if she was in that
position to run.

Lol, oh, because YOU saw "Game Change." I see. Check the elections where
Sarah Palin's endorsements turned unknowns with no money into election
winners.

Just before Sarah Palin announced she wasn't running for President, she
was beating Obama among independents in the polls. In the 2010 mid term
elections, independents voted over 2 to 1 for the conservative
candidate. Sarah endorsed most of them.

She's still huge with conservatives if not even more so; a left wing,
fictional cable movie that a small percentage of people even saw, means
jackshit.

The more attacks from the left, the more she has always benefited in her
constituency poll numbers. She's untouchble as a conservative influence,
and has and will have more political influence than any other single
individual by far.

"Future political opportunities"?
She could become a senator from Arizona (she has residence) or Texas or
a southern state without even showing up.

Influence? You've heard of evangelicals, right?

She could also "primary" Romney in 2016 if he wins the presidency. It's
doubtful Romney would like to see that happen. Unlike in the Republican
primary where the vote was split, Sarah could have Mittens one-on-one
all to herself in an incumbent challenged, presidential primary (the
Republican electorate is 75% conservative and Tea Partiers, btw).

However, I do agree that they shouldn't have let Bristol loose. Hard to
argue with "the money opportunities," though.

[phlash74]

LMAO!

Would that be as opposed to the substantive assessment of the situation
you used to say that A) Sarah Palin was definitely going to run; B) She
was a lock for the nomination; and C) She would win the election?

Funny - when I said Romney would have the nomination locked up by March,
you said I was crazy and/or stupid. Yet both Nate Silver and you agree
that Romney effectively clinched the nomination with his victory in the
Michigan primary (to quote your oft-posted response to Fake Pickle "After
Michigan it was over, numbnuts"). That would be the primary held
on...let's see here...carry the 9...February 29.

Guess I just got completely lucky predicting that Romney would have the
nomination locked up by then months before the fact, at a time when Herman
Cain (chortle) was leading the polls.

Michael

-----------------
"> phlash
On your circle jerk k00l kidz email list. Should be disqualified for
that, but I'll give him a pass because he is smart." - ramashiva,
8/22/2010

"Hitler has already been forgiven, but you have not." - Reptillian AKA
Igotskillz, 4/6/2011

[da pickle no spam]

ROFLMAO!!! I told you way back in November of 2011 that Romney was
definitely be the GOP nominee. It was easily apparent to me because I
understand politics. Shortly thereafter on December 2, 2011 you posted
your now infamous post, ‘Oh, Risky Biz’.

Here’s the link in case you forgot. (chortle)
https://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.poker/browse_frm/thread/76550834e1a74874/4db7ed2d0f99fdc3?lnk=gst&q=o%2C+risky+biz#4db7ed2d0f99fdc3

I won’t embarrass you by printing in here but at the time you were
very confident, to say the least, that I would be wrong. But as it
turned out (just like in the Sarah Palin running thing) I was indeed
right and you were again wrong.

[da pickle no spam]

I think you admitted somewhere that you had not seen GAME CHANGE. I
really think if you would see it, even you would realize how wrong you
are in idolizing that bimbo Sarah Palin. The whole family is whack. I
am anxious to see how Todd Palin does in HIS upcoming reality TV show,
‘Stars Earn Stripes’.

He’s going to be going up against some major stars and big shots.
Here’s the line up.

-Dean Cain, former Superman
-Laila Ali, boxer and Dancing with the Stars contestant
-Terry Crews, former NFL player
-Nick Lachey, ex-hubby of Jessica Simpson
-Picabo Street, skier
-Dolvett Quince, trainer on NBC's The Biggest Loser
-Eva Torres, WWE wrestler

Here’s a photo: http://images.buddytv.com/articles/starsearnstripes.jpg
Todd is looking good.

ROLLING ON FLOOR LAUGHING MY FUCKING ASS OFF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Travel A]

Lol, one of the pleasures of having vastly superior intellect, is the
ease in which one can deliver the ass-kickings.

All your retarded sputting and blithering in the wake of your
humiliating defeat on every nuance of this, Risky Biz and Splashie, is
addressed right here, below.

