Doyle brunson
JDOLLAR10
johnny moss were the Biggest cheaters in town that all you guys got your
bankrolls by cheating and jack straus selling dope.you also must have :stole 5
million from major riddle alone.What about the camera you and jack had at the
horshoe and a I you know what I am talking about doyle...by the way how much
have you and chip cheated out of thos guy down in la costa ....San Diego.The
funny thing evreyone talks about what a cheat johnny moss was because he is
dead or about how bad stuey was because he is gone also .Well your still alive
and you were just as big as cheats as they were and you still are.Doyle the
fact that you could even post on here anything other than you were atound in
the days were all that poker was is a way to steal a guys money.Also what about
R.D in dallas...Jack Binion saved your ass many a time
Brian Rice
jdol...@aol.com (JDOLLAR10) writes:
>Why dont you let everyone know about how you and jack strauss, puggy pearson,
Woo, ee cummings speaks, thanks for your input. Go back to drugs asshole.
--
Bri
mailto:b...@whitestone.com
http://www.whitestone.com
John A. D. Cervanyk
> <some trash>
Out for a Saturday morning troll, are we?
--
Take care,
John A. D. Cervanyk --- ja...@dnvr.uswest.net
Crawl back under your rock.
MrHeadsup
>From: jdol...@aol.com (JDOLLAR10)
>Date: 10/7/00 1:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20001007043038...@ng-fd1.aol.com>
>
>Why dont you let everyone know about how you and jack strauss, puggy pearson,
Wow my man, tell it like it is! Preach on with the gospel! As I've said again
and again, where there is smoke there is fire. Sounds like you know your
stuff, I'm sure some of that has to be a little true, preach on. It's about
time the truth comes out about the glorified scumbags in the poker world,
Preach on brotha, preach on!
>
>
>
>
>
RazzO
FU
razzo
On 07 Oct 2000 08:30:38 GMT, jdol...@aol.com (JDOLLAR10) wrote:
>Why dont you let everyone know about how you and jack strauss, puggy pearson,
>johnny moss were the Biggest cheaters in town that all you guys got your
>bankrolls by cheating and jack straus selling dope.you also must have :stole 5
>million from major riddle alone.What about the camera you and jack had at the
>horshoe and a I you know what I am talking about doyle...by the way how much
>have you and chip cheated out of thos guy down in la costa ....San Diego.The
>funny thing evreyone talks about what a cheat johnny moss was because he is
>dead or about how bad stuey was because he is gone also .Well your still alive
>and you were just as big as cheats as they were and you still are.Doyle the
>fact that you could even post on here anything other than you were atound in
>the days were all that poker was is a way to steal a guys money.Also what about
>R.D in dallas...Jack Binion saved your ass many a time
________________________________________________________
|* POKERWORLD.COM
|* POKERwwwORLD by RazzO - http://www.pokerworld.com
|* The Poker Show - http://www.poker2000.com
| EMAIL ra...@pokerworld.com or ra...@lvmc.com
| ADVERTISE @ http://www.pokerworld.com/spaceavail.html
__________________________________________________
RazzO
"FU, scumbag!!!!!!" - Howard Stern(no relation to Dr. Stern :)
http://www.pokerworld.com/openfl1.swf
One of my most proudess moments... and greatest photos...
Barring the one of Jack Binion and I...
http://www.pokerworld.com/DCP_2605a.jpg
...look at Joe Kennedy?
