Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Good Use of STATIC FILTERS in Lottery
592 views
Skip to first unread message
Parpaluck
Jan 9, 2014, 5:24:04 PM1/9/14
to
Axiomatic Colleagues of Mine:
R.G.L. is the place where lottery experts and regular players heard the term FILTER for the first time. I coined the term — and that caused some whirling around here. But I love it, despite screeching fights I had to face from GOOGOOS here. One should never choose flight over fight. As ol’ Nietzsche (NO-NO, Psycholin Zamzalasheep, you are just MAD-MAD — Nietzsche was also a philosopher) put it:
“What doesn't kill me makes me stronger.”
Axios, I’ll make it shorter, for you can read a lot more in the proper place. The lottery experts in this community talked about parameters such as LOW/HIGH, ODD/EVEN, SUMS, DECADES. I called them STATIC FILTERS, as opposed to parameters of true lottery filtering: DYNAMIC FILTERS (implemented only in my lotto software, even at this time of writing). Thus, I was adamantly dismissive of the static filters in generating lotto combinations.
We are dynamic, or so must we. Therefore, perspective and thoughts change. I did write software to generate lotto combinations restricted by static filters. But lately, especially at the turn of this year of grace 2014, I finally discovered good use for the static filters: LIE elimination lottery strategies.
That LIE is, in fact, pure TRUTH! I used the concept many years ago, because of the 3-letter word. The correct concept should have been NOT. However, I am a computer programmer and NOT is an important keyword. This new and absolutely original lotto strategy can be expressed in logic as:
NOT (NOT Win) = Win
In plain words, the static lotto filters are streaky and win extremely rarely (the second NOT). If so, let’s eliminate from play the lotto combinations generated by said filters (the first NOT)! Hence, Win!
Gloriomatic ones, please read so many more details and real-life cases:
http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-2.html#post2718
Best of luck to you all, googoo and follower, foe and friend!
Ion Saliu,
“Always dynamic, static when warranted”
nigel
Jan 9, 2014, 5:33:39 PM1/9/14
to
Parpaluck wrote:
> Axiomatic Colleagues of Mine:
>
> R.G.L. is the place where lottery experts and regular players heard
> the term FILTER for the first time. I coined the term � and that
> Axiomatic Colleagues of Mine:
>
> R.G.L. is the place where lottery experts and regular players heard
> caused some whirling around here.
Wow, you're at least 2300 years old! And usenet was around even when you
were young! One of my early maths teachers said that everything you
could do on a computer you could do on an abacus, although it might take
longer, but I never really believed him.
Tell me, which browser did you use on your wooden counting-frame?
> But I love it, despite screeching
> fights I had to face from GOOGOOS here. One should never choose
> you are just MAD-MAD � Nietzsche was also a philosopher) put it:
>
> �What doesn't kill me makes me stronger.�
>
> Axios, I�ll make it shorter, for you can read a lot more in the
> proper place. The lottery experts in this community talked about
> parameters such as LOW/HIGH, ODD/EVEN, SUMS, DECADES. I called them
> STATIC FILTERS, as opposed to parameters of true lottery filtering:
> DYNAMIC FILTERS (implemented only in my lotto software, even at this
> time of writing). Thus, I was adamantly dismissive of the static
> filters in generating lotto combinations.
>
> We are dynamic, or so must we. Therefore, perspective and thoughts
> change. I did write software to generate lotto combinations
> restricted by static filters. But lately, especially at the turn of
> this year of grace 2014, I finally discovered good use for the static
> filters: LIE elimination lottery strategies.
>
> That LIE is, in fact, pure TRUTH! I used the concept many years ago,
> because of the 3-letter word. The correct concept should have been
> NOT. However, I am a computer programmer and NOT is an important
> keyword. This new and absolutely original lotto strategy can be
> expressed in logic as: NOT (NOT Win) = Win
>
> In plain words, the static lotto filters are streaky and win
> extremely rarely (the second NOT). If so, let�s eliminate from play
> parameters such as LOW/HIGH, ODD/EVEN, SUMS, DECADES. I called them
> STATIC FILTERS, as opposed to parameters of true lottery filtering:
> DYNAMIC FILTERS (implemented only in my lotto software, even at this
> time of writing). Thus, I was adamantly dismissive of the static
> filters in generating lotto combinations.
