How a REAL Criminal Uses the IRS

[Clave]

"Now here's the point, Bob: please get me the names of the Jews, you know,
the big Jewish contributors of the Democrats...Could we please investigate
some of the cocksuckers?"

-- Guess Who

--
"Was I even talking to you?"
Paul "Pop-Tard" Popinjay

[Dave the Clueless]

I take it you consider Obama to be an amateur criminal.

-------
JerryFOREX the retard thinks "Cornel Ronald West (born June 2, 1953) is an
American philosopher, academic, activist, author and prominent member of
the Democratic Socialists of America" is a right-winger! LOL! HAHAHAHAH!
What a moron!!!

[Clave]

"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:psjv6ax...@news.ezprovider.com...

> On May 22 2013 3:34 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "Now here's the point, Bob: please get me the names of the Jews, you
>> know,
>> the big Jewish contributors of the Democrats...Could we please
>> investigate
>> some of the cocksuckers?"
>>
>> -- Guess Who
>>
>> --
>> "Was I even talking to you?"
>> Paul "Pop-Tard" Popinjay
>
> I take it you consider Obama to be an amateur criminal.

You think a lot of really stupid shit.

Jim

[mo_ntresor]

On May 22 2013 2:13 PM, O-PGManager wrote:

> Nixon? There is a lot that guy could've learned from Obama:
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/05/21/obama-the-media-and-national-security/only-nixon-harmed-a-free-press-more

obama told his advisors to keep him in the dark about it.

mo_ntresor

[O-PGManager]

On May 22 2013 2:34 PM, Clave wrote:

> "Now here's the point, Bob: please get me the names of the Jews, you know,
> the big Jewish contributors of the Democrats...Could we please investigate
> some of the cocksuckers?"
>
> -- Guess Who

Nixon? There is a lot that guy could've learned from Obama:

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/05/21/obama-the-media-and-national-security/only-nixon-harmed-a-free-press-more

>

> --
> "Was I even talking to you?"
> Paul "Pop-Tard" Popinjay

Opie G. Manager
Rec.Gambling.Poker
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator Emeritus (2009-2011)

[mo_ntresor]

On May 22 2013 2:44 PM, brattt wrote:

> > obama told his advisors to keep him in the dark about it.
>

> Yeah - he was really in the dark.
>
> The American Spectator has broken a story on President Obama meeting with
> the head of an �anti-tea party� union head the day before the IRS began
> targeting conservative groups. confirms this report.
>
> According to searchable White House visitor logs, the President of the
> National Treasury Employees Union Colleen Kelley met with the President of
> the United States on March 31st, 2010, just one day before the Inspector
> General�s report shows the top tax agency began targeting tea party and
> conservative groups for audits and other forms of harassment.
>
> And in the link below is proof of the White House Records.
>
>
http://www.ijreview.com/2013/05/53781-president-obama-met-with-anti-tea-party-union-head-day-before-irs-conservative-group-targeting-began/

weird. if he told them not to tell him, how'd he know?

mo_ntresor

[brattt]

[brattt]

You will have to ask clavie or Jerry that question.

[mo_ntresor]

On May 22 2013 3:15 PM, brattt wrote:

> You will have to ask clavie or Jerry that question.

the only way i'd see their answer is if some other idiot responded to
them. nobody here's that dumb!

mo_ntresor

[Dave the Clueless]

Then what, exactly, WAS your point, skippy?

[Clave]

"Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message

news:ji707ax...@news.ezprovider.com...

> On May 22 2013 4:51 PM, Clave wrote:
>
>> "Dave the Clueless" <a98...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:psjv6ax...@news.ezprovider.com...
>> > On May 22 2013 3:34 PM, Clave wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Now here's the point, Bob: please get me the names of the Jews, you
>> >> know,
>> >> the big Jewish contributors of the Democrats...Could we please
>> >> investigate
>> >> some of the cocksuckers?"
>> >>
>> >> -- Guess Who
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> "Was I even talking to you?"
>> >> Paul "Pop-Tard" Popinjay
>> >
>> > I take it you consider Obama to be an amateur criminal.
>>
>> You think a lot of really stupid shit.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Then what, exactly, WAS your point, skippy?

