question for Jerry and clavie and other libturd apologists

[bratt]

What is your take on all the secret info getting out?

Kind of hard to blame it on Bush, isn't it?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP

[ramashiva]

On Jun 18, 2:59 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?

> Kind of hard to blame it on Bush, isn't it?

The leaks are obviously all coming from a Bush Administration mole who
has managed to survive undetected in the Obama Administration.


William "The Life" Coleman (ramashiva)

[popinjay999]

On Jun 18, 2:59 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

Atsa my girl. She's on the job. Bright-eyed and bushy-tailed.

-Paul "The Way" Popinjay

[bratt]

Peggy Noonan (who I love) have a great column the other day. If I can
find it, I'll post it

[bratt]

well, since both clavie and Jerry have been posting and reading everything
I write, they obviously don't have an answer for this simple question.

This is Peggy Noonan's take on it.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303734204577466910796158718.html

[ramashiva]

On Jun 18, 4:34 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> This is Peggy Noonan's take on it.

> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230373420457746691079615...

Susan, Peggy Noonan has absolutely no credibility among liberals, nor
does the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. So the only
reaction you are going to get to citing a Peggy Noonan column is
derisive laughter.

Also you might want to refer to my post --

"The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"

https://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.poker/msg/538094aedd70bae6

I would encourage you to use "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"
as shorthand for the stupid liberals on this newsgroup.

[fffurken]

On Jun 19, 1:22 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would encourage you to use "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"
> as shorthand for the stupid liberals on this newsgroup.

Yeah, I don't see that one taking off. Ten out of ten for trying
though.

[bratt]

I'd like to see them take apart what she said.

I have also read many things that were definitely very liberal leaning. I
love her writing.

I will read "The four horsemen" later.

People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes than to get
anyone with half a brain to agree with them.

[Clave]

"ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f77a5efd-e1d8-469b...@oo8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

> On Jun 18, 4:34 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>
>> This is Peggy Noonan's take on it.
>
>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230373420457746691079615...
>
> Susan, Peggy Noonan has absolutely no credibility among liberals, nor
> does the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. So the only
> reaction you are going to get to citing a Peggy Noonan column is
> derisive laughter.
>
> Also you might want to refer to my post --
>
> "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"

Yeah, that was hilariously petty and stupid too.

Jim

[bratt]

On Jun 18 2012 7:38 PM, bratt wrote:

> On Jun 18 2012 7:22 PM, ramashiva wrote:
>
> > On Jun 18, 4:34 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > This is Peggy Noonan's take on it.
> >
> > > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230373420457746691079615...
> >
> > Susan, Peggy Noonan has absolutely no credibility among liberals, nor
> > does the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. So the only
> > reaction you are going to get to citing a Peggy Noonan column is
> > derisive laughter.
> >
> > Also you might want to refer to my post --
> >
> > "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"

> I will read "The four horsemen" later.
>
> People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes than to get
> anyone with half a brain to agree with them.

I just read the thread, and what you said so eloquently is what I just
said in simple words.

[Clave]

"bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:b9u4b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...

<...>

> People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes
> than to get anyone with half a brain to agree with them.

Unlike some people I could name, the Democrats I know don't vote according
to how people they don't like vote.

And I must say that the concern trolling is getting pretty fucking deep
around here.

Jim

[ramashiva]

On Jun 18, 5:38 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> On Jun 18 2012 7:22 PM, ramashiva wrote:

> > On Jun 18, 4:34 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> > > This is Peggy Noonan's take on it.

> > >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230373420457746691079615...

> > Susan, Peggy Noonan has absolutely no credibility among liberals, nor
> > does the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal.  So the only
> > reaction you are going to get to citing a Peggy Noonan column is
> > derisive laughter.

> > Also you might want to refer to my post --

> > "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"

> >https://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.poker/msg/538094aedd70bae6

> > I would encourage you to use "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"
> > as shorthand for the stupid liberals on this newsgroup.

> I'd like to see them take apart what she said.

That's not the point. If you actually want to engage "The Four
Horsemen" in a discussion, you need to cite a source which is credible
to them, like mainstream media -- NYT, Washington Post, CNN, the major
broadcast news networks. etc. Or better yet, a liberal blog like
Daily Kos, Talking Points Memo, or Huffington Post. That's why I try
to use a source which is credible to conservatives when I am arguing
with them -- Fox News, WSJ, Washington Times, New York Post, etc.

