first email from ramashiva to razzo
William Coleman
----- Original Message -----
From: "RazzO" <tico...@yahoo.com>
To: "William Coleman" <rama...@earthlink.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 4:20 PM
Subject: Hi Bill
:
: Hi Bill,
:
: I appreciate the fact I am one of few you trust enough to watch your
house and care for your cats.
:
: However, I cannot do it. I'm sorry.
And exactly why can't you do it, Darryl??? This is total bullshit. I spent
nine hours at your house trying to solve your computer problems. The only
thing I received in return is a Windows XP installation disk, which may or
may not work for me, because the sleeve says that this disk is only for use
by Darryl Phillips.
Christ, you would think I am asking for some great sacrifice from you. I
merely suggested that you house sit my house, as that would give me the most
peace of mind, knowing that my house was not standing empty, vulnerable to
burglars. Did I mention that I live in a bad neighborhood, that my house
has already been broken into once, after which I installed iron bars?
I clearly suggested that an alternative would be for you to come out twice a
week and feed and water the cats. I can leave enough food and water for
them to last them three or four days.
So, if I am gone three weeks, you would have to make a total of six trips.
We are talking about six hours of your time total. If you don't have a
reliable car, I told you that you can use mine.
Listen, Darryl, if you don't do this for me, don't ever expect me to help
you in any way or give you any more advice about fasting or anything else.
If you don't do this for me, here is what I will have to do. I have a total
of six inside cats. Four are living here with me. Two are living with my
mother in Boulder City. The scenario is to put all six cats in my house and
leave them food and water for four days.
There is no one else I trust to give a key to my house when I am out of
town. If you stiff me on this request, I will have to board all six cats at
a cost of $15 per day per cat. That's $90 per day. If I am gone 20 days,
that is $1800. That is what it will cost me if you stiff me on this
request.
Unfuckingbelieveable that you were Doyle's gofer for years. Listen, Doyle
is a card cheat who cannot play. Either Russ or I would slaughter Doyle and
Chip in a straight game where Russ and I provided the cards and the dealers.
Chip and Doyle have been sitting in the top section at the Mirage and the
Bellagio for years, cheating the high rollers out of millions of dollars.
We both know this is true, Darryl. Don't bother to deny it. Yet you have
been attacking Russ and defending Chip and Doyle for years on RGP. What's
up with that?
Chip and Doyle are subhuman scum, and you can quote me on that. But you
will kiss Doyle's ass and do anything he wants. You claim to be my friend,
yet you cannot assume the responsibility to come to my house twice a week to
feed and water my cats???
If that is your final position, then go fuck yourself, Darryl. You are
subhuman scum, just like your cheating overlords of the real poker mafia --
Chip and Doyle.
Oh, by the way, can you do one thing for me? You previously told me you
knew how to get ahold of Robbie Border. I believe it was his email address.
If you know Robbie's email address and/or phone number can you please email
me that information or call me and tell me?
Oh, by the way, I reserve the right to publish this email on RGP, and I
probably will if I do not get a satisfactory response from you. I put Russ
on the CC list just to let him know clearly and unambiguously exactly how I
stand vis a vis Razzo, Chip, and Doyle -- in other words, the cheating
overlords of the real poker mafia and their asskissing, brownnosing minion.
That would be you, Darryl. The asskissing, brownnosing minion.
Ramashiva, High Priest of the Virgin Mary on Planet Earth
William Coleman (ramashiva)
Department of Agitation, Propaganda, and Demagoguery
________________________
Please visit my weblog, Ramashiva Rules --
http://www.ramashivarules.blogspot.com
Before clicking on the URL, please set your monitor's resolution to 1152x864
or higher and turn off Ad Blocking. Please help me out by clicking on the
affiliate banners at the top of the page, the Amazon book links on the
right, and the Google ads.
Windows Live Messenger -- ramas...@hotmail.com
IESOUS CHRISTOS THEOU YIOS SOTER (corrupted version)
IESOUS CHRISTOS THEOS YIOS SOTERES (true version)
Sell all your possessions, give the money to the poor, and come, follow me.
-- Jesus Christ
God told me to smite Al Qaeda, so I smote them. Then God told me to smite
Saddam, so I smote him also.
-- George W. Bush, Liberator of Afghanistan and Iraq
SwampMidget
Paul Popinjay
your little cat friends must be very important to you. If I were you, I
would board them anyway, whether you find a house sitter or not. There's
just too much that could go wrong if you leave the cats without a caring
human to supervise. What if one were to need emergency care? It's just not
worth taking the risk with some little friends of yours who I am sure you
love and they love you back.
So find a more economical cat hotel. Surely they can do better than $15 per
day per cat.
Go ahead and gamble with leaving the house alone. But don't gamble with the
welfare of your little cat friends. That's my 2-cents.
-Paul Popinjay
"William Coleman" <rama...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:pF0Ig.10584$Qf....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Paul Popinjay
importance of having a CARING human to supervise your cats. With emphasis
on the 'caring'. In other words, I'm not so sure that Razzo is the right
person to care for them even if he agrees. Although I have never met Razzo,
I get the impression that he is somewhat of a irresponsible, carefree kinda
person. So do you really think he is the kind of guy to accept
responsibility for your cats? Watching the house is one thing. You can
always replace material things. But you can't replace the little creatures
you love. Are you sure that Razzo is the kind of guy you want to trust with
that kind of responsibility?
Too bad I don't live in Vegas. I'd watch your cats for you. And if some
emergency happened, I'd take them to emergency and spend whatever I had to
on them and if I ran out of money then there's always credit cards. I can't
tell you how many animals I've saved over the years which I might have seen
on the side of the road or something.
Think TWICE if you're considering someone like Razzo to take responsibility
for your cats.
-Paul Popinjay
"Paul Popinjay" <pape...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:sC1Ig.5007$S_5...@tornado.socal.rr.com...
Wei...@gmail.com
position with a mediocre hand. Unless you have a read, you should fold
this preflop. As for your play on subsequent streets, it is okay. The
river bet is a little questionable though.
ChrisRobin
They'll come by your house every few days, feed and play with the cats, take in
the mail, water the plants, etc. It'll cost you $15-20 a visit, tops. Plus, it
won't be as disruptive to the cats, who won't exactly appreciate being taken
from their home and thrown in a cage for three weeks.
Just make sure the sitter is insured and bonded, and get references.
This is a pretty handy search engine to locate a pet sitter in your area:
http://www.petsitusa.com/vegas.htm
_______________________________________________________________
Watch Lists, Block Lists, Favorites - http://www.recpoker.com
William Coleman
"ChrisRobin" <4308...@recpoker.com> wrote in message
news:1156625054$859...@recpoker.com...
: Why don't you hire a pet sitter? There must be dozens in the Las Vegas
: They'll come by your house every few days, feed and play with the cats,
take in
: the mail, water the plants, etc. It'll cost you $15-20 a visit, tops.
Plus, it
: won't be as disruptive to the cats, who won't exactly appreciate being
taken
: from their home and thrown in a cage for three weeks.
:
: Just make sure the sitter is insured and bonded, and get references.
:
: This is a pretty handy search engine to locate a pet sitter in your area:
:
: http://www.petsitusa.com/vegas.htm
Thanks for your unsolicited advice, Chris. Since you gave me absolutely
terrible and incorrect legal advice regarding my libel suit against Howard
"Treeboy" LIEbeler, I am not going to pay any attention to your advice on
any subject.
Did you read my reply to you on that subject? If not, go read it. Every
statement you made in your post is false.
William Coleman
: Also, after reviewing what I said, I should point out that I mentioned the
: importance of having a CARING human to supervise your cats. With emphasis
: on the 'caring'. In other words, I'm not so sure that Razzo is the right
: person to care for them even if he agrees. Although I have never met
Razzo,
: I get the impression that he is somewhat of a irresponsible, carefree
kinda
: person. So do you really think he is the kind of guy to accept
: responsibility for your cats? Watching the house is one thing. You can
: always replace material things. But you can't replace the little
creatures
: you love. Are you sure that Razzo is the kind of guy you want to trust
with
: that kind of responsibility?
:
: Too bad I don't live in Vegas. I'd watch your cats for you. And if some
: emergency happened, I'd take them to emergency and spend whatever I had to
: on them and if I ran out of money then there's always credit cards. I
can't
: tell you how many animals I've saved over the years which I might have
seen
: on the side of the road or something.
:
: Think TWICE if you're considering someone like Razzo to take
responsibility
: for your cats.
Well, Paul, I am glad we have at least one thing in common. We both love
cats. Now maybe you understand why I feel the way I do about dogs. When I
was a child, I had to stand by helplessly on several occasions and watch
large dogs kill several of my cats in cold blood. If you are so concerned
about my cats' welfare, perhaps we can work something out where you can take
care of my cats while I make a cross country trip.
Here is what I propose. Let me transport my six cats to you and you take
care of them while I am on the road. What would be required would be six
large cages suitable for a 20 pound animal. I only have one of these cages,
since I have no need to transport more than one cat at a time. These cages
are pretty large, so two cats could easily fit in one cage. This would work
OK, as long as the two cats got along. However, I have a major problem with
that. This is why my two lead cats, Rama and Isis, are currently residing
at my mother's house in Boulder City. Rama is a totally dominant male who
will not tolerate the presence of other tomcats. He will not even tolerate
Shiva, who is a fixed black male cat. Shiva was neutered when he showed up.
I would never cut the balls off a tomcat. I have had many tomcats in my
life, and I never considered neutering any of them. If you cannot handle
all the stresses and hassles which go with being the guardian of a tomcat,
don't get a tomcat.
Isis is my only Siamese. She is super highstrung and intense, and she will
not tolerate the presence of other female cats. She is a tiny thing: she
only weighs about five pounds, yet she terrorizes other cats twice her size.
Rama and Isis are lifetime lovers and friends, yet Rama's love must forever
go unrequited, since Isis has been spayed. I was forced to do that to bail
her out of the death machine, AKA the animal pound. Isis was already grown
when Rama showed up as a tiny kitten who had somehow lost his mother, or had
been abandoned by some thoughtless person. Isis immediately adopted Rama as
her little brother, and the two have been celibate lovers and friends ever
since.
I will never forget when Rama was about half grown, and I let Isis out the
front door. She was immediately confronted by the neighborhood tomcat
bully, who started menacing her. Rama saw this and he immediately ran out
the door and interposed himself between Isis and the bully tomcat. He then
adopted the classic tomcat fighting pose of turning his body sideways,
bushing out his tail and body fur, twisting and turning his head and neck in
a threatening way, and emitting an extremely loud "Rowr, rowr, rowr, rowr."
The bully tomcat, who was easily twice Rama's size, immediately backed off
and trotted away.
Rama is now a monster tomcat. He easily weighs 20 pounds, and he has very
long legs and a very big head for a cat his size. He can stand at the base
of a six foot concrete wall and effortlessly jump to the top of the wall.