Also, I'm humbled (chortle) that I'm so much a part of your lives.


Reread your endless number of ass-kickings, again:-):



nin...@webtv.net
From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz: "Already Lost"
Date: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:28 PM


Lol, back before the original "Newt Surge," you said that it was all
over and that Romney was definitely the nominee. I said that Newt had a
chance and further, predicted that, Newt, due to his debating skills and
rising to a more center debating
stage position, had a chance. He did, and he surged just as I
predicted. You lost. End of story.

Due to my, obviously, vastly superior analytical ability, I proved you
wrong and exposed you (not that it was really necessary) as a
media-parroting dumbfuck.

Trying to weasel and change your story to "who eventually wins the
nomination" won't save you: my stated position has always been that
Romney wins if the conservative field is split. And that's exactly
what's happening, just as I stated long ago.

You were, as usual, checkmated a long time ago.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: OT: Not that anyone except Travel is surprised, but... Group:
rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Oct 5, 2011, 5:08pm From: da pickle no
spam <jcpi...@hotmail.com>


On Oct 5, 4:28 pm, nine...@webtv.net (Travel A) wrote:

I wrote:
Lol, you merely had dumb luck on the up or down of Sarah running.

Also, with, within Sarah's numerous Fox commentaries stating that she's
thinking about running (stating she has "the fire in the belly" to run
for president in a Chris Wallace interview) and can beat Obama if she
does, the Rolling Thunder day, her historic America bus tour, her
documentary opening at a theater in Iowa, her big showing at the Iowa
State Fair/on Hannity's national television show, the professional
campaign video of it all, the big speech at Indianola Iowa, (organized
by a special tea party group for that purpose) huge tea party support
from all over the country and "owed" endorsements from those she put
into office in the 2010 mid-term elections, only a complete idiot like
Risky Biz would say she definitely wasn't running. Which Risky Biz did
say of course.

The left wing media and RINOs just said she wasn't running because it
reduced "buzz" and buzz increases poll numbers and can increase
contributions to her PAC.

So, one would either have to be a Sarah-hater or a dumb fuck or both to
declare she definitely wasn't running (rest assured that with Risky Biz,
all the above applies).

So, you still remain ass-kicked on every aspect that requires any
intelligent evaluation of the situation. What you "get out of it" is the
same as a broken clock being on the right time twice a day.

See how easy it is to kick your dumb ass. That's what you "get out of
it": another ass-kicking.

.........................................................
...........................................................

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
....................................
....................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

....................................
.......................................

From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM
Wow,
this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

....................................
....................................

From: Travel A
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 11:41 PM
To: nin...@webtv.net
Subject: Risky Biz- Romney "Definitely" Slam


Fake Pickel blithered:

and with Rick Perry


leading in the polls you thought he would be the nominee.



I wrote:
I never said Rick Perry would be the nominee, I said Rick Perry would be
my choice in the current field (Risky Biz-lie #1).

Fake Pickel blithered:


Next, you insisted that Herman Cain who was then leading in all the
polls would be the nominee.

I wrote:
I never said Cain would be the nominee, only that I was okay with Cain
if he did win (Risky Biz-lie #2).

However, you, on the other hand, in your total ignorance say that Romney
is definitely the nominee: this idiocy is based on Romney with, not ever
getting out of the mid 20s percent, and 75% of the Republican electorate
rejecting Romney and speading their support around six other candiates;
of whom, with any drop-outs, their support wouldn't be going to Romney,
but would go to the remaining, leading conservative
alternative-candidate to Romney. I.e., as the lesser candidates drop
off, Romney goes down in the spread.

So, as everyone can clearly see, your statements of Romney -definitely-
winning the nomination (at this point) is the very depth of publicly
displayed idiocy.

As I say, you've already lost.

....................................
....................................

Prev Next Normal view To: Travel A From: Travel A Subject: Splashie
(use) 5/3/12 Date: Thursday, May 3, 2012 5:38 AM

(This, of course, also applies to Risky Biz- who's the Fake Pickle)


May 2

I wrote:
- show quoted text -
Yes, that, as always, is quite easy: as I said from the beginning, if
the vote is split, Romney can win. The vote was split, and Romney won on
plurality contest wins.