razzo
On 07 Oct 2000 19:24:47 GMT, mrhe...@aol.com (MrHeadsup) wrote:
>>Subject: Doyle brunson
>>From: jdol...@aol.com (JDOLLAR10)
>>Date: 10/7/00 1:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time
>>Message-id: <20001007043038...@ng-fd1.aol.com>
>>
>>Why dont you let everyone know about how you and jack strauss, puggy pearson,
>>johnny moss were the Biggest cheaters in town that all you guys got your
>>bankrolls by cheating and jack straus selling dope.you also must have :stole
>>5
>>million from major riddle alone.What about the camera you and jack had at the
>>horshoe and a I you know what I am talking about doyle...by the way how much
>>have you and chip cheated out of thos guy down in la costa ....San Diego.The
>>funny thing evreyone talks about what a cheat johnny moss was because he is
>>dead or about how bad stuey was because he is gone also .Well your still
>>alive
>>and you were just as big as cheats as they were and you still are.Doyle the
>>fact that you could even post on here anything other than you were atound in
>>the days were all that poker was is a way to steal a guys money.Also what
>>about
>>R.D in dallas...Jack Binion saved your ass many a time
>
>Wow my man, tell it like it is! Preach on with the gospel! As I've said again
>and again, where there is smoke there is fire. Sounds like you know your
>stuff, I'm sure some of that has to be a little true, preach on. It's about
>time the truth comes out about the glorified scumbags in the poker world,
>Preach on brotha, preach on!
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
________________________________________________________
mike_...@my-deja.com
What makes you sure? Sounds like you are biased.
M>N>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
TEX DOLLY
you come out from under your rock. Maybe you could write a movie with your
demented mind. Doyle Brunson
timmer
expect to find such a troll.
timmer
DrToast
DrToast
Pokerpunk
>Date: 10/7/00 4:30 AM Ea
>
>Why dont you let everyone know about how you and jack strauss, puggy pearson,
>johnny moss were the Biggest cheaters in town that all you guys got your
>bankrolls by cheating and jack straus selling dope
>ou also must have :stole 5
>million from major riddle alone.What
Do you have any kind of proof?Or are you just flaming?Or maybe you sat down
with the big boys a few times and got beat?You claim Doyle knows whatr your
talking about.Hell,He probably doesnt even know you!I guess if Doyles a
cheat,so is Mike Caro,one of his friends and co authors of super system,THE
book on big poker.Hmmm,he dosent mention cheating in there.I guess he cheated
his way into 2 wsop championships and i dont know how many other events at
wsop.By the way,Mike is for honesty in the game,I'm sure he would like to smoke
all cheaters out of poker.
RazzO
much as Anita Bryant needs a pair of warm pink panties over her head.
razzo
________________________________________________________
Jim Geary
> I guess he cheated his way into 2 wsop championships and i dont know
> how many other events at wsop.
About 6 others I think.
Jim Geary
jimgeary.com - something to bore everyone
RazzO
razzo
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000 01:26:38 -0700, Jim Geary <jay...@primenet.com>
wrote:
>On 8 Oct 2000, Pokerpunk wrote:
>
>> I guess he cheated his way into 2 wsop championships and i dont know
>> how many other events at wsop.
>
>About 6 others I think.
>
>Jim Geary
>jimgeary.com - something to bore everyone
>
>
________________________________________________________
RazzO
razzo
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000 01:26:38 -0700, Jim Geary <jay...@primenet.com>
wrote:
>On 8 Oct 2000, Pokerpunk wrote:
>
>> I guess he cheated his way into 2 wsop championships and i dont know
Gary Carson
about him that I've heard about Johnny Moss and some others.
But, the fact that he is a good poker player doesn't mean he's not a cheat.
I don't know where y'all got a silly idea like that. Most cheats are bad
poker players, that doesn't mean they all are.
I've never heard anything that suggests to me that Brunson is a cheat. But,
you guys sure aren't making the aruguements in his favor that you think you
are.
The fact that he didn't mention cheating in his chapter on no-limit sure
isn't an arguement that he's not a cheat. Lot's of cheating goes on in
private nolimit games, his lack of mention of it might make some wonder why.
For the kneejerk among you who can't stand anything that even hints of being
critical of some imagined icon, read this post twice before you jump on my
about it.
--
Gary Carson
www.garycarson.com
Jim Geary wrote in message ...