But he can jump higher than that. After I moved him and Isis to my mother's
house, I started leaving my bedroom sliding door open so the cats could go
out on the upstairs patio whenever they wanted. I figured they would just
go out on the patio, but no. Rama is a tomcat. I was sitting out on the
patio at about 3 am, enjoying the moonlit view of Lake Mead and smoking a
doobie, when I heard a scrambling sound. Much to my amazement, I saw Rama
pulling himself up onto the patio. The distance from the patio floor to the
ground is easily ten feet. This cat superathlete has a ten foot vertical
leap. This puts to shame all the great NBA players, none of whom have a
vertical leap exceeding four feet, as far as I know.
Anyway, I would be willing to pay all my expenses for a roundtrip to bring
my cats to you, then come back and pick them up when I return from my trip.
I really have no use for six cages. If you could pay for the other five
cages, then keep them as your property when this operation is over, that
would be ideal. Petsmart sells the cages I am talking about for $30 each,
and you get a discount if you are in the Petsmart Pet Perks Program.
There is also the problem of a vehicle to transport the cats. Neither my
car nor my mother's car could accomodate six large cat cages. Either car
could accomodate three cages, so if I put two cats in each cage, that would
work. Or, I suppose I could get someone to drive the other car and bring
three cages in each car. A minivan with fold down rear seats would be ideal
for transporting six cages in one vehicle.
Would you consider renting a minivan in California, then coming and picking
up the cats and taking them back with you? I would split the cost of the
minivan and your gas and other travel costs.
Anyway, if you would like to help me, I would be willing to negotiate the
details. I now see that Razzo is not reliable, since I thought I had an
agreement with him that he would come over and feed and water my cats if I
went out of town. As I already said, apparently I misunderstood or
misremembered the conversation Darryl and I had on this subject several
months ago.
Paul Popinjay
That Rama tama cat sounds quite impressive. I enjoyed reading about him,
and Isis. The part where he valiantly charged outside to protect her
reminded me of you. This is how I always felt that you would react if you
were in the same room where an abortion was to be performed. Yes, I know
that you say that God does not forbid abortion. But still, I have always
imagined that you are selflessly brave and valiant like Rama Cat and that
you too would step forward to protect the innocent, with no fear of the
trouble you might meet.
Regarding your travel plans, I must say that I already have six large cages
from Pet Smart. You don't think I would scrimp and buy little cages for cat
travel, do you? When I have moved cats in the past, they have traveled as
comfortably as I could accomodate.
I also have a large truck, white, (with air conditioning), as I try to match
the image of all the other rich farmers in the valley, even though I am far
from rich. All the farmers and businessmen drive large white trucks. I try
to look like I too am a rich farmer, but this is all just image projection
as I am really not a rich capitalist but a dedicated Marxist-Leninist trying
to blend in while waiting for the Revolution.
As much as I am concerned about what you do with your cats, I must remind
you that I am still deathly afraid to even visit Nevada for the small chance
of running into you and getting my ass kicked and stomped into a grease
spot. Your tale of the Angel of Death in another post has just confirmed my
fears. I probably will have trouble sleeping tonight.
Under other circumstances I might have been agreeable to helping. I am
certainly not irresponsible as I suspect Razzo is. On the contrary, I am
very responsible. Just imagine the discipline I must maintain in keeping my
identity secret in this community. Do you know what these fascist red neck
hicks would do to me if they found out I am working for Moscow?
Anyway, I am up to my eyeballs in responsibility and will have to decline.
That doesn't mean I don't care. The best I can offer right now is $20 and
encouragement to other RGPers to donate to your cats' boarding costs, should
you have difficulty covering that. I think I speak for most of RGP when I
say that we all care what happens to you and wish you and your cats the
best.
-Paul Popinjay
James L. Hankins
Ya know, the police should search both basements in both of your houses just
as a matter of course about every other month. Just to be on the safe side.
Camillo
_______________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
William Coleman
"James L. Hankins" <jhan...@cox.net[no spam]> wrote in message
news:UA6Ig.4309$_q4.3360@dukeread09...
:
: "Paul Popinjay" <pape...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
I do not have a basement in my house, at least not one that I would ever
admit to having, or that any pig could possibly be smart enough to find.
Pigs are the dumbest human beings on earth, you know, as well as the most
cowardly.
Jumbo Cranium is a perfect example of this. I post with my real name, and
my real address and phone number are easily discoverable by anyone with even
a rudimentary knowledge of how to use Google. This lying cowardly pig
(which is a derogatory term for cop, in case you didn't know) threatened to
kick my ass up and down Fremont Street. I then gave him my real name and
address and told him to come get some if he thought he could kick my ass. I
also challenged him to reciprocate by giving me his real, verifiable name
and address. His response was that he would never tell me who he was or
where he lived, since I am an obvious, dangerous lunatic.
LMFAO!!! Jumbo Cranium is the classic internet tough guy. He posts tough
talk and threats behind an anonymous troll handle. When challenged to back
up his threats at a real world meeting, he demures and offers some bullshit
excuse as to why he cannot tell me who he is.
Jumbo Cranium is the classic pig. He is as dumb as they come, and a total
coward who becomes a bully in packs, just like all pigs.
Jumbo Cranium is also in for a big suprise. The internet is not as
anonymous as he thinks it is. I am quite confident that he has left enough
clues to his identity that I could easily find out exactly who he is and
exactly where he lives with a few hours of research. However, as you know,
I have a huge number of issues on my plate with which to deal at this time.
Jumbo Cranium is not even on my radar screen of important issues to deal
with at this time. I have bigger fish to fry, like Doug Dalton, Bobby
Baldwin, Chip Reese, and Doyle Brunson.
But remember, my rising sign is Scorpio. Remember, Scorpios never forget.
Remember, Scorpios always get even.
When I do find out exactly who Jumbo Cranium is and exactly where he lives,
two things will happen --
First, if he has not entered into serious settlement negotiations with my
attorney by that time, I will slap a slander and libel lawsuit on him for
his net worth.
Second, at a time and place of my choosing, when I am sure none of his
fellow pigs are available to come to his assistance, I will confront him and
challenge him to kick my ass, as he has threatened. Of course, when he sees
who I am in real life, he will shit his pants, drop down on his knees, and
beg for mercy.
If I am in a compassionate mood at the time, I will, in my infinite mercy,
forgive all, providing he gives me complete unfettered sexual access to his
wife and all female children, regardless of age, for a period of at least a
week.
I would also have to have a guarantee that I would have "visitation" rights
once a month, where I could come by and pick up his wife and all his female
children and take them off for a weekend of continuous fucking and sucking.
On the other hand, if I am not in a compassionate mood -- if I am in a
cranky, pissed off mood, like I am right now, I will probably just blow his
head off with my short-barreled 12-gauge Winchester Defender, and deposit
his headless body on his family doorstep, with a little note attached saying
that this is what happens to pigs who pose as internet tough guys behind
anonymous troll handles, and who issue theats of physical violence which
they cannot possibly back up.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
Department of Agitation, Propaganda, and Demagoguery
________________________
Please visit my weblog, Ramashiva Rules --
http://www.ramashivarules.blogspot.com
Before clicking on the URL, please set your monitor's resolution to 1152x864
or higher and turn off Ad Blocking. Please help me out by clicking on the
affiliate banners at the top of the page, the Amazon book links on the
right, and the Google ads.
Windows Live Messenger -- ramas...@hotmail.com
IESOUS CHRISTOS THEOU YIOS SOTER (corrupted version)
IESOUS CHRISTOS THEOS YIOS SOTERES (true version)
Sell all your possessions, give the money to the poor, and come, follow me.
-- Jesus Christ
God told me to smite Al Qaeda, so I smote them. Then God told me to smite
Saddam, so I smote him also.
:
:
William Coleman
: "William Coleman" <rama...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
Paul, if you will help me out and take care of my cats while I make a cross
country trip, all will be forgiven, I promise. I will be eternally in your
debt and will be forever at your service if you should ever need my
assistance on any matter. I will even release you from troll probation.
You will not have to continue to post as Paul Popinjay, unless you want to.
Nor will you need to continue to follow my rules for probationary trolls.
: Your tale of the Angel of Death in another post has just confirmed my
: fears. I probably will have trouble sleeping tonight.
Paul, you have probably gathered by now that if I am your friend, I am the
best friend you could possibly have. If I am your enemy, then I am the
worst enemy you could possibly have.
If you show me that you are my friend by taking care of my cats, then you
will always be my friend. Unless, of course, you fuck me over in some way,
such as posting lies about me on RGP or elsewhere, as the fool Eric
"Treeboy" LIEbeler has done. If you are my friend, then, of course, all
threats of a libel lawsuit also go out the window. Think about it. Would
you like to be my friend?
: Under other circumstances I might have been agreeable to helping. I am
: certainly not irresponsible as I suspect Razzo is. On the contrary, I am
: very responsible. Just imagine the discipline I must maintain in keeping
my
: identity secret in this community. Do you know what these fascist red
neck
: hicks would do to me if they found out I am working for Moscow?
:
: Anyway, I am up to my eyeballs in responsibility and will have to decline.
: That doesn't mean I don't care. The best I can offer right now is $20 and
: encouragement to other RGPers to donate to your cats' boarding costs,
should
: you have difficulty covering that. I think I speak for most of RGP when I
: say that we all care what happens to you and wish you and your cats the
: best.
Paul, I do not need charity, from you or anyone else. $1800 is a large sum
of money to me, but it is less than a third of my current poker bankroll. I
could easily pay $1800 for cat boarding and still have plenty of money to
play my favorite poker game -- $2/$4 limit holdem on Poker Stars and Party
Poker.
It's just that there are a lot of other things I would rather spend $1800
on. For example, lap dances at Cheetahs are $10 each during the day. I buy
lap dances during the day at the bulk rate of 6 for $50. $1800 would buy
216 lap dances from the sexy wenches of my choice at Cheetahs. Think of how
many times I would have to go out to my car and put on a clean, dry pair of
pants when one of these titty bar seductresses made me come in my pants
AGAIN.
I do not have much of a sex life, but I do have a sex life. I haven't been
laid in 20 years, but my sex life at Cheetahs is really quite enjoyable. I
am deathly afraid of getting AIDS, so I would never consider sticking my
dick in a woman's pussy again, unless she first tested HIV negative, then
consented to my having complete control over her for six months, such as
locking her in a room or cage, then having her test HIV-negative again in
six months.
Unlikely that any woman would ever agree to these terms, so I am resigned to
the fact that, for the rest of my life, my sex life will consist of
strippers in titty bars making me come in my pants by letting me suck and
fondle her tits, while she reaches into my pants and gives me a hand job,
while I get my finger wet by finger fucking her.
You should try it. It really is a lot of fun. And I would much rather
engage in this type of safe sex with a perfectly beautiful woman with a
perfect body, than fuck and suck with the type of ugly uppity insolent
skanks who seem to compose the great majority of American females these
days.
Getting back to the problem of your caring for my cats. You already have
the perfect vehicle and cages to transport my six cats. How does this sound
for a proposition --
I will drive to your location at my expense, in either my classic 1985
Toyota Tercel, or my mother's car. I will not tell you exactly what my
mother's car is, other than to tell you that it is a late model high end
sports touring sedan from one of the world's leading automobile
manufacturers. This car has a wholesale Kelly Blue Book value of about
$7500. I just put $1500 into servicing and refurbishing this vehicle to
make it roadworthy for a cross country trip for my mother and myself. This
refurbishment included --
Complete checkout from stem to stern by a master mechanic for all possible
problems.
