PokerStars Tournament #223754024, Limit 7 Card Stud Hi/Lo
Buy-In: $10.00/$1.00 USD
24 players
Total Prize Pool: $240.00 USD
Tournament started 2009/12/22 11:45:00 ET
Dear Raiders Rule,
You finished the tournament in 1st place. A USD 108.00 award has been
credited to your Real Money account.
You earned 98.50 tournament leader points in this tournament. For
information about our tournament leader board, see our web site at
http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/tournaments/leader-board/
Congratulations!
Thank you for participating
"This has got to be some sports-related crap, that's all Raiderfan gives a
fuck about." -- Paul Popinjay 2/27/09
------�
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
$11 is way out of Beldin's comfort zone.
PokerStars Tournament #241010581, No Limit Hold'em
Buy-In: $10.00/$1.00 USD
2844 players
Total Prize Pool: $28440.00 USD
Tournament started 2009/12/21 15:15:00 ET
Dear brewcam,
You finished the tournament in 6th place. A USD 952.74 award has been
credited to your Real Money account.
You earned 437.77 tournament leader points in this tournament. For
information about our tournament leader board, see our web site at
http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/tournaments/leader-board/
Congratulations!
Thank you for participating.
--
I don't care about you! Fuck you! - FEAR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyM4uAJBujA
______________________________________________________________________�
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
Now , can you explain to the rest of the world what you were thinking when
you decided to scoot UTG with 8 Bb with q2 soo ?
>
> You earned 437.77 tournament leader points in this tournament. For
> information about our tournament leader board, see our web site at
> http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/tournaments/leader-board/
>
>
> Congratulations!
>
> Thank you for participating.
>
>
> --
> I don't care about you! Fuck you! - FEAR
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyM4uAJBujA
Recession .. when IMike's neighbor loses his trailer
Depression .. when IMike loses his trailer
Recovery .. when IMike accepts public assistance funded by Obama
--------�
Yeah
I let the guy get to me, I was pissed that 1) I had raised and folded to
his reraise a few hands earlier. 2) I had called his raise with KJh and
then folded on the flop, leaving me way shorter than I should have been.
3) I was steaming and thought they'd all fold.
> >
> > You earned 437.77 tournament leader points in this tournament. For
> > information about our tournament leader board, see our web site at
> > http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/tournaments/leader-board/
> >
> >
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Thank you for participating.
> >
> >
> > --
> > I don't care about you! Fuck you! - FEAR
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyM4uAJBujA
>
>
> Recession .. when IMike's neighbor loses his trailer
> Depression .. when IMike loses his trailer
> Recovery .. when IMike accepts public assistance funded by Obama
--
I don't care about you! Fuck you! - FEAR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyM4uAJBujA
______________________________________________________________________�
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
Are we showing off tournament leader points now?
Can I play along too? =)
PokerStars Tournament #217250521, No Limit Hold'em
Buy-In: 1.00/0.10 FUN
2751 players
Total Prize Pool: 10446.00 FUN
Tournament started 2009/12/01 20:00:00 ET
Dear Diputsur,
You finished the tournament in 1st place. A 1,672.98 award has been credited
to your FUN Money account.
You earned 575.33 tournament leader points in this tournament. For
>> Now , can you explain to the rest of the world what you were thinking when
>> you decided to scoot UTG with 8 Bb with q2 soo ?
>
> Yeah
>
> I let the guy get to me, I was pissed that 1) I had raised and folded to
> his reraise a few hands earlier. 2) I had called his raise with KJh and
> then folded on the flop, leaving me way shorter than I should have been.
> 3) I was steaming and thought they'd all fold.
Huh. Are you sure it wasn't a read and math play based on your
extensive notes on this particular player? Are you sure it wasn't that
anyone should have made exactly that move in that spot, otherwise they
should just give up now? Are you sure doggy isn't just a "shithead?"
Ok, maybe you'll answer yes to that last one...
Follow :)
I'm always happy when someone manages to win a tournament.
Where's that put you for the year?
> "Raider Fan" <raidersgo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:o3q707x...@recgroups.com...
> > Stick this in your pipe and smoke it!
> >
>
> I'm always happy when someone manages to win a tournament.
>
> Where's that put you for the year?