>On 8 Oct 2000, Pokerpunk wrote:
>
>> I guess he cheated his way into 2 wsop championships and i dont know
OKLAJOHNNY
>From: texd...@aol.com (TEX
>DOLLY)
>Date: 10/7/00 7:27 PM Pacifi
>Daylight Time
Hi -- to all ; I think Poker Players as a group or the most honorable of any
other group of people on the earth. I have been asked many times--Johnny who is
the best player you have ever played with?--My answer is always the same -----
Doyle (Tex Dolly)Brunson--and I think his son Todd is the best young player--I
have played with both and I don't play with cheaters and I would not have
recommended that Doyle Brunson be inducted into the Seniors Poker Players Hall
Of Fame if he were not an honorable player .Lets all clean up poker and stop
the attacks on each other leave that up to Gore and Bush--They will do enough
of that--We should not come down to their level. Stay Lucky O.K.Johnny
Craig
what ever we want in the privacy of our own homes and leave these words on
any of a million + bulletin boards. This does not mean that this individual
isn't telling the truth, but he or she must provide more evidence then this.
In today's world it is too easy to say anything on the internet, and it must
be taken with a grain of salt. Take the stock market boards for example.
Considering the era that Mr. Brunson was brought up in, and especially
considering his chosen profession, it wouldn't necessarily be such a shock.
His very own book, ("Super System") of which I have, mentions his early days
of playing in very dangerous neighborhoods; in backrooms run by mobsters.
This can be found on page 6, the second paragraph. This will mention only
one area, but at the time, where else was he and the other players going to
find games throughout their travels?
I am NOT lambasting Mr. Brunson. I have never met the man, though it would
be great to get to know him. I would love to hear his stories of the old
days, regardless of how good or bad they may seem. As a matter of fact that
may be a good idea for him to base another book on.
Back to the book...
Doyle takes the time to talk about his wife, the serious life threatening
ailment he faced as well as the rest of his family. It is also known that
his wife is a devoted Christian. This does not guarantee that he was on the
up and up all those years, but could he have loved this women, and his
daughter, the way he has for so many years keeping such dark secrets hidden
from them?
As easy as one can say things about the time and era he played in (early
days that is) it is also known how men were more devoted to the women they
loved. I can go on and on with this but lets face it, without evidence
these are nothing but words and that is the point.
JDollar10, whomever this person is, has absolutely no evidence. Mr.
Brunson appears to be a very nice person who I would like to meet someday.
JDollar10 was probably beaten by Doyle many times and blames Doyle for his
or her losses, rather then admit that they are just a poor poker player.
--
Craig
Bub...@home.com
"JDOLLAR10" <jdol...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20001007043038...@ng-fd1.aol.com...
> Why dont you let everyone know about how you and jack strauss, puggy
pearson,
> johnny moss were the Biggest cheaters in town that all you guys got your
> bankrolls by cheating and jack straus selling dope.you also must have
:stole 5
Steve Brecher
> ... I would love to hear [Doyle Brunson's] stories of the old
> days, regardless of how good or bad they may seem. As a matter of fact
that
> may be a good idea for him to base another book on.
"According to Doyle: (Poker Wisdom from the World Champion)" by Doyle
Brunson; A Gambling Times book distributed by Lyle Stuart; 1984; ISBN
0-89746-003-0.
Mark Boyer
was a way of life. Did they play by the rules? What rules? Only one rule.
Never give a sucker an even break. Did they play in less than straight up
games? Yes. Did they beat the less than honest at their own game? Sure they
did. It wasn't about integrity in gambling, it was about getting the money.
Was Doyle Brunson around when this was going on. Sure he was. So what?
"Gary Carson" <garyc...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:8rqlcv$h8k$1...@slb3.atl.mindspring.net...
Dsklansky
>Never give a sucker an even break.
If that was once the only rule and it isn't now, when did things change? Just
curious.
hippiechuckI
Chuck
In article <gBvE5.3510$GA1.2...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
--
I contradict myself? very well then I contradict
myself. I am large. I contain multitudes.
from WALT WHITMANS Leaves of Grass.
JIM CULBERTSON
Brunson never cheated in his life. He is an honorable man and you sir are a
miserable piece of dung. Please spread your filth somewhere else other than
the poker rpg. You better never show up in West Texas.