Complete tuneup, including cleaning and adjusting the fuel injectors for
optimum gas mileage. Cleaning and gapping the spark plugs and distributor
points. Setting timing for optimum gas mileage.
Flushing and refilling the cooling system.
Flushing and refilling the air conditioning coolant.
Flushing and refilling the automatic transmission fluid.
Complete lube and oil change with Mobil 1 synthetic motor oil, 0W-40W heavy
duty grade.
Replacement of the air, fuel, and oil filters. Normally, a fuel filter
costs just a few dollars. On this particular car, the fuel filter is a
complex mechanism which includes some sort of pressure regulator. The fuel
filter for this car costs $100, plus another $100 for installation. I hope
this information does not give too much away to someone knowledgeable about
automobiles.
Purchase and balancing of five brand new tires -- Pirelli P6 all season high
performance radials. The "high performance" is not just a marketing slogan.
It has a specific meaning -- speed rated for 130+ mph and pressure rated for
44 psi. These tires are normally installed on high performance sports
touring sedans, such as those made by Mercedes Benz and BMW. Normally, I
always buy high end Michelins for my cars. However, in this case, the
equivalent Michelins cost $50 more per tire, and my guru for everything on
the underside of the car told me that the Pirelli P6 is actually a better
tire than the equivalent Michelin. Obviously, he was giving his honest
opinion, since he would make more money by selling me the Michelins.
If you need new tires, and want the best tires you can buy at any price, I
would strongly recomment the Pirelli P6.
Five year contract for free balancing and rotation, as well as unlimited
four wheel alignments.
As you can see, I do not fuck around when I refurbish a car.
Whichever car I drive to your location, I would leave it as security for
return of your van. I would also sign a contract assuming all
responsibility for any repairs and damages to your van. I assume you have
insurance which would cover the cost of any repairs due to an accident. Of
course, I would pay any deductible involved.
Then I would return to Las Vegas, pick up my cats, return to your location,
turn over my cats to you for safekeeping, and return to Las Vegas in the car
I drove in on. Again, I would pay for all gas and travel expenses
incidental to the trip.
I am willing to negotiate the details of such a deal. If you are
interested, please let me know. I would rather not discuss this any further
in public on RGP, because I do not want any of my enemies to learn any
details of the car I would be driving or my itinerary.
If you are interested, shoot me an email. I will send you my cell phone
number. Or we can do the negotiations by email if you prefer.
ChrisRobin
On Aug 26 2006 6:09 PM, William Coleman wrote:
> "ChrisRobin" <4308...@recpoker.com> wrote in message
> news:1156625054$859...@recpoker.com...
> : Why don't you hire a pet sitter? There must be dozens in the Las Vegas
> area.
> : They'll come by your house every few days, feed and play with the cats,
> take in
> : the mail, water the plants, etc. It'll cost you $15-20 a visit, tops.
> Plus, it
> : won't be as disruptive to the cats, who won't exactly appreciate being
> taken
> : from their home and thrown in a cage for three weeks.
> :
> : Just make sure the sitter is insured and bonded, and get references.
> :
> : This is a pretty handy search engine to locate a pet sitter in your area:
> :
> : http://www.petsitusa.com/vegas.htm
>
> Thanks for your unsolicited advice, Chris.
Unsolicited advice? Bwahahahahahaha. YOU ARE POSTING PRIVATE EMAILS TO A PUBLIC
NEWSGROUP, you half-wit. If you want to keep your commuications with people
private, then I suggest communicating by telephone. Are you familiar with the
telephone, William? It's a wonderful invention.
> Since you gave me absolutely terrible and incorrect legal advice regarding my
> libel suit against Howard "Treeboy" LIEbeler
William, I was trying to help you avoid embarrassing yourself in a most
magnificent manner. If you choose to ignore my advice and blow mommy's money
pursuing a lawsuit you have no chance to win, fine. But promise me this: When
you fail spectacularly (and you will), promise to post the court's judgement (or
dismissal) to RGP. Conversely, if you win your libel suit, I will post a public
apology for ever doubting the great Ramashiva and leave this newsgroup for good,
never to return. Deal?
> I am not going to pay any attention to your advice on any subject.
Well, my wife runs a pet sitting business, so I'm guessing I'm uniquely
qualified to offer you advice on the subject. If you'd prefer to spit in my eye
for trying to help you save some money... that's your choice. But given your
circumstances (financially and logistically), my solution makes the most sense.
> Did you read my reply to you on that subject?
Not until just now. You waited nearly two weeks to reply, which I assumed was
evidence of your embarrassment, because you immediately dropped from sight
thereafter. Given your absolute cluelessness about this country's libel laws,
and the absurdity of your purported "lawsuit," I can't say I blame you.
> If not, go read it. Every statement you made in your post is false.
Actually, every statement I made in that post is 100% correct. I don't know what
kind of dufus you've hired to be your lawyer, but he's filling your head with
all sorts of nonsense. I studied journalism at one of the top three J-schools in
the country, bud. I'll bet I know a little more about libel law than the tax
attorney you hired to represent you.
The burden of proof is on YOU, William. Do you understand that? This isn't
England or Austrailia, where the burden of proof in libel cases falls on the
defendant. Treesong doesn't have to prove SHIT. You have to prove that his
statements are false, that they were maliciously motivated, AND that they
somehow damaged your reputation or your ability to perform your occupation. And
"emotional damage," as you claimed in your belated post, absolutely does NOT
qualify as libel. You must prove real, quantifiable damage - "he hurt my
feelings" ain't gonna cut it.
Good luck, William. You're going to need it.
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
Paul Popinjay
>
> If you are interested, shoot me an email. I will send you my cell phone
> number. Or we can do the negotiations by email if you prefer.
>
>
> William Coleman (ramashiva)
>
Under other circumstances, I'd like to help. But I'm scared of you. I'd
like to be your friend. We could go to Cheetahs together sometime to
satisfy your interests. And at other times we could attend meetings of the
Progressive Labor Party and the Revolutionary Communist Party together to
satisfy my interests. I'm glad you like cats. But since I found out
that your parents set up a trust fund for you, I became convinced that this
is not a joke. You are freakishly brilliant and perceptive, like Dustin
Hoffman in Rain Man. I'm scared of you.
Good luck with the cats. Please opt to do something besides leaving them
there unsupervised. I still think maybe RGP could start a fund drive for
your boarding expenses. There's no reason to be too proud to take the money
we could raise. Think of it not as a blind charity but rather a conscious
effort of people who love you, trying and wanting to help.
Incidentally, I like my new name 'Popinjay' and do not want to change it
back. It's a cool name.
-Paul Popinjay
William Coleman
:
: On Aug 26 2006 6:09 PM, William Coleman wrote:
:
: > "ChrisRobin" <4308...@recpoker.com> wrote in message
: > news:1156625054$859...@recpoker.com...
: > : Why don't you hire a pet sitter? There must be dozens in the Las Vegas
: > area.
: > : They'll come by your house every few days, feed and play with the
cats,
: > take in
: > : the mail, water the plants, etc. It'll cost you $15-20 a visit, tops.
: > Plus, it
: > : won't be as disruptive to the cats, who won't exactly appreciate being
: > taken
: > : from their home and thrown in a cage for three weeks.
: > :
: > : Just make sure the sitter is insured and bonded, and get references.
: > :
: > : This is a pretty handy search engine to locate a pet sitter in your
area:
: > :
: > : http://www.petsitusa.com/vegas.htm
: >
: > Thanks for your unsolicited advice, Chris.
:
: Unsolicited advice? Bwahahahahahaha. YOU ARE POSTING PRIVATE EMAILS TO A
PUBLIC
: NEWSGROUP, you half-wit.
You are too funny, Chris. You have now degenerated into a total joke on
RGP. I am posting my emails to Darryl, not his emails to me. Plus, I have
never had any confidentiality agreement with Darryl. Plus, if you noticed,
in my first email to Darryl, I advised him that I reserved the right to post
my email to him on RGP. I have not violated any ethical or moral standard
by posting my emails to Darryl.
: If you want to keep your commuications with people
: private, then I suggest communicating by telephone.
You fucking idiot. Apparently you are not aware of Bush's illegal
warrantless wiretap program. Telephone communications are the least secure
means of communication imaginable.
: Are you familiar with the
: telephone, William? It's a wonderful invention.
Don't talk down to me, Chris. You are an ignorant idiot who thinks there is
any credibility at all to the ridiculous 9/11 conspiracy theories. Your
ignorance of basic economic theory is so total that you think there is
actually some question whether free trade in general, and CAFTA and NAFTA in
particular, are an overall benefit to the U.S. economy. Please read Paul
Krugman on free trade. His credentials as a liberal economist are
impeccable, as are his credentials as the world's leading expert on
international economics. You are a complete fool if you think I would not
totally destroy you on any debate on free trade.
:
: > Since you gave me absolutely terrible and incorrect legal advice
regarding my
: > libel suit against Howard "Treeboy" LIEbeler
: William, I was trying to help you avoid embarrassing yourself in a most
: magnificent manner.
Chris, you advice is unwanted and and has no credibility whatsoever with me.
As I said, every statement you made in your post to me about suing Eric
"Treeboy" LIEbeler was incorrect. Why don't you go back and read my
response and you will realize how totally ignorant you are on this matter?
: If you choose to ignore my advice
Of course I choose to ignore your advice. Your post about libel shows you
know nothing at all about libel law.
: and blow mommy's money
Thanks for confirming that you know nothing at all about libel lawsuits. If
you did, you would know that standard practice among attorneys specializing
in libel is to take cases on a contingency fee basis if they think the suit
has merit.
: pursuing a lawsuit you have no chance to win, fine.
You really are an arrogant little punk, aren't you? You know nothing about
libel law. You know nothing about the facts of my case against Eric
"Treeboy" LIEbeler. Yet you think you are qualified to make a judgement
that I have no chance to win a libel lawsuit against Treeboy? My attorney,
who has an interstate highway named after him, who has been a respected
attorney in Clark County for over 40 years, and who has been a respected
Clark County Commissioner for many years, says the case is a slam dunk. He
says Treeboy's arboreal onanism lies about me are libel per se. He says my
only obstacle to collecting significant damages are to prove that I
experienced significant emotional suffering as a result of the arboreal
onanism lies, and/or that my reputation suffered significant damage as a
result of Treeboy lying about me.
: But promise me this:
Why should I promise you anything??? You are an ignorant jackoff who
supposes that you are qualified to debate me on any subject matter
whatsoever. Let's just take one example. According to your erroneous legal
advice, in order to win a libel lawsuit, I must prove that Treeboy's
libelous lies are false. The exact opposite is the case. I have no burden
of proof whatsoever. The burden of proof is on Treeboy, he must either
demonstrate that his libelous lies are true, which he obviously cannot,
since there is no factual basis whatsoever to support them. Or, he must
show that he had substantial and credible reasons to believe that his
libelous lies were true and the time he made them. He obviously cannot do
that either, since there cannot possibly be any credible evidence for a
complete fabrication. Treeboy is further damned by the fact that he told me
explicitly at the 2005 WSOP that he always was certain that the whole
arboreal onanism fable was a complete hoax, and that he never believed for a
minute that there was any factual basis for any of the nonsense and lies
published about me. Yet he has been one of the main posters who has kept
this libelous lie alive for four years. KNOWING ALL THE WHILE THAT WHAT HE
WAS SAYING WAS A COMPLETE LIE AND FABRICATION. Do you understand now what a
malicious, mendacious scumbag Treeboy is???