If I have to explain it to you, explaining it to you wouldn't do any good.

I now return you to your regularly-scheduled conspiracy party.

Jim

[FL Turbo]

Obama is turning out to be a modern day Sergeant Schultz.
"I know nuuuthing!!"

[Pepe Papon]

On Wed, 22 May 2013 21:38:51 -0500, FL Turbo <noe...@notime.com>
wrote:

He's a modern-day Ronald Reagan - "I can't recall".

Or a modern-day Gerge H.W. Bush - "I was out of the loop."
--

Pepe Papon

[brattt]

so what happened to that *hope and change* thingie he ran on?

[mo_ntresor]

On May 23 2013 5:41 AM, brattt wrote:

> so what happened to that *hope and change* thingie he ran on?

it's all good. some republicans sometime did some bad things too.

mo_ntresor

[Tom White]

On 2013-05-23, FL Turbo <noe...@notime.com> wrote:
> Obama is turning out to be a modern day Sergeant Schultz.
> "I know nuuuthing!!"

I can easily believe Obama was out of the loop on almost
everything. He's from Academia where those at the top do
little but schmooze and fundraise.

Finding the underling who concluded that it would be
better politically to abandon our people in Benghazi
than have a rescue mission go bad is important. One
so amoral and stupid should have no decision-making
authority at all.

[mo_ntresor]

On May 23 2013 7:11 AM, Tom White wrote:

> I can easily believe Obama was out of the loop on almost
> everything. He's from Academia where those at the top do
> little but schmooze and fundraise.
>
> Finding the underling who concluded that it would be
> better politically to abandon our people in Benghazi
> than have a rescue mission go bad is important. One
> so amoral and stupid should have no decision-making
> authority at all.

he's from the university of chicago, tom. we're all honest and hard
working to a fault.

mo_ntresor

[VegasJerry]

.
.> You think a lot of really stupid shit.

Then he posts it and we get to embarrass him with it.

[VegasJerry]

.
.> so what happened to that *hope and change* thingie he ran on?

He implemented it by saving us from a depression, pulling us from a recession, overhauling healthcare, pulling us from a war and saving the American auto industry. So what happened to you ignoring the advice of switching from Fox so you'd know the above?

Jerry 'n Vegas

[Pepe Papon]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 04:41:09 -0700, "brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:

We're still hoping for the change.
--

Pepe Papon

[Pepe Papon]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:11:34 +0000 (UTC), Tom White
<tomi...@bulldogcountry.com> wrote:

>He's from Academia where those at the top do
>little but schmooze and fundraise.

I'm guessing that you actually do believe this.
--

Pepe Papon

[mo_ntresor]

On May 24 2013 1:32 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:

> >He's from Academia where those at the top do
> >little but schmooze and fundraise.
>
> I'm guessing that you actually do believe this.

LOFL. poor peptard ...

my vote for post of the year.

mo_ntresor

[Tom White]

None of the university presidents who frequent RGP
have challenged my analysis.

[Pepe Papon]

I'm sure it is. That's because you're an extremely stupid individual.
--

Pepe Papon

[mo_ntresor]

On May 24 2013 10:48 PM, Pepe Papon wrote:

> I'm sure it is. That's because you're an extremely stupid individual.

EARTH TO PEPTARD ... !!

tom's in academia, you fucking idiot.

mo_ntresor

[Will in New Haven]

On May 22, 2:34 pm, "Clave" <ChrisClav...@TheMonastery.com> wrote:
> "Now here's the point, Bob: please get me the names of the Jews, you know,
> the big Jewish contributors of the Democrats...Could we please investigate
> some of the cocksuckers?"