>
> We are dynamic, or so must we. Therefore, perspective and thoughts
> change. I did write software to generate lotto combinations
> restricted by static filters. But lately, especially at the turn of
> this year of grace 2014, I finally discovered good use for the static
> filters: LIE elimination lottery strategies.
>
> That LIE is, in fact, pure TRUTH! I used the concept many years ago,
> because of the 3-letter word. The correct concept should have been
> NOT. However, I am a computer programmer and NOT is an important
> keyword. This new and absolutely original lotto strategy can be
> expressed in logic as: NOT (NOT Win) = Win
>
> In plain words, the static lotto filters are streaky and win
> the lotto combinations generated by said filters (the first NOT)!
> Hence, Win!
>
> Gloriomatic ones, please read so many more details and real-life
> cases:
>
> http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-2.html#post2718
>
>
> Best of luck to you all, googoo and follower, foe and friend!
>
> Ion Saliu, �Always dynamic, static when warranted�
> Hence, Win!
>
> Gloriomatic ones, please read so many more details and real-life
> cases:
>
> http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-2.html#post2718
>
>
> Best of luck to you all, googoo and follower, foe and friend!
>
Evil Nigel
Parpaluck
Jan 9, 2014, 5:53:25 PM1/9/14
to
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 5:33:39 PM UTC-5, nigel wrote:
>
> Wow, you're at least 2300 years old! And usenet was around even when you
>
> were young! One of my early maths teachers said that everything you
>
> could do on a computer you could do on an abacus, although it might take
>
> longer, but I never really believed him.
>
>
> Tell me, which browser did you use on your wooden counting-frame?
>
>
> Evil Nigel
>
> Wow, you're at least 2300 years old! And usenet was around even when you
>
> were young! One of my early maths teachers said that everything you
>
> could do on a computer you could do on an abacus, although it might take
>
> longer, but I never really believed him.
>
>
> Tell me, which browser did you use on your wooden counting-frame?
>
>
What???
Pull your head out of that barrel of whiskey!!!
“A woman with a trick and a stick
Can beat a man with a fan in his van
Who for summer prepared
But the winter he dared.”
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/rec.gambling.lottery/dynamic$20static$20saliu/rec.gambling.lottery/RbChT_187RU/UrAxnAt7foQJ
Parpaluck
Jan 9, 2014, 6:12:47 PM1/9/14
to
High Wycombe
Buckinghamshire
HP13
http://saliu.com/images/NigelNigella.jpg
Colin Fairbrother
Jan 9, 2014, 9:16:04 PM1/9/14
to
Why involve his wife?
Just the kind of below the belt punch one can expect from an unrepentant Communist and Stalinist Nicolai Ceauchescu devotee.
SYNOPSIS OF LOTTO CHARLATIN ION SALIU
http://www.colinfairbrother.com/SynopsisOfLottoCharlatanIonSaliu.aspx
THE MADNESS OF ION SALIU AND HIS SPURIOUS CLAIM
TO THE SO CALLED FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
http://www.colinfairbrother.com/IonSaliuandhisFundamentalFormulaOfGambling.aspx
FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING AND PARADOX OR PROBLEM OF N TRIALS IS
PLAGIARISM BY ION SALIU
http://www.colinfairbrother.com/FundamentalFormulaOfGamblingIonSaliuPlagiarism.aspx
Message has been deleted
Parpaluck
Jan 10, 2014, 11:10:40 AM1/10/14
to
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:16:04 PM UTC-5, Colin Fartbrothel (Psycholin Zamzalasheep) wrote:
>
> >
>
> Why involve his wife?
>
>
What WIFE, monster of disproportionately insane dimensions? The same as your “wife, daughters, family”? In your case, they are the psychosis medicines you throw down the drain instead of down your foaming mouth — when them psychiatrists furlough you from that madhouse from time to time…
>
> >
>
> Why involve his wife?
