a lottory number sales story and Ken Silver's "Lotto Link System"

[kwi]

A company sell lottory number on Internet, claim that his numbers will
make you win big. first number will be free test.

So 10,000 people get the first free number and buy tickets, there
are 200 people winning a small mount. then the company tell them
the
free numbers only could win small amount, their numbers that win big
money
will be 300$, so the 200 people buy the numbers. and then the company
disappeared with $60,000 money. this is a lottory sales tricks.

I have study lottory for a while and programmed a small tools for
myself,
I recently buy the Ken Silver's Lotto Link System, hope that his
system could have some good idea. after I got it, I just feel so
disappointed that waste me $37 to buy a garbage.

The system like : you pick the first comb based on some position
range and Even/Odd rule, then loop down, example:

5,10,16,20,35,43
6,11,17,21,36,44
7,12,18,22,37,45
.................

So hope any experts here to judge whether this method really work,
but I do feel it like garbage to me, and don't good than my random
pick software with filters.

[Duncan Smith]

"kwi" <kwi2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d4ce994b.01112...@posting.google.com...

There's certainly no mathematical reason why this should work (for anyone
other than Ken Silver). I'd stick to software (your own if you're up to
writing it) that lets you do interesting things, rather than something that
promises winning combinations.

Duncan

[pau...@diplomacy.com]

You obviously didn't see the 'no guarantee' guarantee.

I suspected it was a con and I have no doubt this proves it.

paul

[Robert Perkis]

Over the years I've fooled around with several systems like this.

On the plus side it puts all the numbers into play which means
you will find all the winning numbers among your combinations. It
also generally means you aren't doing anything that hurts your
chances. In a game that returns something for a 2 number hit or
includes a 7th bonus ball you will generally win something every
other draw on average. It helps to remember every 2 lines makes
a 100% 3if5of6in12number2combination wheel and every three lines
makes an 82% 3if6in18number3combination wheel so 7 to 9 combinations
can make an interesting collection of 2 and 3 line pairings.

Anyway, this is information I half expect to get every time I send
for a $5. to $15. dollar system, I believe Todd on Lotterypost.com
sells a system of this type in that price range. At $37. it is far
less than I'd hope for, though the more you know about lottery the
more you hope for and the less useful you receive. :-( For a total
idiot a system like this might be better than playing the birthdays
of his equally unlucky family.

In short, you were overcharged, I wouldn't say you were cheated.

Robert Perkis / http://www.lotto-logix.com/

[kwi]

I agree that his system is work some better for a total idiot that always
play lucky number.

with my own's system , I do have improved my odds 2 times higher
than the official odds based on real tickets. (say on average, official
odds 1:60 to win a prize, my odd is 1:30 to get a win ticket).

with his system, it's almost worth nothing.

Robert Perkis <rob...@icdus.com> wrote in message news:<3C045D52...@icdus.com>...

[pau...@diplomacy.com]

And I thought I would never disagree with you Robert.

paul

[Robert Perkis]

> From: pau...@diplomacy.com
> Newsgroups: rec.gambling.lottery
> Subject: Re: a lottory number sales story and Ken Silver's "Lotto
> Link System"
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:23:44 GMT

Ok, guess I'd better do a little song and dance.

In the grand scheme of things, let's say a zero is where you
send your money and get nothing and a ten is where you send
your money and win the lottery. Where does this system fall?

A bad system would give everyone the same result like some of
the lottery software systems where the natural series of clicks
had hundreds of people playing the same numbers on the same wheel
a very likely result with many of the old dos lottery software.

So if Ken's system has everyone making up their own starting
number rather than using the last draw, etc. the randomizing
factor isn't a bad thing.

If we think of each column as being 1-49 on a reel, of five or
six reels we can randomly set at a point with attention to odd/
even, low/high and then look at the resulting 49 combinations
or those that would fit within a budget, we should get a fairly
good collection of alternating odd/even, low/high combinations
along the lines Harry used to claim he did so well with.

I would have a big problem if asked to pay for a system that
turned out to simply tell people to put all the numbers into
play on 8 or 9 tickets.

If and I do say IF the system came with a decent description
how to pick the starting combination and how to use the system
I would think it would be in the $5 to $15 price range one
comes across in the back of magazines, etc. I do think $37 is
a rip and the glowing descriptions of these systems deceptive.

However, in this day and age, sending for a system and actually
getting one stands for something, they didn't just steal your
money and the system doesn't screw you over lumping you in with
everyone else who bought it. I wouldn't be surprised if players
get some wins off it with a reasonable number of people using it.

Now that I know what it is, I wouldn't point people that way, I
just don't think selling it was a crime, more of an overpricing
for value received, ordering what you hoped would be a 10, while
expecting a 7 and getting a 3 disappointing, but I've paid more
for dinner and a movie and gotten worse.

Sorry to disappoint you Paul. Robert