Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
You stupid wing nuts need to shoot yourselves for our own good
8 views
Skip to first unread message
VegasJerry
Feb 4, 2012, 9:12:12 AM2/4/12
to
A billionaire backs a millionaire. One fires people, the other "likes to
fire people." And you wing nuts think that's a good thing. You stupid,
cool aid drinking right wing nuts are priceless.
The facts and figures actually show you the middle class is declining; you
don't know why, but you think it's great. Upper-class and lower-class. You
actually want to work our way back to Old England, where the King and 2%
owned everything and you 98% worked for them for whatever they wanted to
pay. They sharecropped and starved and you find this loss of middle class
admirable.
You actually back the guys that are causing you and the middle class to
shrink. They wanted to let the auto industry die and you agreed. Some
Republican governors suspend unions and cancel their contracts, and you're
okay with that. They get another state in the Right to Work column, and
you actually think that's good. They keep telling you, "Management good;
unions bad," and you nod your pointed little head up and down. They tell
you union membership is going down and you think this is a good thing.
They want to cancel Healthcare and allow insurance companies to cancel
your insurance if you cost them too much and you agree. They want to keep
it where nobody has to be responsible for their medical and have it dumped
on the county taxpayer (you); and you agree. They want to cut Social
Security (which they're not in) and you say YES! They want to cut
Healthcare (which they don't use) and you agree. They bribe their
congressmen to past laws so they make more money shipping jobs overseas,
and you go along with it (till your jobs is gone). They want to cut
minimum wage and you cheer (till your wages are cut). They get congress to
lower, then drop, tariffs and you agree. Our nation invents the best solar
panels; subsidizes Solyndra so we can build them in this country to sell
to the world, but you support some corporation that takes advantage of
having rules changed and tariffs removed so they can ship these jobs
overseas; and you think that's good. The Chinese even agree to subsidize
their plants more than we subsidize ours. The Chinese supply cheaper,
slave/child labor and we can't compete. Then you believe the right wing
nuts when they say that Obama was the cause of Solyndra folding - while
you purchase the Chinese product. Companies like Wal-Mart ("Always Low
Wages") hires illegal's and bribes their congressman so they don't have to
check their citizenship and you're okay with this. Wal-Mart buys their
products from slave-labor China; sells it to you with non-union labor and
you happily support Wal-mart (whose employees use your county's social and
'free' medical services, that you pay for). They get the SCOTUS to declare
their corporations People so they can bribe even more politicians, and you
actually go along with it. They want to do away with Environmental
Protections Agency so they can poison streams and put more mercury in the
air, and you agree. They had their congressmen design Chapter 11 and 12 so
they could dump their employee's retirement systems and medical onto you,
the taxpayer (PBGP); and you think that's good. (Until it happens to
you)(but you still don't mind paying for other's retirement).
All those Middle Eastern country in the Arab Spring saw the 1% screwing
the 99% and rioted (showing their leaders were billionaires and
millionaires) and you thought that was good; yet are blind to seeing our
own OWS folks pointing out that our own middle class slipping into the
very same thing. The Republicans lie to you about what OWS is about, and
you believe the millionaire Republicans' lies. Wall Street fucks you, lies
to you, and you support them.
You believe the corporations when they tell you "most Americans don't pay
taxes at all;" at the same time these Corporations have special tax
breaks, special deductions, receive federal money, grants and outright
subsidies; some corporations pay no taxes at all; and you agree with all
that.
You're a member of the middle class that's slowing losing ground (and
jobs) to the 1% and you're too stupid to understand why; you just cheer
it. And when people smarter than you grab you by the nape of your scrawny
little neck, bend you over and rub your nose in it; you whine; pick some
little part of it and say, "Well, I don't really support 'this' little
part, so it's all my fault." Too embarrassed at having someone show how
you've supported those that cause the downfall of our middle class and the
economy; you immediately start blaming others. Then go right back to
voting, purchasing and cheering against your own economic survival. If
you're going to destroy yourself and the economy, why not just shoot
yourself so you don't take us with you.
Now go cheer the billionaires and millionaires that want your support.
It's the only time they really care about the poor; you fucking idiots.
Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
---
fire people." And you wing nuts think that's a good thing. You stupid,
cool aid drinking right wing nuts are priceless.
The facts and figures actually show you the middle class is declining; you
don't know why, but you think it's great. Upper-class and lower-class. You
actually want to work our way back to Old England, where the King and 2%
owned everything and you 98% worked for them for whatever they wanted to
pay. They sharecropped and starved and you find this loss of middle class
admirable.
You actually back the guys that are causing you and the middle class to
shrink. They wanted to let the auto industry die and you agreed. Some
Republican governors suspend unions and cancel their contracts, and you're
okay with that. They get another state in the Right to Work column, and
you actually think that's good. They keep telling you, "Management good;
unions bad," and you nod your pointed little head up and down. They tell
you union membership is going down and you think this is a good thing.
They want to cancel Healthcare and allow insurance companies to cancel
your insurance if you cost them too much and you agree. They want to keep
it where nobody has to be responsible for their medical and have it dumped
on the county taxpayer (you); and you agree. They want to cut Social
Security (which they're not in) and you say YES! They want to cut
Healthcare (which they don't use) and you agree. They bribe their
congressmen to past laws so they make more money shipping jobs overseas,
and you go along with it (till your jobs is gone). They want to cut
minimum wage and you cheer (till your wages are cut). They get congress to
lower, then drop, tariffs and you agree. Our nation invents the best solar
panels; subsidizes Solyndra so we can build them in this country to sell
to the world, but you support some corporation that takes advantage of
having rules changed and tariffs removed so they can ship these jobs
overseas; and you think that's good. The Chinese even agree to subsidize
their plants more than we subsidize ours. The Chinese supply cheaper,
slave/child labor and we can't compete. Then you believe the right wing
nuts when they say that Obama was the cause of Solyndra folding - while
you purchase the Chinese product. Companies like Wal-Mart ("Always Low
Wages") hires illegal's and bribes their congressman so they don't have to
check their citizenship and you're okay with this. Wal-Mart buys their
products from slave-labor China; sells it to you with non-union labor and
you happily support Wal-mart (whose employees use your county's social and
'free' medical services, that you pay for). They get the SCOTUS to declare
their corporations People so they can bribe even more politicians, and you
actually go along with it. They want to do away with Environmental
Protections Agency so they can poison streams and put more mercury in the
air, and you agree. They had their congressmen design Chapter 11 and 12 so
they could dump their employee's retirement systems and medical onto you,
the taxpayer (PBGP); and you think that's good. (Until it happens to
you)(but you still don't mind paying for other's retirement).