Why are you defending him, anyway??? You do know that he is a stout
defender of Ann Coulter, and that his posts about her make it quite clear
that he is beyond the pale in terms of mainstream American politics? What
are you, a faux troll? Are you really a right-wing nutcase who has been
posing as a liberal, so at the appropriate time you could attack me and have
credibility with RGP as a fellow liberal???
Seriously, man, why are you giving me grief about this? It is none of your
fucking business. Mind your own fucking business, and I will mind mine.
All you advice on this or any other matter is unwanted and unwelcome. In
other words, fuck off. If you keep sticking your nose into my business,
when you know I want you to leave me the fuck alone, then you will move up
on my enemies list of people I need to ratfuck at the appropriate time.
: When you fail spectacularly (and you will),
Again, you show what an arrogant, ignorant punk you are. You know nothing
of libel law. You know nothing of the facts of the case. Yet you feel
qualified to make a prediction of the case's outcome, when an experienced
respected attorney says my case is a slam dunk. Do you have any idea what a
fool you have made of yourself on RGP on this matter??? Almost as big a
fool as you have made of yourself with your insane 9/11 conspiracy theories.
: promise to post the court's judgement (or dismissal) to RGP.
Listen, shit for brains, you are not the boss of me. You do not give me
orders about what to post on RGP. Once the libel lawsuit is actually filed,
believe me, I will lawyer up completely. In fact, my lawyer has already
advised me not to discuss the case any further on RGP, since Treeboy has
already shown himself to be an unscrupulous liar, who will try to twist and
distort anything I say to his advantage.
In fact, I am going to start following my lawyer's advice right now. This
is the last post in which I will discuss Treeboy or my impending libel
lawsuit against him with you or anyone else. As of this moment, I am
lawyering up completely. In case you hadn't noticed, Treeboy has already
lawyered up. When is the last time he discussed any aspect of the case???
I am not at all concerned. I know for a fact that I have piano wire wrapped
around Treeboy's nutsack. One yank and I cut his balls off. Treeboy knows
this. He has lawyered up and is hoping that something else will distract me
and I will lose interest in suing him for libel. If that is what Treeboy
thinks, he is sadly mistaken. Treeboy knows it is going to cost him a
substantial sum of money to make this matter go away permanently. I know
this also. Eventually, especially when he receives a letter from my
attorney that a libel lawsuit will be filed by a date certain unless he
enters serious settlement negotiations, I guarantee you Treeboy will
suddenly have great interest in making this whole matter go away
permanently.
: Conversely, if you win your libel suit, I will post a public
: apology for ever doubting the great Ramashiva and leave this newsgroup for
good,
: never to return. Deal?
Deal??? What the fuck are you talking about??? In order to make a deal
with me, you must have something of value to offer me. You've got nothing.
It is a matter of complete indifference to me whether you ever post to RGP
again. In particular, I wish you would stop replying to my posts,
especially concerning Treeboy. You are an irritating gnat who wastes my
time replying to your ignorant spew.
I have already told you that this is the last post in which I will discuss
Treeboy with you or anyone else. So don't expect me to reply to you on any
matter regarding Treeboy. In fact, don't expect me to reply to you on any
matter at all. You are now my leading candidate for the next incarceration
in my killfile. Give me any shit about anything in the future, and you will
join the other inmates in my killfile. And I will not offer you troll
probation, as I have so generously offered my other killfile inmates. In
other words, leave me the fuck alone and go flame bub. He is more your
speed. You are totally out of your depth in trying to debate any matter
with me.
:
: > I am not going to pay any attention to your advice on any subject.
:
: Well, my wife runs a pet sitting business, so I'm guessing I'm uniquely
: qualified to offer you advice on the subject.
Oh, yes. That obviously makes you an expert on pet care and pet sitting.
You can't be serious.
: If you'd prefer to spit in my eye for trying to help you save some
money... that's your choice. But given your
: circumstances (financially and logistically),
Again, you are an ignorant, arrogant punk. What makes you think you know
anything at all about my financial circumstances???
Please tell me in which poker rooms I have money on deposit and how much.
Please tell me the current balance in my Neteller account.
Please tell me with which banks I have checking accounts and what my balance
is in those accounts.
Please tell me the same information about my money market accounts.
Please tell me what stocks are in my stock portfolio and their value.
Please tell me what credit lines I have at which banks.
Please tell me what insurance policies I hold and the cash value of each.
Please tell me which credit cards I have and how much is available for cash
advances if I need emergency cash.
Please tell me how much cash is in my pocket right now.
Please tell me how much cash is in the two safety deposit boxes I have in
the Las Vegas area.
Please tell me how much cash is in the safety deposit boxes I may have in
other cities on escape routes from Las Vegas.
Please tell me how much money I have on deposit denominated in Pesos in
Mexico earning 20% annual interest.
Please tell me how much junk silver I have buried in remote desert
locations.
Et cetera, ad nauseum.
You know absolutely nothing about my financial situation. Did it ever occur
to you that I deliberately poormouth my financial situation on RGP so
Treeboy and my other enemies will not report me to the IRS for tax evasion?
Again, you are an ignorant, arrogant punk for thinking you know anything at
all about my financial situation.
: my solution makes the most sense.
:
: > Did you read my reply to you on that subject?
:
: Not until just now. You waited nearly two weeks to reply, which I assumed
was
: evidence of your embarrassment, because you immediately dropped from sight
: thereafter.
You are fucking beyond belief. You are not even on my radar screen,
jackoff. If you suppose that anything you ever post has any effect
whatsoever on whether I post on RGP, you are totally clueless. I did not
post at all to RGP for two weeks because I have been very involved with
dealing with issues related to my father's recent death. I assure you,
nothing you or anyone else posted to RGP has had any effect on my RGP
posting. If you had been around RGP for awhile, you would know that I
frequently take posting hiatuses of weeks and even months. RGP is nothing
but a sideshow and source of amusement for me.
: Given your absolute cluelessness about this country's libel laws,
: and the absurdity of your purported "lawsuit," I can't say I blame you.
:
: > If not, go read it. Every statement you made in your post is false.
:
: Actually, every statement I made in that post is 100% correct.
Actually, every statement you made in your post is incorrect, as any lawyer
will tell you.
: I don't know what kind of dufus you've hired to be your lawyer,
Of course you don't. I have given you his name. You can verify that he has
an interstate highway named after him, and that he has been a respected
attorney in Clark County for forty years. He says my case is a slam dunk.
Got that? A slam dunk. He says that Treeboy's arboreal onanism lies are
libel per se. Got that? Libel per se.
: but he's filling your head with all sorts of nonsense.
Chris, you have shown yourself to be completely ignorant of libel law. I
think I will ignore your advice and take the advice of a respected attorney
with 40 years experience and with an interstate highway named after him.
: I studied journalism at one of the top three J-schools in
: the country, bud. I'll bet I know a little more about libel law than the
tax
: attorney you hired to represent you.
I'll bet you are full of shit and do not know what you are talking about.
Just how much do you want to bet that you are 100% wrong on this matter?
All money to be deposited with a third party, of course.
I am sure that taking a course on libel law in a journalism school is
superior to the knowledge of libel law of a respected attorney with forty
years experience and an interstate highway named after him. Wow!!! You have
become a complete joke and an exaggerated parody of a know it all who knows
nothing about anything.
Tell me, how much did Treeboy pay you to harass me about this? Or, are you
in fact Treeboy's sockpuppet who is now hounding me on this matter with
completely false and misleading statements about libel law? You seem to
have developed a monomania about harassing me on this matter, and are
compulsively giving me false and misleading information about libel law.
And where did you ever get the idea that my attorney is a tax attorney??? I
certainly never said that. In fact, my mother and I had numerous tax
questions which we asked him. He told us everything he knows about our tax
questions, but he specifically told us that tax law is not one of his
specialities, and he recommended that we retain both a tax attorney and a
CPA specializing in tax matters to get definitive answers to our questions.
: The burden of proof is on YOU, William.
100% incorrect. The burden of proof is on Treeboy to prove his statements
true. I have no burden whatsoever to prove his statements false.
: Do you understand that?
No, I don't, Chris. Because what you are saying is 100% false. Ask any
lawyer.
This isn't England or Austrailia, where the burden of proof in libel cases
falls on the
: defendant. Treesong doesn't have to prove SHIT.
Again, 100% false. He must either prove his libelous lies are true, or he
must prove that, at the time he published his libelous lies, he had credible
information which convinced him what he was saying was true. He cannot
possible have any such credible information, because the whole story is a
complete fabrication and hoax. His case is further damaged by the fact that
he told me at the 2005 WSOP that he knew at the time he published his
libelous lies that the arboreal onanism story was a complete hoax, with no
factual basis whatsoever.
: You have to prove that his statements are false,
No, I do not. I have no burden of proof whatsoever to prove his statements
false. His libelous lies are libel per se. What part of that simple
sentence do you not understand???
: that they were maliciously motivated,
The maliciousness and viciousness of his libel is quite obvious, and would
be so ruled by any judge.
: AND that they somehow damaged your reputation or your ability to perform
your occupation.
Again, the damage to my reputation is obvious. What part of libel per se do
you not understand???
: And "emotional damage," as you claimed in your belated post,
My belated post??? What the fuck are you talking about??? You vastly
overestimate your significance to me. You are an irritating gnat to me,
nothing more. I had much more important matters to attend to than posting
to RGP, much less responding to your ignorant spew.
: absolutely does NOT qualify as libel.
You do not know the first thing about libel law, do you? The question of
emotional suffering has absolutely nothing to do with whether Treeboy's lies
constitute libel. If Treeboy fails to meet his burden of proof that his
libelous lies are true, which he obviously will, then the only question is
how much damages I should be awarded. He will obviously fail to meet his
burden of proof, since the entire arboreal onanism story was a complete hoax
and fabrication, AND TREEBOY KNEW THAT AT THE TIME HE PUBLISHED HIS LIBELOUS
LIES.
Once it is established that Treeboy libeled me, the question becomes how
much emotional suffering and damage to my reputation did he cause?
I know for a fact that I have a strong case with plenty of witnesses in both
those areas. Obviously I am not going to discuss this at all on RGP.
: You must prove real, quantifiable damage - "he hurt my
: feelings" ain't gonna cut it.
Chris, go fuck yourself. You are completely uninformed on this matter.
Again, how much is Treeboy paying you to harass me about this???
: Good luck, William. You're going to need it.
I don't need any luck, you fucking moron. My attorney says my case is a
slam dunk. What part of that do you not understand? My attorney says
Treeboy's libelous lies are libel per se. What part of that do you not
understand?