Romney:

Iowa: 25%

New Hampshire, (one of his big states) a lousy 39%.

South Carolina: 28% and lost.

Florida: 46%, another weak plurality.

Nevada: a huge Mormon state for Romney and a disappointing 50%.

Colorado: Romney lost.

Minnesota: Romney lost.

Missouri: Romney lost.

Maine: another lousy plurality @ 39%.

Michigan: Another lousy plurality in another of Romney's "big states"


with 41%

Arizona: Romney-41%


After these contests it was de facto, over. With the Romney big-money,
the Romney "inevitability" set in. And, he still went on to lose states
in the south to a weak opponent with no money.

The vote was split as I just indisputably proved, and Romney won without
the majority of voters wanting him to be the nominee.

You lose. You're an imbecile.


May 2

I wrote:
Oh, and I'll destroy you on the "Romney 25% ceiling," again. This time
proved by the actual results.


Romney was at the mid 20s% throughout the many months and debates
leading up to the first contest in the Iowa caucus. Romney got 25% in
Iowa with ALL candidates in the race. I proved my point.


It was then, numbnuts, that Bachmann dropped out and Perry skipped New
Hampshire, giving Romney a smaller field-split to his advantage in New
Hampshire: his huge state, where he couldn't even get a majority of the
vote. Not even in the 40s%, coming in at 39%. This is in New Hampshire,
not a neutral state; where he clearly wouldn't have broken the 20s%.


Then Huntsman quit, giving Romney a boost in numbers and, even then,
Romney actually lost in South Carolina with 28%. That's in his 20s%
ceiling range, imbecile.


Romney squeaked by in the early states, which, these early states,
effectively gives a primary candidate the nomination.


After candidates start dropping out, and the remaining candidates'
contributions dry-up,the "frontrunner" gets votes that he wouldn't have
had otherwise: a significant percentage of voters will just give up on
their preferred candidate and turn to the frontrunner; therefore, after
the early contests, much of the Romney vote-percentage increase was just
merely by default after a certain point.


And the media beat-back Romney's conservative opponents (Herman
Caine,Rick Perry and Newt) as much as Romney's big Wall Street money.


Bottom line: Romney had 75% of the Republican electorate that didn't
want him as the nominee.

Just as I stated at the beginning, and just as I'm proving, now.

That's the trouble with imbeciles like, Splashie, (and, of course,
"Risky Biz") they're too dumb to know when they get an ass-kicking, and
one has to waste their time totally humiliating them in the end.

....................................
....................................

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
....................................
....................................


This post is about: "The boy who hides from the real Pickel." 


Fact: Sarah Palin did not endorse anyone in the Nevada 2010 senate race.
Out of the countless ass-kickings and lies exposures of Risky Biz on a
daily basis, I've merely reposted a few of my favorites.

Here's a few of the countless many:


From: Travel A
Subject: Risky Biz "Own Ears"
Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:38 AM


This was to "da pickel no spam" (who's Risky Biz-the Fake Pickel) a
creep who, pathetically, is too dumb to even successfully hide behind a
phony username.
The fake, lying "da pickel no spam" (Risky Biz) claimed that Sarah Palin
endorsed Sharron Angle in the Nevada Repubican primary for the U.S.
senate election. He further, bogusly claimed that he "heard it with his
own ears" at Sarah Palin's Searchlight Nevada speech. He lied, and I
proved it.

So, you can see why the fake "pickel no spam" is so upset and can't
forget his public humiliation (chortle):

Re: ot: Sarah Palin's most embarrassing screw-up yet? Group:
rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Jul 7, 2010, 1:55am From: Travel A
<nin...@webtv.net>


Heard it with your "own ears," huh, lol. This is what we call a total
moron-ass-kicking.

http://www.examiner.com/x-44562-National-News-Headlines-Editor~y2010m6d9-Sarah-Palins-endorsement-is-the-winning-ticket-in-key-races-in-Calif-SC-and-Iowa

Toward the end of the article, note well that Sarah Palin endorsed no
one in the Nevada, Republican senate primary race. In fact, Sarah Palin
gave a"shout-out" to Sue Lowden (not Sharron Angle) at another Nevada
speech, elsewhere.