Big Jim
JDOLLAR10 wrote in message <20001007043038...@ng-fd1.aol.com>...
>
roGER
Rest assured, nobody here takes this stupid troll seriously - I'm afraid a
famous person like yourself has to take this kind of ugly personal attack from
time to time. Don't bother trying to contact him - he's not worth the slightest
effort!
- roGER
Mark Napolitano
Gentleman, (yes I will stand up and be counted as a fan of the greatest
living
Poker Legend) I am sure he wouldn't mind us just calling him "Doyle"
--
Be Lucky
Mark Napolitano
www.pokerpages.com Daily Updates
roGER <Roger_...@Datawatch.com> wrote in message
news:39E38750...@Datawatch.com...
genejmpr
Nobody should reply to this type of character assasination from an
annonomous source. A response of any sort is just what the initial
poster was looking for.
Best,
John
JP Massar
<jim.cul...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> I know for sure that Doyle
>Brunson never cheated in his life.
Wow! That's quite a claim. How could person X ever KNOW FOR SURE
that person Y never cheated in his life?
Sometimes I am simply overwhelmed at the seemingly superhuman
abilities of some reg.gambling.poker posters.
(And no, I don't mean Barbara Yoon)
(And no, I don't mean to imply in any way that I think Doyle has
cheated in his life. I don't know. But then, I'm only human)
Bill T
"JP Massar" <mas...@alum.mit.edu> wrote in message
news:39e3ab77...@news.mindspring.com...
The answer is obvious: "JIM CULBERTSON" is really Doyle Brunson.
Bill T
"SwamperTw" <swam...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20001010210853...@ng-cj1.aol.com...
> >From: "Bill T" wct...@pacbell.net
>
> >The answer is obvious: "JIM CULBERTSON" is really Doyle Brunson
>
no,i
> am not Doyle Brunson.
O yeah? What are your SAT's ?
(Oh boy! Another product of the American school system. How da
hell do they learn to get on AOL? Wait...never mind.)
Bill T
SwamperTw
ddaver...@my-deja.com
without proof? You say the Brunson supporter's arguments are not
helping exhonerate Brunson. You are probably right.
But unsupported allegations of cheating do not need to be defended in
the first place. Without proof, they are meaningless. And made
anonymously, they are nothing but scandalous. While uninformed posters
may be quick to defend a legend without substance in their defense, the
equal lack of substance in the attack is enough to make their defense
perfect. They carry the day.
BobA928674
>yes I will stand up and be counted as a fan of the greatest
>living
>Poker Legend) I am sure he wouldn't mind us just calling him "Doyle"
Actually, I prefer to be called Bob.
roGER
Oh well, I was trying to be respectful and look where it got me ($4-$8).
Thanks,
- roGER
Mark Napolitano wrote:
> That should of course be Mr. "Brunson", or being that he is an absolute
> Gentleman, (yes I will stand up and be counted as a fan of the greatest
> living
> Poker Legend) I am sure he wouldn't mind us just calling him "Doyle"
>
Nick Christensen
Unfortunately, this book is out of print, and rather difficult to find
on the used market. Hopefully the Gambling Times folks will reprint
this fine work.
--
Nick Christenson
n...@jetcafe.org
Bill Alan
He doesn't have to.
Bill Alan
Tom Weideman
vc...@aol.com wrote on 10/11/00 2:37 PM:
> There is one very obvious reason to believe that Doyle never cheats.
>
> He doesn't have to.
I don't have a comment one way or the other about DB's modus operandi. But
I do know that the above comment just begs the question. I'll spell it out:
TW: Does Doyle cheat?
BA: No.
TW: How do you know?
BA: He doesn't have to.
TW: How do you know that?
BA: Because he is a successful player.
TW: How do you know his success doesn't come from cheating?
BA: How dare you say that Doyle cheats!
TW: I didn't... and we're through talking.
Tom Weideman
lvdlrs
the illusion of it a criteria for cheating? So I guess all the rich
kids never ever tried to cheat anyone?