All those Middle Eastern country in the Arab Spring saw the 1% screwing
the 99% and rioted (showing their leaders were billionaires and
millionaires) and you thought that was good; yet are blind to seeing our
own OWS folks pointing out that our own middle class slipping into the
very same thing. The Republicans lie to you about what OWS is about, and
you believe the millionaire Republicans' lies. Wall Street fucks you, lies
to you, and you support them.
You believe the corporations when they tell you "most Americans don't pay
taxes at all;" at the same time these Corporations have special tax
breaks, special deductions, receive federal money, grants and outright
subsidies; some corporations pay no taxes at all; and you agree with all
that.
You're a member of the middle class that's slowing losing ground (and
jobs) to the 1% and you're too stupid to understand why; you just cheer
it. And when people smarter than you grab you by the nape of your scrawny
little neck, bend you over and rub your nose in it; you whine; pick some
little part of it and say, "Well, I don't really support 'this' little
part, so it's all my fault." Too embarrassed at having someone show how
you've supported those that cause the downfall of our middle class and the
economy; you immediately start blaming others. Then go right back to
voting, purchasing and cheering against your own economic survival. If
you're going to destroy yourself and the economy, why not just shoot
yourself so you don't take us with you.
Now go cheer the billionaires and millionaires that want your support.
It's the only time they really care about the poor; you fucking idiots.
Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
---
bratt
Feb 4, 2012, 10:51:56 AM2/4/12
to
On Feb 4 2012 8:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> One fires people, the other "likes to fire people."
Wrong genius - cite?
> One fires people, the other "likes to fire people."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
-------
Puppytoes
Feb 4, 2012, 12:53:47 PM2/4/12
to
_____________________________________________________________________
bratt
Feb 4, 2012, 1:09:35 PM2/4/12
to
VegasJerry
Feb 4, 2012, 1:17:05 PM2/4/12
to
________________________________________________________________________
VegasJerry
Feb 4, 2012, 1:16:13 PM2/4/12
to
On Feb 4 2012 7:51 AM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 4 2012 8:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > One fires people, the other "likes to fire people."
>
> Wrong genius - cite?
Didn't I tell you? At least one idiot that can't address the post.
> On Feb 4 2012 8:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > One fires people, the other "likes to fire people."
>
> Wrong genius - cite?
-----
VegasJerry
Feb 4, 2012, 1:17:49 PM2/4/12
to
--------
bratt
Feb 4, 2012, 1:36:20 PM2/4/12
to
can't back it, so no problem Jerry.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
Mossingen
Feb 4, 2012, 1:34:25 PM2/4/12
to
"bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:vr8009x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
There's some things in there that are spot on. "Bin Laden's dead; GM is
alive" is actually a powerful message. Economic indicators are turning
around.
These last few elections have just been a comedy of errors by both parties.
Here, the GOP had basically a sitting duck Democratic President, unpopular
even in his own party and voters like me ready for the taking. All they had
to do was field a credible candidate and they can't even do that. I'll have
to choose between Obama or a corporate raider/Gordon Gekko clone, the former
Speaker who was drummed out of his own party in disgrace and has
questionable morals, or a candidate with such extreme religious views that
he's against birth control (not ABORTION, BIRTH CONTROL).
Gawdalmightyfriday...what a sad situation. Last time, the GOP had G.W.
Bush, an inept buffoon who started this country down the road to bankruptcy
with spending and foreign wars. And who did the Democrats give the American
people as a reasonable alternative to this White House disaster? Al Gore
and John Kerry.
The whole this is a pathetic joke.
news:vr8009x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
alive" is actually a powerful message. Economic indicators are turning
around.
These last few elections have just been a comedy of errors by both parties.
Here, the GOP had basically a sitting duck Democratic President, unpopular
even in his own party and voters like me ready for the taking. All they had
to do was field a credible candidate and they can't even do that. I'll have
to choose between Obama or a corporate raider/Gordon Gekko clone, the former
Speaker who was drummed out of his own party in disgrace and has
questionable morals, or a candidate with such extreme religious views that
he's against birth control (not ABORTION, BIRTH CONTROL).
Gawdalmightyfriday...what a sad situation. Last time, the GOP had G.W.
Bush, an inept buffoon who started this country down the road to bankruptcy
with spending and foreign wars. And who did the Democrats give the American
people as a reasonable alternative to this White House disaster? Al Gore
and John Kerry.
The whole this is a pathetic joke.
bratt
Feb 4, 2012, 2:01:51 PM2/4/12
to
Jerry out on that stupid tagline - "he stupid"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
bub
Feb 4, 2012, 2:18:15 PM2/4/12
to
On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:09:35 -0800, "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:
>> Well you got your close correct anyway ... "he stupid"
>>
>
>and he thinks we make up these taglines about him.
>
>
dammit. do i need to change the original one i use?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Golf of Tonkin resolution was thought to be real, too"
"Jerry (education the stupid since '62) 'n Vegas"
wrote:
>> Well you got your close correct anyway ... "he stupid"
>>
>
>and he thinks we make up these taglines about him.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Golf of Tonkin resolution was thought to be real, too"
"Jerry (education the stupid since '62) 'n Vegas"
Puppytoes
Feb 4, 2012, 2:18:40 PM2/4/12
to
-------
mo_ntresor
Feb 4, 2012, 7:21:38 PM2/4/12
to
On Feb 4 2012 7:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
<snip>
if the wingnuts off themselves, who's left to pick up the lazy idiots'
bills?
mo_ntresor
_____________________________________________________________________
<snip>
if the wingnuts off themselves, who's left to pick up the lazy idiots'
bills?
mo_ntresor
_____________________________________________________________________
mo_ntresor
Feb 4, 2012, 7:27:59 PM2/4/12
to
On Feb 4 2012 11:34 AM, Mossingen wrote:
> > and he thinks we make up these taglines about him.
