OT: why Cellulite Sarah will never be president
da pickle nospam
Tad Perry
other 2/3rds didn't have much of an opinion, she might be viable, but it
seems like 1/3rd love her and 2/3rds dislike or even hate her. That isn't
gonna work.
I'm actually in the 1/3 that likes her, but I wouldn't support her due to
the waste of time issue. (She won't win, so it would be a waste of time.)
tvp
da pickle
"Tad Perry"
I agree there is a third that likely likes her but I think there is only a
third that actually dislikes her. The other third just does not care ...
about her or much of anything else.
I am in the third that actually likes her. I agree that I cannot support
her because I do not believe she is the right person for the job AND it is
clear that she cannot win. I do not believe that it would be a horrible
thing if she did win. I think that she would be better than Hillary and I
think Hillary is much better than our current president.
Vic Vaselino
> her because I do not believe she is the right person for the job AND it is
> clear that she cannot win. I do not believe that it would be a horrible
> thing if she did win. I think that she would be better than Hillary and I
> think Hillary is much better than our current president.
No woman should ever be elected president, and I can tell you why in
two words.....Lisa Nowak.
Vic
_______________________________________________________________________
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
risky biz
But then, of course, you're an imbecile and a troll.
---
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
risky biz
Someone should nuke her legs. That's disgusting. Travel's a deviant.
---
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
joeturn
> On Sep 3 2010 10:16 AM, da pickle nospam wrote:
>
> >http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/fav-palin.php?
> > and
>
> Someone should nuke her legs. That's disgusting. Travel's a deviant.
>
> ---
> RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader :www.recgroups.com
The illuminati used her as a mother daughter team($60,000 a
throw).Keep you eyes open on "Dancing With The Stars" for her
political views! Then ask youselves if cellulite is an issue with
Bristol, would she make a good blinder "For the People"?
joeturn
Exerpt:
I want to thank you my blessed people of the United States for
entrusting me with you futures.
I can't promise you deliverence,but I will make the hole of the World
know that the United States of America is in need of it!
I will stand up to our corrupt Government and veto any bills that
threaten our society while I'm in office.
With your help we can get rid of this cancer we have been living with
for way too long!
Dave the Clueless
I hope she runs. Well, I hope she runs and loses the primary so fucking
bad she'll never try again. If the Republitards let her head up the ticket
we deserve 4 more years of Obama.
misanthropic whackjob
What about those of us that don't give a shit about her one way or the
other? You forgot that group.
--
"The woods could be full of grizzly whores or stupid drunk lumber
cocksuckers for all you know." - Bubbles
______________________________________________________________________
misanthropic whackjob
> On Sep 3 2010 10:16 AM, da pickle nospam wrote:
>
> > http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/fav-palin.php?
> > and
> > http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/images/thumbnails/sarah-palin-12169-5.jpg
>
> Someone should nuke her legs. That's disgusting. Travel's a deviant.
It's not ok for someone to say they think Whoopi Goldberg is ugly, but it
is ok for you to say you think Sarah Palin is ugly?
Double standard much?
--
"The woods could be full of grizzly whores or stupid drunk lumber
cocksuckers for all you know." - Bubbles
_____________________________________________________________________
risky biz
> On Sep 3 2010 8:40 PM, risky biz wrote:
>
> > On Sep 3 2010 10:16 AM, da pickle nospam wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/fav-palin.php?
> > > and
> > > http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/images/thumbnails/sarah-palin-12169-5.jpg
> >
> > Someone should nuke her legs. That's disgusting. Travel's a deviant.
>
> It's not ok for someone to say they think Whoopi Goldberg is ugly, but it
> is ok for you to say you think Sarah Palin is ugly?
>
> Double standard much?
What are you babbling about, fool? Whoopi Goldberg IS ugly. She looks like
someone beat her with an ugly stick. Is her fsce uglier than Sarah Palin's
legs? I don't think Whoopi Goldberg's face is quite that ugly, no.
I wonder if Travel gets off on Whoopi, too. Whoopi-de-doo.
-------
risky biz
> On Sep 3 2010 1:16 PM, da pickle nospam wrote:
>
> > http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/fav-palin.php?
