_______________________________________________________________
New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
That's completely fucked-up. So all the guy has to do is not say fuck and
he can't fucking manage it? What's so hard about not saying fuck that he
managed to fuck it up? Fuck!
>
> That's completely fucked-up. So all the guy has to do is not say fuck and
> he can't fucking manage it? What's so hard about not saying fuck that he
> managed to fuck it up? Fuck!
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
------
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
> To be fair the way he explained it was that in Denmark where he is from the word
> is commonly used in everyday conversation.
Why didnt he just say it in Danish?
Matt
www.SavageTournaments.com
www.PokerTDA.com
www.Bay101.com
On Mar 4 2007 10:51 PM, GambleAB wrote:
> Matthew, do you think that if you say "fuck" the next time you are up to
> sing kareoke, you'll get a 10 minute penalty and not be able to sing?
> Something to think about....
_______________________________________________________________
Your Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
> Yes, if it is on TV and that would be a good thing if I got shut down in
> karaoke!
>
Well the tournament isn't broadcast LIVE is it? Can't the editors just
not include the "fuck" hands?
It seems like too brutal of a punishment to me.
> Matt
> www.SavageTournaments.com
> www.PokerTDA.com
> www.Bay101.com
>
> On Mar 4 2007 10:51 PM, GambleAB wrote:
>
> > Matthew, do you think that if you say "fuck" the next time you are up to
> > sing kareoke, you'll get a 10 minute penalty and not be able to sing?
> > Something to think about....
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Now its over, I'm dead and I haven't done anything I want,
or I'm still alive and there's nothing I want to do!
If you must: brewmaster at brewcam dot com
--------
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
_______________________________________________________________
The Largest Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
Matt Savage
www.SavageTournaments.com
www.PokerTDA.com
www.Bay101.com
On Mar 4 2007 11:14 PM, Alan Gilbert aka brewmaster wrote:
> On Mar 4 2007 11:06 PM, Matt Savage wrote:
>
> > Yes, if it is on TV and that would be a good thing if I got shut down in
> > karaoke!
> >
>
> Well the tournament isn't broadcast LIVE is it? Can't the editors just
> not include the "fuck" hands?
> It seems like too brutal of a punishment to me.
>
> > Matt
> > http://www.SavageTournaments.com
> > http://www.PokerTDA.com
> > http://www.Bay101.com
> >
> > On Mar 4 2007 10:51 PM, GambleAB wrote:
> >
> > > Matthew, do you think that if you say "fuck" the next time you are up to
> > > sing kareoke, you'll get a 10 minute penalty and not be able to sing?
> > > Something to think about....
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Now its over, I'm dead and I haven't done anything I want,
> or I'm still alive and there's nothing I want to do!
> If you must: brewmaster at brewcam dot com
_______________________________________________________________
Block Lists, Favorites, and more - http://www.recpoker.com
Well, it entered English as a less nasty replacement for the word 'swive.'
Let's bring back 'swive,' and then we can say "At least he only said
'fuck'."
Seriously, I like the idea of more graded penalties, but more broadly
applied. Just as there's a sign warning that you are giving an implicit
photo release walking into a WPT event area, you may as well be warned
that behavior unsuitable for television may be subject to arbitrary
punishments.
I think threats of violence should be under the same rubric. "I'll rip off
your leg and hit you over the head with it" is obviously kidding, but it
deserves a warning any time in a casino and probably a one hand penalty on
television. "We know how to treat slow-rollers in Delaware" or the like is
heading toward some kind of penalty in any game, and severe penaltiesin
televised events.
> Why didnt he just say it in Danish?
He did.
Maybe there should be penalties for mean looks too.
That said, the big issue for me is your language you used in defining abusive
language: "My rule about abusive language is simple, if it is offensive to or
aimed at any other player, dealer, or tournament personnel that a penalty will
be assessed."
The problem is the definition of "offensive language". You need a hard and fast
definition. Having penalties against players that are abusive to players,
dealers, or tournament personnel is a good thing. All for that. But without a
definition of what offensive language is, it'll all be subjective. Reminds me of
the classic statement during the senate debates several years ago regarding
pornography when the Senator in charge was asked to define pornography. When he
couldn't define it he blurted out: "I'll know it when I see it!".
It's been my experience that players swear more out of frustration. They aren't
directing it towards anyone. They're frustrated and it comes out as anger
toward no one in particular. Under your definition, would calling another
player a "donkey" be a penalty? Couldn't Matisow's constant yaking be taken as
abusive by someone (Let alone Helmuth's constant denigration.....)?