Gary (just to get over on someone is reason enough to some)
Philips
Bill Alan wrote:
> There is one very obvious reason to believe that Doyle never cheats.
>
> He doesn't have to.
>
> Bill Alan
CodeSavvy
>
>in article 20001011173728...@ng-fg1.aol.com, Bill Alan at
>vc...@aol.com wrote on 10/11/00 2:37 PM:
>
>>
>> He doesn't have to.
>
>I do know that the above comment just begs the question. I'll spell it out:
>
>TW: Does Doyle cheat?
>BA: No.
>TW: How do you know?
>BA: He doesn't have to.
>TW: How do you know that?
>BA: Because he is a successful player.
>TW: How do you know his success doesn't come from cheating?
Actually there are many reasons to believe that his success comes from excellent
playing.
Tom Weideman
CodeSavv...@newsguy.com wrote on 10/11/00 11:57 PM:
> In article <B60A3A9A.29939%zwi...@pacbell.net>, Tom says...
>
>> in article 20001011173728...@ng-fg1.aol.com, Bill Alan at
>> vc...@aol.com wrote on 10/11/00 2:37 PM:
>>
>>> There is one very obvious reason to believe that Doyle never cheats.
>>>
>>> He doesn't have to.
>>>
>> I don't have a comment one way or the other about DB's modus operandi. But I
>> do know that the above comment just begs the question. I'll spell it out:
>>
>> TW: Does Doyle cheat? BA: No. TW: How do you know? BA: He doesn't have to.
>> TW: How do you know that? BA: Because he is a successful player. TW: How do
>> you know his success doesn't come from cheating?
>>
> Actually there are many reasons to believe that his success comes from
> excellent playing.
And thank you for listing them. BTW, even if you do so now, it doesn't
change the fact that the original poster didn't do it, which was my whole
point.
I'd really appreciate seeing some real, honest-to-goodness solid use of
compelling logic occasionally in this newsgroup, rather than the steady
stream of knee-jerk responses that are so prevalent.
Tom Weideman
James Hoffmann
Ooops, was that a knee jerk reaction???
Tom Weideman <zwi...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:B60AF184.299D2%zwi...@pacbell.net...
mdm...@my-deja.com
texd...@aol.com (TEX DOLLY) wrote:
> I tried to e-mail this coward but he is hiding under a false name.
Why don't
> you come out from under your rock. Maybe you could write a movie with
your
> demented mind. Doyle Brunson
Isn't JDollar the guy who was spamming on and on about TJ and others
after WSOP? Just ignore the loser.
Rick Nebiolo
You wrote:
>I'd really appreciate seeing some real, honest-to-goodness solid use of
>compelling logic occasionally in this newsgroup, rather than the steady
>stream of knee-jerk responses that are so prevalent.
A lot of us wish you would post more on 2+2. We promise to avoid
knee-jerk responses whenever possible; however, sometimes we may throw
in a jerky or dumb response just to make you feel at home.
Regards,
Rick Nebiolo
jimb...@my-deja.com
where real poker hands and situations are intelligently discussed. The
majority of postings here on rgp are trivial having nothing to do with
poker, feeble attempts at humor and sarcasms, and personal attacks on
other posters.
In article <B60AF184.299D2%zwi...@pacbell.net>,
> I'd really appreciate seeing some real, honest-to-goodness solid use
of
> compelling logic occasionally in this newsgroup, rather than the
steady
> stream of knee-jerk responses that are so prevalent.
>
> Tom Weideman
JohnnyD
itself. But it is a good place to find out what's going on in the poker
world. On any "open" forum, you're going to have all of the things you
mentioned.
But I hope you don't think 2+2 is perfect. An example, I made a post where
my views were different from the majority. This was on the tournament
forum. DS only has one post in that active forum. All he said was "JohnnyD
is wrong". I asked him to clarify, he did not. I mentioned it in another
post wondering why he did not respond and got no answer. In a personal
email to a friend, who I know is a big DS and MM supporter, I asked him why
he thought DS did not respond. I really don't care if he responds, what he
thinks matters little in my life, I just don't agree when some paint 2+2 as
a better forum.
