BackupBillB gets another on wrong

[VegasJerry]

THE NEW YORK TIMES

Officers in Fatal Shooting of Rayshard Brooks Will Not Be Charged

Mr. Brooks was shot to death in 2020, after two
Atlanta officers tried to arrest him. A special
prosecutor announced on Tuesday that the case
against them would be dropped.

ATLANTA — More than two years after Rayshard Brooks, a 27-year-old Black man, was fatally shot by a white police officer in the parking lot of an Atlanta fast-food restaurant, a prosecutor has determined that the officer who fired, as well as another officer on the scene, “committed no crimes” in the incident.

The decision to drop charges against the two Atlanta police officers, Devin Brosnan and Garrett Rolfe, was announced in a news conference on Tuesday by Pete Skandalakis, a veteran former Georgia prosecutor appointed to handle the case by Chris Carr, the Georgia attorney general. Mr. Skandalakis and another former prosecutor, Danny Porter, presided over a multimedia presentation about the June 12, 2020, incident, which they said showed that Mr. Brooks, by taking the taser of one officer and firing it at the officers, had given Mr. Rolfe justification to use deadly force, shooting him in the back and buttocks.

Mr. Porter described a police interaction that began cordially in the parking lot of a Wendy’s restaurant in South Atlanta, as Mr. Brosnan responded to a call about complaints that Mr. Brooks had fallen asleep, while behind the wheel of his car, in the drive-through lane. The interaction remained cordial as Mr. Rolfe arrived and subjected Mr. Brooks to a drunken-driving breath test, which Mr. Brooks failed.

But as Mr. Rolfe moved to handcuff Mr. Brooks and place him under arrest, Mr. Brooks lunged forward, instigating a brawl that left Mr. Brosnan with a concussion. As Mr. Brooks ran away, he pointed and fired the taser he had wrested away from Mr. Brosnan at Mr. Rolfe, who then fired his handgun at Mr. Brooks.

Mr. Rolfe was initially charged with a number of counts, including murder, and Mr. Brosnan faced a number of lesser charges. The prosecutors said they would move to vacate those charges.

The killing of Mr. Brooks occurred a few weeks after the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. That incident sparked protests nationwide and a vigorous discussion of the treatment of Black Americans at the hands of the police.

A fresh round of protests erupted in Atlanta after Mr. Brooks’s killing. In its immediate wake, the police chief at the time, Erika Shields, resigned, and the Wendy’s restaurant was burned down. The area around the site was briefly dominated by protesters, some of whom were armed and threatened passers-by.

On July 4, 2020, an 8-year-old girl, Secoriea Turner, was fatally shot while being driven through the area in an SUV.
__________________
..
If only he had done what the nice police officer told him.

[BillB]

You'll have to refresh my memory. What was I wrong about? Did I say they'd be convicted?

[Irish Mike]

On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 4:11:59 PM UTC-4, VegasJerry wrote:
> THE NEW YORK TIMES
>
> Officers in Fatal Shooting of Rayshard Brooks Will Not Be Charged

Shut up Gas Bag, you lying hypocrite. The Democrats you always defend and vote for
are the ones who fund & support BLM and they are the same left wing loons who
implemented "Defund the Police" policies in every major Democrat controlled
city in America. So just stop pretending you care about cops.

Every one knows you kiss the Democrat's asses and all you really care about are
the government handouts they keep promising you.

So just shut up Gas Bag and go stab some more cops in the back.

Irish Mike

[risky biz]

~ Irish Mike



How many more times are you going to post this same dopey cut & paste, Mike?

[BTSinAustin]

As long as the grass grows and the wind blows and Jerry thinks everything is from FOX

[VegasJerry]

.

You may notice, it's all he has. He can't respond, cite, show, or engage in conversations
because he has no thoughts, reasoning or logic of his own. Only what FOX feeds him.
That's why he's so easy to laugh at and dismiss. Cut & Paste is all he is...

[VegasJerry]

.

> As long as the grass grows and the wind blows and Jerry thinks everything is from FOX

.

Same here. Ever seen him engage? Cite? Reply? Discuss?
He can't even state why he votes Republican.

[Irish Mike]

As long as Gas Bag keeps telling the same hypocritical lies
and stabbing cops in the back.

Irish Mike

[risky biz]

~ As long as Gas Bag keeps telling the same hypocritical lies

> and stabbing cops in the back.
>
> Irish Mike

Impressively original. And 'defund the police' is OK as long as it's a Republican saying it?

[Irish Mike]

Would you care to provide a list of Republicans who are demanding that we defund the police?
Didn't think so.

Irish Mike

[VegasJerry]

On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 11:26:33 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:

.

Nothing, really, until he responds. I've started the process of proving Irish Mick is a FoxBot.

[VegasJerry]

.

> Would you care to provide a list of Republicans who are demanding that we defund the police?

.

https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/62721

Fox News: House Republicans Voted to Defund the Police

JUNE 27, 2021 BLOG
From the Speaker's Press Office:

House Republicans voted against the American Rescue Plan’s billions in funding available to keep police officers on the street – and Fox News is asking tough questions about it.

This morning on Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace called out House Republicans for voting unanimously to defund the police.

Wallace: You voted against that package, against that $350 billion just like every other Republican in the House and Senate. So, can't you make the argument that it's you and the Republicans who are defunding the police?…I'm asking you, there's $350 billion in this package the President says can be used for policing...The President is saying cities and states can use this money to hire more police officers, invest in new technologies, and develop summer job training and recreation programs for young people...You and every other Republican voted against this $350 billion.
.

How does that shit taste? Wann'a stop crying long enough to admit you're wrong?
.

> Didn't think so.
.

Neither did we...

Now answer this, asshole: What party said they want to defund the FBI!


> Running Coward Irish Mick

[risky biz]

You thought wrong. That's nothing new. When it's 'your' criminal getting apprehended it's a different story, isn't it? Your principles are relative.

'Republicans used the "defund the police" slogan after George Floyd's murder to paint the Democratic Party as radical. But since the FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago, a growing number of GOP candidates and lawmakers are rallying around their own calls to defund or abolish federal law enforcement agencies.

Why it matters: The new demands muddle a narrative embraced by Republicans long before the Black Lives Matter demonstrations of 2020 — that they are the party of law enforcement. They also show how much former President Trump has reshaped his party.

Strategists say it could jeopardize the GOP's chances in some contests in November.

The big question: Could this become the new Trump loyalty litmus test?

Driving the news: Dan Bolduc and Bruce Fenton, leading Republican Senate candidates in New Hampshire, said in a recent debate they believe the Department of Homeland Security and top agencies need to be significantly "reduced" and called for abolishing the FBI.

Anthony Sabatini, a leading primary candidate in Florida's 7th District, has long called to defund the FBI and tweeted on the night of the Mar-a-Lago search that Florida should "sever all ties with DOJ immediately" and arrest FBI agents on sight.

Tim Baxter, a candidate in New Hampshire’s 1st District, expressed support for abolishing the FBI in a debate on Saturday. Another candidate, Karoline Leavitt, called to "investigate, litigate and incarcerate them."

