Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Lets Re-Focus Doggy's Thread
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Will in New Haven
Feb 5, 2012, 9:06:53 PM2/5/12
to
Doggy started a thread by saying this:
"best job numbers and manufacturing increases this century
seen as a failure by Repugs
but hes "BLECK"
Of course, all of you imbeciles took this thread as an opportunity to
continue your partisan bickering. However, doesn't Doggy deserve that
we concentrate on the important thing that this post illustrates:
Doggy is a fucking moron. He is saying here that the Republicans would
be praising Obama, in an ELECTION year, if he were White or that they
would just give up and concede the election.
Give him his props. He's an idjit.
--
Will in New Haven
"best job numbers and manufacturing increases this century
seen as a failure by Repugs
but hes "BLECK"
Of course, all of you imbeciles took this thread as an opportunity to
continue your partisan bickering. However, doesn't Doggy deserve that
we concentrate on the important thing that this post illustrates:
Doggy is a fucking moron. He is saying here that the Republicans would
be praising Obama, in an ELECTION year, if he were White or that they
would just give up and concede the election.
Give him his props. He's an idjit.
--
Will in New Haven
DDawgster
Feb 7, 2012, 7:57:43 AM2/7/12
to
> Apparently I see no reason for Perry to have lied well over a year ago..
Another gem from Alim Nassor
--------
Will in New Haven
Feb 7, 2012, 12:11:03 PM2/7/12
to
On Feb 7, 7:57 am, "DDawgster" <a1e5...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> On Feb 5 2012 8:06 PM, Will in New Haven wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Doggy started a thread by saying this:
>
> > "best job numbers and manufacturing increases this century
>
> > seen as a failure by Repugs
>
> > but hes "BLECK"
>
> > Of course, all of you imbeciles took this thread as an opportunity to
> > continue your partisan bickering. However, doesn't Doggy deserve that
> > we concentrate on the important thing that this post illustrates:
>
> > Doggy is a fucking moron. He is saying here that the Republicans would
> > be praising Obama, in an ELECTION year, if he were White or that they
> > would just give up and concede the election.
>
> > Give him his props. He's an idjit.
>
> > --
> > Will in New Haven
>
> news flash .. old white guy from alabama denies racism ..
Look, asshole, admit that your logic in that post was stupid or shut
> On Feb 5 2012 8:06 PM, Will in New Haven wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Doggy started a thread by saying this:
>
> > "best job numbers and manufacturing increases this century
>
> > seen as a failure by Repugs
>
> > but hes "BLECK"
>
> > Of course, all of you imbeciles took this thread as an opportunity to
> > continue your partisan bickering. However, doesn't Doggy deserve that
> > we concentrate on the important thing that this post illustrates:
>
> > Doggy is a fucking moron. He is saying here that the Republicans would
> > be praising Obama, in an ELECTION year, if he were White or that they
> > would just give up and concede the election.
>
> > Give him his props. He's an idjit.
>
> > --
> > Will in New Haven
>
> news flash .. old white guy from alabama denies racism ..
the fuck UP. Of course there is racism in the Republican Party but
that has nothing to do with the fact that your post had no point. And
all the one-liners in the world won't change that.
Besides, I wanted to be the idiot who started a new thread when none
was needed for a change.
DDawgster
Feb 7, 2012, 7:48:24 PM2/7/12
to
from the lethal Weapon movie .. the pesci character paints the guy as an
upstanding citizen , and the South African guy is extremely interested ..
then he finds out that the guy is black
and as i see it .. that is exactly what is happening to Obama (to a
limited extent)
you go ahead and go on record as saying that NO ONE hates him because he
is black .. and i will continue to say that a 'core group" do in fact hate
him because he is black
and you will continue to be wrong and i will continue to be right
> Apparently I see no reason for Perry to have lied well over a year ago..
Another gem from Alim Nassor
Will in New Haven
Feb 11, 2012, 8:28:40 PM2/11/12
to
opposition party was racist for _opposing_ the guy in office. Sure,
some people certainly hate him for being Black. However, no Republican
would support him if he were White. He might lose some voters who
agreed with his policies but couldn't stomach voting for a Black but I
don't think there are many of those around. There used to be a lot of
racist New Deal Democrats but I doubt that he will lose more than a
few people who would otherwise agree with him.
Now shut up or I shall taunt you.
BillB
Feb 11, 2012, 8:40:10 PM2/11/12
to
On 2/11/2012 5:28 PM, Will in New Haven wrote:
> You imbecile, I was criticizing you for apparent claim that the
> opposition party was racist for _opposing_ the guy in office.
He made no such claim. Looks like you are the imbecile....again.