>
> There's some things in there that are spot on. "Bin Laden's dead; GM is
> alive" is actually a powerful message. Economic indicators are turning
> around.
>
> These last few elections have just been a comedy of errors by both parties.
> Here, the GOP had basically a sitting duck Democratic President, unpopular
> even in his own party and voters like me ready for the taking. All they had
> to do was field a credible candidate and they can't even do that. I'll have
> to choose between Obama or a corporate raider/Gordon Gekko clone, the former
> Speaker who was drummed out of his own party in disgrace and has
> questionable morals, or a candidate with such extreme religious views that
> he's against birth control (not ABORTION, BIRTH CONTROL).
>
> Gawdalmightyfriday...what a sad situation. Last time, the GOP had G.W.
> Bush, an inept buffoon who started this country down the road to bankruptcy
> with spending and foreign wars. And who did the Democrats give the American
> people as a reasonable alternative to this White House disaster? Al Gore
> and John Kerry.
>
> The whole this is a pathetic joke.
mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems. if a
> > and he thinks we make up these taglines about him.
>
> There's some things in there that are spot on. "Bin Laden's dead; GM is
> alive" is actually a powerful message. Economic indicators are turning
> around.
>
> These last few elections have just been a comedy of errors by both parties.
> Here, the GOP had basically a sitting duck Democratic President, unpopular
> even in his own party and voters like me ready for the taking. All they had
> to do was field a credible candidate and they can't even do that. I'll have
> to choose between Obama or a corporate raider/Gordon Gekko clone, the former
> Speaker who was drummed out of his own party in disgrace and has
> questionable morals, or a candidate with such extreme religious views that
> he's against birth control (not ABORTION, BIRTH CONTROL).
>
> Gawdalmightyfriday...what a sad situation. Last time, the GOP had G.W.
> Bush, an inept buffoon who started this country down the road to bankruptcy
> with spending and foreign wars. And who did the Democrats give the American
> people as a reasonable alternative to this White House disaster? Al Gore
> and John Kerry.
>
> The whole this is a pathetic joke.
lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years beats a guy
like mitt, it's time to move. seriously, if you vote obama in 2012, don't
show your embarrassing face in public. you don't deserve this nation.
mo_ntresor
---
~M~
Feb 4, 2012, 7:37:02 PM2/4/12
to
"VegasJerry" wrote in message news:suqvv8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
>Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
Jerry did the jail you lied about going to have internet? That would suck
for the taxpayers. I hope they didn't give you Viagra or anything like that
when you were there. Power abusers like you have admitted to being are much
more likely to rape innocent women and children. Society is much better off
with you remaining impotent.
-- "Let's take a wander into the Republican Southern States, including
Texas.
We'll find a typical singlewide (with a doublewide porch for 8-dogs to hid
under); with a shiny new pickup with tires the size of Bel-dim's ego; gun
rack, stars and bars, Christian cross and a radio blaring Rush Limbaugh.
The single-toothed right-wing idiot comes out and spits as he laughs at
the suggestion that Democrats are against 'colored people' and are Ku Klux
Klan lovers."
- Jerry (he stupid) 'n Vegas Sturdivant 4/6/2011
>Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
for the taxpayers. I hope they didn't give you Viagra or anything like that
when you were there. Power abusers like you have admitted to being are much
more likely to rape innocent women and children. Society is much better off
with you remaining impotent.
-- "Let's take a wander into the Republican Southern States, including
Texas.
We'll find a typical singlewide (with a doublewide porch for 8-dogs to hid
under); with a shiny new pickup with tires the size of Bel-dim's ego; gun
rack, stars and bars, Christian cross and a radio blaring Rush Limbaugh.
The single-toothed right-wing idiot comes out and spits as he laughs at
the suggestion that Democrats are against 'colored people' and are Ku Klux
Klan lovers."
- Jerry (he stupid) 'n Vegas Sturdivant 4/6/2011
arseniccollection
Feb 4, 2012, 7:38:04 PM2/4/12
to
On 2/4/2012 16:27, mo_ntresor wrote:
>
> mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems. if a
> lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years beats a guy
> like mitt, it's time to move. seriously, if you vote obama in 2012, don't
> show your embarrassing face in public. you don't deserve this nation.
So where are you moving to? France? Canada?
>
> mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems. if a
> lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years beats a guy
> like mitt, it's time to move. seriously, if you vote obama in 2012, don't
> show your embarrassing face in public. you don't deserve this nation.
Wilhelm Kuhlmann
Feb 4, 2012, 7:58:03 PM2/4/12
to
On Feb 4, 4:27 pm, "mo_ntresor" <amontilladofortun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems. if a
> lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years
What the fuck is it with you and this $6 trillion in debt bullshit?
First of all, BEFORE Obama was inaugurated, the CBO projected the
FY2009 budget deficit at $1.3 trillion. That was baked into the cake
before Obama took office. You can only blame Obama for FY2010,
FY2011, and FY2012. That's about $4 trillion in deficits.
Second of all, you have been shown multiple analyses showing clearly
that MOST of that $4 trillion is the direct result of the policies and
actions of the Bush administration, not anything Obama has or hasn't
done. Most of the huge deficits we have seen recently are the direct
result of the Bush tax cuts, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, unfunded
Medicare Part D, and reduced tax revenues resulting from the deep
recession, which is also arguably the result of policies and actions
of the Bush administration.
Obama tried to reach a comprehensive $4 trillion debt reduction deal
with the Republicans, composed of roughly $3 trillion in spending cuts
and $1 trillion in tax increases, but the Republicans absolutely will
not agree to anything which increases taxes. Thanks Grover Norquist!