J.R. Majewski, the GOP nominee in Ohio's 9th District, says on his website's issues page: "I will fight to abolish all unconstitutional three letter agencies," including the CIA.

Sandy Smith, the GOP nominee in North Carolina’s 1st District, tweeted a poll with "Abolish the FBI" as one of the options.

Asked in a recent radio interview whether Republicans are "actually going to be willing" to defund the FBI, IRS and other agencies, Bo Hines, the Trump-endorsed GOP nominee in North Carolina's 13th District, responded: "Well, I mean we have to."

The position also has been embraced by
Texas GOP chair Matt Rinaldi and
Reps. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.),
Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) and
Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), who is selling "Defund the FBI" merchandise.

[risky biz]

~ You'll have to refresh my memory. What was I wrong about? Did I say they'd be convicted?


All you did was spend weeks arguing that the police officers were guilty of murder. They weren't. Their actions were objectively reasonable. You can't understand that because you were, at best, a paralegal for 10 minutes 30 years ago. You must have been weeded our pretty quickly. Most likely for spending too much time on the job talking about yourself.

[BillB]

More fantasies?

[risky biz]

~ More fantasies?


Why would someone believe you were ever a lawyer when you can barely compose an English sentence?

After claiming that your name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia it took me all of 3 miniues to look up the BC list which did not include the name you claim here is your real name. You were incensed about that for weeks and accused me of 'stalking' you. You apparently hate fact checks.

[BillB]

Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of the world's top rated universities?

> After claiming that your name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia it took me all of 3 miniues to look up the BC list which did not include the name you claim here is your real name. You were incensed about that for weeks and accused me of 'stalking' you. You apparently hate fact >checks.

Maybe my vocabulary needs work. What is a miniues?

Here is what you said at the time, liar:

"There's only the slightest possibility that you actually have a degree in law and acquired a license to practice. And even if you did I doubt that you haven't been disbarred. There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

How did you search every public database for me in only "3 miniues?" Not only are you a liar, but an incompetent one.

You are clearly obsessed with me, and you admitted that you searched what you believed was "every public database" for me. That's a stalker.

[VegasJerry]

.
.

> Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> the world's top rated universities?

.

Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:
.

> I am a walking encyclopedia.
> I was born an academic superstar.
> Skipped twice in elementary school…
> Finish high school in two years…
> Perfect undergrad GPA at world's best universities…
> Stratospheric LSAT score…
> Graduate top of law school class…
> Highest bar exam score in the province….
> I am very likely the most knowledgeable lawyer you have ever encountered.
> I could walk in a week from tomorrow and ace the California Bar Exam.
> I could be an Olympic gold medal 100m sprinter, and make millions overnight.
> I did learn to play poker when I was about 5, but I didn't actually turn pro until I was 9.
> I turned pro when I was three.
> * (Yet) a professional poker player at age 5.
> I have superior logic skills.
> I have more education than your entire family tree
> Truthfulness is my creed.
> I am an extraordinarily compassionate person.
> I make about $250 an hour.
> I've never voted for anyone.
> I’m a bicycle expert.
> My word is solid 24k gold.
> I already said you did. That settles it.
> I said it happened, therefore it happened.
> I said it. That's the proof.
> I'm a Life Coach.
> I type 80-90 wpm
> I don't support any politician or any party.
> I majored in anthropology/sociology in undergrad
.

> How did you search every public database for me in only "3 miniues?" Not only are you a liar, but an
> incompetent one.

.

Then why don't you do the search for him and post the links?

(Heh)

[risky biz]

Go ahead. Blab away, Clydesdale. Yet:

After claiming that your name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia it took me all of 3 minutes to look up the BC list which did not include the name you claim here is your real name.


Ooh. Blab got me on a single letter typo. And then, when he mangles an entire sentence he calls it a 'typo'. LOL. Only a comedian could make it up.

[BillB]

The list you looked at is a list of current due-paying members. It has nothing to do with being on the rolls of the Law Society, which means you were called to the bar in BC and have not been disbarred (i.e. struck from the rolls). Does that satisfy you curiosity, stalker? You really need to get over your obsession with me. It's not healthy, and it's **extremely** creepy. Get something going in your own life and you won't be so inexplicably obsessed with mine.

[BillB]

On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

> > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > the world's top rated universities?
> .
>
> Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:

Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol

[risky biz]

~ The list you looked at is a list of current due-paying members. It has nothing to do with being on the rolls of the Law Society, which means you were called to the bar in BC and have not been disbarred (i.e. struck from the rolls). Does that satisfy you curiosity, stalker? You really need to get over your obsession with me. It's not healthy, and it's **extremely** creepy. Get something going in your own life and you won't be so inexplicably obsessed with mine.


In the interest of getting a basic fact straight, I didn't access the B.C. Law Society directory out of the blue. I did so pursuant to you prancing around and blabbing your head off about being listed on their rolls. I decided that would be at least one item of proof that you actually were a lawyer and looked it up for the purpose of putting to bed my suspicions about your claims of being an attorney. Imagine my surprise when it turned out to be nothing but smoke.

'The Lawyer Directory is a searchable tool that you can use to help you find the names, contact information 👉and current practice status of lawyers licensed in BC.👈

For the best results, type the lawyer's last name only, in full or in part.'

Search term: 'Bradley'
Name
Alyssa D. Bradley
Joyce W. Bradley, QC
Kathleen M. Bradley
Kimberley Bradley
L. Allan Bradley
Melanie M. Bradley
Michelle Lee Bradley
Paul D. Bradley
https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

I informed you that the Law Society of B.C. didn't seem to know anything about you. You then told a story about being a non-practicing attorney which supposedly, therefore, explained why you don't appear in the directory. However, it seems to me to be entirely logical that 'current practice status' would include 'non-practicing'.

Do you have additional stories?

[risky biz]

On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > the world's top rated universities?
> > .
> >
> > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:

~ Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol


Does the Law Society of B.C. have personal conduct rules? Wouldn't they consider it a professional embarrassment if an actual licensed attorney was spending copious amounts of time on the internet concocting lies and promulgating hatred of law enforcement officers?

[risky biz]

~ The list you looked at is a list of current due-paying members. It has nothing to do with being on the rolls of the Law Society, which means you were called to the bar in BC and have not been disbarred (i.e. struck from the rolls).


So NOW you aren't a member to them but you are to you? You have your own personal definition of 'being on the rolls of the Law Society'?

[VegasJerry]

On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:

.

Yea, and I PROVED it. You've YET to prove anything.
So show us those links and names...

[VegasJerry]

.

Yea, and after I posted the numbers and PROVED my book deals. That REALLY got him. He whimpered
and wined and moaned and groaned. And now, "Put your money where your mouth is?"
.

You and I have bitch-slapped this poor fool into insanity...

[BillB]

^^ incapable of learning

[BillB]

Why are you lying? This is what you said:

"There's only the slightest possibility that you actually have a degree in law and acquired a license to practice. And even if you did I doubt that you haven't been disbarred. There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

"ANY database" How many did you search again?