I realize that you've got a business enterprise to run, with sponsors, TV, and
their money to consider, but can't you just edit out the language for the TV
show, and penalize the players for abuse?
Bruno
> I realize that you've got a business enterprise to run, with sponsors, TV, and
> their money to consider, but can't you just edit out the language for the TV
> show, and penalize the players for abuse?
This is the most sensible way to handle future issues.
How do you get a sweet eighty year old lady to say the word "F**K"
Have another sweet eighty year old lady say the word "BINGO"
_______________________________________________________________
Watch Lists, Block Lists, Favorites - http://www.recpoker.com
if they have vague rules they can discriminate,those players that say
things that may offend one group would be penalized or thrown out of
the tournament,if a group of people are not liked by the particular
tournament director he can let the offense slide.
if someone says something offensive and no one says anything is the
player penalized?do they not say anything because the fear reprisals
if they do?if a player in frustration blurts out mohammed "the
friggin" prophet i missed my flush will he/she be penalized.
the tournament directors want an easy out,where their not the bad
guy,the television networks are the ones who ultimately decide what is
acceptable to say.
As far af being edited, on the Poker Dome shows we have a one day turn around so
most of the play is shown so therefore it cannot be edited out. He would not
have received a penalty at all in most of the tournaments I run.
Matt
_______________________________________________________________
>Yes violent threats at all are considered more punishable than swear words. What
>do they do to slow rollers in Delaware?
Buckwheats.
Matt, I'd like your opinion on something that I posted here a year or two ago.
I was in a NLHE poker tournament in a B & M and after a player sucked out on me
with a really bad play, I blurted out " Jesus CHRIST ! "
The player complained to the dealer and the dealer called the floor. The dealer
explained to floor and I added that I didn't think Jesus Christ was a vulgar
term.
The dealer said that it was THE WAY that I said it. The floor put me on a
'Warning', to be followed by disqualification if it happened again.
My question is..... is it a correct ruling ?
Doug
_______________________________________________________________
Your Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
_______________________________________________________________
>I think threats of violence should be under the same rubric.
How about my favorite? "Don't make me scowl at you."
-P
--
Patti Beadles, Oakland, CA |
pattib~pattib.org |
http://www.pattib.org/ | http://www.urbanscapephoto.com
Or just yell, "Hey Patti!" |
>
>
> Matt, I'd like your opinion on something that I posted here a year or two ago.
> I was in a NLHE poker tournament in a B & M and after a player sucked out on
> me
> with a really bad play, I blurted out " Jesus CHRIST ! "
> The player complained to the dealer and the dealer called the floor. The
> dealer
> explained to floor and I added that I didn't think Jesus Christ was a vulgar
> term.
> The dealer said that it was THE WAY that I said it. The floor put me on a
> 'Warning', to be followed by disqualification if it happened again.
>
> My question is..... is it a correct ruling ?
> Doug
>
JC is not vulgar, however it could be seen as offensive as many believe you
should not use the lord's name that way. I would have politely asked you not to
do it any more as it obviously offended someone.
Matt Savage
_______________________________________________________________
* New Release: RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
On Mar 5 2007 11:40 AM, Patti Beadles wrote:
> In article <2LednSJmdIJ7kHHY...@comcast.com>,
> Stephen Jacobs wrote:
>
> >I think threats of violence should be under the same rubric.
>
> How about my favorite? "Don't make me scowl at you."
Automatic penalty :-)
Matt
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
On Mar 5 2007 3:37 PM, Matt Savage wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 5 2007 11:30 AM, Smorgass Bored wrote:
>
> >
> > Matt Savage wrote:
> > > Yes violent threats at all are considered more punishable than swear
> > > words.
> > > What
> > > do they do to slow rollers in Delaware?
> > > > Matt
> >
> >
> > Matt, I'd like your opinion on something that I posted here a year or two
> > ago.
> > I was in a NLHE poker tournament in a B & M and after a player sucked out on
> > me
> > with a really bad play, I blurted out " Jesus CHRIST ! "
> > The player complained to the dealer and the dealer called the floor. The
> > dealer
> > explained to floor and I added that I didn't think Jesus Christ was a vulgar
> > term.
> > The dealer said that it was THE WAY that I said it. The floor put me on a
> > 'Warning', to be followed by disqualification if it happened again.
> >
> > My question is..... is it a correct ruling ?
> > Doug
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Doug - Max Culpa on Poker Stars
Feverishly Trying To Outrun The Bots
> > My question is..... is it a correct ruling ?