You know what, Chris? I have had it with you. I have spend two hours
responding to your ignorant post. Absolutely every statement in your latest
post is 100% false.
You have obviously been hired by Treeboy to fuck with me and get me to talk
about the case, in hopes that I will make some statement that he can use
against me. I am not only putting you in my permanent killfile with no
possibility of probation. I am also putting you close to the top of my
enemies list, as you are now either obviously either a paid agent or
sockpuppet of Treeboy.
You know what it means to be on my enemies list, Chris? It means that if I
ever find out exactly who you are and exactly where you live, I will ratfuck
you mercilessly and make you life totally miserable. Before you get your
panties in a bunch and start accusing me of threatening you, let me define
ratfucking to you. Ratfucking someone is doing anyone of a number of things
which can destroy a person's life and make his existence totally miserable.
In order to qualify as a ratfuck, no laws can be broken in the process of a
ratfuck, nor can any criminal or civil liability be incurred. The perfect
ratfuck is one in which the ratfuckee cannot even identify the ratfucker.
I have been a master ratfucker for many years. Try me. You'll see. If you
have any brains at all, which I now doubt, you will leave me the fuck alone
and go fuck with someone like bub, who is at your level. You are totally
out of your league in trying to fuck with me, as you are now obviously
doing.
Welcome to my killfile, Chris. Welcome to my enemies list. If you are
smart, you will avoid drawing attention to yourself by fucking with me any
further. Of course you are obviously quite stupid, so you will probably try
to fuck with me some more, even though you are killfiled. I have no doubt
that I will soon be reading posts from your sockpuppets. Again, you are
completely out of your league. Need I remind you that I am THE ubertroll of
RGP? I can smell a sockpuppet a mile away.
Goodby Chris. If you have even half a brain, you will leave me the fuck
alone and find some other way to amuse yourself on RGP. I am in a
thoroughly nasty mood because of all the shit people have been pulling on me
lately. If you fuck with me anymore, I will put you at the top of my
enemies list, do the research necessary to find out exactly who you are and
exactly where you live, then ratfuck you so badly that your entire life will
come crashing down on your head and you will have no idea what happened to
you.
Enough said. I will never spend another second responding to your posts.
If you fuck with me again in any way, I will ratfuck you so badly that you
will be miserable for the rest of your life. Think I am bluffing? Go
ahead. Call my bluff. Fuck with me again. Your life will be destroyed.
Ramashiva has spoken.
FL Turbo
<jhan...@cox.net[no spam]> wrote:
>
>Ya know, the police should search both basements in both of your houses just
>as a matter of course about every other month. Just to be on the safe side.
>
ROFL of the week.
I can visualize the neighbors being interviewed.
"I just can't believe it. That nice Mr. Popinjay. He was just so
friendly to everybody as long as you didn't mention unions.
I just can't believe it."
OR.
"I just knew it. We all knew that @*@@& @#*&^ Coleman was nuts when
he ran up and down the street in a raincoat yelling at everybody.
I just knew it."
Paul Popinjay
news:d963f2pavelp9rvsf...@4ax.com...
>
> "I just knew it. We all knew that @*@@& @#*&^ Coleman was nuts when
> he ran up and down the street in a raincoat yelling at everybody.
> I just knew it."
>
Not a raincoat, but a London Fog trench coat. I'm sure the Angel of Death
is not only menacing, but actually quite stylish. Very cool!
BillB
> There is no one else I trust to give a key to my house when I am out of
> town. If you stiff me on this request, I will have to board all six cats
> at
> a cost of $15 per day per cat. That's $90 per day. If I am gone 20 days,
> that is $1800. That is what it will cost me if you stiff me on this
> request.
Have you considered a professional pet sitter? There are many in Las Vegas.
ChrisRobin
to settle this up as briefly as possible.
> : Unsolicited advice? Bwahahahahahaha. YOU ARE POSTING PRIVATE
> EMAILS TO A PUBLIC NEWSGROUP, you half-wit.
>
> You are too funny, Chris. You have now degenerated into a total joke on
> RGP. I am posting my emails to Darryl, not his emails to me.
Please point out where I claimed otherwise.
> Plus, I have never had any confidentiality agreement with Darryl. Plus, if
> you
> noticed, in my first email to Darryl, I advised him that I reserved the right
> to post
> my email to him on RGP. I have not violated any ethical or moral standard
> by posting my emails to Darryl.
No. But when you publish your private emails in a private forum, don't whine
when you get feedback from the peanut gallery. 'Kay?
> : If you want to keep your commuications with people
> : private, then I suggest communicating by telephone.
>
> You fucking idiot. Apparently you are not aware of Bush's illegal
> warrantless wiretap program. Telephone communications are the least secure
> means of communication imaginable.
The telephone is assuredly more private than posting your communications on a
public newsgroup. Common sense isn't exactly your strong suit, is it?
> : Are you familiar with the
> : telephone, William? It's a wonderful invention.
>
> Don't talk down to me, Chris. You are an ignorant idiot who thinks there is
> any credibility at all to the ridiculous 9/11 conspiracy theories. Your
> ignorance of basic economic theory is so total that you think there is
> actually some question whether free trade in general, and CAFTA and NAFTA
> in particular, are an overall benefit to the U.S. economy. Please read Paul
> Krugman on free trade. His credentials as a liberal economist are
> impeccable, as are his credentials as the world's leading expert on
> international economics. You are a complete fool if you think I would not
> totally destroy you on any debate on free trade.
I must be a complete fool then, because you are wrong on two major points: NAFTA
is NOT good for the U.S. economy as a whole (the evidence is overwhelming), and
there is nothing "free" about free trade. But that is argument for another day.
> : > Since you gave me absolutely terrible and incorrect legal advice
> regarding my
> : > libel suit against Howard "Treeboy" LIEbeler
>
> : William, I was trying to help you avoid embarrassing yourself in a most
> : magnificent manner.
>
> Chris, you advice is unwanted and and has no credibility whatsoever with me.
> As I said, every statement you made in your post to me about suing Eric
> "Treeboy" LIEbeler was incorrect. Why don't you go back and read my
> response and you will realize how totally ignorant you are on this matter?
I read it. I disagree.
> : If you choose to ignore my advice
>
> Of course I choose to ignore your advice. Your post about libel shows you
> know nothing at all about libel law.
Sure. Then full speed ahead with your lawsuit, I'd imagine. As I've stated
before, best of luck.
> : and blow mommy's money
>
> Thanks for confirming that you know nothing at all about libel lawsuits. If
> you did, you would know that standard practice among attorneys specializing
> in libel is to take cases on a contingency fee basis if they think the suit
> has merit.
>
> : pursuing a lawsuit you have no chance to win, fine.
>
> You really are an arrogant little punk, aren't you? You know nothing about
> libel law. You know nothing about the facts of my case against Eric
> "Treeboy" LIEbeler. Yet you think you are qualified to make a judgement
> that I have no chance to win a libel lawsuit against Treeboy? My attorney,
> who has an interstate highway named after him, who has been a respected
> attorney in Clark County for over 40 years, and who has been a respected
> Clark County Commissioner for many years, says the case is a slam dunk. He
> says Treeboy's arboreal onanism lies about me are libel per se. He says my
> only obstacle to collecting significant damages are to prove that I
> experienced significant emotional suffering as a result of the arboreal
> onanism lies, and/or that my reputation suffered significant damage as a
> result of Treeboy lying about me.
As I have stated previously, your "emotional suffering" doesn't mean fuck-all in
a libel case. And as I've also stated before, to prove damage to your
reputation, you must prove that Howard's statements somehow damaged your public
image as an erratic, eccentric, often threatening and egomaniacal sociopath. I'd
imagine Treesong's lawyers will have ample ammunition to establish this beyond
any doubt.
Other than that, though, your lawsuit is golden.
> : But promise me this:
>
> Why should I promise you anything??? You are an ignorant jackoff who
> supposes that you are qualified to debate me on any subject matter
> whatsoever. Let's just take one example. According to your erroneous legal
> advice, in order to win a libel lawsuit, I must prove that Treeboy's
> libelous lies are false. The exact opposite is the case. I have no burden
> of proof whatsoever. The burden of proof is on Treeboy, he must either
> demonstrate that his libelous lies are true, which he obviously cannot,
> since there is no factual basis whatsoever to support them. Or, he must
> show that he had substantial and credible reasons to believe that his
> libelous lies were true and the time he made them. He obviously cannot do
> that either, since there cannot possibly be any credible evidence for a
> complete fabrication. Treeboy is further damned by the fact that he told me
> explicitly at the 2005 WSOP that he always was certain that the whole
> arboreal onanism fable was a complete hoax, and that he never believed for a
> minute that there was any factual basis for any of the nonsense and lies
> published about me. Yet he has been one of the main posters who has kept
> this libelous lie alive for four years. KNOWING ALL THE WHILE THAT WHAT
> HE
> WAS SAYING WAS A COMPLETE LIE AND FABRICATION. Do you understand
> now what a malicious, mendacious scumbag Treeboy is???
And I'd imagine in a court of law, he would be an idiot to admit that any such
conversation took place.
> Why are you defending him, anyway??? You do know that he is a stout
> defender of Ann Coulter, and that his posts about her make it quite clear
> that he is beyond the pale in terms of mainstream American politics? What
> are you, a faux troll? Are you really a right-wing nutcase who has been
> posing as a liberal, so at the appropriate time you could attack me and have
> credibility with RGP as a fellow liberal???
I'm confused - when did I attack you? And how have I been defending Treesong? I
don't give two shits about your juvenile spat. I merely offered my opinion that
your lawsuit was frivolous, and then I offered you advice for how to care for
your cats. Let's be clear: You're the attacker here, William.
And please, don't flatter yourself that I'd spend that much time and energy
creating a false persona, just so I could turn on you. Clearly your egomania has
gotten the better of you.
> Seriously, man, why are you giving me grief about this? It is none of your
> fucking business. Mind your own fucking business, and I will mind mine.
> All you advice on this or any other matter is unwanted and unwelcome. In
> other words, fuck off. If you keep sticking your nose into my business,
> when you know I want you to leave me the fuck alone, then you will move up
> on my enemies list of people I need to ratfuck at the appropriate time.
There you go again - posting your pathetic personal dramas to a public
newsgroup, and then whining when people comment on it. If you want me to mind my
own business, then keep your personal business to yourself. Otherwise, I will
continue to comment whenever the fuck I please.
> : When you fail spectacularly (and you will),
>
> Again, you show what an arrogant, ignorant punk you are. You know nothing
> of libel law. You know nothing of the facts of the case. Yet you feel
> qualified to make a prediction of the case's outcome, when an experienced
> respected attorney says my case is a slam dunk. Do you have any idea what a
> fool you have made of yourself on RGP on this matter??? Almost as big a
> fool as you have made of yourself with your insane 9/11 conspiracy theories.
Time will tell.
> : promise to post the court's judgement (or dismissal) to RGP.
>
> Listen, shit for brains, you are not the boss of me. You do not give me
> orders about what to post on RGP. Once the libel lawsuit is actually filed,
> believe me, I will lawyer up completely. In fact, my lawyer has already
> advised me not to discuss the case any further on RGP, since Treeboy has
> already shown himself to be an unscrupulous liar, who will try to twist and
> distort anything I say to his advantage.