> 'The Lawyer Directory is a searchable tool that you can use to help you find the names, contact information 👉and current practice status of lawyers licensed in BC.👈
>
> For the best results, type the lawyer's last name only, in full or in part.'
>
> Search term: 'Bradley'
> Name
> Alyssa D. Bradley
> Joyce W. Bradley, QC
> Kathleen M. Bradley
> Kimberley Bradley
> L. Allan Bradley
> Melanie M. Bradley
> Michelle Lee Bradley
> Paul D. Bradley
> https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results
>
> I informed you that the Law Society of B.C. didn't seem to know anything about you.

They know I was I was called to the bar in BC on August 30, 1996 (i.e. I appear on the rolls of the Law Society of BC) and that I have never been disbarred or otherwise disciplined. I am not currently a dues paying member, because I don't see the value in sending them $500 a year to get a quarterly magazine. That also means I am not under their jurisdiction and I am not required to give them an undertaking, which is important.

>You then told a story about being a non-practicing attorney which supposedly, therefore, explained why you don't appear in the directory. However, it seems to me to be entirely logical that 'current practice status' would include 'non-practicing'.
>

Only if you are a current dues-paying member. I am not.

> Do you have additional stories?

I haven't told any "stories." You really need to seek professional help for your unhealthy obsession with my life.

[BillB]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 8:06:51 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> > > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > > the world's top rated universities?
> > > .
> > >
> > > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:

> > Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol
> .
>
> Yea

Great. How much are you willing to lose? My transcript is currently in a filing cabinet about six feet from me.


, and I PROVED it.

What did you prove? That you lied about having book deals? Yes, you did prove that.

[BillB]

All you "proved" is that you lied. You didn't write any books, nor did you have a deal to write any.


book deal (plural book deals)
Noun

"An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain number of books to be published by the publisher."

[BillB]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 1:47:07 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> > > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > > the world's top rated universities?
> > > .
> > >
> > > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:
> ~ Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol
>
>
> Does the Law Society of B.C. have personal conduct rules?

Yes, for current members.

>Wouldn't they consider it a professional embarrassment if an actual licensed attorney was spending copious amounts of time on the internet concocting lies and >promulgating hatred of law enforcement officers?

Are you trying to suggest I have done any of that? I haven't. You need to quit this bizarre obsession with me.

By the way, Canada is a free country.

Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(a) freedom of conscience and religion;

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

(d) freedom of association.

[VegasJerry]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 11:43:17 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 8:06:51 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > > > the world's top rated universities?
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:
>
> > > Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol
> > .
> >

> > Yea, and I PROVED it.

.
> What did you prove?
.
That I had two book deals. You haven't trouble following this?

.

> You've YET to prove anything.

.

Yea, you're having trouble dodging your fuckup. I posted the ISBN numbers and you shit yourself.
.

> That you lied about having book deals? Yes, you did prove that.

.

How did I prove a lie by posting the ISBN numbers.
(Heh. I love how this pretend lawyer backs himself into his own lies).
.

> > Now, so show us those links and names..
.

*** No Reply Noted ***

(BackupBillB Bitch slapped again by the Jerry & Risky tag team)

[BillB]

You didn't write those books. Why are you persisting with these silly lies?

book deal:
"An agreement between a publisher and an author , by which the author agrees to write a certain number of books to be published by the publisher."

[VegasJerry]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 11:46:48 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 8:12:18 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 1:47:07 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > > > > the world's top rated universities?
> > > > > .
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:
> > > ~ Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol
> > >
> > >
> > > Does the Law Society of B.C. have personal conduct rules? Wouldn't they consider it a professional embarrassment if an actual licensed attorney was spending copious amounts of time on the internet concocting lies and promulgating hatred of law enforcement officers?
> > .
> >
> > Yea, and after I posted the numbers and PROVED my book deals. That REALLY got him. He whimpered
> > and wined and moaned and groaned. And now, "Put your money where your mouth is?"
> > .
> >
> > You and I have bitch-slapped this poor fool into insanity...
> All you "proved" is that you lied.

.

Again you've back yourself in your own corner.
"How did I prove I lied?"

(This fake is SO fucking easy)

.

> You didn't write any books, nor did you have a deal to write any.

ISBN 0-87455-059-9
ISBN 0-942386-20-5

Same numbers you asked for and received last time.

> book deal (plural book deals)
> Noun
>
> "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain
> number of books to be published by the publisher."

Heh, you are SO fucking easy to bitch slap:

"A book contract is a written agreement that encompasses every facet of an author's work with a publisher. When a book publisher offers to publish a book, and the author accepts, there are deal points that must be discussed and agreed to. Typically, these points are hashed out between the author's agent and publisher."

You though you could bluff (lie) your way out of your fuck up?

[BillB]

You did not write those books.

> Same numbers you asked for and received last time.
> > book deal (plural book deals)
> > Noun
> >
> > "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain
> > number of books to be published by the publisher."
> Heh, you are SO fucking easy to bitch slap:
>
> "A book contract is a written agreement that encompasses every facet of an author's work with a publisher. When a book publisher offers to publish a book, and the author accepts, there are deal points that must be discussed and agreed to. Typically, these points are hashed out between the author's agent and publisher."
>
> You though you could bluff (lie) your way out of your fuck up?

You didn't write a book and you did not have "a book deal," let alone two. You lied.

"book deal: An agreement between a publisher and an author , by which the author agrees to write a certain number of books to be published by the publisher."

[risky biz]

~ ^^ incapable of learning


That sounds like a frightened dodge.

[risky biz]

~ I haven't told any "stories." You really need to seek professional help for your unhealthy obsession with my life.


Those are good stories. You have a lot of stories. A real storyteller. All the stories seem to end in 'can't be verified'. Like the law firm where you made partner in two years but the law firm is secret.

Like the law school you graduated from but you don't want to reveal which one.

[risky biz]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 11:43:17 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:

Why the unhealthy obsession with Jerry's life?

[risky biz]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 11:46:48 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 8:12:18 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 1:47:07 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > > > > the world's top rated universities?
> > > > > .
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:
> > > ~ Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol
> > >
> > >
> > > Does the Law Society of B.C. have personal conduct rules? Wouldn't they consider it a professional embarrassment if an actual licensed attorney was spending copious amounts of time on the internet concocting lies and promulgating hatred of law enforcement officers?
> > .
> >
> > Yea, and after I posted the numbers and PROVED my book deals. That REALLY got him. He whimpered
> > and wined and moaned and groaned. And now, "Put your money where your mouth is?"
> > .
> >
> > You and I have bitch-slapped this poor fool into insanity...

~ All you "proved" is that you lied. You didn't write any books, nor did you have a deal to write any.

>
>
> book deal (plural book deals)
> Noun
>
> "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain number of books to be published by the publisher."

[risky biz]

~ You didn't write a book and you did not have "a book deal," let alone two. You lied.

>
> "book deal: An agreement between a publisher and an author , by which the author agrees to write a certain number of books to be published by the publisher."

[BillB]

No, it sounds like I already explained to you what being on the rolls of Law Society means, and, as usual, it went in one ear and right out the other. You are incapable of learning. You have demonstrated that many dozens of times.