> > Doug
> >
> JC is not vulgar, however it could be seen as offensive as many believe you
> should not use the lord's name that way. I would have politely asked you not
> to
> do it any more as it obviously offended someone.
> > Matt Savage
Thank you for your reply. I taped Poker Dome and I'm going to watch it in a few
minutes (when I'm knocked out of the Omaha 8/B tournament :-)
Doug - Max Culpa on Poker Stars
Feverishly Trying To Outrun The Bots
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
But the real problem is definitions. "If it is offensive to or aimed at any
other player, dealer, or tournament personell...", could be used by any player
to complain regarding another player. Personally, someone picking their nose at
the table and handling the cards before washing their hands is a bit offensive
to me. Am I allowed to call the floor and ask for a penalty to be assessed?
Sure, the example is facetious, and a floorman is going to have to be pragmatic.
But that's my point. "Offensive to" in the workplace has now been so ran through
(with companies so afraid of sexual harrassement and religious lawsuits), that
any time anyone complains in a company of any size, the manager must contact a
HR rep. Or the manager may be considered complicit by the company, and possibly
be submitted for disciplinary actions.
My attitude is this, "what comes out of someone elses mouth says nothing about
me, but says alot about them". As long as it isn't directed towards me. And
that's the philosophy I think out to be adopted.
_______________________________________________________________
* New Release: RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
Oh well, I can watch it RIGHT NOW..... DAMMIT !
when used as a profanity it is offensive.what if in a similiar
incident a player said he was "jewed" out of the hand.if a player used
the term "nigger flush" at the table and there weren't any black
people at the table would it be an infraction?as i mentioned in this
thread before what if somebody used mohammed the friggin' prophet
after they got sucked out on,or buddhist priest as a profanity when
men nguyen was at the table.
a simple rule would be no religious,ethnic,or racially offensive terms
at the table,everything else would be alright.
lol
j/k
That is a harsh penalty though, but if he knew the rules going in it
is his own fault.
>> How about my favorite? "Don't make me scowl at you."
>Automatic penalty :-)
*Scowl*
When said loudly and fast, " GOTdandruffinmyhair and someofititches" might
warrant a 10 minute penalty too.... imo
Doug - Max Culpa on Poker Stars
_______________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
Mike Hunt says, "loosen up."
:-)
Doug - Max Culpa on Poker Stars
_______________________________________________________________
The Largest Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
> Totally agree it is too harsh, that is why we changed the rule in the TDA. I
had
> given this penalty in 2 previous events and therefore needed to continue
through
> the rest of the series as it would not be fair for the two others I penalized
> with time.
I'm glad you changed it. I remember a situation at a WSOP final table
(last year??? or the year before) where someone called for a penalty
against Vinny Vinh when they were heads up at the final table. Seems like
too much of an opportunity for angle shooting to me.
-----
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
> >
> >
> > Matt, I'd like your opinion on something that I posted here a year or two
ago.
> > I was in a NLHE poker tournament in a B & M and after a player sucked out
on
> > me
> > with a really bad play, I blurted out " Jesus CHRIST ! "
> > The player complained to the dealer and the dealer called the floor. The
> > dealer
> > explained to floor and I added that I didn't think Jesus Christ was a
vulgar
> > term.
> > The dealer said that it was THE WAY that I said it. The floor put me on a
> > 'Warning', to be followed by disqualification if it happened again.
> >
> > My question is..... is it a correct ruling ?
> > Doug
> >
> JC is not vulgar, however it could be seen as offensive as many believe you
> should not use the lord's name that way.
Not trying to start anything (this time), but wouldn't you have to first
believe that JC IS the lord first? If you do not believe he is, then
saying JC can't be offensive. If you have to consider what each and every
person considers offensive you won't be able to say anything (which is why
I thought there was a specific "f-word" rule.
In the 2005 ME I was at a table with that foul mouth chick that was
married to the NY Met (you know, the chick who goes on Howard Stern all
the time...I can't remember her name). Anyway, she got a penalty when the
dealer heard her whisper "what the fuck was that guy thinking" to her
neighbor. When she got back she said "so I can't say the f-word but I can
say cunt, bitch, shit, asshole, or anything like that?" then she called
the dealer a cunt. She got warned not to talk like that anymore or she'd
get another penalty. The "ESPN Hollywood" cameras were on her the whole
time and egging her on.
> I would have politely asked you not to
> do it any more as it obviously offended someone.
>
> Matt Savage
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Now its over, I'm dead and I haven't done anything I want,
or I'm still alive and there's nothing I want to do!
If you must: brewmaster at brewcam dot com
____________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com