JohnnyD
<jimb...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8s7nqe$4pl$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Sunfish
have time to deal with 2+2. Please keep posting here.
Best Regards,
Paul Person
Rick Nebiolo wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> You wrote:
>
> >I'd really appreciate seeing some real, honest-to-goodness solid use of
> >compelling logic occasionally in this newsgroup, rather than the steady
> >stream of knee-jerk responses that are so prevalent.
>
Dsklansky
>my views were different from the majority. This was on the tournament
>forum. DS only has one post in that active forum. All he said was "JohnnyD
>is wrong". I asked him to clarify, he did not. I mentioned it in another
>post wondering why he did not respond and got no answer.
I don't check out our tournament forum very often. I must have felt your error
was obvious and that others would tell you why. I have no recollection of it.
If you repost it here, I'll answer it.
Gary Carson
where the games are so good he's gotta keep spamming this news group to try
to round up new players.
--
Gary Carson
www.garycarson.com
jimb...@my-deja.com wrote in message <8s7nqe$4pl$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>Tom, I agree with Rick Nebiolo, and I think you should post more on 2+2
>where real poker hands and situations are intelligently discussed. The
>majority of postings here on rgp are trivial having nothing to do with
>poker, feeble attempts at humor and sarcasms, and personal attacks on
>other posters.
>
>
>> I'd really appreciate seeing some real, honest-to-goodness solid use
>of
>> compelling logic occasionally in this newsgroup, rather than the
>steady
>> stream of knee-jerk responses that are so prevalent.
>>
SwamperTw
Horseshoe?OMG!!Cameras at a casino?Whats the world coming too?
SwamperTw
>Date: 10/13/00 3:29 PM Eastern
>Tom, I agree with Rick Nebiolo, and I think you should post more on 2+2
>where real poker hands and situations are intelligently discussed. The
>majority of postings here on rgp are trivial having nothing to do with
>poker, feeble attempts at humor and sarcasms, and personal attacks on
>other posters.
Gee,thats what makes rgp so much more interesting than 2+2
Darren Rowley
>Tom, I agree with Rick Nebiolo, and I think you should post more on 2+2
>where real poker hands and situations are intelligently discussed.
You are obviously not a regular reader of their internet forum then?
Darren
(Auckland, NZ)
CodeSavvy
In article <B60AF184.299D2%zwi...@pacbell.net>, Tom says...
CodeSavvy
>TW: Does Doyle cheat?
>BA: No.
>TW: How do you know?
>BA: He doesn't have to.
>TW: How do you know that?
>BA: Because he is a successful player.
>TW: How do you know his success doesn't come from cheating?
Actually there are many reasons to believe that his success comes from excellent
playing.
>BA: How dare you say that Doyle cheats!
>TW: I didn't... and we're through talking.
What I should have posted instead:
>TW: Does Doyle cheat?
>BA: No.
>TW: How do you know?
>BA: He doesn't have to.
>TW: How do you know that?
>BA: Because he is a successful player.
>TW: How do you know his success doesn't come from cheating?
Actually there are many reasons to believe that his success comes from excellent
playing.
>TW: ?
Tom took the liberty of putting word's in Bill Alan's mouth which to my way of
thinking is rude and arrogant. I won't take that liberty with Tom. Tom is
making an extremely trivial point IMO.
Jim Geary
> Isn't JDollar the guy who was spamming on and on about TJ and others
> after WSOP? Just ignore the loser.
Hmm, a quick search of jdollar and rgp at deja reveals him saying
this about tj:
-----
Do you people really think T.J. even cares what is said about him on
here.Even if you dont find the posring funny the man made it as a
joke. Get over it already and talk about somthing else.This is the shit
that makes this so stupid ....All of you talking about law suits and
shit....grow up...Do (any) of you even know T.J.?If you did you would
realize he dosent give a shit!
-----
You seem to have bolstered his credibility.
Jim Geary
jimgeary.com - something to bore everyone
timmer
JP Massar wrote:
> Wow! That's quite a claim. How could person X ever KNOW FOR SURE
> that person Y never cheated in his life?