> You imbecile, I was criticizing you for apparent claim that the
> opposition party was racist for _opposing_ the guy in office.
Sure,
> some people certainly hate him for being Black.
However, no Republican
> would support him if he were White.
He might lose some voters who
> agreed with his policies but couldn't stomach voting for a Black but I
> don't think there are many of those around.
the white vote for Kerry vs. the white vote for Obama in the South. Did
you do your homework, Will? Don't expect a passing grade if you don't do
your homework.
bratt
Feb 11, 2012, 9:01:26 PM2/11/12
to
this like B-BillB says, racism only comes in one color.
Barack Obama's politics meant nothing to Samuel L. Jackson because the
"Pulp Fiction" star only voted for the president for one reason and one
reason only ... because he's black.
In an interview with Ebony magazine, Jackson explained, "I voted for
Barack because he was black. 'Cuz that's why other folks vote for other
people — because they look like them ... That's American politics, pure
and simple. [Obama's] message didn't mean [bleep] to me."
Jackson then went on to drop the N-word several times when discussing
Obama, telling the mag, "When it comes down to it, they wouldn't have
elected a [bleep]. Because, what's a [bleep]? A [bleep] is scary. Obama
ain't scary at all. [Bleeps] don't have beers at the White House. [Bleeps]
don't let some white dude, while you in the middle of a speech, call [him]
a liar. A [bleep] would have stopped the meeting right there and said,
‘Who the [bleep] said that?' I hope Obama gets scary in the next four
years, 'cuz he ain't gotta worry about getting re-elected."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
---
Iceman
Feb 11, 2012, 10:44:20 PM2/11/12
to
"bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:m4jj09x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
Beldin the Sorcerer
Feb 11, 2012, 11:19:06 PM2/11/12
to
"BillB" <bo...@shaw1.ca> wrote in message
news:VLEZq.14170$JN6....@newsfe13.iad...
are
Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
Kerry, no matter what else, actually served in the military. That's a huge
difference to a lot of voters. Only a complete and total shithead (and
again, yes you are one) would try and say that voting shift between Kerry
and Obama was wholely, or even largely, due to race.
Of course a racist asshole (again, like you) might try and imply it anyway
>
BillB
Feb 11, 2012, 11:32:36 PM2/11/12
to
On 2/11/2012 8:19 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
> Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
No, they weren't clones. Obama was a much better candidate in every way,
> Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
and his results reflected that, all across the country....except...in
redneck America. The same region that voted 50% to keep interracial
marriage illegal. Just a coincidence, right? It was all about Kerry's
military record, right? Are you really that naive, Beldumb?
Steam
Feb 12, 2012, 5:34:45 AM2/12/12
to
reflected that
---
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 5:47:32 AM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 2:34 AM, Steam wrote:
> A much worse candidate in every way
Kerry lost to George Bush.
> A much worse candidate in every way
Clave
Feb 12, 2012, 6:15:55 AM2/12/12
to
"BillB" <bo...@shaw1.ca> wrote in message
news:8NMZq.2598$hJ4....@newsfe20.iad...
> On 2/12/2012 2:34 AM, Steam wrote:
>
>> A much worse candidate in every way
>
> Kerry lost to George Bush.
Interesting data point -- in the latest Fox News poll, in addition to
>
>> A much worse candidate in every way
>
> Kerry lost to George Bush.
Mittens and the current three not-Mittenses, they polled Obama against Jeb
Bush too.
Pretty funny for the brokered-convention crowd. Just go look yourselves.
Jim
Beldin the Sorcerer
Feb 12, 2012, 6:47:44 AM2/12/12
to
"Steam" <a74...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:57hk09x...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
Canadian fucknut is too goddamn stupid to grasp that
Beldin the Sorcerer
Feb 12, 2012, 6:54:05 AM2/12/12
to
news:zhHZq.16759$Ep3....@newsfe08.iad...
worse candidate in the mind of willie the canadian fucknut than a senior
senator who served in vietnam.
Do we need further proof of Willie's status as complete shit for brains?
> and his results reflected that, all across the country....except...in
> redneck America. The same region that voted 50% to keep interracial
> marriage illegal. Just a coincidence, right? It was all about Kerry's
> military record, right? Are you really that naive, Beldumb?
Are you really that big of a racist shithead, Willie?
Seriously?
Well, yes, you must be, because fuck, asshat, you just said a rookie senator
was a much better candidate than a senior senator with shitloads more
experience.
Take that leftwing cock out of your mouth, you're growing delusional
> On 2/11/2012 8:19 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
>> Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
>
> No, they weren't clones. Obama was a much better candidate in every way,
Wow! An extremely short term senator with no military experience is a much
>
>> Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
>
> No, they weren't clones. Obama was a much better candidate in every way,
worse candidate in the mind of willie the canadian fucknut than a senior
senator who served in vietnam.