"Risky Biz" lied through his teeth and got caught.

..................

Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Fri, Nov 26, 2010, 8:29pm
From: da pickle nospam <jcpi...@hotmail.com>


On Nov 26, 8:58 pm, "Irish Mike" <ad7c...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

"Sarah Palin made a slip of the tongue, on one word, in an interview and
immediately corrected it."


Risky Biz (who's the fake pickel) blithered:

"Sorry to correct you because I know how easily you are annoyed by facts
but actually it was Glenn Beck interviewing her who corrected HER. Had
he not she would still believe that North Korea was a U.S. ally."


I wrote:
Here are the facts. The fact is that Sarah was fully prepared to discuss
North/South Korea and saying "North" was clearly just a slip of the
tongue. She first, correctly, referred to whether the White Houe has the
balls to sanction North Korea. So, clearly, she used the name "North
Korea" in the correct context BEFORE she, later, misspoke in using that
same name.

Let's see if you idiots can read a transcript and realize what I'm
talking about. I'll grade you on your reading comprehension "abilities."

This vindicates Sarah, entirely.

So, Risky Biz, it seems it's you who's afraid of the facts, doesn't it.


Here's the entire interview Q & A with regard to Korea:

Cite:http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/196/48554/

Quote, (relevant from the article):

PAT: And polls show that you would probably win the Republican
nomination. How would you handle a situation like just developed in
North Korea?

SARAH PALIN: Well, North Korea, this is stemming from I think a greater
problem when we're all sitting around asking, "Oh, no, what are we going
to do" and we're not having a lot of faith that the White House is going
to come out with a strong enough policy to sanction what it is that
North Korea's going to do. So this speaks to a bigger picture here that
certainly scares me in terms of our national security policies. But
obviously got to stand with our North Korean allies. We're bound to by
treaty. We're also bound to by ‑‑

STU: South Korea.

SARAH PALIN: Yeah. And we're also bound by prudence to stand with our
South Korean allies, yes. And, you know, to remind North Korea, well,
we're not going to reward bad behavior and we're not going to walk away
and we do need to press China to do more to increase pressure on that
arena.



GLENN: How do we press China? I mean, Sarah, I'm going to go way out on
a lunatic fringe here but I've talked to enough people are in this
missile business who say that was not an airplane contrail that we saw
off the coast of California. It is my belief that that was a
two‑stage missile launched by China telling, sending a signal
that the world has changed. They're dropping the dollar in their trade
with Russia today. I mean, they control the world. The world has
changed. We're no longer the superpower that we were even two years ago.

SARAH PALIN: Well, that's right. And China's going to own our notes
because we are becoming so beholden on them. And a lot of this has to do
with energy. When we're not allowed to responsibly exploit our own
natural resources, and that's, of course, one of the ways that America
grew into such a prosperous nation.

GLENN: Yes.

SARAH PALIN: We developed domestically our own energy supplies. Instead
as we're reliant on foreign sources of energy, here's one thing that we
can do in pressing China. They need to restrict energy exports to North
Korea. But do you think that the Obama administration gets that and
understands why we would need to? No, they do not because they're still
locking up the lands that are warehousing our own domestic supplies of
energy. So they have it all wrong on energy policy to start with.

...................


On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


....................................
Re: "Machete"
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:14am
From: Travel A <nin...@webtv.net>


Re: "Machete"
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:50am (PDT+3)
From: jb <joe...@comcast.net>

(jb, Written to Risky Biz)
"You have listed many great movies and quite a few bad ones. What this
has to do with Tarantino is dubious at best. This list clearly proves
that you are gay by the way."


I wrote:
(Chortle)
..................................

[Pepe Papon]

On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:09:13 -0700, "brewmaster"
<a1...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

>>
>> Just wait till she announces that she's running for president!
>
>Travel already told us that if she had chosen to run she would have easily
>won the nomination, and the whitehouse, but she prefers to be a king
>maker. I believe Travel, he's one of the rgp "never wrong" crowd.

The "never admits he's wrong" crowd would be a lot more accurate..

[Pepe Papon]

You were right and he as wrong on every point, but he kicked your ass!
Checkmate!

