Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anyone Got a Better Name?

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Clave

unread,
May 25, 2012, 5:11:14 AM5/25/12
to
Two or three players minraise each other back and forth five, six, eight
times pre-flop.

"Dink War" is what I think in my own head when I'm not thinking "collusion".

Jim



brewmaster

unread,
May 25, 2012, 7:03:53 AM5/25/12
to
We've been calling the min raise a "gobble" for many years now.

popinjay999

unread,
May 25, 2012, 12:03:48 PM5/25/12
to
Why would "you be thinking collusion", you fucking n00b? Why would
that indicate collusion? Can you explain that one? Huh? Well can
you? I can't wait to hear your opinion. Please set me straight. I'm
waiting.

Clave

unread,
May 25, 2012, 1:54:38 PM5/25/12
to
"popinjay999" <paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8411d142-2b3c-42b3...@oe8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
Damn -- stepped in some pop-tard...


popinjay999

unread,
May 25, 2012, 2:00:01 PM5/25/12
to
On May 25, 10:54 am, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
Translation: "I don't know why I mentioned "collusion" and now that I
think about it that really didn't make any fucking sense. Be patient
with me, even though I've been playing poker and posting to RGP for
several years, I'm still just a slow-learning newb."

Clave

unread,
May 25, 2012, 2:29:11 PM5/25/12
to


"popinjay999" <paulpo...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:e8264d5a-f94d-4a90...@s9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
> On May 25, 10:54 am, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
>> "popinjay999" <paulpopin...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:8411d142-2b3c-42b3...@oe8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On May 25, 2:11 am, "Clave" <clav...@the.monastery.com> wrote:
>> >> Two or three players minraise each other back and forth five, six,
>> >> eight
>> >> times pre-flop.
>>
>> >> "Dink War" is what I think in my own head when I'm not thinking
>> >> "collusion".
>>
>> >> Jim
>>
>> > Why would "you be thinking collusion", you fucking n00b? Why would
>> > that indicate collusion? Can you explain that one? Huh? Well can
>> > you? I can't wait to hear your opinion. Please set me straight. I'm
>> > waiting.
>>
>> Damn -- stepped in some pop-tard...
>
>
> Translation: "I don't know why I mentioned "collusion"

Sorry Tardboi, but I don't feel like reducing it to single syllables for
you.

*scrape* *scrape*

Jim



Message has been deleted

Clave

unread,
May 25, 2012, 3:08:58 PM5/25/12
to
"Vince" <vi...@hush.ai> wrote in message
news:XnsA05E798...@94.75.214.39...
> "Clave" <cla...@the.monastery.com> wrote in
> news:N_Hvr.20735$x11...@newsfe21.iad:
> Tit for Tat?

Good as anything, I guess.

Jim



Dutch

unread,
May 25, 2012, 3:41:07 PM5/25/12
to
Vince wrote:
> "Clave"<cla...@the.monastery.com> wrote in
> news:N_Hvr.20735$x11...@newsfe21.iad:
>
> Tit for Tat?
>

Oh yeah? Why I oughta..

Message has been deleted
0 new messages