> > and
> > http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/images/thumbnails/sarah-palin-12169-5.jpg
>
> I hope she runs. Well, I hope she runs and loses the primary so fucking
> bad she'll never try again. If the Republitards let her head up the ticket
> we deserve 4 more years of Obama.
If they nominated Chuck Hagel for President I'd probably vote for him.
_____________________________________________________________________
popinjay999
>
> That's disgusting. Travel's a deviant.
>
Plus, he posts at 4:00 in the morning. The guy is dangerous.
Travel A
from a celebrity "gossip" source no less.
This is a legitimate photo taken at a governors' conference showing
that, Sarah Palin who isn't prone to fat, and never has been fat has
legs as smooth as silk.
http://dailycontributor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/sarah-palin-shorts4.jpg
2- Check the ratings of other candidates. What were Ronald Reagan's poll
numbers before his campaign started for his 1980 landslide? "I'm PAYING
for this microphone!..."
Sarah Palin is light years ahead in name recognition than that of Ronald
Reagan at the same"campaign point in time."
Sarah Palin needs "only" to win the Republican nomination, and then the
people can decide if they want socialism or the American Dream freedom.
Are you going to vote for Obama, or Sarah in the end?
How does she get there?:
Huckabee may lead in the Iowa Caucus polls at the moment, due the fact
that he's already been around the course in the 2008 elections, but
Sarah is now only beginning to "work" Iowa: with last weeks keynote
speech at the Republican Party event in Iowa. Sarah Palin, by the way,
just got Terry Branstad elected as the Republican nominee for Governor
of Iowa.
She also got Nikki Haley in the same position in South Carolina and the
Rick Scott in Florida is the Republican-establishment-slaying
conservative candidate who is now the Republican nominee for Governor of
Florida.
Marco Rubio, the conservative nominee for the Florida U.S. senate race,
is ahead of the Independent-flipping Charlie Crist by 10 points. Meeks,
the Democrat nominee, is way out of it and hasn't got a chance.
All of these CONSERVATIVE-Republican candidates are favored to win.
She has (will) helped a lot of candidates throughout the country, who
will be in office for two years and in a position to "pull for Sarah" in
support, influence and campaign contributions. They can force the hand
of the "Republican establishment" in Sarah's direction, too.
Remember, Michele Bachmann and Paul Ryan may be the leadership in the
House, sometime after the mid-term elections. They're both huge friends
of Sarah (HFOS).
If Sarah wins South Carolina and Florida she's in; an Iowa win would be
good, early publicity and may help in New Hampshire against Mitt Romney.
Sarah will have a lot of enthusiastic support out there.
Underestimate Sarah at your peril.
Tad Perry
news:geual7x...@recgroups.com...
> On Sep 3 2010 10:19 AM, Tad Perry wrote:
>
>> Her appeal is too limited and far too polarized. If 1/3rd loved her and
>> the
>> other 2/3rds didn't have much of an opinion, she might be viable, but it
>> seems like 1/3rd love her and 2/3rds dislike or even hate her. That isn't
>> gonna work.
>>
>> I'm actually in the 1/3 that likes her, but I wouldn't support her due to
>> the waste of time issue. (She won't win, so it would be a waste of time.)
>>
>> tvp
>
> What about those of us that don't give a shit about her one way or the
> other? You forgot that group.
When I was writing it, I got done and thought: "Maybe I should change this
to 1/3 like her, 1/3 hate her, and 1/3 don't care." Then I thought: "Naw, I
don't wanna rewrite it, it's good enough."
Now two different people have gotten on me for it!
So, I actually didn't forget. You just have to take my word for it that I
was lazy.
(The "not enough people like her and too many people hate her" thing still
remains true, though.)
tvp
Travel A
risky biz
> 1- That picture of Sarah Palin is a photoshopped
Bwa-hah-hah-hah-hah-hah-hah!
> attack attempt and it's
> from a celebrity "gossip" source no less.
>
> This is a legitimate photo taken at a governors' conference showing
> that, Sarah Palin who isn't prone to fat, and never has been fat has
> legs as smooth as silk.
>
http://dailycontributor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/sarah-palin-shorts4.jpg
Travel's panties are all wet over his Repub-A-Mommy's creepy looking legs.