>
I must admit I once cheated in a poker game. I slipped a few extra 10's,
2's and 4's into my stud hand to beat Pablo out of a huge pot with seven
A's. I really do feel terrible about this now. But , I seem to remember
that stack of cookies being especially good. untill he punched me.
timmer
like I said "a little shit".
Gary Carson
small scar across my chest to remind me.
I had a summer job at Eagle Rock Resort Ranch in Wimberley, Texas. I stayed
in a line shack with some college student wranglers and a couple of cowboys.
Back in those days (early 60's), the hispanic wranglers and cowboys had
seperate quarters. I went to the mexican cowboy's shack for a dice game
with the two anglo cowboy's. During the game I noticed that one of the die
magically turned from a five to a four. I said something about it. The two
cowboys got me out of there with only a small cut across my chest. I am
forever indebted to those two guys.
--
Gary Carson
www.garycarson.com
timmer wrote in message <39E8F09A...@earthlink.net>...
mdm...@my-deja.com
I think he was the guy who started those threads too...I just
remembered the name jdollar from somewhere....anywayz...he didn't
respond to 1 post...but got dozens of responses...trolling at its
best/worst.
In article <Pine.BSI.3.96.1001014151448.24596I-
100...@usr08.primenet.com>,
Bill Alan
>thinking is rude and arrogant. I won't take that liberty with Tom. Tom is
making an extremely trivial point IMO.
==============================
"I have become accustomed to the kindness of strangers."
- Tennessee Williams
irre...@my-deja.com
very close friend of his whom I rather don't name.(He is in the gaming
industry, recently relocated to Tunica)
Here is part of D.B.'s reply (partially edited):
"I don't have to estimate it,you know that I keep an accurate record of
everything. Considering all the sessions I have ever played I cheated
in 61% of them. I don't have to tell you that the method obviously
changed over time, nowadays it is mostly partnership,my legendary
manual skills are almost gone,I don't even practice any more.Since I
had that..."
Sorry for posting this Mr Brunson, but I think if we really want to
clear up poker sometimes we have to take some unpopular steps as well.
I did it only for Poker.
In article <20001007222712...@ng-da1.aol.com>,
texd...@aol.com (TEX DOLLY) wrote:
> I tried to e-mail this coward but he is hiding under a false name.
Why don't
> you come out from under your rock. Maybe you could write a movie with
your
> demented mind. Doyle Brunson
>
claus
somethink like that, isn't it?
How did he calculate???
He's legendary manual skills are almost gone?? really?
do you know him personally?
sorry
claus
<irre...@my-deja.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
8sfdhk$oi4$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Tom Weideman
jimb...@my-deja.com wrote on 10/13/00 12:29 PM:
> Tom, I agree with Rick Nebiolo, and I think you should post more on 2+2
> where real poker hands and situations are intelligently discussed. The
> majority of postings here on rgp are trivial having nothing to do with
> poker, feeble attempts at humor and sarcasms, and personal attacks on
> other posters.
On the encouragement of you two, I have been looking for a thread that
interests me enough to contribute to 2+2. It took me quite some time before
such a thread appeared (the above quote from Jim Brier was 5 days ago)...
Poker:General Theory:"Poker Math and EV Hands". I wrote (as usual) a
long-winded, boring treatise on exploitive play vs. game theory, showing the
role of calculating ev when playing either "people poker" or playing
optimally (game theoretically). I spent at least 2-3 hours on it, and was
quite happy with it. Then I clicked the "preview" button and started to
read it. I found a place to make an adjustment, so I clicked "back". It
was gone! Desperate, I clicked "forward", and got a "duplicate submisson"
message that told me to click "back" (big help). I was able to find no way
to rescue what I wrote. Three hours of work, down the tubes (okay, so
cutting and pasting the work is a safer method, but I'm still pissed...
stupid, but pissed).