> I have also read many things that were definitely very liberal leaning.  I
> love her writing.

Susan, let's be realistic. Peggy Noonan is a propagandist for the
conservative POV. I have read enough of her columns and seen her on
enough shows like Meet the Press to know that is the case.

[bratt]

which part is petty and stupid?

who do you think is behind it all?

[ramashiva]

On Jun 18, 5:59 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> On Jun 18 2012 7:38 PM, bratt wrote:

> > On Jun 18 2012 7:22 PM, ramashiva wrote:

> > > Also you might want to refer to my post --

> > > "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"
> > I will read "The four horsemen" later.

> > People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes than to get
> > anyone with half a brain to agree with them.

> I just read the thread, and what you said so eloquently is what I just
> said in simple words.

Notice Clave, Jerry, and fffurken all reacted like scalded dogs to my
OP in that thread, and I see Clave and fuckface also chimed in here at
its mention.

The truth hurts.

[Clave]

"bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message

news:9905b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...

> On Jun 18 2012 8:02 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "ramashiva" <ramas...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:f77a5efd-e1d8-469b...@oo8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Jun 18, 4:34 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is Peggy Noonan's take on it.
>> >
>> >> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230373420457746691079615...
>> >
>> > Susan, Peggy Noonan has absolutely no credibility among liberals, nor
>> > does the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. So the only
>> > reaction you are going to get to citing a Peggy Noonan column is
>> > derisive laughter.
>> >
>> > Also you might want to refer to my post --
>> >
>> > "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"
>>
>> Yeah, that was hilariously petty and stupid too.
>>
>> Jim
>
> which part is petty and stupid?
>
> who do you think is behind it all?

Golly susan, I'm *certain* to lose sleep pondering that one.

Jim

[bratt]

as expected - deep reply clavie

If it were a Republican White House leaking info about drone attacks, etc,
I'm sure you wouldn't ponder that either.

[bratt]

On Jun 18 2012 8:12 PM, Clave wrote:

> "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:b9u4b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>
> <...>
>
> > People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes
> > than to get anyone with half a brain to agree with them.
>
> Unlike some people I could name, the Democrats I know don't vote according
> to how people they don't like vote.

Which has nothing to do with not voting because I do or do not like you,
Jerry, and any other number of posters. A coherent argument goes a lot
further than zippy one liners and Jerry in particular running when he is
challenged on something.

[Clave]

"bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message

news:b035b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...

> On Jun 18 2012 8:12 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:b9u4b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>>
>> <...>
>>
>> > People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes
>> > than to get anyone with half a brain to agree with them.
>>
>> Unlike some people I could name, the Democrats I know don't vote
>> according
>> to how people they don't like vote.
>
> Which has nothing to do with not voting because I do or do not like you,
> Jerry, and any other number of posters. A coherent argument goes a lot
> further than zippy one liners and Jerry in particular running when he is
> challenged on something.

Well then by all means continue as you started -- by pretending I've said
things I haven't. You don't seem to need my help to argue with me at all.

Jim

[Clave]

"bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message

news:l435b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...

<...>

> If it were a Republican White House leaking info about
> drone attacks, etc, I'm sure you wouldn't ponder that either.

I'll offer opinions about things when I want to, not when idiots try to
summon me.

It should be noted that you Suck At This.

Jim

[popinjay999]

On Jun 18, 5:22 pm, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Also you might want to refer to my post --
>
> "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"
>
> https://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.poker/msg/538094aedd70bae6
>
> I would encourage you to use "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"
> as shorthand for the stupid liberals on this newsgroup.
>
> William "The Life" Coleman  (ramashiva)

Conquest, War, Famine, and Netk00k.


-Paul "The Way" Popinjay

[fffurken]

On Jun 19, 2:11 am, ramashiva <ramashiv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Notice Clave, Jerry, and fffurken all reacted like scalded dogs to my
> OP in that thread, and I see Clave and fuckface also chimed in here at
> its mention.
>
> The truth hurts.

The truth is that you are trying to label people for your own benefit,
segregation is your hallmark. You are classically a bully.

You got a little reaction, so what.

[Clave]

"fffurken" <fffu...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:db8576cf-607c-491b...@e20g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...