_____________________________________________________________________
Travel A
1- That picture of Sarah Palin is a doctored-up, photoshopped attack
attempt and it's from a celebrity "gossip" source no less.
This is a legitimate photo taken at a governors' conference showing
that, Sarah Palin who isn't prone to fat and never has been fat, has
legs as smooth as silk.
http://dailycontributor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/sarah-palin-shorts4.jpg
2- Check the ratings of other candidates. What were Ronald Reagan's poll
numbers before his campaign started for his 1980 landslide? "I'm PAYING
for this microphone!..."
Sarah Palin is light years ahead in name recognition than that of Ronald
Reagan at the same "campaign point in time."
Sarah Palin needs "only" to win the Republican nomination, and then the
people can decide if they want socialism or the American Dream and
freedom from big government.
da pickle nospam
> 1- That picture of Sarah Palin is a doctored-up, photoshopped attack
> attempt and it's from a celebrity "gossip" source no less.
> This is a legitimate photo taken at a governors' conference showing
> that, Sarah Palin who isn't prone to fat and never has been fat, has
The cellulite photo was not doctored. She's covered in cellulite in
many other pictures and wears nylon stockings with shorts. Your
example pic means nothing as she is hiding her flab in the pose.
Cellulite is mostly on the back of thighs as in bimbo Sarah's case.
You are one sick pervert. Have you seen her in person? No. I have and
she looks awful.
misanthropic whackjob
So what? Let's make a comprehensive list of women in politics who look
awful, ok (since that is your criteria for whether that person will be a
good leader)? You started with:
1. Sarah Palin
Let's add (off the top of my head):
2. Nancy Pelosi
3. Hillary Clinton
4. Maxine Waters
5. Margaret Thatcher
6. Michelle Obama
Your turn.
--
"The woods could be full of grizzly whores or stupid drunk lumber
cocksuckers for all you know." - Bubbles
_____________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
da pickle nospam
wrote:
Travel thinks she is the hottest woman on face of the earth. I’m
merely pointing out that she is not hot at all. The not making a good
leader thing; that has to do with her being stupider than a house
plant and nasty to boot.
risky biz
He's right, Brew. You need to make a list of Democrat women who someone
here says of, "That'll send a thrill up your leg!", like Travel does in
reference to his Repub-A-Mommy.
_______________________________________________________________________
Travel A
Travel A
Palin in person. He lies, as proven (below). However, the people who are
in a position to see Sarah Palin in person, all say she's gorgeous:
which is obvious from the many and various live, taped coverages in many
different settings and conditions. The picture I linked is a legitimate
photograph, and the "hate and fear of Sarah," phony, photoshopped
pictures and porn are obviously bogus.
But it is fun to know how much Sarah bothers you:-) (You too,
Misanthropic)
The proof that "Risky Biz"/"da pickel no spam" lies through his teeth
and has no credibilty in the first place:

I wrote:
This was to "da pickel no spam" (who's Risky Biz) a creep who,
pathetically, is too dumb to even successfully hide behind a phony
username.
The fake, lying "da pickel no spam" (Risky Biz) claimed that Sarah Palin
endorsed Sharron Angle in the Nevada Repubican primary for the U.S.
senate election. He further, bogusly claimed that he "heard it with his
own ears" at Sarah Palin's Searchlight Nevada speech. He lied, and I
proved it.
So, you can see why the fake "pickel no spam" is so upset and can't
forget his public humiliation (chortle).
........................
Re: ot: Sarah Palin's most embarrassing screw-up yet? Group:
rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Jul 7, 2010, 1:55am From: Travel A
<nin...@webtv.net>
Heard it with your "own ears," huh, lol. This is what we call a
total moron-ass-kicking.
Toward the end of the article, note well that Sarah Palin endorsed no
one in the Nevada, Republican senate primary race. In fact, Sarah Palin
gave a"shout-out" to Sue Lowden (not Sharron Angle) at another Nevada
speech, elsewhere.
"Risky Biz" lied through his teeth and got caught.