> beats a guy like mitt,
"Corporations are People"
"I am not concerned about the very poor"
Romney's tax plan would reduce tax revenues by $600 billion in 2015.
What a guy! How could anyone argue with any of that?
> it's time to move. seriously,
Can we take that as a pledge that you will leave the country if Obama
is reelected?
> if you vote obama in 2012, don't show your embarrassing face in public.
It's Gordon Gekko versus the Kenyan Usurper. I will probably be
voting for Ralph Nader again. Did you know Nader came in third in the
popular vote in the last three presidential elections?
> you don't deserve this nation.
You don't get to decide that.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
wrote:
> mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems. if a
> lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years
First of all, BEFORE Obama was inaugurated, the CBO projected the
FY2009 budget deficit at $1.3 trillion. That was baked into the cake
before Obama took office. You can only blame Obama for FY2010,
FY2011, and FY2012. That's about $4 trillion in deficits.
Second of all, you have been shown multiple analyses showing clearly
that MOST of that $4 trillion is the direct result of the policies and
actions of the Bush administration, not anything Obama has or hasn't
done. Most of the huge deficits we have seen recently are the direct
result of the Bush tax cuts, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, unfunded
Medicare Part D, and reduced tax revenues resulting from the deep
recession, which is also arguably the result of policies and actions
of the Bush administration.
Obama tried to reach a comprehensive $4 trillion debt reduction deal
with the Republicans, composed of roughly $3 trillion in spending cuts
and $1 trillion in tax increases, but the Republicans absolutely will
not agree to anything which increases taxes. Thanks Grover Norquist!
> beats a guy like mitt,
"I am not concerned about the very poor"
Romney's tax plan would reduce tax revenues by $600 billion in 2015.
What a guy! How could anyone argue with any of that?
> it's time to move. seriously,
is reelected?
> if you vote obama in 2012, don't show your embarrassing face in public.
voting for Ralph Nader again. Did you know Nader came in third in the
popular vote in the last three presidential elections?
> you don't deserve this nation.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
Alim Nassor
Feb 5, 2012, 2:48:26 AM2/5/12
to
are misquoting him, he sure has no problem misquoting others.
Robert Ladd
Feb 5, 2012, 11:49:12 AM2/5/12
to
"VegasJerry" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:suqvv8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
>snipped boringly stupid partisan rant.< >
>
> Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
>
I'm guessing *he stupid since long before '62*. Maybe he check he text
> Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
>
before he hit send next time. Me think he not understand the irony of he
telling us how much smarter he is than we.
My 5th grade grandson would be embarrassed to write the way you do......
wait, actually my 5th grade grandson would never be embarrassed the way you
are, because he understands that when he writes something he should spell
check it and proof read it at least once, and that would catch 99% of the
errors. That would make you a true 99 percenter. And no, you're not
smarter than a 5th grader, I've got one to compare you with.
Anyone can occasionally make a mistake, be in a hurry, forget to check
something over once in a while, but you consistently tell us that we're
stupid for being concerned about the mistakes you make with your words, yet
those same words are what you are hammering us over the heads with, using
them to try and convince us of something you want us to take you serious
about. *I'm smarter than you about some idea, and although I can't spell
worth a damn and I'm lazier than hell, you should listen to me.*
Right, Jerry.
I'll start addressing your posts when you can make them at least appear like
they were written by someone with an IQ above a brick.
Robert Ladd
VegasJerry
Feb 5, 2012, 1:07:31 PM2/5/12
to
unbudgeted wars; tax cuts and Medicare benefits. Does that change your
thinking?
Jerry 'n Vegas
seriously, if you vote obama in 2012, don't
> show your embarrassing face in public. you don't deserve this nation.
>
> mo_ntresor
>
> ---
VegasJerry
Feb 5, 2012, 1:03:48 PM2/5/12
to
On Feb 4 2012 10:36 AM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 4 2012 12:16 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Feb 4 2012 7:51 AM, bratt wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 4 2012 8:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > >
> > > > One fires people, the other "likes to fire people."
> > >
> > > Wrong genius - cite?
> >
> > Didn't I tell you? At least one idiot that can't address the post.
> >
> > -----
>
> I am addressing your ascertion that Romney said that. Apparently you
> can't back it, so no problem Jerry.
I am addressing that part of my statement stating that some will be unable
> On Feb 4 2012 12:16 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Feb 4 2012 7:51 AM, bratt wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 4 2012 8:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > >
> > > > One fires people, the other "likes to fire people."
> > >
> > > Wrong genius - cite?
> >
> > Didn't I tell you? At least one idiot that can't address the post.
> >
> > -----
>
> I am addressing your ascertion that Romney said that. Apparently you
> can't back it, so no problem Jerry.
to address the message and try picking at a little piece of it. So no
problem seeing you as one, SS.
Jerry 'n Vegas
-----
VegasJerry
Feb 5, 2012, 1:11:05 PM2/5/12
to
On Feb 4 2012 4:37 PM, ~M~ wrote:
> "VegasJerry" wrote in message news:suqvv8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
>
> >Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
>
>
> Jerry did the jail you lied about going to have internet? That would suck
> for the taxpayers. I hope they didn't give you Viagra or anything like that
> when you were there. Power abusers like you have admitted to being are much
> more likely to rape innocent women and children. Society is much better off
> with you remaining impotent.
You're such a stupid child.....
> "VegasJerry" wrote in message news:suqvv8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
>
> >Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
>
>
> Jerry did the jail you lied about going to have internet? That would suck
> for the taxpayers. I hope they didn't give you Viagra or anything like that
> when you were there. Power abusers like you have admitted to being are much
> more likely to rape innocent women and children. Society is much better off
> with you remaining impotent.
>
>
> -- "Let's take a wander into the Republican Southern States, including
> Texas.
> We'll find a typical singlewide (with a doublewide porch for 8-dogs to hid
> under); with a shiny new pickup with tires the size of Bel-dim's ego; gun
> rack, stars and bars, Christian cross and a radio blaring Rush Limbaugh.