Profit - $936 ROI - 25% ITM - 24%
Last 120 days (which is more important IMHO)
Profit - $816 ROI - 40% ITM - 25%
"This has got to be some sports-related crap, that's all Raiderfan gives a
fuck about." -- Paul Popinjay 2/27/09
_______________________________________________________________________�
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
PokerStars Tournament #21186201, No Limit Hold'em
Freeroll Super Satellite
9493 players
Target Tournament #21125949
27 tickets to the target tournament
Tournament started - 2006/03/19 - 23:02:00 (ET)
Dear John_Brian_K,
You finished the tournament in 1st place.
That's right 9493 players.
==========================================
You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
==============================
47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
JBK
Dear John_Brian_K,
You finished the tournament in 16th place.
A $55.92 award has been credited to your Real Money account.
That's right 4473 players. I got sucked out on in the end also.
==========================================
You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
==============================
47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
JBK
_______________________________________________________________________�
Hey that's impressive ... unless you were dealt 9-6 suited 50 or more
times ...
in which case it was just luck ...
It was a freeroll so 27th was 'basically' the same as 1st, but after
playing for like 8 hours I WANTED first and I got it.
Thanks
==========================================
You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
==============================
47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
JBK
-----�
>> You earned 575.33 tournament leader points in this tournament. For
>> information about our tournament leader board, see our web site at
>> http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/tournaments/leader-board/
>>
>>
>> Congratulations!
>>
>> Thank you for participating.
> Tournament started - 2006/03/19 - 23:02:00 (ET)
Hey numbnuts, this thread was about tournament leader points
recently accumulated... WTF are you posting a freeroll sat
message for? WhyTF do you even still have that one nearly
4 years later?!? What have you done lately?
SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!
Speaking of that, I sent you $2000 ($1000 on Stars and $1000 on FTP) and I
have yet to see an email from you with two enclosures (that's right 2,
cause I paid for them) of your book .txt file!
--
I don't care about you! Fuck you! - FEAR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyM4uAJBujA
-------�
Full Tilt stops them after the winners are set ...In the 10000 man
free roll yesterday advancing to some Sunday Tourny ... they advanced
250 ... I was basically hanging around 200th place watching the bubble
approach ... until I thought ... bleep this ... the program I was
watching on TV was over ... I was getting tired ... so to stay
awake ... I started playing more dilligently and got on a roll ending
in like 20 th when the bubble burst ... I wanted to keep playing ...
Seemed I had a total feel of all that was going on ...most were like
me before just hanging around ... and bigger stack aggressors were so
obvious when they were bluffing ... so a little aggression and
concentration went a long way ... I'm all in favor of continuing to
play ... even after 5 hours ...
It's a different ... but more challenging game to win it all after
that ... as they start playing bingo again ... too bad they end it ...
I sent them both immediatly after I received your payment.
If you want another copy, you'll have to ship again.
:)
Nothing.
At least nothing online.
Last week I played 3-6FKLHE at Greektown for about 7 hours and won about
300.00, but of course I cannot 'prove' that.
==========================================
You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
==============================
47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
JBK
____________________________________________________________________�
The call was mandatory.
--
~ Seth Jackson
MySpace URL - http://www.myspace.com/sethjacksonsong
Songwriting and Music Business Info: http://www.sethjackson.net
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:54:31 -0700, Follow <lamema...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >misanthropic whackjob wrote:
> >
> >>> Now , can you explain to the rest of the world what you were thinking
when
> >>> you decided to scoot UTG with 8 Bb with q2 soo ?
> >>
> >> Yeah
> >>
> >> I let the guy get to me, I was pissed that 1) I had raised and folded to
> >> his reraise a few hands earlier. 2) I had called his raise with KJh and
> >> then folded on the flop, leaving me way shorter than I should have been.
> >> 3) I was steaming and thought they'd all fold.
> >
> >Huh. Are you sure it wasn't a read and math play based on your
> >extensive notes on this particular player? Are you sure it wasn't that
> >anyone should have made exactly that move in that spot, otherwise they
> >should just give up now? Are you sure doggy isn't just a "shithead?"
> >Ok, maybe you'll answer yes to that last one...
>
> The call was mandatory.