Sorry guys, but I think it will be quite awhile before I post anything
substantive over there because I hate the damn interface (okay, I'm tilted
that I didn't use the interface in the best way, but I currently don't care
about this distinction), I see very few threads that interest me, and I
lurked (and later posted to) rg and rgp before most poker players even knew
that such a thing existed.
Maybe we should have a behind-closed-doors meeting to agree to consolidate
both these forums. I'll let others elaborate on whether or not this
violates antitrust statutes.
Tom Weideman
Abdul Jalib
> in article 8s7nqe$4pl$1...@nnrp1.deja.com, jimb...@my-deja.com at
> jimb...@my-deja.com wrote on 10/13/00 12:29 PM:
>
> > Tom, I agree with Rick Nebiolo, and I think you should post more on 2+2
> > where real poker hands and situations are intelligently discussed. The
> > majority of postings here on rgp are trivial having nothing to do with
> > poker, feeble attempts at humor and sarcasms, and personal attacks on
> > other posters.
>
> On the encouragement of you two, I have been looking for a thread that
> interests me enough to contribute to 2+2. It took me quite some time before
> such a thread appeared (the above quote from Jim Brier was 5 days ago)...
> Poker:General Theory:"Poker Math and EV Hands". I wrote (as usual) a
> long-winded, boring treatise on exploitive play vs. game theory, showing the
> role of calculating ev when playing either "people poker" or playing
> optimally (game theoretically). I spent at least 2-3 hours on it, and was
> quite happy with it. Then I clicked the "preview" button and started to
> read it. I found a place to make an adjustment, so I clicked "back". It
> was gone! Desperate, I clicked "forward", and got a "duplicate submisson"
> message that told me to click "back" (big help). I was able to find no way
> to rescue what I wrote. Three hours of work, down the tubes (okay, so
> cutting and pasting the work is a safer method, but I'm still pissed...
> stupid, but pissed).
Yes, this happens all the time. If the text of your article was
still on the preview screen, you could have dragged your mouse to
copy all the text, and then pasted it back in the entry screen.
You can likely still retrieve your article. If you're on Unix,
use something like grep "Poker Math and EV Hands" ~/.netscape/.cache/*
This is how I retrieve my articles that Mason Malmuth censors.
--
Abdul
Linda Sherman
>
> Maybe we should have a behind-closed-doors meeting to agree to consolidate
> both these forums.
Who would moderate?
Lin
--
Linda K Sherman <lins...@gte.net>
Learn Welsh - http://www.dalati.com
Derek Opitz
Linda Sherman <lins...@gte.net> wrote in message
news:39ED7EAA...@gte.net...
Gary Carson
--
Gary Carson
www.garycarson.com
Linda Sherman wrote in message <39ED7EAA...@gte.net>...
Sunfish
>
> Tom Weideman wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we should have a behind-closed-doors meeting to agree to consolidate
> > both these forums.
I never liked the idea of splitting the community in
the first place, and cannot tolerate the 4 interface
either (tried twice...regular and digest).
> Who would moderate?
I hope nobody. I prefer an un-censored forum (crazy
as it can sometimes be).
Regards,
Paul Person
Sunfish
>
> Sorry guys, but I think it will be quite awhile before I post anything
> substantive over there because I hate the damn interface (okay, I'm tilted
> that I didn't use the interface in the best way, but I currently don't care
> about this distinction), I see very few threads that interest me, and I
> lurked (and later posted to) rg and rgp before most poker players even knew
> that such a thing existed.
Me too.
> Maybe we should have a behind-closed-doors meeting to agree to consolidate
> both these forums.
Why behind-closed-doors?
In any case, when I see your name on an RGP post, I
know it's worth reading. Thanks for your contributions.
Best Regards,
Paul Person
Linda Sherman
>
> Linda Sherman wrote:
> >
> > Tom Weideman wrote:
> > >
> > > both these forums.
>
> the first place, and cannot tolerate the 4 interface
> either (tried twice...regular and digest).
>
> > Who would moderate?
>
> I hope nobody. I prefer an un-censored forum (crazy
> as it can sometimes be).
I'm with you on that one.