> The single-toothed right-wing idiot comes out and spits as he laughs at
> the suggestion that Democrats are against 'colored people' and are Ku Klux
> Klan lovers."
> - Jerry (he stupid) 'n Vegas Sturdivant 4/6/2011
VegasJerry
Feb 5, 2012, 1:09:27 PM2/5/12
to
Give it up kid; you couldn't address the post....
------
Iceman
Feb 5, 2012, 1:29:27 PM2/5/12
to
"mo_ntresor" <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f1v009x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
politics! Let's make it even worse!
> if a lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years beats a
> guy like mitt, it's time to move.
that have higher taxes than here?
> seriously, if you vote obama in 2012, don't show your embarrassing face in
> public. you don't deserve this nation.
Iceman
Feb 5, 2012, 1:32:24 PM2/5/12
to
news:ilu009x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
> On Feb 4 2012 7:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> if the wingnuts off themselves, who's left to pick up the lazy idiots'
> bills?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelpinto/2987025203/lightbox/
>
> <snip>
>
> if the wingnuts off themselves, who's left to pick up the lazy idiots'
> bills?
Iceman
Feb 5, 2012, 1:41:54 PM2/5/12
to
"VegasJerry" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:34t209x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
> On Feb 4 2012 4:27 PM, mo_ntresor wrote:
>> mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems. if a
>> lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years beats a guy
>> like mitt, it's time to move.
>
> Slight correction here. The vast majority of that 6T was Bush's. His
> unbudgeted wars; tax cuts and Medicare benefits. Does that change your
> thinking?
No, it's been explained to him many times. He either doesn't get it or
>> mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems. if a
>> lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years beats a guy
>> like mitt, it's time to move.
>
> Slight correction here. The vast majority of that 6T was Bush's. His
> unbudgeted wars; tax cuts and Medicare benefits. Does that change your
> thinking?
doesn't care.
bratt
Feb 5, 2012, 1:43:09 PM2/5/12
to
Really, you will truly feel better.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
mo_ntresor
Feb 5, 2012, 2:15:03 PM2/5/12
to
On Feb 5 2012 11:29 AM, Iceman wrote:
> > mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems.
>
> Large corporations and the richest 1% don't have enough domination of our
> politics! Let's make it even worse!
>
> > if a lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years beats a
> > guy like mitt, it's time to move.
>
> LOL. Where are you going to move to? To countries like Canada and Europe
> that have higher taxes than here?
>
> > seriously, if you vote obama in 2012, don't show your embarrassing face in
> > public. you don't deserve this nation.
>
> You should say that about anyone who voted Bush in 2004.
junior lawyer's words or mitt's lifelong dedication to charity and service
> > mitt's a gift with perfect skills for bush / obama racked problems.
>
> Large corporations and the richest 1% don't have enough domination of our
> politics! Let's make it even worse!
>
> > if a lying lawyer whore who's racked up 6T in debt in four years beats a
> > guy like mitt, it's time to move.
>
> LOL. Where are you going to move to? To countries like Canada and Europe
> that have higher taxes than here?
>
> > seriously, if you vote obama in 2012, don't show your embarrassing face in
> > public. you don't deserve this nation.
>
> You should say that about anyone who voted Bush in 2004.
.. tough call! that's this election in a nutshell. vote for the empty
promises of a good speech giver with great skin tone or a guy uniquely
qualified to solve this nation's enormous and pressing fiscal problems.
more debt or a future of financial freedom.
mo_ntresor
--------
Iceman
Feb 5, 2012, 2:54:13 PM2/5/12
to
news:n21309x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
The "good speech giver with great skin tone" inherited a mess from the last
guy. He's done fairly well, considering.
With Mitt promising more tax cuts and continued high military spending and
interventionism, you can bet the debt isn't going anywhere.
guy. He's done fairly well, considering.
With Mitt promising more tax cuts and continued high military spending and
interventionism, you can bet the debt isn't going anywhere.
johnny_t
Feb 5, 2012, 4:36:40 PM2/5/12
to
Sheesh, new to the internet are you? You won't respond to the content?
Try not responding at all. He's not here to serve your overly
sensitive spelling sensibilities.
Alim Nassor
Feb 5, 2012, 4:53:58 PM2/5/12
to
On Feb 5, 3:36 pm, johnny_t <nobod...@home.com> wrote:
> On 2/5/12 8:49 AM, Robert Ladd wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "VegasJerry" <jerr...@cox.net> wrote in message
> On 2/5/12 8:49 AM, Robert Ladd wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
VegasJerry
Feb 6, 2012, 3:24:06 PM2/6/12
to
On Feb 5 2012 10:43 AM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 5 2012 12:03 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Feb 4 2012 10:36 AM, bratt wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 4 2012 12:16 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Feb 4 2012 7:51 AM, bratt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Feb 4 2012 8:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > One fires people, the other "likes to fire people."
> > > > >
> > > > > Wrong genius - cite?
> > > >
> > > > Didn't I tell you? At least one idiot that can't address the post.
> > > >
> > > > -----
> > >
> > > I am addressing your ascertion that Romney said that. Apparently you
> > > can't back it, so no problem Jerry.
> >
> > I am addressing that part of my statement stating that some will be unable
> > to address the message and try picking at a little piece of it. So no
> > problem seeing you as one, SS.
> >
> >
> > Jerry 'n Vegas
> >
> > -----
>
> Jerry - it is so easy to say I have no cite to show you SS. Try it.
> Really, you will truly feel better.
You've already proved my statement correct. You simply cannot address the
> On Feb 5 2012 12:03 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Feb 4 2012 10:36 AM, bratt wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 4 2012 12:16 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Feb 4 2012 7:51 AM, bratt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Feb 4 2012 8:12 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > One fires people, the other "likes to fire people."
> > > > >
> > > > > Wrong genius - cite?
> > > >
> > > > Didn't I tell you? At least one idiot that can't address the post.
> > > >
> > > > -----
> > >
> > > I am addressing your ascertion that Romney said that. Apparently you
> > > can't back it, so no problem Jerry.