>
>
What WIFE, monster of disproportionately insane dimensions? The same as your “wife, daughters, family”? In your case, they are the psychosis medicines you throw down the drain instead of down your foaming mouth — when them psychiatrists furlough you from that madhouse from time to time…
nigel
Jan 10, 2014, 11:44:56 AM1/10/14
to
Parpaluck wrote:
>
> Nigel & Nigella
Uh oh, I'd better warn the butler to expect barbarian hordes arriving at
the front door demanding cucumber sandwiches, scones and cream teas on
the croquet lawn :(
Evil Nigel
>
> Nigel & Nigella
Uh oh, I'd better warn the butler to expect barbarian hordes arriving at
the front door demanding cucumber sandwiches, scones and cream teas on
the croquet lawn :(
Evil Nigel
Parpaluck
Jan 10, 2014, 12:51:11 PM1/10/14
to
From: NIGEL HURNEYMAN <ni...@loud-n-clear.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 13:02:59 +0100
Local: Thurs, Aug 1 2002 8:02 am
Subject: Re: Combination '1,2,3,4,5,6': Probability and Reality
Ion Saliu wrote:
> • Reposted from "The World Message Board" Lotto Forums, Lottery Message Board
> We can hear two divisive opinions:
> 1: "Combination 1-2-3-4-5-6 has the same chance of being drawn as any other lotto combination. I play it religiously!"
> 2: "Combination 1-2-3-4-5-6 should not be played. It represents a weird arrangement of numbers. Only fools can waste their money and play such a combination!"
> It is the kind of issue that pits brother-of-opposites against brother-of-opposites and enemy against foe. Incidentally, the combination 1-2-3-4-5-6 is played by thousands of lotto players worldwide in any given drawing.
There's a very important third. On average, 10,000 people pick 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 for every UK Lotto draw, so if that combination did come up the jackpot would be pathetic.
I'm repeating a previous posting here, but my in correlation analysis of every ball vis a vis every other ball in the UK Lotto, 50% of the highest ranked correlations were between numbers with a difference of 8, ie where one ball starts on top of the other.
The corollary to this is that you are reducing your chances slightly by choosing 1,2,3,4,5,6 in
the UK Lottery because none of the ball numbers differ by 8. Of course, now I've published this fact, if anyone notifies Camelot they may reduce the amount of waffle in the program and let the balls churn round for longer. (As an aside, much as I hated Anthea Turner, at least she could
read an autocue and smile convincingly, unlike poor petrified Gigi.)
<snip>
Evil Nigel
==========
You are who you are, Nigo. I wonder why persons like you try so hard to hide a lot about themselves?! That 2-girl pic I posted appears in Google Images on the term NIGEL HURNEYMAN!!! Go after Miss Google now!
Just publish your photo and some real data, including your website, on your coldly empty Facebook and Google+ pages… You applied for the accounts, after all! Nobody is going to kill you if some personal data is public. “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”
-------
An interesting aside: “…the highest ranked correlations were between numbers with a difference of 8…” Statistically, the MEDIAN of the average deltas in 6/49 lotto is 7.40. That is the case for 864 drawings in Pennsylvania Lottery. You can run SUMS.EXE for any lottery game:
http://saliu.com/forum/lottery-sums.html
nigel
Jan 11, 2014, 7:09:58 AM1/11/14
to
Parpaluck wrote:
>
> You are who you are, Nigo.
Yes, I'm Marmaduke Jinks. Or am I?
>
> You are who you are, Nigo.
> I wonder why persons like you try so hard
> to hide a lot about themselves?!
around these days. I choose to make it as difficult as possible for them
to find me.
> That 2-girl pic I posted appears in
> now!
Sadly I don't know them. I think I know someone who knows someone who
would be able to find out their names, but I'm not going to bother.
> Just publish your photo and some real data, including your website,
What happens on Facebook doesn't stay on Facebook - it gets distributed
to paying customers around the world. And many people have been bitten
by posts on Facebook which have come back to haunt them. I carefully
censor my posts, except against Monsanto with whom there is absolutely
no possibility I'd ever accept a job.
I wasn't aware I had a Google+ page. I can only think it's a consequence
of Google co-opting users of one of their services onto all of their
services to egg-up their number of users.
> You applied for the
> accounts, after all! Nobody is going to kill you if some personal
Multiple Sclerosis?
Your daughter's cute - how many camels do you want for her?
Evil Nigel
Parpaluck
Jan 21, 2014, 2:16:58 PM1/21/14
to
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 5:24:04 PM UTC-5, Parpaluck wrote:
> Axiomatic Colleagues of Mine:
>
> Axiomatic Colleagues of Mine:
>
> “Always dynamic, static when warranted”
Axiomatics:
This new type of lotto software leads to some “mathematical curiosities”. They only occur in the cases of Lotto Decades and Last Digits. Here is more food for thought :
http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-3.html#post2736
Best of luck to you all, googoo and follower, foe and friend!