Also note the pic of Sarah and Nikki together. Now THERE'S a
presidential ticket that'll send a thrill up your leg!
misanthropic whackjob
> No, Risky Biz, who hides behind a phony username, hasn't seen Sarah
> Palin in person. He lies, as proven (below). However, the people who are
> in a position to see Sarah Palin in person, all say she's gorgeous:
> which is obvious from the many and various live, taped coverages in many
> different settings and conditions. The picture I linked is a legitimate
> photograph, and the "hate and fear of Sarah," phony, photoshopped
> pictures and porn are obviously bogus.
>
> But it is fun to know how much Sarah bothers you:-) (You too,
> Misanthropic)
You think Sarah Palin bothers me? She doesn't bother me at all. I like
her, she's intelligent, speaks well, has good values. But, she will never
be president. What I don't like is that people like Obama, McCain, Palin
etc make it so real presidential material (Ron Paul) has no chance of
victory and hence the country is doomed to mediocrity with the two party
system forever now.
>
> The proof that "Risky Biz"/"da pickel no spam" lies through his teeth
> and has no credibilty in the first place:
>
>
>
> I wrote:
> This was to "da pickel no spam" (who's Risky Biz) a creep who,
> pathetically, is too dumb to even successfully hide behind a phony
> username.
> The fake, lying "da pickel no spam" (Risky Biz) claimed that Sarah Palin
> endorsed Sharron Angle in the Nevada Repubican primary for the U.S.
> senate election. He further, bogusly claimed that he "heard it with his
> own ears" at Sarah Palin's Searchlight Nevada speech. He lied, and I
> proved it.
>
> So, you can see why the fake "pickel no spam" is so upset and can't
> forget his public humiliation (chortle).
> .........................
>
>
>
> Re: ot: Sarah Palin's most embarrassing screw-up yet? Group:
> rec.gambling.poker Date: Wed, Jul 7, 2010, 1:55am From: Travel A
> <nin...@webtv.net>
>
>
> Heard it with your "own ears," huh, lol. This is what we call a
> total moron-ass-kicking.
>
>
http://www.examiner.com/x-44562-National-News-Headlines-Editor~y2010m6d9-Sarah-Palins-endorsement-is-the-winning-ticket-in-key-races-in-Calif-SC-and-Iowa
>
> Toward the end of the article, note well that Sarah Palin endorsed no
> one in the Nevada, Republican senate primary race. In fact, Sarah Palin
> gave a"shout-out" to Sue Lowden (not Sharron Angle) at another Nevada
> speech, elsewhere.
>
> "Risky Biz" lied through his teeth and got caught.
>
> Also note the pic of Sarah and Nikki together. Now THERE'S a
> presidential ticket that'll send a thrill up your leg!
--
"The woods could be full of grizzly whores or stupid drunk lumber
cocksuckers for all you know." - Bubbles
--------
Travel A
from a post on this thread, below). You deny that she bothers you, but
it doesn't pass the smell test; especially since you insist that she
shouldn't be President. You also go out of you're way to throw in digs
on Sarah Palin, repeatedly.
Quotes:
...................................
da pickel no spam lied:
"...I have and she looks awful."
You (Misanthropic) replied:
"So what?"
.............................
I wrote:
That's what I'm talking about. You agreed with the creep in his lie that
Sarah Palin looks "awful." She obviously doesn't look awful, therefore,
you went out of your way to give her a "dig." You then went on to
compare Sarah Palin to a list you made of obviously homely women.
Travel A
Look."
Misanthropic wrote:
So I would have said to her "I've seen that documentary 'Who's Nailin'
Palin' and I was wondering if your tits look as good and if you can give
as good a bj as Sarah can, care to come with me to my room for awhile?"
I wrote:
That doesn't sound like you "like Sarah Palin" as you claim. That sounds
like you go out of your way to ridicule
I personally, especially didn't appreciate it, given the fact that the
thead was created to ridicule me as well as my support for Sarah Palin.
You seemed to be having some fun for yourself.
I'm just telling you now, if you have no consideration for me, I'll
definitely return the favor in the future. The choice is yours.
misanthropic whackjob
Lighten up Francis.
--
"The woods could be full of grizzly whores or stupid drunk lumber
cocksuckers for all you know." - Bubbles
------
misanthropic whackjob
> This an example of why I say that Sarah Palin bothers you
Actually, nobody bothers me. People are who they are, it has absolutely
nothing to do with me. OTOH, I don't have to associate with people I
think are idiots and morons (there are four in this newsgroup who I find
to be so stupid and without redeeming quality that I have simply stopped
responding to them...I refuse to killfile).