> >
> > I am addressing that part of my statement stating that some will be unable
> > to address the message and try picking at a little piece of it. So no
> > problem seeing you as one, SS.
> >
> >
> > Jerry 'n Vegas
> >
> > -----
>
> Jerry - it is so easy to say I have no cite to show you SS. Try it.
> Really, you will truly feel better.
message
____________________________________________________________________
VegasJerry
Feb 6, 2012, 3:25:18 PM2/6/12
to
____________________________________________________________________
VegasJerry
Feb 6, 2012, 3:30:02 PM2/6/12
to
On Feb 5 2012 8:49 AM, Robert Ladd wrote:
> "VegasJerry" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:suqvv8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
> >snipped boringly stupid partisan rant.< >
> >
> > Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
> >
> I'm guessing *he stupid since long before '62*. Maybe he check he text
> before he hit send next time. Me think he not understand the irony of he
> telling us how much smarter he is than we.
As I've shown before, if you can't address the message, attack the
> "VegasJerry" <jer...@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:suqvv8x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
> >snipped boringly stupid partisan rant.< >
> >
> > Jerry (educating he stupid since '62) 'n Vegas
> >
> I'm guessing *he stupid since long before '62*. Maybe he check he text
> before he hit send next time. Me think he not understand the irony of he
> telling us how much smarter he is than we.
messenger. In your case, you dodge to spell checking.
Good dog.
Jerry
>
> My 5th grade grandson would be embarrassed to write the way you do......
> wait, actually my 5th grade grandson would never be embarrassed the way you
> are, because he understands that when he writes something he should spell
> check it and proof read it at least once, and that would catch 99% of the
> errors. That would make you a true 99 percenter. And no, you're not
> smarter than a 5th grader, I've got one to compare you with.
>
> Anyone can occasionally make a mistake, be in a hurry, forget to check
> something over once in a while, but you consistently tell us that we're
> stupid for being concerned about the mistakes you make with your words, yet
> those same words are what you are hammering us over the heads with, using
> them to try and convince us of something you want us to take you serious
> about. *I'm smarter than you about some idea, and although I can't spell
> worth a damn and I'm lazier than hell, you should listen to me.*
>
> Right, Jerry.
>
> I'll start addressing your posts when you can make them at least appear like
> they were written by someone with an IQ above a brick.
>
> Robert Ladd
VegasJerry
Feb 6, 2012, 3:32:10 PM2/6/12
to
On Feb 5 2012 8:49 AM, Robert Ladd wrote:
errors?
(Stupid asshole....)
Jerry 'n Vegas
_____________________________________________________________________
VegasJerry
Feb 7, 2012, 10:50:53 AM2/7/12
to
yours....
------
Alim Nassor
Feb 7, 2012, 1:46:54 PM2/7/12
to
ChrisRobin
Feb 7, 2012, 6:53:16 PM2/7/12
to
On Feb 5 2012 2:15 PM, mo_ntresor wrote:
> junior lawyer's words or mitt's lifelong dedication to charity and service
> ... tough call! that's this election in a nutshell. vote for the empty
> junior lawyer's words or mitt's lifelong dedication to charity and service
> promises of a good speech giver with great skin tone or a guy uniquely
> qualified to solve this nation's enormous and pressing fiscal problems.
> more debt or a future of financial freedom.
Romney's our savior, huh? Going to magically solve all of our problems?
> qualified to solve this nation's enormous and pressing fiscal problems.
> more debt or a future of financial freedom.
Going to behave differently than the last guy, who behaved so much
differently than the guy before him, who... oh, forget it.
You're starting to sound a bit like an '07 Obamaton. Hope and change, baby!
-------
VegasJerry
Feb 7, 2012, 6:55:53 PM2/7/12
to
____________________________________________________________________
ChrisRobin
Feb 7, 2012, 6:54:53 PM2/7/12
to
On Feb 7 2012 10:50 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> Seems you've got _your_ panties in a twist. I made my point; try proving
> yours....
Translated from Jerryspeak: I know you are, but what am I?
> Seems you've got _your_ panties in a twist. I made my point; try proving
> yours....
_______________________________________________________________________
bratt
Feb 7, 2012, 7:03:00 PM2/7/12
to
Alim Nassor
Feb 8, 2012, 2:01:43 AM2/8/12
to
figure out how that is different than what you said he said.
VegasJerry
Feb 8, 2012, 11:27:58 AM2/8/12
to
statement to. Then apologize.
Jerry 'n Vegas
________________________________________________________________________
VegasJerry
Feb 8, 2012, 11:34:29 AM2/8/12
to
On Feb 7 2012 3:54 PM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> On Feb 7 2012 10:50 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > Seems you've got _your_ panties in a twist. I made my point; try proving
> > yours....
>
> Translated from Jerryspeak: I know you are, but what am I?
Dodge noted. Do you even have a clue as to what it means when we charge
> On Feb 7 2012 10:50 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > Seems you've got _your_ panties in a twist. I made my point; try proving
> > yours....
>
> Translated from Jerryspeak: I know you are, but what am I?
various idiots for attacking the messenger when they can't address the
message? (Or cry about spelling). Have you even heard of the statement,
"Killing the Messenger?" Where it came from? What it's in reference to? It
means they've lost. They can't they statements. All they have left is
trying to attack the person that made the statement.
Or is this, too, to confusing for you? We'll see by your reply…..
Jerry 'n Vegas
________________________________________________________________________
VegasJerry
Feb 8, 2012, 11:35:01 AM2/8/12
to
On Feb 7 2012 4:03 PM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 7 2012 5:54 PM, ChrisRobin wrote:
>
> > On Feb 7 2012 10:50 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> > > Seems you've got _your_ panties in a twist. I made my point; try proving
> > > yours....
> >
> > Translated from Jerryspeak: I know you are, but what am I?
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
>
> teehee
See what I mean, Chris?
> On Feb 7 2012 5:54 PM, ChrisRobin wrote:
>
> > On Feb 7 2012 10:50 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> > > Seems you've got _your_ panties in a twist. I made my point; try proving
> > > yours....