Do we need further proof of Willie's status as complete shit for brains?
> and his results reflected that, all across the country....except...in
> redneck America. The same region that voted 50% to keep interracial
> marriage illegal. Just a coincidence, right? It was all about Kerry's
> military record, right? Are you really that naive, Beldumb?
Seriously?
Well, yes, you must be, because fuck, asshat, you just said a rookie senator
was a much better candidate than a senior senator with shitloads more
experience.
Take that leftwing cock out of your mouth, you're growing delusional
BillB
Feb 12, 2012, 9:19:50 AM2/12/12
to
On 2/12/2012 3:54 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
> Wow! An extremely short term senator with no military experience is a much
> worse candidate in the mind of willie the canadian fucknut than a senior
> senator who served in vietnam.
>
> Do we need further proof of Willie's status as complete shit for brains?
Do we need any further proof that you can't read, write or think? I
> Wow! An extremely short term senator with no military experience is a much
> worse candidate in the mind of willie the canadian fucknut than a senior
> senator who served in vietnam.
>
> Do we need further proof of Willie's status as complete shit for brains?
didn't say Obama is a "much worse candidate," you fucking idiot. I said
he was the better one.
The first measure of a "good candidate" is whether he can win or not.
Kerry couldn't even beat George Bush ffs.
Beldin the Sorcerer
Feb 12, 2012, 9:37:04 AM2/12/12
to
news:bUPZq.14598$JN6....@newsfe13.iad...
candidate. No experience, no record at all.
My god, shit for brains, why did you shove a rifle up your ass and pull the
trigger?
>
> The first measure of a "good candidate" is whether he can win or not.
> Kerry couldn't even beat George Bush ffs.
Wow, you're an imbecile.
Obama couldn't have beat GWB in 2004 either
Goddamn, shithead, just go fuck your own ass now and be done with it
>
> On 2/12/2012 3:54 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
>> Wow! An extremely short term senator with no military experience is a
>> much
>> worse candidate in the mind of willie the canadian fucknut than a senior
>> senator who served in vietnam.
>>
>> Do we need further proof of Willie's status as complete shit for brains?
>
> Do we need any further proof that you can't read, write or think? I didn't
> say Obama is a "much worse candidate," you fucking idiot. I said he was
> the better one.
Of course you did. And that's incredibly stupid. He IS a much worse
>
>> Wow! An extremely short term senator with no military experience is a
>> much
>> worse candidate in the mind of willie the canadian fucknut than a senior
>> senator who served in vietnam.
>>
>> Do we need further proof of Willie's status as complete shit for brains?
>
> Do we need any further proof that you can't read, write or think? I didn't
> say Obama is a "much worse candidate," you fucking idiot. I said he was
> the better one.
candidate. No experience, no record at all.
My god, shit for brains, why did you shove a rifle up your ass and pull the
trigger?
>
> The first measure of a "good candidate" is whether he can win or not.
> Kerry couldn't even beat George Bush ffs.
Obama couldn't have beat GWB in 2004 either
Goddamn, shithead, just go fuck your own ass now and be done with it
>
bratt
Feb 13, 2012, 6:02:53 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 11 2012 10:32 PM, BillB wrote:
> On 2/11/2012 8:19 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
> > Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
>
> No, they weren't clones. Obama was a much better candidate in every way,
> and his results reflected that, all across the country....except...in
> redneck America. The same region that voted 50% to keep interracial
> marriage illegal.
so you are bigoted against redneck America?
> On 2/11/2012 8:19 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
> > Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
>
> No, they weren't clones. Obama was a much better candidate in every way,
> and his results reflected that, all across the country....except...in
> redneck America. The same region that voted 50% to keep interracial
> marriage illegal.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas
da pickle
Feb 13, 2012, 6:36:34 PM2/13/12
to
On 2/13/2012 5:02 PM, bratt wrote:
> On Feb 11 2012 10:32 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/2012 8:19 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>>
>>> Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
>>
>> No, they weren't clones. Obama was a much better candidate in every way,
>> and his results reflected that, all across the country....except...in
>> redneck America. The same region that voted 50% to keep interracial
>> marriage illegal.
>
> so you are bigoted against redneck America?
Not the black ones.
> On Feb 11 2012 10:32 PM, BillB wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/2012 8:19 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>>
>>> Kerry and Obama are not remotely clones.
>>
>> No, they weren't clones. Obama was a much better candidate in every way,
>> and his results reflected that, all across the country....except...in
>> redneck America. The same region that voted 50% to keep interracial
>> marriage illegal.
>
> so you are bigoted against redneck America?
0 new messages