[BillB]

I wasn't a partner. I declined the offer. I have already given an eminently reasonable explanation why I declined to name the firm where I worked. Namely, I don't want obsessed weirdos like you and Jerry calling them to investigate me, which would only result in them declining to give you any information about me, and then calling me to alert me to that the fact that weirdos were calling them to investigate me. That would be embarrassing for me. So what would be the point?

> Like the law school you graduated from but you don't want to reveal which one.

I have explicitly stated several times what law school I attended, and I have even posted a photo of my graduation picture in my law school yearbook. Why is this important information to you, aside from your weirdo obsession with me?

[risky biz]

~ No, it sounds like I already explained to you what being on the rolls of Law Society means, and, as usual, it went in one ear and right out the other. You are incapable of learning. You have demonstrated that many dozens of times.


explanation
noun
▸a reason you give for something that has happened or something you have done
more...
▸a description of how something works or of how to do something


lie
verb
▸to deliberately say something that is not true



Secret law firm, secret law school.

[BillB]

I don't have one. He claims he bitchslapped me for calling bullshit on his ridiculous "two book deal" lie, which he disproved HIMSELF.

[BillB]

Exactly, and I explained to you how getting on the rolls of the Law Society works.

> lie
> verb
> ▸to deliberately say something that is not true

Which I never do.

> Secret law firm, secret law school.

Declining to tell obsessed weirdo stalkers details about my life does not mean it is a "secret." I have told hundreds of people over the years where I went to law school and where I worked.

[risky biz]

~ I have explicitly stated several times what law school I attended, and I have even posted a photo of my graduation picture in my law school yearbook. Why is this important information to you, aside from your weirdo obsession with me?

A photo of someone.

A secret partnership offer.

And if you turned it down it must have been a pretty shoddy offer or it had attached performance requirements you knew you would fail to achieve.

[BillB]

More fantasies about me? LOL

[risky biz]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 2:36:50 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 2:14:02 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 11:43:17 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 8:06:51 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > > > > > the world's top rated universities?
> > > > > > .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:
> > >
> > > > > Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > Yea
> > > Great. How much are you willing to lose? My transcript is currently in a filing cabinet about six feet from me.
> > >
> > >
> > > , and I PROVED it.
> > >
> >
> >
> > > What did you prove? That you lied about having book deals? Yes, you did prove that.
> > > You've YET to prove anything.
>

> > Why the unhealthy obsession with Jerry's life?

~ I don't have one. He claims he bitchslapped me for calling bullshit on his ridiculous "two book deal" lie, which he disproved HIMSELF.


You're the one who brought up the books in this thread which has no relationship to them. And what he said in response is true.

Do you think no one can see through your juvenile digging up of a definition of 'book deal' that feebly and superficially seems to support your bullshit? Jerry gave you the ISBN (International Standard Book Number) for both, i.e., it isn't UNVERIFIABLE like all your claims. BOOK.

I think you're jealous of his ability to be honest about the books. That might explain your obsession with them.

[risky biz]

~ Which I never do.


Would you like to take a vote on that?

[risky biz]

~ More fantasies about me? LOL


Translation: too true for comfort.

[VegasJerry]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 1:04:49 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 12:41:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 11:46:48 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 8:12:18 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 1:47:07 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > > > > > > the world's top rated universities?
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:
> > > > > ~ Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Does the Law Society of B.C. have personal conduct rules? Wouldn't they consider it a professional embarrassment if an actual licensed attorney was spending copious amounts of time on the internet concocting lies and promulgating hatred of law enforcement officers?
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > Yea, and after I posted the numbers and PROVED my book deals. That REALLY got him. He whimpered
> > > > and wined and moaned and groaned. And now, "Put your money where your mouth is?"
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > You and I have bitch-slapped this poor fool into insanity...
> > > All you "proved" is that you lied.
> > .
> >
> > Again you've back yourself in your own corner.
> > "How did I prove I lied?"

.

****** No Reply Noted ******
.

> >
> > (This fake is SO fucking easy)
> > .
> >
> > > You didn't write any books, nor did you have a deal to write any.

.

> > ISBN 0-87455-059-9
> > ISBN 0-942386-20-5
.

As in:
"A book contract is a written agreement that encompasses every facet of an author's work with a publisher. When a book publisher offers to publish a book, and the author accepts, there are deal points that must be discussed and agreed to. Typically, these points are hashed out between the author's agent and publisher.”
.
Which is what happened with:
.
ISBN 0-87455-059-9
ISBN 0-942386-20-5
.
Of which I received royalties on both.
..

Care to try dodging some more, dipshit?
.

> You did not write those books.

.

Who the fuck said I did?
(What a wasted dodger…)

.



> > Same numbers you asked for and received last time.
> > > book deal (plural book deals)
> > > Noun
> > >
> > > "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain
> > > number of books to be published by the publisher."
> > Heh, you are SO fucking easy to bitch slap:
> >
> > "A book contract is a written agreement that encompasses every facet of an author's work with a publisher. When a book publisher offers to publish a book, and the author accepts, there are deal points that must be discussed and agreed to. Typically, these points are hashed out between the author's agent and publisher."
> >
> > You though you could bluff (lie) your way out of your fuck up?

.

******* No Reply Noted *******

Yea, dodge, lie, bluff. Watch:
.

> You didn't write a book..
.

See? (Actually I did, but not these two).
..

> ..and you did not have "a book deal," let alone two.
.
Heh. Here, let you show you your error and my correction AGAIN:
.

> > > "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain
> > > number of books to be published by the publisher."
> > Heh, you are SO fucking easy to bitch slap:

.

With MY correction:
.

> > "A book contract is a written agreement that encompasses every facet of an author's work with a publisher. When a book publisher offers to publish a book, and the author accepts, there are deal points that must be discussed and agreed to. Typically, these points are hashed out between the author's agent and publisher."

.
See? That’s why I bitch-slapped you with:

> > You though you could bluff (lie) your way out of your fuck up?

And you ran…

LOL!

(He is SO fucking jealous...)

[VegasJerry]

.

> Why the unhealthy obsession with Jerry's life?

.

He's jealous. I was in a discussion with someone about book royalties and I mention knowing something about
it because I've received some book Royalities; jealous BillB couldn't conceive of somebody better than him
so me simply called me a liar. And I bitch-slapped him with proof.

[VegasJerry]

.

And proving you a liar..

//NEXT//

[BillB]

You said you had two book deals, right?

book deal: "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain number of books to be published by the publisher."

Did you write any books, Jerry?

You love polls. Why don't you take a poll to see if anyone believes you've written any books.

[VegasJerry]

On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 2:36:50 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 2:14:02 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 11:43:17 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 8:06:51 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:59:54 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Is that how I received a mark of 90% in English composition (and an academic prize for it) at one of
> > > > > > > the world's top rated universities?
> > > > > > .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh! Oh! I get to add another BackupBillB lie:
> > >
> > > > > Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Two Book Deals? lol
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > Yea
> > > Great. How much are you willing to lose? My transcript is currently in a filing cabinet about six feet from me.
> > >
> > >
> > > , and I PROVED it.
> > >
> >
> >
> > > What did you prove? That you lied about having book deals? Yes, you did prove that.
> > > You've YET to prove anything.
>
> > Why the unhealthy obsession with Jerry's life?