> >
> > Translated from Jerryspeak: I know you are, but what am I?
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
>
> teehee
________________________________________________________________________
ChrisRobin
Feb 8, 2012, 12:31:21 PM2/8/12
to
On Feb 8 2012 11:34 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> Dodge noted. Do you even have a clue as to what it means when we charge
> various idiots for attacking the messenger when they can't address the
> message? (Or cry about spelling). Have you even heard of the statement,
> "Killing the Messenger?" Where it came from? What it's in reference to? It
> means they've lost. They can't they statements. All they have left is
> trying to attack the person that made the statement.
>
> Or is this, too, to confusing for you? We'll see by your reply…..
Yes Jerry, I find your four stock replies very confusing. Could you make a
> Dodge noted. Do you even have a clue as to what it means when we charge
> various idiots for attacking the messenger when they can't address the
> message? (Or cry about spelling). Have you even heard of the statement,
> "Killing the Messenger?" Where it came from? What it's in reference to? It
> means they've lost. They can't they statements. All they have left is
> trying to attack the person that made the statement.
>
> Or is this, too, to confusing for you? We'll see by your reply…..
little better effort to explain yourself more clearly in the future
please? Thanks in advance.
---
Alim Nassor
Feb 8, 2012, 12:46:08 PM2/8/12
to
Romney never said he likes to fire people. He said he likes being able
to fire people.
What you said was
'A billionaire backs a millionaire. One fires people, the other "likes
to
fire people."
So tell me Jerry, who were you talking about if not Trump and Romney.
Will you just admit you got the fucking quote wrong, and that your
version means something different than what the man actually said?
And then, you can apologize.
bratt
Feb 8, 2012, 1:35:01 PM2/8/12
to
This is the whole quote
“I want individuals to have their own insurance,” Romney said on Monday.
“That means the insurance company will have an incentive to keep you
healthy. It also means if you don’t like what they do, you can fire them.
I like being able to fire people who provide services to me.
“You know, if someone doesn’t give me a good service that I need, I want
to say I’m going to go get someone else to provide that service to me.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
Alim Nassor
Feb 8, 2012, 12:46:58 PM2/8/12
to
of what they said. And then dodges the fact he fucked up.
VegasJerry
Feb 8, 2012, 5:01:42 PM2/8/12
to
Jerry
And then dodges the fact he fucked up.
VegasJerry
Feb 8, 2012, 5:00:28 PM2/8/12
to
On Feb 8 2012 9:31 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
> On Feb 8 2012 11:34 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > Dodge noted. Do you even have a clue as to what it means when we charge
> > various idiots for attacking the messenger when they can't address the
> > message? (Or cry about spelling). Have you even heard of the statement,
> > "Killing the Messenger?" Where it came from? What it's in reference to? It
> > means they've lost. They can't they statements. All they have left is
> > trying to attack the person that made the statement.
> >
> > Or is this, too, to confusing for you? We'll see by your reply…..
>
> Yes Jerry, I find your four stock replies very confusing.
Yea, I know. You find it all confusing. Go ahead and blame your confusion.
> On Feb 8 2012 11:34 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > Dodge noted. Do you even have a clue as to what it means when we charge
> > various idiots for attacking the messenger when they can't address the
> > message? (Or cry about spelling). Have you even heard of the statement,
> > "Killing the Messenger?" Where it came from? What it's in reference to? It
> > means they've lost. They can't they statements. All they have left is
> > trying to attack the person that made the statement.
> >
> > Or is this, too, to confusing for you? We'll see by your reply…..
>
> Yes Jerry, I find your four stock replies very confusing.
Much better than admitting you were wrong.
Jerry 'n Vegas
Could you make a
> little better effort to explain yourself more clearly in the future
> please? Thanks in advance.
>
> ---
VegasJerry
Feb 8, 2012, 4:58:19 PM2/8/12
to
statements. Or you did go back and saw your error. I never said who made
that statement. So, once again, I'm right and you're wrong. And you even
proved it in your following statement:
> What you said was 'A billionaire backs a millionaire. One fires people,
> the other "likes to fire people."
>
> So tell me Jerry, who were you talking about if not Trump and Romney.
Learn to lose, asshole.
Jerry 'n Vegas
> Will you just admit you got the fucking quote wrong, and that your
> version means something different than what the man actually said?
> And then, you can apologize.
bratt
Feb 8, 2012, 5:15:20 PM2/8/12
to
referring to when you said he likes to fire people.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
bratt
Feb 8, 2012, 5:16:21 PM2/8/12
to
work out so well, does it.
Alim Nassor
Feb 8, 2012, 6:02:12 PM2/8/12
to
recently that a dumb fuck like you could fuck up to read something
even close to "I like to fire people" HMMMM!!! Who?
mo_ntresor
Feb 9, 2012, 8:29:44 PM2/9/12
to
mo_ntresor
-----
BillB
Feb 9, 2012, 8:55:00 PM2/9/12
to
On 2/9/2012 5:29 PM, mo_ntresor wrote:
> romney can't possibly do worse than obama.
haha...dialing back the expectations a bit, are we? Last week you were
> romney can't possibly do worse than obama.
claiming Captain Romney was going to save America!
Did the fact that Ramashiva and I explained his tax and budget plans to
you have anything to do with your reassessment?
Dutch
Feb 10, 2012, 2:28:14 PM2/10/12
to
"mo_ntresor" <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8h8e09x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
see Bush
news:8h8e09x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
mo_ntresor
Feb 10, 2012, 3:14:51 PM2/10/12
to
On Feb 10 2012 12:28 PM, Dutch wrote:
> > romney can't possibly do worse than obama.
>
> see Bush
LOL!
> > romney can't possibly do worse than obama.
>
> see Bush
compared to obama's 6T in debt in four years, bush looks like a bigger
miser than warren buffett.
mo_ntresor
______________________________________________________________________
VegasJerry
Feb 10, 2012, 6:28:25 PM2/10/12
to
Jerry
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
>
> --------
VegasJerry
Feb 10, 2012, 6:29:02 PM2/10/12
to
Jerry
Who else had said anything
> recently that a dumb fuck like you could fuck up to read something
> even close to "I like to fire people" HMMMM!!! Who?