> (see quotes
> from a post on this thread, below). You deny that she bothers you, but
> it doesn't pass the smell test; especially since you insist that she
> shouldn't be President. You also go out of you're way to throw in digs
> on Sarah Palin, repeatedly.
>
>
> Quotes:
> ....................................
> da pickel no spam lied:
> "...I have and she looks awful."
>
>
> You (Misanthropic) replied:
> "So what?"
> ..............................
>
> I wrote:
> That's what I'm talking about. You agreed with the creep in his lie that
> Sarah Palin looks "awful." She obviously doesn't look awful, therefore,
> you went out of your way to give her a "dig." You then went on to
> compare Sarah Palin to a list you made of obviously homely women.
--
"The woods could be full of grizzly whores or stupid drunk lumber
cocksuckers for all you know." - Bubbles
------
Travel A
So, when someone starts a special attack thread about you, you won't
mind if I have fun at your expense then, right? I mean, nothing bothers
you, right?
How about the Tina Fey v. Sarah thread? Sarah "seemed" to bother you
there, too. You bothered to work against me all the way on that one.
I only bother to, first, appeal to reason with other conservative
posters. And that has a limit. That's my point.
I went through this with Susan and fuckface over my support of Sarah
Palin.
misanthropic whackjob
> I'm plenty lightened, thanks.
>
> So, when someone starts a special attack thread about you, you won't
> mind if I have fun at your expense then, right? I mean, nothing bothers
> you, right?
No, wouldn't bother me. I might not read it though.
>
> How about the Tina Fey v. Sarah thread? Sarah "seemed" to bother you
> there, too. You bothered to work against me all the way on that one.
>
> I only bother to, first, appeal to reason with other conservative
> posters. And that has a limit. That's my point.
>
> I went through this with Susan and fuckface over my support of Sarah
> Palin.
I understand your genuine support for Sarah. I will refrain from
denigrating her in your threads in the future.
--
"The woods could be full of grizzly whores or stupid drunk lumber
cocksuckers for all you know." - Bubbles
____________________________________________________________________
Travel A
risky biz
> No, Risky Biz, who hides behind a phony username, hasn't seen Sarah
> Palin in person. He lies, as proven (below). However, the people who are
> in a position to see Sarah Palin in person, all say she's gorgeous:
> which is obvious from the many and various live, taped coverages in many
> different settings and conditions. The picture I linked is a legitimate
> photograph, and the "hate and fear of Sarah," phony, photoshopped
> pictures and porn are obviously bogus.
>
> But it is fun to know how much Sarah bothers you:-) (You too,
> Misanthropic)
>
> The proof that "Risky Biz"/"da pickel no spam" lies through his teeth
> and has no credibilty in the first place:
When did I ever say I've seen Sarah Palin in person, you imbecile? I
wouldn't walk around the block to see her.
risky biz
Brew is on notice. He's about to get Etch-A-Sketched to death.
______________________________________________________________________
Travel A
and has no credibilty in the first place:

I wrote:
This was to "da pickel no spam" (who's Risky Biz) a creep who,
pathetically, is too dumb to even successfully hide behind a phony
username.
The fake, lying "da pickel no spam" (Risky Biz) claimed that Sarah Palin
endorsed Sharron Angle in the Nevada Repubican primary for the U.S.
senate election. He further, bogusly claimed that he "heard it with his
own ears" at Sarah Palin's Searchlight Nevada speech. He lied, and I
proved it.
So, you can see why the fake "pickel no spam" is so upset and can't
forget his public humiliation (chortle).
.......................
Re: ot: Sarah Palin's most embarrassing screw-up yet? Group:
Travel A
Group: rec.gambling.poker
Date: Sun, Sep 5, 2010, 1:50am (PDT+3)
From: jb <joe...@comcast.net>
(Written to Risky Biz)
"You have listed many great movies and quite a few bad ones. What this
has to do with Tarantino is dubious at best. This list clearly proves
that you are gay by the way."
.............................................
I wrote:
(Chortle)
risky biz
> ..............................................
>
>
> I wrote:
> (Chortle)
If I were gay what difference would it make to you?