>
> In fact, I am going to start following my lawyer's advice right now. This
> is the last post in which I will discuss Treeboy or my impending libel
> lawsuit against him with you or anyone else. As of this moment, I am
> lawyering up completely. In case you hadn't noticed, Treeboy has already
> lawyered up. When is the last time he discussed any aspect of the case???
> I am not at all concerned. I know for a fact that I have piano wire wrapped
> around Treeboy's nutsack. One yank and I cut his balls off. Treeboy knows
> this. He has lawyered up and is hoping that something else will distract me
> and I will lose interest in suing him for libel. If that is what Treeboy
> thinks, he is sadly mistaken. Treeboy knows it is going to cost him a
> substantial sum of money to make this matter go away permanently. I know
> this also. Eventually, especially when he receives a letter from my
> attorney that a libel lawsuit will be filed by a date certain unless he
> enters serious settlement negotiations, I guarantee you Treeboy will
> suddenly have great interest in making this whole matter go away
> permanently.
How big of you.
> : Conversely, if you win your libel suit, I will post a public
> : apology for ever doubting the great Ramashiva and leave this newsgroup for
> good, never to return. Deal?
>
> Deal??? What the fuck are you talking about??? In order to make a deal
> with me, you must have something of value to offer me. You've got nothing.
> It is a matter of complete indifference to me whether you ever post to RGP
> again. In particular, I wish you would stop replying to my posts,
> especially concerning Treeboy. You are an irritating gnat who wastes my
> time replying to your ignorant spew.
And you are a great, great man. A great, great man who threatens to stomp his
foes into grease stains... and then sicks his lawyer on them.
> I have already told you that this is the last post in which I will discuss
> Treeboy with you or anyone else. So don't expect me to reply to you on any
> matter regarding Treeboy. In fact, don't expect me to reply to you on any
> matter at all. You are now my leading candidate for the next incarceration
> in my killfile. Give me any shit about anything in the future, and you will
> join the other inmates in my killfile. And I will not offer you troll
> probation, as I have so generously offered my other killfile inmates. In
> other words, leave me the fuck alone and go flame bub. He is more your
> speed. You are totally out of your depth in trying to debate any matter
> with me.
Do whatever you see fit. But please don't play the victim. You attacked me for
offering pet care advice. Keep that in mind, you disingenuous prick.
> : > I am not going to pay any attention to your advice on any subject.
> :
> : Well, my wife runs a pet sitting business, so I'm guessing I'm uniquely
> : qualified to offer you advice on the subject.
>
> Oh, yes. That obviously makes you an expert on pet care and pet sitting.
> You can't be serious.
I'm perfectly serious. Serious enough to say that the thought of shipping my own
cats off to be caged in a boarding facility for 20 days would never occur to me.
What an animal lover you must be.
> : If you'd prefer to spit in my eye for trying to help you save some
> money... that's your choice. But given your
> : circumstances (financially and logistically),
>
> Again, you are an ignorant, arrogant punk. What makes you think you know
> anything at all about my financial circumstances???
Enough to know that your dumb ass had to take out a cash advance in order to
re-up your supply of Mexican dirt weed.
> Please tell me in which poker rooms I have money on deposit and how much.
>
> Please tell me the current balance in my Neteller account.
>
> Please tell me with which banks I have checking accounts and what my balance
> is in those accounts.
>
> Please tell me the same information about my money market accounts.
>
> Please tell me what stocks are in my stock portfolio and their value.
>
> Please tell me what credit lines I have at which banks.
>
> Please tell me what insurance policies I hold and the cash value of each.
>
> Please tell me which credit cards I have and how much is available for cash
> advances if I need emergency cash.
>
> Please tell me how much cash is in my pocket right now.
>
> Please tell me how much cash is in the two safety deposit boxes I have in
> the Las Vegas area.
>
> Please tell me how much cash is in the safety deposit boxes I may have in
> other cities on escape routes from Las Vegas.
>
> Please tell me how much money I have on deposit denominated in Pesos in
> Mexico earning 20% annual interest.
>
> Please tell me how much junk silver I have buried in remote desert
> locations.
>
> Et cetera, ad nauseum.
>
> You know absolutely nothing about my financial situation. Did it ever occur
> to you that I deliberately poormouth my financial situation on RGP so
> Treeboy and my other enemies will not report me to the IRS for tax evasion?
LMAO. You sure are a clever one.
> Again, you are an ignorant, arrogant punk for thinking you know anything at
> all about my financial situation.
>
>
> : my solution makes the most sense.
> :
> : > Did you read my reply to you on that subject?
> :
> : Not until just now. You waited nearly two weeks to reply, which I assumed
> was evidence of your embarrassment, because you immediately dropped from
> sight thereafter.
>
> You are fucking beyond belief. You are not even on my radar screen,
> jackoff. If you suppose that anything you ever post has any effect
> whatsoever on whether I post on RGP, you are totally clueless. I did not
> post at all to RGP for two weeks because I have been very involved with
> dealing with issues related to my father's recent death. I assure you,
> nothing you or anyone else posted to RGP has had any effect on my RGP
> posting. If you had been around RGP for awhile, you would know that I
> frequently take posting hiatuses of weeks and even months. RGP is nothing
> but a sideshow and source of amusement for me.
How noble of you. Have you managed to get your father's watch back, and if so,
how many minutes did it take you to drive to the nearest pawn shop?
> : Given your absolute cluelessness about this country's libel laws,
> : and the absurdity of your purported "lawsuit," I can't say I blame you.
> :
> : > If not, go read it. Every statement you made in your post is false.
> :
> : Actually, every statement I made in that post is 100% correct.
>
> Actually, every statement you made in your post is incorrect, as any lawyer
> will tell you.
You can insist on that until you're blue in the face, it doesn't change the fact
that the burden of proof is on you.
> : I don't know what kind of dufus you've hired to be your lawyer,
>
> Of course you don't. I have given you his name. You can verify that he has
> an interstate highway named after him, and that he has been a respected
> attorney in Clark County for forty years. He says my case is a slam dunk.
> Got that? A slam dunk. He says that Treeboy's arboreal onanism lies are
> libel per se. Got that? Libel per se.
Got it. But surely you realize your lawyer's assertions mean nothing until they
hold up in court, right? Libel per se only means that your lawyer does not have
to prove maliciousness on Treesong's part; it does nothing to shift the burden
of proof.
> : but he's filling your head with all sorts of nonsense.
>
> Chris, you have shown yourself to be completely ignorant of libel law. I
> think I will ignore your advice and take the advice of a respected attorney
> with 40 years experience and with an interstate highway named after him.
Let me know how it turns out.
> : I studied journalism at one of the top three J-schools in
> : the country, bud. I'll bet I know a little more about libel law than the
> tax attorney you hired to represent you.
>
> I'll bet you are full of shit and do not know what you are talking about.
> Just how much do you want to bet that you are 100% wrong on this matter?
> All money to be deposited with a third party, of course.
Name your price.
> I am sure that taking a course on libel law in a journalism school is
> superior to the knowledge of libel law of a respected attorney with forty
> years experience and an interstate highway named after him. Wow!!! You have
> become a complete joke and an exaggerated parody of a know it all who knows
> nothing about anything.
Know-it-all parody? Sorry, I think you've cornered the market on that.
> Tell me, how much did Treeboy pay you to harass me about this? Or, are you
> in fact Treeboy's sockpuppet who is now hounding me on this matter with
> completely false and misleading statements about libel law? You seem to
> have developed a monomania about harassing me on this matter, and are
> compulsively giving me false and misleading information about libel law.
Give your egomania a rest for once. Nobody is paying me to "harass" you. In
fact, YOU instigated this confrontation by rebuking my pet sitting advice. Quit
playing the victim.
> And where did you ever get the idea that my attorney is a tax attorney??? I
> certainly never said that. In fact, my mother and I had numerous tax
> questions which we asked him. He told us everything he knows about our tax
> questions, but he specifically told us that tax law is not one of his
> specialities, and he recommended that we retain both a tax attorney and a
> CPA specializing in tax matters to get definitive answers to our questions.
I assumed any lawyer stupid enough to take on your case was in over his head.
> : The burden of proof is on YOU, William.
>
> 100% incorrect. The burden of proof is on Treeboy to prove his statements
> true. I have no burden whatsoever to prove his statements false.
Wrong.
> : Do you understand that?
>
> No, I don't, Chris. Because what you are saying is 100% false. Ask any
> lawyer.
>
> This isn't England or Austrailia, where the burden of proof in libel cases
> falls on the defendant. Treesong doesn't have to prove SHIT.
>
> Again, 100% false. He must either prove his libelous lies are true, or he
> must prove that, at the time he published his libelous lies, he had credible
> information which convinced him what he was saying was true. He cannot
> possible have any such credible information, because the whole story is a
> complete fabrication and hoax. His case is further damaged by the fact that
> he told me at the 2005 WSOP that he knew at the time he published his
> libelous lies that the arboreal onanism story was a complete hoax, with no
> factual basis whatsoever.
Yeah, and any judge is going to treat the "arboreal onanism" story as such a
silly, over-the-top accusation, that it can't possibly be true - and thus, not
libelous.
> : You have to prove that his statements are false,
>
> No, I do not. I have no burden of proof whatsoever to prove his statements
> false. His libelous lies are libel per se. What part of that simple
> sentence do you not understand???
No part.
> : that they were maliciously motivated,
>
> The maliciousness and viciousness of his libel is quite obvious, and would
> be so ruled by any judge.
Possibly.
> : AND that they somehow damaged your reputation or your ability to perform
> your occupation.
>
> Again, the damage to my reputation is obvious. What part of libel per se do
> you not understand???
Your reputation, in a word, is fucked - entirely of your own doing. If you think
Howard's silliness made any dent in your "reputation," you're off your rocker.
> : And "emotional damage," as you claimed in your belated post,
>
> My belated post??? What the fuck are you talking about??? You vastly
> overestimate your significance to me. You are an irritating gnat to me,
> nothing more. I had much more important matters to attend to than posting
> to RGP, much less responding to your ignorant spew.
You are a great, great man. I know this because you tell me so.
> : absolutely does NOT qualify as libel.
>
> You do not know the first thing about libel law, do you? The question of
> emotional suffering has absolutely nothing to do with whether Treeboy's lies
> constitute libel. If Treeboy fails to meet his burden of proof that his
> libelous lies are true, which he obviously will, then the only question is
> how much damages I should be awarded. He will obviously fail to meet his
> burden of proof, since the entire arboreal onanism story was a complete hoax
> and fabrication, AND TREEBOY KNEW THAT AT THE TIME HE PUBLISHED
> HIS LIBELOUS LIES.
Sigh. I tire of this. Of course your emotional suffering has nothing to do with
whether Treesong's comments constitute libel. That's what I've been saying all
along. Please keep up.
> Once it is established that Treeboy libeled me, the question becomes how
> much emotional suffering and damage to my reputation did he cause?