VegasJerry
Feb 10, 2012, 6:30:17 PM2/10/12
to
On Feb 8 2012 2:16 PM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 8 2012 11:31 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
>
> > On Feb 8 2012 11:34 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> > > Dodge noted. Do you even have a clue as to what it means when we charge
> > > various idiots for attacking the messenger when they can't address the
> > > message? (Or cry about spelling). Have you even heard of the statement,
> > > "Killing the Messenger?" Where it came from? What it's in reference to?
It
> > > means they've lost. They can't they statements. All they have left is
> > > trying to attack the person that made the statement.
> > >
> > > Or is this, too, to confusing for you? We'll see by your reply…..
> >
> > Yes Jerry, I find your four stock replies very confusing. Could you make a
> > little better effort to explain yourself more clearly in the future
> > please? Thanks in advance.
> >
> > ---
>
> LOL how do you like trying to have a conversation with Jerry?
LOL at you not understanding even that.
> On Feb 8 2012 11:31 AM, ChrisRobin wrote:
>
> > On Feb 8 2012 11:34 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> > > Dodge noted. Do you even have a clue as to what it means when we charge
> > > various idiots for attacking the messenger when they can't address the
> > > message? (Or cry about spelling). Have you even heard of the statement,
> > > "Killing the Messenger?" Where it came from? What it's in reference to?
It
> > > means they've lost. They can't they statements. All they have left is
> > > trying to attack the person that made the statement.
> > >
> > > Or is this, too, to confusing for you? We'll see by your reply…..
> >
> > Yes Jerry, I find your four stock replies very confusing. Could you make a
> > little better effort to explain yourself more clearly in the future
> > please? Thanks in advance.
> >
> > ---
>
> LOL how do you like trying to have a conversation with Jerry?
Doesn't
> work out so well, does it.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
bratt
Feb 10, 2012, 6:52:07 PM2/10/12
to
On Feb 10 2012 5:28 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > OK Jerry - I went back and read everything you wrote. Who were you
> > referring to when you said he likes to fire people.
>
> Apology accepted.
apology?
> > OK Jerry - I went back and read everything you wrote. Who were you
> > referring to when you said he likes to fire people.
>
> Apology accepted.
> Jerry
wow talk about a non-answer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
Pepe Papon
Feb 11, 2012, 3:05:19 AM2/11/12
to
BillB
Feb 11, 2012, 3:13:00 AM2/11/12
to
Romney made $22 million last year, and mo is the biggest wannabe that
ever lived. Now that he's swallowed, reality is starting to set in.
Alim Nassor
Feb 11, 2012, 7:02:03 AM2/11/12
to
VegasJerry
Feb 11, 2012, 11:17:50 AM2/11/12
to
On Feb 10 2012 3:52 PM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 10 2012 5:28 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > > OK Jerry - I went back and read everything you wrote. Who were you
> > > referring to when you said he likes to fire people.
> >
> > Apology accepted.
>
> apology?
As feeble as it is for you.
> On Feb 10 2012 5:28 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > > OK Jerry - I went back and read everything you wrote. Who were you
> > > referring to when you said he likes to fire people.
> >
> > Apology accepted.
>
> apology?
> wow talk about a non-answer
admitted you went back and saw you were wrong about your charge against me.
Live with it
____________________________________________________________________
VegasJerry
Feb 11, 2012, 11:20:04 AM2/11/12
to
> and you dodgeted the question as usual.
error. I was right; you two were wrong. Live with it.
Jerry 'n Vegas
________________________________________________________________________
Pepe Papon
Feb 12, 2012, 4:26:09 AM2/12/12
to
Austrian economist and became a religious convert.
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 4:33:37 AM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 1:26 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
> I don't even buy the wannabe theory. I think he read something by an
> Austrian economist and became a religious convert.
Honestly, I think he has an old Mitt Romney campaign sign hanging over
> I don't even buy the wannabe theory. I think he read something by an
> Austrian economist and became a religious convert.
his bed that he jerks off to every night. He even wants to move to Utah
now and live among the Mormons (not that Utah isn't a step up from
Chicago, but still...). He talks about Romney in terms of a Messiah.
Something not quite right with that boy.
Frisbieinstein
Feb 12, 2012, 6:26:46 AM2/12/12
to
On Feb 4, 10:12 pm, "VegasJerry" <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
Shooting yourself for your own good.
That's all the health care plan we need.
Shooting yourself for your own good.
That's all the health care plan we need.
Pepe Papon
Feb 13, 2012, 3:32:45 AM2/13/12
to
begun feeling a bit guilty about ridiculing him.
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 6:00:37 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 11 2012 2:13 AM, BillB wrote:
>
> Good point. What then? Maybe he was just sucking Romney's cock because
> Romney made $22 million last year, and mo is the biggest wannabe that
> ever lived. Now that he's swallowed, reality is starting to set in.
so you are bigoted against gay people?
>
> Good point. What then? Maybe he was just sucking Romney's cock because
> Romney made $22 million last year, and mo is the biggest wannabe that
> ever lived. Now that he's swallowed, reality is starting to set in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
da pickle
Feb 13, 2012, 6:35:50 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 5:00 PM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 11 2012 2:13 AM, BillB wrote:
>
>>
>> Good point. What then? Maybe he was just sucking Romney's cock because
>> Romney made $22 million last year, and mo is the biggest wannabe that
>> ever lived. Now that he's swallowed, reality is starting to set in.
>
> so you are bigoted against gay people?
Not the black ones.
> On Feb 11 2012 2:13 AM, BillB wrote:
>
>>
>> Good point. What then? Maybe he was just sucking Romney's cock because
>> Romney made $22 million last year, and mo is the biggest wannabe that
>> ever lived. Now that he's swallowed, reality is starting to set in.
>
> so you are bigoted against gay people?
0 new messages