I had 8bb at that point, I don't see where I had any other play
PokerStars Game #37023963796: Tournament #241010581, $10+$1 USD Hold'em No
Limit - Level XLIV (20000/40000) - 2009/12/21 23:26:15 ET
Table '241010581 78' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Maikevaw (812741 in chips)
Seat 2: brewcam (330722 in chips)
Seat 4: Teffzel (928866 in chips)
Seat 6: davywchn (570788 in chips)
Seat 7: GE0RD1 (2091395 in chips)
Seat 9: pacofoli (3797488 in chips)
Maikevaw: posts the ante 5000
brewcam: posts the ante 5000
Teffzel: posts the ante 5000
davywchn: posts the ante 5000
GE0RD1: posts the ante 5000
pacofoli: posts the ante 5000
GE0RD1: posts small blind 20000
pacofoli: posts big blind 40000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to brewcam [Qc 2c]
Maikevaw: folds
brewcam: raises 285722 to 325722 and is all-in
Teffzel: folds
davywchn: folds
GE0RD1: folds
pacofoli: calls 285722
*** FLOP *** [7c Jd 6d]
*** TURN *** [7c Jd 6d] [9d]
*** RIVER *** [7c Jd 6d 9d] [3d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
pacofoli: shows [Kc Jc] (a pair of Jacks)
brewcam: shows [Qc 2c] (high card Queen)
pacofoli collected 701444 from pot
Sky_Kaster [observer] said, "damn"
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 701444 | Rake 0
Board [7c Jd 6d 9d 3d]
Seat 1: Maikevaw folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: brewcam showed [Qc 2c] and lost with high card Queen
Seat 4: Teffzel folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: davywchn (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: GE0RD1 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: pacofoli (big blind) showed [Kc Jc] and won (701444) with a pair
of Jacks
> --
> ~ Seth Jackson
>
> MySpace URL - http://www.myspace.com/sethjacksonsong
> Songwriting and Music Business Info: http://www.sethjackson.net
--
I don't care about you! Fuck you! - FEAR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyM4uAJBujA
--------�
I don't think your play there was absolutely terrible or anything. It
was a tough spot, especially in the heat of the moment. I don't think
it would have been a bad fold either. The only way you could have
fucked it up was a 3x or a limp or something followed by a fold, shove
or fold are acceptable enough.
The reason I posted what I did is the stark difference between a real
poker player who is willing to either acknowledge error or at least look
for a better solution. This contrasted to a jackhole who doesn't know a
god damn thing about poker and whose first reaction is always to get
defensive and whine like a nerdy little bitch.
Follow :)
> I don't think your play there was absolutely terrible or anything. It
> was a tough spot, especially in the heat of the moment. I don't think
> it would have been a bad fold either. The only way you could have
> fucked it up was a 3x or a limp or something followed by a fold, shove
> or fold are acceptable enough.
Correct. M < 4. One more hand before the blinds. Stacking off is a
perfectly reasonable play. By mocking Brew for making this play,
Dogfucker is just providing more evidence, although no more evidence
is needed, that he is totally clueless about poker strategy.
> The reason I posted what I did is the stark difference between a real
> poker player who is willing to either acknowledge error or at least look
> for a better solution. This contrasted to a jackhole who doesn't know a
> god damn thing about poker and whose first reaction is always to get
> defensive and whine like a nerdy little bitch.
Thank God we don't have anyone like that posting to RGP.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
>On Dec 23 2009 4:47 PM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:54:31 -0700, Follow <lamema...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >misanthropic whackjob wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Now , can you explain to the rest of the world what you were thinking
>when
>> >>> you decided to scoot UTG with 8 Bb with q2 soo ?
>> >>
>> >> Yeah
>> >>
>> >> I let the guy get to me, I was pissed that 1) I had raised and folded to
>> >> his reraise a few hands earlier. 2) I had called his raise with KJh and
>> >> then folded on the flop, leaving me way shorter than I should have been.
>> >> 3) I was steaming and thought they'd all fold.
>> >
>> >Huh. Are you sure it wasn't a read and math play based on your
>> >extensive notes on this particular player? Are you sure it wasn't that
>> >anyone should have made exactly that move in that spot, otherwise they
>> >should just give up now? Are you sure doggy isn't just a "shithead?"
>> >Ok, maybe you'll answer yes to that last one...
>>
>> The call was mandatory.
>
>I had 8bb at that point, I don't see where I had any other play
You really had none. The caller's play was also correct.