Cole-Tard is just another of that truly baffling brand of Usenet fuckhead
who posts really fuckheaded shit, then when someone says "Hey, that's some
really fuckheaded shit you posted," brays like a mule on crack because they
"trolled" someone into calling them a fuckhead...for acting like a fuckhead.

Jim

[Bill Vanek]

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:06:32 -0700 (PDT), ramashiva
<ramas...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Susan, let's be realistic. Peggy Noonan is a propagandist for the
>conservative POV. I have read enough of her columns and seen her on
>enough shows like Meet the Press to know that is the case.

Please. I used to admire her because she worked for Reagan, but these
days I can barely stomach her columns. She is far more concerned with
the image of politicians and politics in general than any specific
political leanings. I think she even used to like Obama for all the
same reasons the liberal flakes worshipped him..

[bratt]

She supported Obama for quite a while before the 2008 election.

[Dave the Clueless]

Says the horseman.

-------
Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon. It doesn't
matter how good you are at chess since the pigeon is just going to knock
over the pieces, crap on the board and strut around likes it’s victorious.

[bratt]

On Jun 18 2012 9:08 PM, Clave wrote:

BS You would be all over it - you find things a whole lot less serious
anti-Republican to gloat over. And you call others apologists - you are a
lib apologist of the worst kind.

[ramashiva]

On Jun 19, 3:54 am, "Dave the Clueless" <a987...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:

> On Jun 18 2012 11:08 PM, Clave wrote:

> > I'll offer opinions about things when I want to, not when idiots try to
> > summon me.

> > It should be noted that you Suck At This.

> Says the horseman.

LOL. And fuckface said "The Four Horsemen of Liberal Stupidity"
would never catch on.

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?

What secret information? And what the fuck libturd?
(And sS spell checks me! LOL)

> Kind of hard to blame it on Bush, isn't it?

Blame what on Bush and why?

AND STOP STALKING ME (Clavie can speak for himself).


Jerry 'n Vegas

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, June 18, 2012 4:34:38 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> On Jun 18 2012 4:59 PM, bratt wrote:
>
> > What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
> >
> > Kind of hard to blame it on Bush, isn't it?
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator, rec.gambling.poker
> > Whose stated mission is to call out the Asses on RGP
>
> well, since both clavie and Jerry have been posting and reading everything
> I write, they obviously don't have an answer for this simple question.

One more example of sS making up positions for others. Again. And still stalking.


Lol @ sS

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, June 18, 2012 6:59:07 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> On Jun 18 2012 8:12 PM, Clave wrote:
>
> > "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:b9u4b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > > People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes
> > > than to get anyone with half a brain to agree with them.
> >
> > Unlike some people I could name, the Democrats I know don't vote according
> > to how people they don't like vote.
>
> Which has nothing to do with not voting because I do or do not like you,
> Jerry, and any other number of posters.

Because we keep showing you wrong and you're unable to answer.

> A coherent argument goes a lot
> further than zippy one liners and Jerry
> in particular running when he is
> challenged on something.

See? You're lying again. This all started when I showed you wrong and you refused to answer my questions and statements. You played SS and refused to answer and just asked stupid questions.

You're a loser, sS. Live with it. All you do is stalk me now.

Jerry 'n Vegas

[VegasJerry]

LOL at the Lying Coward Ramashiva. Seems Mr. TOTAL IGNORE not only lies about ignoring, but has just shown why he's no longer able to respond to those that prove him wrong.

What's the matter, Ram-ass; get put in your place too often? Let's make it TOTALLY UNABLE TO RESPONSE WHEN PROVEN WRONG.



> The truth hurts.

Then just IGNORE IT.

LOL!


Jerry 'n Vegas

[da pickle]

On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:

> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
>
> What secret information?

It has been in all the papers and on the TV.

[Puppytoes]

Apparently not on planet Jerry. He is the king of the dodge.

[Bill Vanek]

Exactly. So it's not secret...

I wonder if that's the key to Jerry's version of logic.

[brewmaster]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ng9uGizNtY

--
Alan "The Hope" Gilbert

[Truthseeker]

That doesn't matter. If it isn't praising Obama or blaming Bush Jerry
can't see it.



--
Truthseeker

"On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog."

[VegasJerry]

On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:33:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:50:37 -0500, da pickle
> <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
> >>
> >> What secret information?
> >
> >It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
>
> Exactly. So it's not secret...