“A good man is an axiomatic man; an axiomatic man is a happy man. Be axiomatic!”
alpi...@gmail.com
Jan 22, 2014, 5:15:57 AM1/22/14
to
Domnul Profesor ,
Please take a look at my difficulty and maybe you can help,
Multumesc SC.
Parpaluck
Jan 22, 2014, 12:00:19 PM1/22/14
to
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:15:57 AM UTC-5, alpi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Domnul Profesor ,
>
> Please take a look at my difficulty and maybe you can help,
>
> Multumesc SC.
>
>
Axiomaticule:
> Domnul Profesor ,
>
> Please take a look at my difficulty and maybe you can help,
>
> Multumesc SC.
>
>
You trying to cheat me, huh? You start in the Romanian language! I saw in another r.g.l. thread you ask how to write a program that does what I talk about in the thread in my forum that I listed here.
Even if someone understood your question (not clear what you are saying, plus you express your thoughts in terrible text-formatting!) – you are asking for WAY TOO MUCH! That would be the foundation of unique, very useful software that could make lots of money. For starters, it can generate LOTTO WHEELS of sizes very, very close to the lotto odds calculated AS EXACTLY.
http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-3.html#post2737
You Romanian, huh? Like Psycholin Zamzalasheep being an Aussie… BRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
IP: 68.246.43.12
Hostname: 68-246-43-12.pools.spcsdns.net
ISP: Sprint PCS
Type: Wireless Broadband
Country: United States us flag
State/Region: Pennsylvania
City: Quakertown
alpi...@gmail.com
Jan 23, 2014, 2:43:12 AM1/23/14
to
salutari ,
ok sunt roman pentru urmatoarel 10minute :
nu stiam de http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-3.html#post2737 ,
dar ce vreau eu e foarte diferit -REzultatele nu sunt luate de la ei ,din drawings sunt concepute manual....aici e secret...am pus mai demult in forum o intrebare despre pick 4 dar nu am primit raspuns /sau poate am primit ca n-am mai fost pe forum -saliu.com de mult....
Se pare ca exista soft care face in majoritate ce intrebam inainte -destepti de la LP mi-au zis de lotto whiz si de soft de la Gail howard -lotto advanced ,deocamdata eu am mac deci cand iau un windows pc pot sa vad cum merge.In alta ordine de idei ,am gasit programarea pentru ce intrebam aseara-am primito de la cineva de pe openoffice forum..dar nu stiu deloc coding ....poate facem programul impreuna ...o idee
intrebare -ce inseamna" For starters, it can generate LOTTO WHEELS of sizes very, very close to the lotto odds calculated AS EXACTLY " one wheel for 5 out of 5 are multe prea multe linii nu ? deci bugetu nu ar permite ....
Sorin un altfel de axiomatic .
alpi...@gmail.com
Jan 23, 2014, 2:58:46 AM1/23/14
to
and done manually with MY drawings i got a 5 of 5 in INDIANA not NJ and 3 of 5 in PB ( the other 2 were inverted of the original 5 of 5 -ex. say i had 10/20 -they were 01/02 ...i also get a few other 3's scattered in cash 5 nationwide...all those within a few weeks ..and i have many 4 out of 4 to use that are winning lines !! ...those came from only one repeating line !!!
but IT'S VERY TIME CONSUMING to do it by hand AND I HAVE ONLY 2 EYEs ....so yea there is lot's of mulah to b made ,
good night !
S
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:00:19 PM UTC-5, Parpaluck wrote:
but IT'S VERY TIME CONSUMING to do it by hand AND I HAVE ONLY 2 EYEs ....so yea there is lot's of mulah to b made ,
good night !
S
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:00:19 PM UTC-5, Parpaluck wrote:
Colin Fairbrother
Jan 23, 2014, 8:16:42 AM1/23/14
to
Instead of that fake degree you're touting, you know the one where they can't find the records, well here's a place where you can get a "real" one with real records - all for $20 and in 5 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO8x8eoU3L4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO8x8eoU3L4
Parpaluck
Jan 23, 2014, 11:38:33 AM1/23/14
to
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:16:42 AM UTC-5, Colin Fartbrothel (dead-name as it never existed; truthful nomination: Psycholin Zamzalasheep) wrote:
> Instead of that fake degree you're touting...
>
>
What DEGREE, monster of disproportionately insane dimensions? The same as your LAST DEGREE OF MADNESS? Them psychiatrists left you off sedation again, for too long again. Enough time for you to spill you idiosyncratic delirious speech all over this place!