.

> I don't have one.

.

Heh. That’s why he keep whining and dodging and lying about it…

.

> He claims he bitchslapped me for calling bullshit on his ridiculous "two book deal" lie,
> which he disproved HIMSELF.

See? I mentioned that I had collected book royalties on two books and he cried “LIAR” and asked
for ISBN numbers. I PROVED I told the by supplying the numbers. He’s by changing his story and
whining and crying ever since. Look what he wrote above” “he disproved HIMSELF.”

Then I bitch-slapped him with, “What the fuck does “disproved himself” mean.

He’s still running….

[VegasJerry]

.

See what I mean, Risky? Dodge, whine and whimper. I said I received royalties on two books with
a deal I made with the publisher. So he tries dodging with what the contract is with getting royalties.
.

> book deal: "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a
> certain number of books to be published by the publisher."

.

Which I showed him was wrong. It’s right there in the Writer’s Digest. But this ‘pretend lawyer’
just can’t stand being proven wrong by me. (And, NO, it’s not “a certain number of books to be published.”)
.

> Did you write any books, Jerry?

And I’ve already told him I’ve written a book and a number of short stories. Having NOTHING to do
with the fact, “I received royalties on two books!”
.

> You love polls.
.

JFC! What’s he dodging off to now?
.

> Why don't you take a poll …
.

Why doesn’t he eat more shit and die?

> to see if anyone believes you've written any books.

Because I don’t have to. I proved him wrong, Now he can fuck off and die.

(And that his obsession with him)

[da pickle]

Jerry Sturdivant 37

It was an interesting book.

[BillB]

I thought his "Tales from the Western Grid' was riveting. It was basically a modern day War and Peace. If I am not mistaken he won the Nobel Prize in Literature for that one.

[VegasJerry]

On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 8:17:04 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:

.

https://gamesdb.launchbox-app.com/games/details/88527

http://www.gamebase64.com/search.php?a=5&f=3&id=1542&d=30&h=0

https://c64online.com/publisher/jerry-sturdivant/

https://www.google.com/search?q=commodore+64+blackjack+%22sturdivant%22&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjxoda_4pnkAhXPo54KHSvmCq0Q5t4CMBd6BAgGEAg&biw=1074&bih=808

[VegasJerry]

> If I am not mistaken....
.

We've proved you're most often mistaken. As shown in this very post...

[BillB]

Are you saying you *didn't* win the Nobel Prize in Literature?? Well, you certainly deserved it. I hang around a lot of literary types and I often hear them put your works in the same league as Tolstoy, Dickens, Dostoevsky and Joyce.

[VegasJerry]

.

> Are you saying you *didn't* win the Nobel Prize in Literature??

.

JFC! You ARE having Reading Comprehension problems. How in the hell did you come up with that?

Here, read this REAL SLOOOWLY.

“We've proved you're most often mistaken. As shown in this very post...”
.

Now go back up and answer those questions you keep running from. THEN you’ll see how your
‘most often mistaken.”
.
(You ever seen anybody dodge like this fool?
.
.
.
.

Well, you certainly deserved it. I hang around a lot of literary types and I often hear them put your works in the same league as Tolstoy, Dickens, Dostoevsky and Joyce.

OH! Wait, here’s a good example of you being “most often mistaken.”

[BillB]

Jerry, I just had a video call with Zuck, and when I showed him your C64 Blackjack program he was gobsmacked. He said, and I quote, that it was one the most exquisite feats of software engineering he had ever seen. He wants to offer you a job running the Western Campus.

[risky biz]

~ You love polls. Why don't you take a poll to see if anyone believes you've written any books.


Jerry did exactly what he said he did and you can't get over it. SAD.

[risky biz]

On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 12:49:49 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:

> > > Jerry Sturdivant 37
> > >
> > > It was an interesting book.

> > .
> >
> > https://gamesdb.launchbox-app.com/games/details/88527
> >
> > http://www.gamebase64.com/search.php?a=5&f=3&id=1542&d=30&h=0
> >
> > https://c64online.com/publisher/jerry-sturdivant/
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=commodore+64+blackjack+%22sturdivant%22&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjxoda_4pnkAhXPo54KHSvmCq0Q5t4CMBd6BAgGEAg&biw=1074&bih=808

~ Jerry, I just had a video call with Zuck, and when I showed him your C64 Blackjack program he was gobsmacked. He said, and I quote, that it was one the most exquisite feats of software engineering he had ever seen. He wants to offer you a job running the Western Campus.


This is just plain SAD. Blabbermouth is so jealous of Jerry that it DRIPS.

Blabbermouth has a multitude of excuses for why he DOESN'T show up in the B.C. Law Society list that he claims he does.

And Jerry posts proof that he DOES collect royalties on books (and more) that he said he does.

Blabbermouth has poop on his face again.

[BillB]

On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 3:50:22 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 12:49:49 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
>
> > > > Jerry Sturdivant 37
> > > >
> > > > It was an interesting book.
>
> > > .
> > >
> > > https://gamesdb.launchbox-app.com/games/details/88527
> > >
> > > http://www.gamebase64.com/search.php?a=5&f=3&id=1542&d=30&h=0
> > >
> > > https://c64online.com/publisher/jerry-sturdivant/
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/search?q=commodore+64+blackjack+%22sturdivant%22&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjxoda_4pnkAhXPo54KHSvmCq0Q5t4CMBd6BAgGEAg&biw=1074&bih=808
> ~ Jerry, I just had a video call with Zuck, and when I showed him your C64 Blackjack program he was gobsmacked. He said, and I quote, that it was one the most exquisite feats of software engineering he had ever seen. He wants to offer you a job running the Western Campus.
>
>
> This is just plain SAD. Blabbermouth is so jealous of Jerry that it DRIPS.

Of course. Who wouldn't want to be Jerry? All the women want him, and all the men want to be him. And that turbo-charged mobility scooter with the spinner rims he rides around on is pure fire.

> Blabbermouth has a multitude of excuses for why he DOESN'T show up in the B.C. Law Society list that he claims he does.

What multitude of excuses? I am not currently a member. That's a multitude of excuses? LOL

> And Jerry posts proof that he DOES collect royalties on books (and more) that he said he does.

Jerry said he had two book deals. He was completely full of shit and i called him on it. And you don't collect royalties 40 years after they reprint one page of your work in a book that sold 12 copies.

> Blabbermouth has poop on his face again.

My God, your fantasies about me get more perverted every day.

[VegasJerry]

On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 4:04:07 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 3:50:22 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 12:49:49 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> >
> > > > > Jerry Sturdivant 37
> > > > >
> > > > > It was an interesting book.
> >
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > https://gamesdb.launchbox-app.com/games/details/88527
> > > >
> > > > http://www.gamebase64.com/search.php?a=5&f=3&id=1542&d=30&h=0
> > > >
> > > > https://c64online.com/publisher/jerry-sturdivant/
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/search?q=commodore+64+blackjack+%22sturdivant%22&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjxoda_4pnkAhXPo54KHSvmCq0Q5t4CMBd6BAgGEAg&biw=1074&bih=808
> > ~ Jerry, I just had a video call with Zuck, and when I showed him your C64 Blackjack program he was gobsmacked. He said, and I quote, that it was one the most exquisite feats of software engineering he had ever seen. He wants to offer you a job running the Western Campus.
> >
> >
> > This is just plain SAD. Blabbermouth is so jealous of Jerry that it DRIPS.
.