Bingo!

> I wonder if that's the key to Jerry's version of logic.

No loss in logic here. The right wing nuts have little to nothing to complain about the President, so they grab what they can. If it's not taking, 'The economy is doing well,' out of context; or trying to revive the, "He wasn't born in this country," they're pissed that President Obama is shown to be a real War Hawk. Whatever will they do? A liberal that's bombing and killing at a un-President-ed rate? Wars are for Republicans to make. And I guarantee, if you vote in Romney and the GOP, you'll get another war. Not-Quite-President (and turncoat POW) McCain is chomping at the bite to get into another war.

I love that the GOP is whining and moaning about what they believe is some sort of WH slip.

Jerry 'n Vegas

[Bill Vanek]

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:37:57 -0700 (PDT), VegasJerry <jer...@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:33:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:50:37 -0500, da pickle
>> <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
>> >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
>> >>
>> >> What secret information?
>> >
>> >It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
>>
>> Exactly. So it's not secret...
>
>Bingo!

OMG...

>> I wonder if that's the key to Jerry's version of logic.
>
>No loss in logic here.

OMG#2...

[Pepe Papon]

Whereas you're just a bully wannabe.

--

Pepe "The Revelation" Papon

[Pepe Papon]

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:59:07 -0700, "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:

>On Jun 18 2012 8:12 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:b9u4b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
>>
>> <...>
>>
>> > People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes
>> > than to get anyone with half a brain to agree with them.
>>
>> Unlike some people I could name, the Democrats I know don't vote according
>> to how people they don't like vote.
>
>Which has nothing to do with not voting because I do or do not like you,
>Jerry, and any other number of posters. A coherent argument goes a lot
>further than zippy one liners and Jerry in particular running when he is
>challenged on something.

Susan, you've changed. You have new responsibilities, and you seem to
be rising to the occasion.

[VegasJerry]

On Monday, June 18, 2012 6:59:07 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:

> On Jun 18 2012 8:12 PM, Clave wrote:

> Which has nothing to do with not voting because I do or do not like you,
> Jerry, and any other number of posters. A coherent argument goes a lot
> further than zippy one liners and Jerry in particular running when he is
> challenged on something.

Running from you? Last encounter we had, you refuse to make a "coherent argument" (reply) and simply asked some strange questions from some past posts. And that's all you've done since.

You’re the one, "running in place."


Jerry 'n Vegas

[fffurken]

On Jun 20, 8:08 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:

> >The truth is that you are trying to label people for your own benefit,
> >segregation is your hallmark. You are classically a bully.
>
> Whereas you're just a bully wannabe.

You do realise that with that statement you have tacitly agreed that
your hero is a bully? And that your hero denies being a bully?

I have a feeling someone is not getting any supper when he get's home
tonight and will have to go straight to the dunce step.

[Dave the Clueless]

On Jun 19 2012 4:37 PM, VegasJerry wrote:

> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:33:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:50:37 -0500, da pickle
> > <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> > >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
> > >>
> > >> What secret information?
> > >
> > >It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
> >
> > Exactly. So it's not secret...
>
> Bingo!

Wunce the Obamma admistrashun releeced it it wuznt sekret LOL!

> > I wonder if that's the key to Jerry's version of logic.
>
> No loss in logic here. The right wing nuts have little to nothing to
complain about the President,
> so they grab what they can. If it's not taking, 'The economy is doing well,'
out of context; or
> trying to revive the, "He wasn't born in this country," they're pissed that
President Obama is
> shown to be a real War Hawk. Whatever will they do? A liberal that's bombing
and killing at a
> un-President-ed rate? Wars are for Republicans to make. And I guarantee, if
you vote in Romney and
> the GOP, you'll get another war. Not-Quite-President (and turncoat POW)
McCain is chomping at the
> bite to get into another war.
>
> I love that the GOP is whining and moaning about what they believe is some
sort of WH slip.
>
> Jerry 'n Vegas

Thes prezidehnt nevar ded enythang wrung

[Dave the Clueless]

On Jun 19 2012 10:22 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:37:57 -0700 (PDT), VegasJerry <jer...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:33:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> >> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:50:37 -0500, da pickle
> >> <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> >> >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
> >> >>
> >> >> What secret information?
> >> >
> >> >It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
> >>
> >> Exactly. So it's not secret...
> >
> >Bingo!
>
> OMG...