Them psychiatrists furlough you from that madhouse too often now… with the hope of a cure for you. This is the only cure for you: SHOCK-THERAPY, as I apply to you when you crawl like a venom-injected spider out of your bounds!
> Instead of that fake degree you're touting...
>
>
What DEGREE, monster of disproportionately insane dimensions? The same as your LAST DEGREE OF MADNESS? Them psychiatrists left you off sedation again, for too long again. Enough time for you to spill you idiosyncratic delirious speech all over this place!
Them psychiatrists furlough you from that madhouse too often now… with the hope of a cure for you. This is the only cure for you: SHOCK-THERAPY, as I apply to you when you crawl like a venom-injected spider out of your bounds!
Parpaluck
Jan 23, 2014, 11:41:34 AM1/23/14
to
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 2:43:12 AM UTC-5, alpi...@gmail.com wrote:
> salutari ,
>
> ok sunt roman pentru urmatoarel 10minute :
>
> nu stiam de http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-3.html#post2737 ,
>
Sorine:
> salutari ,
>
> ok sunt roman pentru urmatoarel 10minute :
>
> nu stiam de http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-3.html#post2737 ,
>
I responded to you with the best intentions. I always do so with everybody, axiomaticule. Even when I devastatingly kick the likes of Psychosama or Psycholin Zamzalasheep.
Indeed, you are a different kind of axiomatic. You write in Romanian from Quakertown, Pennsylvania. Again, I have the best intentions when I advise you about PRESENTATION. You should put an effort into improving the formatting of your posts — of all your writings, for that matter.
The presentation and especially text-formatting is very important in the United States. The act started here. It is not much about fancy — as it is about CLARITY. Good formatting does improve clarity and also improves the flow of thinking. Of course, your first reaction would be triggered by some sort of ambition (probably you will curse me, most likely in Romanian!)
Pay attention to punctuation. I is I (as in me) — not i. A period . , a comma , a bracket ( , … other punctuation signs are always followed by ONE BLANK SPACE. The text must be divided into PARAGRAPHS based on common ideas. There shouldn’t be more than 5 sentences in one paragraph.
Just look at my post. I did spend a little more time than you — but not much more. But my post is far more FORCEFULLY CLEAR.
Now, the topic of your post: LOTTO WHEELING SOFTWARE. I presented some ideas in this r.g.l. newsgroup:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!searchin/rec.gambling.lottery/saliu$20lotto$20wheels/rec.gambling.lottery/DAawKHhLKP4/kj3y-ofPUXcJ
“… lotto whiz si de soft de la Gail howard…”
The truth is that my software is the only to this date to GENERATE lotto wheels. Other pieces of software only wheel the lotto numbers. That is, a bunch of lotto wheels were created MANUALLY, and the ‘other lottery software’ SIMPLY REOPLAces the theoretical numbers with players’ picks.
The LOTTO WHEEL GENERATING software started with my own WheelCheck6 and WheelCheck5. Other software only has primitive copies of my own LottoWheeler.
My lotto wheel generators output lotto wheels I call BALANCED. They treat all lotto numbers EQUALLY. The results is a LARGER lotto wheel — but a better one because of the balance.
The algorithm I used in my software for the programs mentioned was based on the AS AT LEAST mode. I just came up with totally accurate algorithms for AS EXACTLY. I discussed the idea in my forum thread I mentioned. I doubt your statement that you didn’t know about it! Your question here was way too soon after my thread in my forum and this very thread in r.g.l.
Noroc, axiomaticule!
Ion Saliu
Parpaluck
Jan 23, 2014, 12:12:03 PM1/23/14
to
“…one wheel for 5 out of 5…”
That is NOT a lotto wheel — it is the ENTIRE SET OF COMBINATIONS for particular parameters. For example: '12 numbers taken 5 at a time' results in 792 5-number combinations. That is not a lotto wheel.
What they call in English LOTTO WHEEL is a REDUCED (ABBREVIATED) set of lotto combinations. The abbreviated set assures ONLY lower prizes IF the parameters are met. As in the example above, a lotto wheel will guarantee ‘3 of 5’ or ‘4 of 5’ IF the player chose the 5 winning numbers in the lotto drawing (amongst the 12 numbers he wheeled).
You said:
“…. am gasit programarea pentru ce intrebam aseara-am primito de la cineva de pe openoffice forum…”
As miserable as your presentation was, I still understood the passage in both languages. My honest opinion is that YOU DID NOT FIND THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION. I DOUBT YOU FOUND THE ALGORITHM TO CODE AS EXACTLY.