> Of course. Who wouldn't want to be Jerry?

.> All the women want him, and all the men want to be him.
.
You’re right, Risky; he has a fascination with BOTH of us..

.

> And that turbo-charged mobility scooter with the spinner rims he rides around on is pure fire.

.

See the snarky jealously this poor shut-in has?
.

> > And Jerry posts proof that he DOES collect royalties on books (and more) that he said he does.
.
> Jerry said he had two book deals. He was completely full of shit and i called him on it.

.

No, you did NOT, and THAT’S what’s caught in your throat. You simply lie with a dodge, as usual.
I PROVED it was not a two-book deal by showing you the books. Had you read the title you would
See they COULDN’T be published at the same time. In fact the second book could not be in
Existence. LOOK AT THE TITLES. Then, if you’re still stupid, look at the publication dates.
.
WHA! HA~Ha! Now what, asshole? BackupBillB out of THAT one.

.


> And you don't collect royalties 40 years after they reprint one page of your work in a book that
> sold 12 copies.

.

See, more made-up bullshit and lie. I NEVER said I collected royalties after 40 years. In my original
Post I mentioned that after about 6-8 months the monthly royalty checks tapered down to nothing,
then stopped; as it usually does in book (and movie) royalties. They sell out a printing, and books that
didn’t sell return and that’s it.

.

> > Blabbermouth has poop on his face again.

.

Does he ever. And I just shit on his face some more.
.

> My God, (MY) fantasies about (YOU) get more perverted every day.
.

Heh, fixed your post…

[BillB]

On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 7:47:13 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 4:04:07 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:

> > Jerry said he had two book deals. He was completely full of shit and i called him on it.
> .
>
> No, you did NOT, and THAT’S what’s caught in your throat. You simply lie with a dodge, as usual.

> I PROVED it was not a two-book deal by showing you the books.

So now you are saying you proved you didn't have two book deals?? LOLOL

"Like when I Studied contract law? Law as applied to being a California Lawman? Or my 26 published articles and two book deals?"

> > And you don't collect royalties 40 years after they reprint one page of your work in a book that
> > sold 12 copies.
> .
>
> See, more made-up bullshit and lie. I NEVER said I collected royalties after 40 years.

You dummy. It was Risky who claimed you were presently receiving royalties.

[VegasJerry]

On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 8:01:34 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 7:47:13 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 4:04:07 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > >

> > > > > > Jerry Sturdivant 37
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It was an interesting book.
> > >
> > > > > .
> > > > >
> > > > > https://gamesdb.launchbox-app.com/games/details/88527
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.gamebase64.com/search.php?a=5&f=3&id=1542&d=30&h=0
> > > > >
> > > > > https://c64online.com/publisher/jerry-sturdivant/
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.google.com/search?q=commodore+64+blackjack+%22sturdivant%22&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjxoda_4pnkAhXPo54KHSvmCq0Q5t4CMBd6BAgGEAg&biw=1074&bih=808
> > > ~ Jerry, I just had a video call with Zuck, and when I showed him your C64 Blackjack program he was gobsmacked. He said, and I quote, that it was one the most exquisite feats of software engineering he had ever seen. He wants to offer you a job running the Western Campus.
> > >
> > >
> > > This is just plain SAD. Blabbermouth is so jealous of Jerry that it DRIPS.
> .
>
> > > Of course. Who wouldn't want to be Jerry?
> .> > All the women want him, and all the men want to be him.
> .
> > You’re right, Risky; he has a fascination with BOTH of us..
.

*** No denial noted ***

.
.
> > And that turbo-charged mobility scooter with the spinner rims he rides around on is pure fire.
> .
>
> > See the snarky jealously this poor shut-in has?
> .
> > > And Jerry posts proof that he DOES collect royalties on books (and more) that he said he does.
> .

> > > Jerry said he had two book deals. He was completely full of shit and i called him on it.
> .
>
> > No, you did NOT, and THAT’S what’s caught in your throat. You simply lie with a dodge, as usual.

> > I PROVED it was not a two-book deal by showing you the books. Had you read the title you would

> > see they COULDN’T be published at the same time. In fact the second book could not be in

> > Existence. LOOK AT THE TITLES. Then, if you’re still stupid, look at the publication dates.
> > .
> > WHA! HA~Ha! Now what, asshole? BackupBillB out of THAT one.
.

.
****************************************************************
**** It looks like BackupBillB couldn’t. So he Cuts & Runs & Lies…. *****
****************************************************************
.
.
.

> > > And you don't collect royalties 40 years after they reprint one page of your work in a book that
> > > sold 12 copies.
> > .
> >

.

> > See? More made-up bullshit and lie. I NEVER said I collected royalties after 40 years. In my original

> > Post I mentioned that after about 6-8 months the monthly royalty checks tapered down to nothing,
> > then stopped; as it usually does in book (and movie) royalties. They sell out a printing, and books that
> > didn’t sell return and that’s it.
.

.
********************************************************************************
**** It looks like BackupBillB couldn’t address this either, so he Cuts & Runs & Lies…. *****
********************************************************************************

.
.


> > > > Blabbermouth has poop on his face again.
> > .
>
> > Does he ever. And I just shit on his face some more.
.

.

*** And all he could do was Cut this and Run.. ****

.
.


> > > My God, (MY) fantasies about (YOU) get more perverted every day.
> .
>

> > Heh, fixed his post…
..

> > > Jerry said he had two book deals. He was completely full of shit and i called him on it.
> > .
> >
> > No, you did NOT, and THAT’S what’s caught in your throat. You simply lie with a dodge, as usual.
>
> > I PROVED it was not a two-book deal by showing you the books.

.

********************** Another BackupBillB Cut & Run & Lie & Hide ******
.
.
.

.
> So now you are saying you proved you didn't have two book deals?? LOLOL

.

BackingUpBillB backing up and lying again…
.
YOU were the one that INSISTED they HAD to be at the same time.
“So now you are saying you DIDN’T?”
.

WHA ! HA! You are so jealous and so ease and so stupid, you prove yourself wrong
with your own hand.
.
.
.

> "Like when I Studied contract law? Law as applied to being a California Lawman?
> Or my 26 published articles and two book deals?"

.

Yea, THAT error of yours. You (again having reading comprehension trouble that a real
lawyer wouldn’t) thought that meant both books deals were at the same time?
SHOW WHERE IT SAYS THAT.
Because I just proved they could NOT be at the same time.
And I PROVED I had two book deals.
.

************ Bitch-Slapping Complete BillB on the Cut & Run ************

.
.

Like I said above (and you ran from) “How you going to get out of that one?”
(He cut it in his last rely. I added it, above, to rub salt in his wounded pride).
.
.

> > > And you don't collect royalties 40 years after they reprint one page of your work in a book that
> > > sold 12 copies.
> > .
> >
> > See, more made-up bullshit and lie. I NEVER said I collected royalties after 40 years.