Shoving there with Q2 is fairly stupid
YOU, of course, are extremely stupid
***
Not till you came back, anyway
> Shoving there with Q2 is fairly stupid
With M < 4, stacking off with Q2 suited is the correct play. If you
disagree, take it up with Harrington.
You and Dogfucker are both complete idiots. Neither of you understand
even the basics of correct poker strategy.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
> Shoving there with Q2 is fairly stupid
With M < 4, stacking off with Q2 suited is the correct play. If you
disagree, take it up with Harrington.
I'll take it up with any moron who thinks they won't get a better hand than
Qx suited that round.
In late position, it might be the best play.
In EP, A) you'll be called and B) You'll be behind
Wilma, take the dildo out of your ass
Oh, and Merry Christmas
> "ramashiva" <ramash...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:6e578f2f-068c-409a...@u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 25, 8:59 am, "Beldin the Sorcerer" <beldin...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > Shoving there with Q2 is fairly stupid
> With M < 4, stacking off with Q2 suited is the correct play. If you
> disagree, take it up with Harrington.
> I'll take it up with any moron
Then take it up with Harrington. Do you even know what M is???
> who thinks they won't get a better hand than Qx suited that round.
That is not the criterion in deciding whether to stack off with a
short stack. Like I said, you are totally clueless about correct
poker strategy.
> In late position, it might be the best play.
> In EP, A) you'll be called
Where do you come up with this bullshit??? It's six-handed. One
player has folded. Are you asserting that one of the four remaining
players will ALWAYS call??? Stacking off has significant fold
equity. That's what makes it the correct play when M < 4.
> and B) You'll be behind
If you are called, you will USUALLY be behind. Not always. JTs and
any lesser suited connectors are about 55-45 dogs against Q2s. Please
do not tell me that players, especially large stacks, don't call
stackoffs by shortstacks with suited connectors.
> Wilma, take the dildo out of your ass
Your continued insistence on addressing me by a woman's name shows you
realize I am more of a man than you will ever be. Your continued
obsession with anal intercourse shows you are a closeted faggot.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
> "ramashiva" <ramash...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:6e578f2f-068c-409a...@u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 25, 8:59 am, "Beldin the Sorcerer" <beldin...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > Shoving there with Q2 is fairly stupid
> With M < 4, stacking off with Q2 suited is the correct play. If you
> disagree, take it up with Harrington.
> I'll take it up with any moron
Then take it up with Harrington. Do you even know what M is???
***
Yeah, M is a concept that Paul M came up with.
It claims to measure the number of rounds you have before you're blinded
off. It's wrong, of course, because it doesn't take the structure into
account.
Nevertheless, even in a FAST structure, 4 rounds is plenty of time to find a
hand better than Q2 sooooted in EP
***
> who thinks they won't get a better hand than Qx suited that round.
That is not the criterion in deciding whether to stack off with a
short stack. Like I said, you are totally clueless about correct
poker strategy.
***
YES, shithead, it actually IS the criteria in EP.
In late position, the likelihood of everyone else folding may take
precidence, but the odds are quite strong that in EP, someone behind you
will pick up a callable hand, and Q2 sooted SUCKS ASS against most calling
hands
> In late position, it might be the best play.
> In EP, A) you'll be called
Where do you come up with this bullshit??? It's six-handed. One
player has folded. Are you asserting that one of the four remaining
players will ALWAYS call???
***
Always?
No.
Much more often than not?
For 7 more BB?
Hell yes
***
Stacking off has significant fold
equity.
***
Only if you're a fucking retard
***
That's what makes it the correct play when M < 4.
> and B) You'll be behind
If you are called, you will USUALLY be behind. Not always. JTs and
any lesser suited connectors are about 55-45 dogs against Q2s. Please
do not tell me that players, especially large stacks, don't call
stackoffs by shortstacks with suited connectors.
***
Sure they do.
They also call with any ace, most K's, and Q9+ if they can afford it
Against the calling range, you're WAY behind
Damn, Willie, go back to fantasizing about big breasted women
***
> Wilma, take the dildo out of your ass
Your continued insistence on addressing me by a woman's name shows you
realize I am more of a man than you will ever be.
***
No, it shows I've figured out you're a poser.
***
Your continued
obsession with anal intercourse shows you are a closeted faggot.
***
Hey, there's a LOT of people I'd like to bang in the ass.
ALL of them are women, of course.