[Pepe Papon]

On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:57:15 -0700, arseniccollection <g...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>
>I just watched "Game Change", the movie, and it (and SNL) basically
>killed any future political-office opportunities for her.

I disagree. Her future opportunities were killed by Sarah being
Sarah.

[Travel A]

I did kick their ass, Poupon, and unfortunately for you, and unlike your
dumb-assed "quips," I always prove it, and in full detail.

But that's what really bothers you, I'm also kicking your ass by proxy.
That really is enjoyable.

[Travel A]

[Travel A]

After Michigan it was over, numbnuts. It was the spilt vote that got
Romney to that point as the frontrunner. You lose. Whatever I posted
about Newt's surges, etc., was true. What's your point? You lose.

As I said from the beginning. If the vote is split, Romney can win. The
vote was split and Romney won, just as I predicted; and stored in the
archives. I was right, you lose (chortle).
...................................
...................................

Sarah Palin also, at the same time and after, was saying nice things
about Santorum.

She didn't endorse, Newt, numbnuts, and that's a fact you can't escape.
If she did endorse him, she could have held Tea Party rallies, got the
various Tea Party voters to back Newt and away from Santorum, and raised
money, etc. She didn't do that. You lose (chortle)

...................................
......................................

From: Travel A Subject: Risky Biz-Sarah Obsession Date: Friday, December
9, 2011 10:26 AM
Wow,
this is more fun that I could ever have hoped.

Risky Biz freaks and hates Newt as much as Sarah. So, he's right back
where he started (chortle).

80% of my posts having to do with Sarah Palin have been in repsonse to
Risky Biz sputtering vitriol and tearing his hair out over her. That's
80% of the posts where I wouldn't be posting about Sarah Palin,
otherewise. But, note well, Risky Biz, DID: now there's your obsession,
folks.


Emotional investment? Holy shit! has there ever been anyone more hate-
obsessed than Risky Biz (who's the fake Pickel) over Sarah Palin?

And now he's equally freak-hating over Newt! Gotta luv that.

...................................
...................................

Unfortunately for you, you've already taken numerous, well detailed,
well witnessed ass-kickings on all of your blitherings.

But keep up what surely has to be a rather tedious obsession, with only
a humiliating result to show for it (chortle).
...................................
...................................

On Dec 24, 1:20 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:


On Dec 24 2011 11:40 AM, da pickle wrote:



Susan wrote:
"I take my Christmas greeting to you back, risky. You remain the coward
and
no account (insert favorite pejorative here) you proved and continue to
prove yourself to be.

It is amazing how little he must think of himself to post as you. And so
insecure in himself that he tries to ruin the whole newsgroup with his
childish antics.

Really a sad sad case."


I wrote:

(titter)


...................................

[brewmaster]

I like that you can't come up with a better derogatory name for me than
"goofmaster" or for phlash than "splashie". Those names sound like a 12
year old thought of them. Try to come up with something that might
actually piss us off, cause those only make us laugh.

[Travel]

Those names are designed to display you as treated with the disrespect that you deserve. You're like a 12 year old, and you're treated like one. And yes, they obviously do bother you, greatly. Good.

Next baboon, please.

[phlash74]

I decided to test the Carbon Poker software out last week and when I
installed it, for some reason phlash74 wasn't available, so I made my user
name Splashie instead.

[Travel A]

And that's what the next baboon sounds like.

[Pepe Papon]

On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:26:21 -0700, "brewmaster"
<a1...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

>On Jun 27 2012 9:49 PM, Travel A wrote:
>
>> I did kick their ass, Poupon, and unfortunately for you, and unlike your
>> dumb-assed "quips," I always prove it, and in full detail.
>>
>> But that's what really bothers you, I'm also kicking your ass by proxy.
>> That really is enjoyable.
>
>I like that you can't come up with a better derogatory name for me than
>"goofmaster" or for phlash than "splashie". Those names sound like a 12
>year old thought of them.

You're seriously underestimating the intelligence and creativity of
12-year-olds. My kids were beyond that level by first grade.

[Travel A]

And there's a baboon from California. Fascinating, call Marlon Perkins.

[Travel A]

"Those names are designed to display you as being treated with the