Fucking funny, isn't it?

> >> I wonder if that's the key to Jerry's version of logic.
> >
> >No loss in logic here.
>
> OMG#2...

And then it just gets pathetic.

[Dave the Clueless]

On Jun 19 2012 1:27 PM, Truthseeker wrote:

> On 6/19/12 7:50 AM, da pickle wrote:
> > On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
> >>
> >> What secret information?
> >
> > It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
>
> That doesn't matter. If it isn't praising Obama or blaming Bush Jerry
> can't see it.
>

LOLL yu drenk the kewlayd from FAHKZ!

Jerrie (i em smatr) 'n Vegis

> --
> Truthseeker
>
> "On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog."

[bratt]

On Jun 20 2012 1:38 PM, Dave the Clueless wrote:

> On Jun 19 2012 10:22 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:37:57 -0700 (PDT), VegasJerry <jer...@cox.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:33:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:50:37 -0500, da pickle
> > >> <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> > >> >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> What secret information?
> > >> >
> > >> >It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
> > >>
> > >> Exactly. So it's not secret...
> > >
> > >Bingo!
> >
> > OMG...
>
> Fucking funny, isn't it?

Actually it would be funny if he wasn't serious.

[Dave the Clueless]

On Jun 20 2012 11:44 AM, VegasJerry wrote:

> On Monday, June 18, 2012 6:59:07 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> > On Jun 18 2012 8:12 PM, Clave wrote:
>
> > Which has nothing to do with not voting because I do or do not like you,
> > Jerry, and any other number of posters. A coherent argument goes a lot
> > further than zippy one liners and Jerry in particular running when he is
> > challenged on something.
>
> Running from you? Last encounter we had, you refuse to make a "coherent
argument" (reply) and simply

> asked some strange questions from some past posts.. And that's all you've

done since.
>
> You’re the one, "running in place."
>
>
> Jerry 'n Vegas

Yor kwestins maed mai hed hurt

[Dave the Clueless]

On Jun 19 2012 9:56 AM, VegasJerry wrote:

> On Monday, June 18, 2012 6:59:07 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> > On Jun 18 2012 8:12 PM, Clave wrote:
> >
> > > "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> > > news:b9u4b9x...@news.ezprovider.com...
> > >
> > > <...>
> > >
> > > > People like clavie and Jerry do more to kill Democratic votes
> > > > than to get anyone with half a brain to agree with them.
> > >
> > > Unlike some people I could name, the Democrats I know don't vote
according
> > > to how people they don't like vote.
> >
> > Which has nothing to do with not voting because I do or do not like you,
> > Jerry, and any other number of posters.
>
> Because we keep showing you wrong and you're unable to answer.

HALOWL aye prewed yu rong!

>
> > A coherent argument goes a lot
> > further than zippy one liners and Jerry
> > in particular running when he is
> > challenged on something.
>
> See? You're lying again. This all started when I showed you wrong and you
refused to answer my
> questions and statements. You played SS and refused to answer and just asked
stupid questions.
>
> You're a loser, sS. Live with it. All you do is stalk me now.
>
> Jerry 'n Vegas

I em teh winer! i winned these descushins!

[phlash74]

I respectfully disagree, it's the fact that he is serious that makes it so
funny. He's the only one not in on the joke.

BTW, you're doing a fantastic job as Ass Coordinator. Keep up the good
work.

Michael

-----------------
"> phlash
On your circle jerk k00l kidz email list. Should be disqualified for
that, but I'll give him a pass because he is smart." - ramashiva,
8/22/2010

"Hitler has already been forgiven, but you have not." - Reptillian AKA
Igotskillz, 4/6/2011

[VegasJerry]

On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:38:40 AM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> On Jun 19 2012 10:22 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:37:57 -0700 (PDT), VegasJerry <jer...@cox.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:33:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:50:37 -0500, da pickle
> > >> <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> > >> >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> What secret information?
> > >> >
> > >> >It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
> > >>
> > >> Exactly. So it's not secret...
> > >
> > >Bingo!
> >
> > OMG...
>
> Fucking funny, isn't it?
>
> > >> I wonder if that's the key to Jerry's version of logic.
> > >
> > >No loss in logic here.
> >
> > OMG#2...
>
> And then it just gets pathetic.