.
.

> You dummy. It was Risky who claimed you were presently receiving royalties..

No, it was YOU that claimed I had to make both book deals at the same time.
.
AGAIN:
“How you going to get out of that one?”
.

(This poor lying Lawyer Wannab should go back to being a Cop Wannab)
.

[BillB]

> > So now you are saying you proved you didn't have two book deals?? LOLOL
> .
>
> BackingUpBillB backing up and lying again…
> .
> YOU were the one that INSISTED they HAD to be at the same time.
> “So now you are saying you DIDN’T?”

I didn't insist any such thing, nor did I even suggest any such thing. You can't read.

> WHA ! HA! You are so jealous and so ease and so stupid, you prove yourself wrong
> with your own hand.
> .
> .
> .
> > "Like when I Studied contract law? Law as applied to being a California Lawman?
> > Or my 26 published articles and two book deals?"
> .
>
> Yea, THAT error of yours. You (again having reading comprehension trouble that a real
> lawyer wouldn’t) thought that meant both books deals were at the same time?
> SHOW WHERE IT SAYS THAT.
> Because I just proved they could NOT be at the same time.
> And I PROVED I had two book deals.

You didn't have any book deal.

> > > > And you don't collect royalties 40 years after they reprint one page of your work in a book that
> > > > sold 12 copies.
> > > .
> > >
> > > See, more made-up bullshit and lie. I NEVER said I collected royalties after 40 years.
> .
> .
>
> > You dummy. It was Risky who claimed you were presently receiving royalties..
>
> No

Yes. That's what he said. Learn to read. Do you understand the concept of tenses in English? Probably not, but the phrase below is what literate people call "present tense."

"And Jerry posts proof that he DOES collect royalties on books"

> it was YOU that claimed I had to make both book deals at the same time.

Never happened. You better get your meds adjusted again.

[VegasJerry]

On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 1:09:34 PM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 11:18:47 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > > > No, you did NOT, and THAT’S what’s caught in your throat. You simply lie with a dodge, as usual.
> > > > I PROVED it was not a two-book deal by showing you the books. Had you read the title you would
> > > > see they COULDN’T be published at the same time. In fact the second book could not be in
> > > > Existence. LOOK AT THE TITLES. Then, if you’re still stupid, look at the publication dates.
> > > > .
> > > > WHA! HA~Ha! Now what, asshole? BackupBillB out of THAT one.
> > .
> > .
> > ****************************************************************
> > **** It looks like BackupBillB couldn’t. So he Cuts & Runs & Lies…. *****
> > ****************************************************************
.

Lie, run, deny. It’s all he has.

.
.


> > > > > And you don't collect royalties 40 years after they reprint one page of your work in a book that
> > > > > sold 12 copies.
> > > > .
> > > >
> > .
> >
> > > > See? More made-up bullshit and lie. I NEVER said I collected royalties after 40 years. In my original
> > > > Post I mentioned that after about 6-8 months the monthly royalty checks tapered down to nothing,
> > > > then stopped; as it usually does in book (and movie) royalties. They sell out a printing, and books that
> > > > didn’t sell return and that’s it.
> > .
> > .
> > ********************************************************************************
> > **** It looks like BackupBillB couldn’t address this either, so he Cuts & Runs & Lies…. *****
> > ********************************************************************************
.

This is the running….

.
.

> > > > > > Blabbermouth has poop on his face again.
> > > > .
> > >
> > > > Does he ever. And I just shit on his face some more.
> > .
> > .
> >
> > *** And all he could do was Cut this and Run.. ****
> > .
> > .
> >
> >
> > > > > My God, (MY) fantasies about (YOU) get more perverted every day.
> > > .
> > >
> > > > Heh, fixed his post…
> > ..
> > > > > Jerry said he had two book deals. He was completely full of shit and i called him on it.
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > > No, you did NOT, and THAT’S what’s caught in your throat. You simply lie with a dodge, as usual.
> > >
> > > > I PROVED it was not a two-book deal by showing you the books.
> > > So now you are saying you proved you didn't have two book deals?? LOLOL
> > .
> >
> > BackingUpBillB backing up and lying again…
> > .
> > YOU were the one that INSISTED they HAD to be at the same time.
> > “So now you are saying you DIDN’T?”

.

> I didn't insist any such thing, nor did I even suggest any such thing.

.

LOL. Go back and look. YOU said a book deal was with a publisher for more than one book.

_____________________________

> > >>>>>>> book deal (plural book deals)
> > >>>>>>> Noun
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain

> > >>>>>>> number of books to be published by the publisher.".
.__________________________
.
See? Asswipe? Half a dozen posts up.
.

LOL!
.


> You can't read.

Read that, dipshit…

> > WHA ! HA! You are so jealous and so ease and so stupid, you prove yourself wrong
> > with your own hand.
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > > "Like when I Studied contract law? Law as applied to being a California Lawman?
> > > Or my 26 published articles and two book deals?"
> > .
> >
> > Yea, THAT error of yours. You (again having reading comprehension trouble that a real
> > lawyer wouldn’t) thought that meant both books deals were at the same time?

.

> > SHOW WHERE IT SAYS THAT.

.
15 lines up. Then “I” showed you the statement right out of the Writers book.

.


> > Because I just proved they could NOT be at the same time.
> > And I PROVED I had two book deals.
.

> You didn't have any book deal.

.

WHA! HA~Ha! Now the denial part. I show BackWordBillB the fucking books and he
says I had no book deal! LOL!
.

More lie, run, denial from this jealous fool…
.
.
.
.

> > it was YOU that claimed I had to make both book deals at the same time.
.
> Never happened. You better get your meds adjusted again.

________________________

> > >>>>>>> book deal (plural book deals)
> > >>>>>>> Noun
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain

> > >>>>>>> number of books to be published by the publisher.".

Eat that, asshole, then run again. Or deny again. Or lie again.

[da pickle]

On 8/29/2022 8:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> book deal (plural book deals)
>>>>>>>>>> Noun
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain
>>>>>>>>>> number of books to be published by the publisher.".
>
> Eat that, asshole, then run again. Or deny again. Or lie again.

He is still cleaning up his bed.

[risky biz]

On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 8:01:34 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:

~ You dummy. It was Risky who claimed you were presently receiving royalties.


Claimed? I said. The former is a hyperbolic characterization.

Is the past tense more correct? How should I know? Should I have contacted Jerry to determine that before replying to an annoying bullshit artist on RGP?

You're so jealous of Jerry that it drips.

[BillB]

On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 6:43:30 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

> LOL. Go back and look. YOU said a book deal was with a publisher for more than one book.

No, I did not. You can't read, let alone write a book.

> _____________________________
> > > >>>>>>> book deal (plural book deals)
> > > >>>>>>> Noun
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain
> > > >>>>>>> number of books to be published by the publisher.".
> .__________________________
> .
> See? Asswipe? Half a dozen posts up.

See what? There is nothing to see.

You did not write any books. A book deal is a deal with a publisher to write one or more books. You are very slow.

[BillB]

When you make a statement of fact, you should know that it is true. I know this is a completely foreign concept to you.