So _now_ the standard has moved from "Better than Bush" to "Better
than Nixon." Well, he _is_ better than those guys. Better than Stalin
or HItler (sorry, Paul) too. He still stinks on ice.

--
Will in New Haven

[brattt]

How is he better than either Bush or Nixon?

[Will in New Haven]

He hasn't tried to impose wage and price controls. He didn't start any
wars by telling lies.
There are more but that's a start.

[brattt]

Clinton tried price controls, as is Obama.

Did Bush tell lies? Or was he lied to?

[Pepe Papon]

If he is, it's hardly a well-known fact as you're trying to imply.
Regardless, you're still an extremely stupid individual.
--

Pepe Papon

[Pepe Papon]

On Sat, 25 May 2013 17:25:41 -0700, "brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid>

"President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements
about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following
September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two
nonprofit journalism groups."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/
--

Pepe Papon

[Tom White]

On 2013-05-25, mo_ntresor <amontillad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> tom's in academia

Was. Retired non-faculty.

[Tom White]

On 2013-05-26, Pepe Papon <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> "President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements
> about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following
> September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two
> nonprofit journalism groups."
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/

There's a difference between a lie and a mistake.

A known producer and user of poison gas is not proven WMD-free
by the absence of WMD from the installations he allowed the UN
to inspect.

Joe Wilson saying one of his old African buddies officially
denied furnishing Sadam yellow cake didn't prove the guy
who set fire to Kuwait's oil infrastructure and poured an
oil slick into the Persian Gulf was as benign an ex-terrorist
as Bill Ayers.

[mo_ntresor]

On May 26 2013 6:16 AM, Tom White wrote:

> > tom's in academia
>
> Was. Retired non-faculty.

i've retired from academia too. full-time rgp.

mo_ntresor

[brattt]

So what is the big difference between Nixon, Bush and Obama? What makes
Obama better?

[VegasJerry]

On Sunday, May 26, 2013 5:50:51 AM UTC-7, Tom White wrote:
> On 2013-05-26, Pepe Papon <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > "President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements
> > about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following
> > September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two
> > nonprofit journalism groups."
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/

.
.> There's a difference between a lie and a mistake.

And there is no mistaking that Bush lied. He lied at the UN and he forced Powell to lie. I believe they call it the 16-magic words.

I can't believe there are still Bush apologists still whining.

[VegasJerry]

.
.> So what is the big difference between Nixon, Bush and Obama? What makes
> Obama better?

He saved us from a depression, pulled us from a recession, overhauled healthcare and saved the American auto industry. So far, no conspiricies, lies or cover ups.

Learn to lose

[Tom White]

On 2013-05-26, brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> So what is the big difference between Nixon, Bush and Obama? What makes
> Obama better?

The only area that Obama's better in is gullying the gullible.

Nixon and Bush knew how to be administrators and appointed
competent lieutenants. Obama and his appointees constantly
duck responsibility for their incompetence, pointing fingers
and pleading ignorance.

Now that they've started taking the fifth, maybe we can bounce
some of the buffoons out.

[Will in New Haven]

On May 26, 2:55 pm, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sunday, May 26, 2013 5:50:51 AM UTC-7, Tom White wrote:

> > On 2013-05-26, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > > "President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements
> > > about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following
> > > September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two
> > > nonprofit journalism groups."
>
> > >http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/
>
> .
> .> There's a difference between a lie and a mistake.
>
> And there is no mistaking that Bush lied. He lied at the UN and he forced Powell to lie. I believe they call it the 16-magic words.
>
> I can't believe there are still Bush apologists still whining.
>
>

OK, already, Bush was horrible. Nixon was horrible. How does that make
Obama any good. And don't start that bullshit about preventing a
recession. We are HAVING one.

I can't believe all the Obama apologists, still lying.