And STILL, nobody able to address my post......

[Bill Vanek]

On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:09:31 -0700 (PDT), VegasJerry <jer...@cox.net>

wrote:

>On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:38:40 AM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>> On Jun 19 2012 10:22 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:37:57 -0700 (PDT), VegasJerry <jer...@cox.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:33:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
>> > >> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:50:37 -0500, da pickle
>> > >> <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> >On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
>> > >> >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> What secret information?
>> > >> >
>> > >> >It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
>> > >>
>> > >> Exactly. So it's not secret...
>> > >
>> > >Bingo!
>> >
>> > OMG...
>>
>> Fucking funny, isn't it?
>>
>> > >> I wonder if that's the key to Jerry's version of logic.
>> > >
>> > >No loss in logic here.
>> >
>> > OMG#2...
>>
>> And then it just gets pathetic.
>

>And STILL, nobody able to address my post......

Is someone posted "asdf oiure klhgsgd", I don't think anyone would be
able to address that either. It's kind of the same principle.

[brewmaster]

Can't address the message so attack the messenger? That's why everyone
calls you SBV.

[Pepe Papon]

On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:28:57 -0700 (PDT), fffurken
<fffu...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Jun 20, 8:08 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> >The truth is that you are trying to label people for your own benefit,
>> >segregation is your hallmark. You are classically a bully.
>>
>> Whereas you're just a bully wannabe.
>
>You do realise that with that statement you have tacitly agreed that
>your hero is a bully? And that your hero denies being a bully?

No, I haven't.

>I have a feeling someone is not getting any supper when he get's home
>tonight and will have to go straight to the dunce step.

There's no apostrophe in "gets home", you blithering dope.

[Pepe Papon]

Learn to lose!

[fffurken]

On Jun 21, 7:51 am, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:

> >> >The truth is that you are trying to label people for your own benefit,
> >> >segregation is your hallmark. You are classically a bully.
>
> >> Whereas you're just a bully wannabe.
>
> >You do realise that with that statement you have tacitly agreed that
> >your hero is a bully? And that your hero denies being a bully?
>
> No, I haven't.

Yes, you did. English mustn't be your first language.

> >I have a feeling someone is not getting any supper when he get's home
> >tonight and will have to go straight to the dunce step.
>
> There's no apostrophe in "gets home", you blithering dope.

Thx for leting me now.

[Dave the Clueless]

Nohbudie kan adres my fakts! They ar fakts! I em smart!

[VegasJerry]

On Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:36:38 AM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> On Jun 20 2012 5:09 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:38:40 AM UTC-7, Dave the Clueless wrote:
> > > On Jun 19 2012 10:22 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:37:57 -0700 (PDT), VegasJerry <jer...@cox.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:33:16 AM UTC-7, Bill Vanek wrote:
> > > > >> On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:50:37 -0500, da pickle
> > > > >> <jcpi...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >On 6/19/2012 7:43 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> On Monday, June 18, 2012 2:59:49 PM UTC-7, bratt wrote:
> > > > >> >>> What is your take on all the secret info getting out?
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> What secret information?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >It has been in all the papers and on the TV.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Exactly. So it's not secret...
> > > > >
> > > > >Bingo!
> > > >
> > > > OMG...
> > >
> > > Fucking funny, isn't it?
> > >
> > > > >> I wonder if that's the key to Jerry's version of logic.
> > > > >
> > > > >No loss in logic here.
> > > >
> > > > OMG#2...
> > >
> > > And then it just gets pathetic.
> >
> > And STILL, nobody able to address my post......

> Nohbudie kan adres my fakts! They ar fakts! I em smart!

I wonder if you have any idea how that sort of incompetent, "inability to respond" reply, shows how pathetic and juvenile you are.


Jerry (laughing at the lame) 'n Vegas

[Pepe Papon]

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:11:51 -0700 (PDT), VegasJerry <jer...@cox.net>
wrote:

>> > > > >No loss in logic here.
>> > > >
>> > > > OMG#2...
>> > >
>> > > And then it just gets pathetic.
>> >
>> > And STILL, nobody able to address my post......
>
>> Nohbudie kan adres my fakts! They ar fakts! I em smart!
>
>I wonder if you have any idea how that sort of incompetent, "inability to respond" reply, shows how pathetic and juvenile you are.

You're attacking the messenger.