>
> I know for a fact that I have a strong case with plenty of witnesses in both
> those areas. Obviously I am not going to discuss this at all on RGP.
Of course. You *NEVER* do that.
> : You must prove real, quantifiable damage - "he hurt my
> : feelings" ain't gonna cut it.
>
> Chris, go fuck yourself. You are completely uninformed on this matter.
> Again, how much is Treeboy paying you to harass me about this???
No one is paying me anything, you paranoid fuck.
> : Good luck, William. You're going to need it.
>
> I don't need any luck, you fucking moron. My attorney says my case is a
> slam dunk. What part of that do you not understand? My attorney says
> Treeboy's libelous lies are libel per se. What part of that do you not
> understand?
Your attorney can annoint you the High Priestess of the Virgin Mary. Until the
courts concur, that and four bucks will get you a Starbucks latte.
> You know what, Chris? I have had it with you. I have spend two hours
> responding to your ignorant post. Absolutely every statement in your latest
> post is 100% false.
>
> You have obviously been hired by Treeboy to fuck with me and get me to talk
> about the case, in hopes that I will make some statement that he can use
> against me. I am not only putting you in my permanent killfile with no
> possibility of probation. I am also putting you close to the top of my
> enemies list, as you are now either obviously either a paid agent or
> sockpuppet of Treeboy.
Enough of the egomania already. I am not a paid agent. I am not a sockpuppet.
And you can take your "probation" and stick it up your ass.
> You know what it means to be on my enemies list, Chris? It means that if I
> ever find out exactly who you are and exactly where you live, I will ratfuck
> you mercilessly and make you life totally miserable. Before you get your
> panties in a bunch and start accusing me of threatening you, let me define
> ratfucking to you. Ratfucking someone is doing anyone of a number of things
> which can destroy a person's life and make his existence totally miserable.
> In order to qualify as a ratfuck, no laws can be broken in the process of a
> ratfuck, nor can any criminal or civil liability be incurred. The perfect
> ratfuck is one in which the ratfuckee cannot even identify the ratfucker.
I imagine the only rat around here that needs fear a "ratfucking" is your pet
rat, William.
> I have been a master ratfucker for many years. Try me. You'll see. If you
> have any brains at all, which I now doubt, you will leave me the fuck alone
> and go fuck with someone like bub, who is at your level. You are totally
> out of your league in trying to fuck with me, as you are now obviously
> doing.
I am not trying to fuck with you. I merely pointed out that your lawsuit is
juvenile, and without merit. Unless Treesong's lawyer is a drooling invalid, you
are going to get laughed out of the court.
> Welcome to my killfile, Chris. Welcome to my enemies list. If you are
> smart, you will avoid drawing attention to yourself by fucking with me any
> further. Of course you are obviously quite stupid, so you will probably try
> to fuck with me some more, even though you are killfiled. I have no doubt
> that I will soon be reading posts from your sockpuppets. Again, you are
> completely out of your league. Need I remind you that I am THE ubertroll of
> RGP? I can smell a sockpuppet a mile away.
What a clever, clever man you are. Do not let that bloated ego of yours
overwhelm your sense of reason, bud. I would not waste my time trying to fuck
you, or creating sock puppets to harass you. And, I would not file a lawsuit
against you, you sniveling little pussy.
> Goodby Chris. If you have even half a brain, you will leave me the fuck
> alone and find some other way to amuse yourself on RGP. I am in a
> thoroughly nasty mood because of all the shit people have been pulling on me
> lately. If you fuck with me anymore, I will put you at the top of my
> enemies list, do the research necessary to find out exactly who you are and
> exactly where you live, then ratfuck you so badly that your entire life will
> come crashing down on your head and you will have no idea what happened to
> you.
I have never made any secret of who I am, William.
And your threats, by the way, are laughable.
> Enough said. I will never spend another second responding to your posts.
> If you fuck with me again in any way, I will ratfuck you so badly that you
> will be miserable for the rest of your life. Think I am bluffing? Go
> ahead. Call my bluff. Fuck with me again. Your life will be destroyed.
> Ramashiva has spoken.
Referring to yourself in the third person now? Perfect.
Don't forget to post the results of your childish lawsuit, William.
_______________________________________________________________
Your Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
Tom White
> You fucking idiot. Apparently you are not aware of Bush's illegal
> warrantless wiretap program. Telephone communications are the least secure
> means of communication imaginable.
Bush's wiretapping should be of no concern to an honest person
who doesn't attempt to feed cats.
William Coleman
: <jhan...@cox.net[no spam]> wrote:
:
:
: >
: >Ya know, the police should search both basements in both of your houses
just
: >as a matter of course about every other month. Just to be on the safe
side.
: >
:
: ROFL of the week.
What the fuck are you doing out of my killfile??? Either my killfile got
fucked up, or you changed your email address.
I really don't care which is true. Either way, back in my killfile.
By the way, have you contacted my attorney or Eric "Treeboy" LIEbeler to
initiate serious settlement negotiations to prevent my filing a libel suit
against you for calling me a communist, a traitor, a terrorist syocphant,
and the many other lies you have told about me?
If not, I strongly suggest you do so. Otherwise, the time will come when
the most important thing I have to do is find out exactly who you are and
exactly where you live. At that point, I will sue you for libel for your
net worth.
As I have told you repeatedly, the internet is not as anonymous as you think
it is. I am quite confident I can find out who you are and where you live
with not too much trouble.
Also, I would strongly suggest you stop posting to RGP altogether. I had
already had enough of your lies and bullshit over a year ago. Since then,
every post you make just infuriates me further.
Play with fire, you will get burned. I guarantee it.
William Coleman
"BillB" <bo...@shaw1.ca> wrote in message
news:jDiIg.472919$iF6.36962@pd7tw2no...
:
: "William Coleman" <rama...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
Nope. I am not going to give someone I do not know the keys to my house
while I am gone for three weeks. I cannot believe I was about to turn over
my house keys to Darryl.
FL Turbo
<rama...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>"FL Turbo" <noe...@notime.com> wrote in message
>news:d963f2pavelp9rvsf...@4ax.com...
>: On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:30:27 -0500, "James L. Hankins"
>: <jhan...@cox.net[no spam]> wrote:
>:
>:
>: >
>: >Ya know, the police should search both basements in both of your houses
>just
>: >as a matter of course about every other month. Just to be on the safe
>side.
>: >
>:
>: ROFL of the week.
>
>What the fuck are you doing out of my killfile??? Either my killfile got
>fucked up, or you changed your email address.
>
>I really don't care which is true. Either way, back in my killfile.
>
What???
I haven't been in your killfile already?
Dammitall.
I thought I could count on you.
Here I've been bragging to Paul Popinjay how I was in your killfile
and he was not.
Now I can only hope he won't read this, or else I'll never hear the
end of it.
>By the way, have you contacted my attorney or Eric "Treeboy" LIEbeler to
>initiate serious settlement negotiations to prevent my filing a libel suit
>against you for calling me a communist, a traitor, a terrorist syocphant,
>and the many other lies you have told about me?
>
Ha.
I have never, ever called you a "syocphant".
But seriously now, I apologize for saying that I could just visualize
the jackboots in your closet.
I made that part up.
>If not, I strongly suggest you do so. Otherwise, the time will come when
>the most important thing I have to do is find out exactly who you are and
>exactly where you live. At that point, I will sue you for libel for your
>net worth.
>
And what would you do with all of it, fix the air conditioning in your
Toyota?
>As I have told you repeatedly, the internet is not as anonymous as you think
>it is. I am quite confident I can find out who you are and where you live
>with not too much trouble.
>
Well, don't forget that you have to bring down Bobby and Doyle, and,
uh, those other guys first.
>Also, I would strongly suggest you stop posting to RGP altogether. I had
>already had enough of your lies and bullshit over a year ago. Since then,
>every post you make just infuriates me further.
>
I spose it wouldn't hurt to start looking for a lawyer right now.
It will probably be damn near impossible to find one with a highway
named after him, so I will probably have to settle for one with only a
street named after him.
>Play with fire, you will get burned. I guarantee it.
>
>
>William Coleman (ramashiva)
>
>Department of Agitation, Propaganda, and Demagoguery
>________________________
>
>Please visit my weblog, Ramashiva Rules --
>
>http://www.ramashivarules.blogspot.com
>
>Before clicking on the URL, please set your monitor's resolution to 1152x864
>or higher and turn off Ad Blocking. Please help me out by clicking on the
>affiliate banners at the top of the page, the Amazon book links on the
>right, and the Google ads.
>
>Windows Live Messenger -- ramas...@hotmail.com
>
>IESOUS CHRISTOS THEOU YIOS SOTER (corrupted version)
>IESOUS CHRISTOS THEOS YIOS SOTERES (true version)
>
>Sell all your possessions, give the money to the poor, and come, follow me.
>
>-- Jesus Christ
>
>God told me to smite Al Qaeda, so I smote them. Then God told me to smite
>Saddam, so I smote him also.
>
>-- George W. Bush, Liberator of Afghanistan and Iraq
>
Well, nice chatting with you.
Don't forget to update your killfile.
I'm counting on you.
Regards,
Rush Limbaugh
BillB
> : Have you considered a professional pet sitter? There are many in Las
> Vegas.
>
> Nope. I am not going to give someone I do not know the keys to my house
> while I am gone for three weeks. I cannot believe I was about to turn
> over
> my house keys to Darryl.
I hear you. Just keep in mind that there are many professional services that
are bonded and insured. They have a strict schedule to follow and I think
the last thing you'd have to worry about is them snooping through your
house. They just want to get in and out of there as quickly as possible. I'd
venture to say your privacy would be better protected with a professional
service than having a friend housesit for you.
William Coleman
:
: "William Coleman" <rama...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
OK. Thanks for the headsup. I was not aware of all this information.
spam]@earthlink.net Paul Popinjay
>
> "BillB" <bo...@shaw1.ca> wrote in message
> news:WE7Jg.495453$IK3.50716@pd7tw1no...
> :
> : "William Coleman" <rama...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> : news:Fa%Ig.2899$xQ1...@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> :
> : > : Have you considered a professional pet sitter? There are many in Las
> : > Vegas.
> : >
> : > Nope. I am not going to give someone I do not know the keys to my
> house
> : > while I am gone for three weeks. I cannot believe I was about to turn
> : > over
> : > my house keys to Darryl.
> :
> : I hear you. Just keep in mind that there are many professional services
> that
> : are bonded and insured. They have a strict schedule to follow and I
> think
> : the last thing you'd have to worry about is them snooping through your
> : house. They just want to get in and out of there as quickly as possible.
> I'd
> : venture to say your privacy would be better protected with a
> professional
> : service than having a friend housesit for you.
>
> OK. Thanks for the headsup. I was not aware of all this information.
>
>
> William Coleman (ramashiva)
>
Oh come on. Surely in a city the size of Las Vegas, after you have lived
there over two decades, surely you have at least one true friend who you can
totally trust who will take care of your house and kitties for no charge.
Just take him or her out for a nice dinner when you get back. Come on. I'm
as big an asshole as you, and even I can say I have at least a couple
friends like that.