[Will in New Haven]

On May 26, 2:57 pm, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sunday, May 26, 2013 7:26:23 AM UTC-7, brattt wrote:
> > On May 26 2013 7:50 AM, Tom White wrote:
>

> > > On 2013-05-26, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements
>
> > > > about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following
>
> > > > September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two
>
> > > > nonprofit journalism groups."
>
> > > >http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/
>
> > > There's a difference between a lie and a mistake.
>
> > > A known producer and user of poison gas is not proven WMD-free
>
> > > by the absence of WMD from the installations he allowed the UN
>
> > > to inspect.
>
> > > Joe Wilson saying one of his old African buddies officially
>
> > > denied furnishing Sadam yellow cake didn't prove the guy
>
> > > who set fire to Kuwait's oil infrastructure and poured an
>
> > > oil slick into the Persian Gulf was as benign an ex-terrorist
>
> > > as Bill Ayers.
>
> .
> .> So what is the big difference between Nixon, Bush and Obama?   What makes
>
> > Obama better?
>
> He saved us from a depression, pulled us from a recession,

We are IN a recession, you lying pile of shit.

overhauled healthcare

You mean made the insurance companies a guaranteed income.

and saved the American auto industry. So far, no conspiricies, lies or
cover ups.

Learn to see, you fucking sycophant.

[Clave]

"Tom White" <tomi...@bulldogcountry.com> wrote in message
news:knvqba$16s$1...@dont-email.me...

> On 2013-05-26, brattt <af3...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
>> So what is the big difference between Nixon, Bush and Obama? What makes
>> Obama better?
>
> The only area that Obama's better in is gullying the gullible.
>
> Nixon and Bush knew how to be administrators and appointed

> competent lieutenants...

Like Agnew and Cheney?

LOFL!!!

[Pepe Papon]

On Sun, 26 May 2013 12:50:51 +0000 (UTC), Tom White
<tomi...@bulldogcountry.com> wrote:

>On 2013-05-26, Pepe Papon <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> "President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements
>> about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following
>> September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two
>> nonprofit journalism groups."
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/
>
>There's a difference between a lie and a mistake.

Yes, there is, although that distinction has nothing to do with the
blatant lying of the Bush administration on WMD. 935 false
statements. "It's a slam dunk that Saddam has WMD." "We know
exactly where they are."

>A known producer and user of poison gas is not proven WMD-free
>by the absence of WMD from the installations he allowed the UN
>to inspect.

Are you trying to suggest that Saddam really did have WMD after all?
That would put you in a select group of kooks who still believe that.
--

Pepe Papon

[Pepe Papon]

On Mon, 27 May 2013 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT), Will in New Haven
<willre...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On May 26, 2:55 pm, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sunday, May 26, 2013 5:50:51 AM UTC-7, Tom White wrote:
>> > On 2013-05-26, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> > > "President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements
>> > > about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following
>> > > September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two
>> > > nonprofit journalism groups."
>>
>> > >http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/
>>
>> .
>> .> There's a difference between a lie and a mistake.
>>
>> And there is no mistaking that Bush lied. He lied at the UN and he forced Powell to lie. I believe they call it the 16-magic words.
>>
>> I can't believe there are still Bush apologists still whining.
>>
>>
>OK, already, Bush was horrible. Nixon was horrible. How does that make
>Obama any good.

It doesn't, but it does negate susan's attempt to suggest that Obama
lied and Bush didn't.

>And don't start that bullshit about preventing a
>recession. We are HAVING one.

Not by the commonly used definition of the term:

"The technical indicator of a recession is two consecutive quarters of
negative economic growth as measured by a country's gross domestic
product (GDP); although the National Bureau of Economic Research
(NBER) does not necessarily need to see this occur to call a
recession. "

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/recession.asp


The NBER does not considers the recession to have ended in June 2009.

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

>
>I can't believe all the Obama apologists, still lying.

If being wrong is the same as lying, then let's just call you
Pinocchio.
--

Pepe Papon

[Beldin the Sorcerer]

Will in New Haven wrote:
>

> Learn to see, you fucking sycophant.