> You're so jealous of Jerry that it drips.

LOL...I am sure you have everyone convinced everyone I am jealous.

[risky biz]

On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 8:45:08 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 8:41:20 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 8:01:34 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 7:47:13 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

> > > > See, more made-up bullshit and lie. I NEVER said I collected royalties after 40 years.

> > ~ You dummy. It was Risky who claimed you were presently receiving royalties.
> >
> >
> > Claimed? I said. The former is a hyperbolic characterization.
> >
> > Is the past tense more correct? How should I know? Should I have contacted Jerry to determine that before replying to an annoying bullshit artist on RGP?

~ When you make a statement of fact, you should know that it is true. I know this is a completely foreign concept to you.

> > You're so jealous of Jerry that it drips.
> LOL...I am sure you have everyone convinced everyone I am jealous.

Oh, Jesus. Stop the whimpering. You're the only person on Earth who finds it vitally important whether Jerry WAS or IS collecting royalties. That's because it's vitally important to you to divert attention away from the now well-established fact that you were completely wrong that Jerry had not collected royalties from a book or books and that he rubbed it in your face.

[BillB]

He isn't collecting royalties from a book, nor has he ever. He would have to write a book first. What I called bullshit on was his claim that he had two book deals. Do you not know what a book deal is either?

[risky biz]

On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 9:04:11 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 8:54:22 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 8:45:08 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 8:41:20 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 8:01:34 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 7:47:13 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> > > > > > See, more made-up bullshit and lie. I NEVER said I collected royalties after 40 years.
> >
> > > > ~ You dummy. It was Risky who claimed you were presently receiving royalties.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Claimed? I said. The former is a hyperbolic characterization.
> > > >
> > > > Is the past tense more correct? How should I know? Should I have contacted Jerry to determine that before replying to an annoying bullshit artist on RGP?
> > ~ When you make a statement of fact, you should know that it is true. I know this is a completely foreign concept to you.
> > > > You're so jealous of Jerry that it drips.
> > > LOL...I am sure you have everyone convinced everyone I am jealous.
> > Oh, Jesus. Stop the whimpering. You're the only person on Earth who finds it vitally important whether Jerry WAS or IS collecting royalties. That's because it's vitally important to you to divert attention away from the now well-established fact that you were completely wrong that Jerry had not collected royalties from a book or books and that he rubbed it in your face.

~ He isn't collecting royalties from a book, nor has he ever. He would have to write a book first. What I called bullshit on was his claim that he had two book deals. Do you not know what a book deal is either?


What I don't know is why I should give a shit about whether Jerry wrote a book or not.

You have a disturbingly unhealthy jealousy of Jerry.

[BTSinAustin]

One chapter

> ISBN 0-942386-20-5

Written by Robinson Mason

[BillB]

It wasn't even a chapter. It was a couple of pages in a chapter, and there wasn't even any writing there to speak of. Jerry was obviously trying to deceive us by saying he had "two book deals." Now that he got called on the lie he's doing somersaults in a lame attempt to cover up his lie.

[BTSinAustin]

I found his page

https://snipboard.io/MyoWvK.jpg

[BillB]

I think that's the one he won the Nobel Prize in Literature for. He obviously had a lot of extra time on his hands while running the Western Grid. I'd trade everything my wife owns for the advance he must have received on that book deal.

[BTSinAustin]

At least a Pulitze

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 8:42:21 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 6:43:30 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > LOL. Go back and look. YOU said a book deal was with a publisher for more than one book.
> No, I did not. You can't read, let alone write a book.
> > _____________________________
> > > > >>>>>>> book deal (plural book deals)
> > > > >>>>>>> Noun
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> "An agreement between a publisher and an author, by which the author agrees to write a certain
> > > > >>>>>>> number of books to be published by the publisher.".
> > .__________________________
> > .
> > See? Asswipe? Half a dozen posts up.
.

> See what? There is nothing to see.

.

Gee, I must have hit the "Invisible Type" button...


*** LOL! ***

Learn to fucking lose, dipshit, you're getting good at it..


.
.
.
.

.

> You did not write any books.

.

Wow! He's frothing at the mouth now.
.
.

.

> A book deal is a deal with a publisher to write one or more books. You are very slow.

.

WHA! HA~Ha! Now he's taking his "above 'invisible'" statement and added singular and
pretends he said that all along. What's ironic is. EVEN THAT IS WRONG.

(And in a previous post, I even TOLD him what it actually was. Taken directly from
the Writer's Digest. The book writers and columnist all read).

https://tinyurl.com/44db9za8

Poor BackupAndFall-InItBillb. The more he lies, dodges, changes his own words,
the more I make a fool of him.

This is a BackUpBillB bitch-slap festival...

LOL

[VegasJerry]

.

See what I mean? The more this jealous fool sticks his hand in the tar baby, the more
he entangles himself. I wonder how he thinks I got paid for those two books? And how
they were allowed to print my writings?

*** LOL! ***
.

.


> He would have to write a book first.

.

WRONG! You STILL don’t know what a book deal is. And that’s after I TOLD YOU!

.

> What I called bullshit on was his claim that he had two book deals.

.

Yet I did, in order to get the royalties from those two books.

.

> Do you not know what a book deal is either?

.

Not from you. I’ve bitch slapped you twice with what it is.
.
So keep embarrassing yourself, changing your statements, lying about it, and get
stuck further in a tar baby of you own making.

***** LOL *****

[VegasJerry]

.

Heh. Thanks for joining in on Bitch slapping BackupBillb.

ISBN 0-942386-20-5 Data Searcher. Copyright 1983. Written by Jerry Sturdivant
ISBN 0-87455-059-9 Jump Search. Copyright 1986. Written by Jerry Sturdivant

[VegasJerry]

.

LOL! NOW he's backed up AGAIN! Is there no end to how much this poor jealous fool
will embarrass himself? Has he no shame?
.

.

> Jerry was obviously trying to deceive us by saying he had "two book deals."

.

Heh. Yea, BY HAVING TWO BOOK DEALS!.

*** (This is SO much fun......) ***
.
.

> Now that he got called on the lie he's doing somersaults...
.

Who's doing the backflips and sumersaults?
.
(The gift that keeps on giving....)

[VegasJerry]

.

Even Brian's laughing....

[VegasJerry]

.

> I think that's the one he won the Nobel Prize in Literature for....
.

Heh. See what I mean about him doing backflips?

.

> He obviously had a lot of extra time on his hands while running the Western Grid.

.

And his jealously...

.

> I'd trade everything my wife owns for the advance he must have received on that book deal.

.

And his back door admission about my book deals...
.

(Oh how this must sting.....)

[risky biz]

On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 10:28:36 AM UTC-7, BillB wrote:

> I think that's the one he won the Nobel Prize in Literature for. He obviously had a lot of extra time on his hands while running the Western Grid.

~I'd trade everything my wife owns


LOL. His Blabbermouth gave up the whole story. Add to the 'own goal' list.

[VegasJerry]

.

Look like dipshit picked Running & Hiding. And I about to bitch the bitch with this:
.
https://www.thebinderyagency.com/blog/howdopublisherspayauthors

That should keep him running.........