Well? Of course, every friend I have in the world I think I've met at a
card room or racetrack. I dunno. Not exactly the environment to meet the
most responsible and quality people. (very few exceptions) Maybe I am
starting to see your point and appreciate your predicament.
Y'know what? Uhh, maybe you ought to just cancel your trip. :-(
-Paul Popinjay
William Coleman
"Paul Popinjay" <paulg123[no spam]@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:%i8Jg.5947$S_5....@tornado.socal.rr.com...
:
: "William Coleman" <rama...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
Uhh, no I don't, Paul. I thought I had exactly one friend in Las Vegas.
That was Razzo. Turns out he not only does not keep his commitments, turns
out he is not only a liar, but he is also a no-good backstabbing
motherfucking asshole. Did you read where I said that he told me that Doyle
was in the next room listening while the RECANT of John Martino was being
taped? He most definitely told me this. I am absolutely positive. It was
a piece of the puzzle which made me suspect that Doyle Brunson was indeed a
card cheat. After all, if Doyle really were sweet and innocent, and if
Doyle has never cheated at cards in Las Vegas, as Doyle and Razzo claim, why
would Doyle possibly care what a known crossroader and card mechanic like
John Martino said about him?
Now Razzo has pounded the final nail in the coffin. Just knowing that Doyle
was in the next room listening during the taping of the RECANT is damning,
but not conclusive, evidence that Doyle is a card cheat. I told Razzo that
he should just sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up, because everytime he
replied to me he just gave me more openings to unload on Chip and Doyle.
Now Razzo has convinced me beyond any doubt that Doyle is a card cheat. I
am 100% certain that Darryl told me that Doyle was in the next room
listening during the taping of the RECANT. But now Darryl denies having
ever said that. He is stone cold lying. What is worse, he knows he is
lying. What is even worse, he knows that I know he is lying. Yet he tells
this flagrant lie anyway. I wonder why?
The only plausible reason is that Doyle leaned on Razzo real hard and told
him to get on RGP and deny having said anything about Doyle being in the
next room. Now there are innocent reasons Doyle could have been in the next
room. Maybe he was just curious. But now, Razzo and Doyle are trying to
cover up Doyle's presence in the next room. The only motive for such a
coverup would be if, in fact, Doyle was in the next room to make sure that
Martino said everything he was supposed to say, and didn't say anything he
wasn't supposed to say.
Again, if Doyle weren't a card cheat, why would he care what Martino said in
the first place? Why would he be so anxious to have Martino tape a RECANT?
And why would Doyle be so concerned, that he would think it necessary to be
in the next room listening during the taping of the RECANT?
If you believe I am telling the truth about what Darryl told me, then simple
logic tells you that Doyle Brunson is a card cheat. So you need to decide
who has more credibility between Darryl and me. If you have followed the
three threads on my emails to Razzo, you know I have caught Darryl telling
numerous lies in these threads. I have never been caught telling a lie on
RGP, mainly because I have never told one. Not on RGP, that is. Of course,
I have told many lies in real life --
No, Officer, of course I don't have any illegal drugs or guns in the car.
No, dear, of course your sister didn't give me a blowjob while you were at
work today.
Of course I have declared all my income, Mr. IRS Tax Auditor.
Etc.
In the real world, always telling the truth is just plain stupid if it will
cause you major problems. Which is why it cracks me up that all the
right-wing nutcases think it is so horrible that Clinton lied under oath
about a blowjob. Like 99.9% of them wouldn't do exactly the same thing if
they were lucky enough to get an extramarital blowjob.
Meanwhile, I have no friends because I am a hermit, and because, as I have
previously explained, you must be perfect or close to perfect if you want to
be my friend. The one thing I absolutely will not tolerate in a friend is
not keeping commitments. I also will not tolerate my friends lying to me.
You break a commitment without a very good reason, and you are no longer my
friend. You lie to me, and you are no longer my friend. Darryl has both
broken a commitment to me, and he has lied to me. And he cannot figure out
why he is no longer my friend. Darryl is an extremely stupid individual.
: Well? Of course, every friend I have in the world I think I've met at a
: card room or racetrack. I dunno. Not exactly the environment to meet the
: most responsible and quality people. (very few exceptions) Maybe I am
: starting to see your point and appreciate your predicament.
I make all my friends in casinos, titty bars, and whorehouses. There are
quite a few people in Las Vegas with whom I am very friendly, WHEN I SEE
THEM. Most of these people I haven't seen in years, and I do not socialize
with them, I just hang out with them when I run into them. I would never
dream of asking them to care for my cats. But I had a specific agreement
with Darryl that he would care for my cats in exchange for help with his
computer problems. I kept my end of the bargain. He welched on his end of
the bargain. The fact that he belatedly and too late offered to come over
to my house and see what is involved in caring for my cats means nothing.
His chance to redeem himself and keep his commitment to me was when he
replied to my first email. In his reply, he lied to me, and he did not
offer to keep his commitment. Only when I published my reply to his reply,
as my second email to Razzo, did Darryl finally realize the seriousness of
the situation and belatedly offer to care for my cats.
I suspect that Doyle was mad as a motherfucker and told Darryl to go care
for my cats already, so I would shut the fuck up.
: Y'know what? Uhh, maybe you ought to just cancel your trip.
I have made a commitment to my mother to drive her back to Alabama, so we
can both visit her family, most of whom we have not seen for many years.
Two of my cousins on my mother's side make occasional trips to Las Vegas and
visit us. We have not seen my other four cousins and their families for
many years. I also have one aunt, who is my mother's sister and is well
into her nineties, who is still alive. I would very much like to see her
again before she dies. Her farm in southeastern Alabama, where she still
lives, is the closest thing I have to an ancestral homestead, since the
original Deloney homestead, where my mother and all her siblings were born
and grew up, was torn down and replaced with a mansion many years ago.
While growing up on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, I spent weekends, Christmas
vacations, and even whole summer vacations, living on my aunt's farm. I
earned money by picking cotton, milking the cows, gathering eggs, etc. That
was where I learned to love cats, as maybe twenty or thirty cats lived in my
aunt's back yard. I also got educated about sex on that farm. I used to
really get off going down to the cattle pen and watching the bulls fuck the
cows. My God, bulls have big dicks. I still feel inadequate every time I
think of just how big a bull cock is.
Unlike Darryl, I always keep my commitments, unless I have a VERY good
reason not to, such as being hospitalized or extremely ill. Just not
wanting to do something, or having something else you would rather do, is
absolutely not a valid reason to break a commitment.
ChrisRobin
On Aug 29 2006 10:55 PM, William Coleman wrote:
> "BillB" wrote in message
> news:WE7Jg.495453$IK3.50716@pd7tw1no...
> :
> : "William Coleman" wrote in message
> : news:Fa%Ig.2899$xQ1...@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> :
> : > : Have you considered a professional pet sitter? There are many in Las
> : > Vegas.
> : >
> : > Nope. I am not going to give someone I do not know the keys to my house
> : > while I am gone for three weeks. I cannot believe I was about to turn
> : > over
> : > my house keys to Darryl.
> :
> : I hear you. Just keep in mind that there are many professional services
> that
> : are bonded and insured. They have a strict schedule to follow and I think
> : the last thing you'd have to worry about is them snooping through your
> : house. They just want to get in and out of there as quickly as possible.
> I'd
> : venture to say your privacy would be better protected with a professional
> : service than having a friend housesit for you.
>
> OK. Thanks for the headsup. I was not aware of all this information.
Are you kidding me, you dumb fuck? I posted this suggestion in the early stages
of this thread, and you turned it into a diatribe about how I'm working for
Treesong, and how I'm getting paid to stalk you online. Maybe it's time to lay
off the "Coleman Cocktail" (© Ramashiva) already.
I sure hope you didn't killfile me as you claimed, you miserable fuck. HIRE A
PETSITTER ALREADY. It'll cost you $150 for the three weeks, tops. And another
plus, the rest of RGP won't have to suffer through your public breakup with
Razzo.
But of course, we all feel your pain, and whatnot. What about that Lunar
landscaped mug ain't to love?
And I guarantee no self-respecting pet sitter would want to spend any more time
in your momma's house than absolutely necessary. Seriously, bud. From what I
hear, it's kinda gross. Maybe you can find a pet sitter/maid?
A guy can dream.
_______________________________________________________________
The Largest Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
RazzO
In another post you mentioned that I have met Russ numerous times and was
responsible for recording the cheating tapes. These claims are also wrong.
I have never met Russ G. and
I did not video the cheating tapes.
I have not spoke to Doyle or Mike Caro in over a year. I did, however,
wave and say hello to him
from a few feet away at his table at the opening of the Venetian poker
room.
RazzO
http://www.razzo.com
email:ticorazz (at) yahoo.com
____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
William Coleman
"RazzO" <ra...@razzo.com> wrote in message
news:lu5gs3x...@recgroups.com...
:I have never told you any such thing about Doyle being there that day.
You are absolutely lying and you know it.
: In another post you mentioned that I have met Russ numerous times and was
: responsible for recording the cheating tapes. These claims are also wrong.
Excuse me, asshole, but I acknowledged that possibility. I did not say I
was 100% certain. I based my claim that you had met Russ on my apparently
mistaken belief that you were the cameraman for the original cheating tapes.
I stated I was not sure you were the cameraman for the original cheating
tapes, therefore I was not sure you had ever met Russ.
However, I am 100% certain beyond any doubt at all that you told me that
Doyle was in the next room listening while the RECANT by John Martino was
being taped. You told me this when I came over to visit you at Tom McEvoy's
house to show you the RECANT OF THE RECANT, because Russ refused to send you
a copy of the RECANT OF THE RECANT. We got into a long discussion about
whether Russ's allegations were true, and whether Doyle was, in fact, a card
cheat. During the course of this conversation, you confided to me that
Doyle was in the next room listening during the taping of the RECANT. This
is a classic example of you running your mouth when you shouldn't, for the
sole purpose of impressing me with your inside knowledge of events.
My memory on this is crystal clear and there is no doubt in my mind
whatsoever that you did, in fact, say what I say you said. Apparently you
do not understand the difference between something which I heard with my own
ears and am 100% certain about, versus my apparently mistaken recollection
that I had read or heard that you taped the original cheating tapes.
I have caught you lying through your teeth when you know that I know you are
lying. Please do not try to obfuscate the issue by pointing out that I am
mistaken about something of which I have no first hand knowledge, but am
depending on my memory of what I have read on RGP. What I am 100% certain
about is what I heard you say with my own ears, and which made a tremendous
impression on me at the time, because Doyle being in the next room listening
to the RECANT being taped is extremely damaging to Doyle. Go ahead and try
to cover up for Doyle. It doesn't matter. Later today, I will make a post
which will expose the Las Vegas Poker Mafia for what they are. I am sending
copies of this upcoming post to the Las Vegas media.
: I have never met Russ G. and
: I did not video the cheating tapes.
I believe you. Even you are not stupid enough to lie about something which
Russ Georgiev and Mike Caro would know is a lie.
But you were the cameraman for the RECANT of John Martino, correct? If you
were, then you would certainly know if Doyle was in the next room listening.
Therefore, you were in a position to know first hand whether Doyle was in
the next room listening.