He is a troll.
You are smart enough to KNOW he is a troll

[brattt]

On May 27 2013 6:39 PM, Pepe Papon wrote:

> On Mon, 27 May 2013 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT), Will in New Haven
> <willre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On May 26, 2:55 pm, VegasJerry <jerr...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sunday, May 26, 2013 5:50:51 AM UTC-7, Tom White wrote:
> >> > On 2013-05-26, Pepe Papon <hitmeis...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >> > > "President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements
> >> > > about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following
> >> > > September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two
> >> > > nonprofit journalism groups."
> >>
> >> > >http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/
> >>
> >> .
> >> .> There's a difference between a lie and a mistake.
> >>
> >> And there is no mistaking that Bush lied. He lied at the UN and he forced
Powell to lie. I
> believe they call it the 16-magic words.
> >>
> >> I can't believe there are still Bush apologists still whining.
> >>
> >>
> >OK, already, Bush was horrible. Nixon was horrible. How does that make
> >Obama any good.
>
> It doesn't, but it does negate susan's attempt to suggest that Obama
> lied and Bush didn't.

I asked why Will said that Obama was better than Bush and Nixon - they all
lie, a lot.

Get back to the question - what makes Obama so much better than Bush and
Nixon which was the original assertion.

[Beldin the Sorcerer]

Will in New Haven wrote:

> I can't believe all the Obama apologists, still lying.

Jimbo will lie till he dies.
Jerry is a troll

[TruthSeeker]

These guys will forgive a Democrat anything, and blame Republicans for
everything.



--
TruthSeeker

"On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog."

[Pepe Papon]

On Mon, 27 May 2013 16:57:24 -0700, "brattt" <af3...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:

They're all politicians. I hated Bush's policies. I was too young
to know much when Nixon was president except that he kept the Vietnam
war going for 4 years and there were violent crackdowns against
protesters during his term. It seems that, overall, he did some good
things as well as some bad things.

If you want to compare Watergate to IRS-gate, the main difference is
that, as of right now, there's no proof that a crime has been
committed and that Obama has orchestrated a coverup. Also, I doubt
you'll see him firing the lead investigator for doing a good job.
--

Pepe Papon

[brattt]

The more comparable thing to Watergate is eavesdroppingwiretappinggate -

[Tom White]

On 2013-05-27, Pepe Papon <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Are you trying to suggest that Saddam really did have WMD after all?
> That would put you in a select group of kooks who still believe that.

I'm trying to suggest how a competent CnC evaluates evidence.

A country that has produced and used WMD and practiced international
terrorism in the recent past must be considered an imminent threat
to do so again in the near future.

Intelligence reports of possible WMD sites must be given credence.
Obama's claim that he would have dismissed them is yet another
sign of his unfitness for command.

[fffurken]

On 28 May, 14:36, Tom White <tomina...@bulldogcountry.com> wrote:

Must. not. blame. Dear (ex)Leader.

Hey did you hear the news, Bush is a war criminal, it's official!

[Pepe Papon]

On Tue, 28 May 2013 13:36:44 +0000 (UTC), Tom White
<tomi...@bulldogcountry.com> wrote:

>On 2013-05-27, Pepe Papon <hitme...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> Are you trying to suggest that Saddam really did have WMD after all?
>> That would put you in a select group of kooks who still believe that.
>
>I'm trying to suggest how a competent CnC evaluates evidence.
>
>A country that has produced and used WMD and practiced international
>terrorism in the recent past must be considered an imminent threat
>to do so again in the near future.

If you believe that, then you must believe that the United States is
an imminent threat to use WMD in the near future.
--

Pepe Papon

[Tom White]

I might be so persuaded in the future, but for now I'm going to
wait to see how similar to Saddam's wood-chippers Obamacare turns
out to be before declaring moral equivalence between Obama's
America and Saddam's Iraq.

[Pepe Papon]

On Wed, 29 May 2013 08:18:33 -0500, Tom White <t...@bulldogcountry.com>

Spoken like a true fanatic.
--

Pepe Papon