There was NO CLUE to how to generate lotto wheels before my own WheelCheck6 software. A guy here in r.g.l. figured out how my program worked (with the AS AT LEAST algorithm). Other guys also figured out. After several years, I saw a few programs which tried to reduce the number of lines in BALANCED lotto wheels as generated by my software.
The best method of generating lotto wheels is as in my Wheel5/6 software. The software applies DYNAMIC FILTERING. The lotto wheels are also RANDOMIZED, in addition to being BALANCED.
Best of luck to you all, axios!
Parpaluck
That is NOT a lotto wheel — it is the ENTIRE SET OF COMBINATIONS for particular parameters. For example: '12 numbers taken 5 at a time' results in 792 5-number combinations. That is not a lotto wheel.
What they call in English LOTTO WHEEL is a REDUCED (ABBREVIATED) set of lotto combinations. The abbreviated set assures ONLY lower prizes IF the parameters are met. As in the example above, a lotto wheel will guarantee ‘3 of 5’ or ‘4 of 5’ IF the player chose the 5 winning numbers in the lotto drawing (amongst the 12 numbers he wheeled).
You said:
“…. am gasit programarea pentru ce intrebam aseara-am primito de la cineva de pe openoffice forum…”
As miserable as your presentation was, I still understood the passage in both languages. My honest opinion is that YOU DID NOT FIND THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION. I DOUBT YOU FOUND THE ALGORITHM TO CODE AS EXACTLY.
There was NO CLUE to how to generate lotto wheels before my own WheelCheck6 software. A guy here in r.g.l. figured out how my program worked (with the AS AT LEAST algorithm). Other guys also figured out. After several years, I saw a few programs which tried to reduce the number of lines in BALANCED lotto wheels as generated by my software.
The best method of generating lotto wheels is as in my Wheel5/6 software. The software applies DYNAMIC FILTERING. The lotto wheels are also RANDOMIZED, in addition to being BALANCED.
Best of luck to you all, axios!
Parpaluck
Colin Fairbrother
Jan 23, 2014, 8:53:31 PM1/23/14
to
Gail Howard claims to have first popularised the term "Wheel" in the USA and Canada in relation to sets of Lotto numbers played when she began flogging a booklet in 1983 called How to Win at Lotto & Pick 6 written by an expatriate Bulgarian, Ivan Dimitrov, with some 65 Wheels. Dimitrov was the first to introduce Wheeling Systems to the USA from Eastern Europe, where they were common - even given out by the Lottery operators.
Wheel is just another name for Cover or Covering. All the combinations of 5 integers from 12 integers, which is 792, can be referred to as a System 12 (as in Australia) or Full System or Full Wheel - whatever. The notation C(12,5,5,5)=792 can be used.
If there was a 5/12 Lotto game and you played the 792 combinations you are guaranteed to win or share 1st prize every draw along with a bunch of lesser prizes. THERE IS NO IF.
For a 5/12 Lotto game you can come up with Wheels where all the combinations of 4 (495), 3 (220) and 2 (66) are considered -
2if2
2if3
2if4
2if5
3if3
3if4
3if5
4if4
4if5
You can get them at Weef's site: -
http://www.weefs-lottosysteme.de/systeme,5,en.htm
or
La Jolla
http://www.ccrwest.org/cover.html
Once you play any of those Wheels in a 5/59 or 5/50 Lotto game the guarantee is gone.
Some like Professor Iliya Bluskov provide prize tables for the hypothetical 5/12 Lotto game with the obvious intention of deceiving the reader. There is no excuse for not using 5/59 or 5/50 Prize Tables. Using pure trickery and slight of hand phraseology they blend in an unhighlighted IF all the while inferring that the guarantees transfer to the 5/59 and 5/50 games.
Regarding Filters they are absolute nonsense and along with using previous history of Random Numbers or Draws are debunked at http://www.ColinFairbrother.com
Colin Fairbrother
Wheel is just another name for Cover or Covering. All the combinations of 5 integers from 12 integers, which is 792, can be referred to as a System 12 (as in Australia) or Full System or Full Wheel - whatever. The notation C(12,5,5,5)=792 can be used.
If there was a 5/12 Lotto game and you played the 792 combinations you are guaranteed to win or share 1st prize every draw along with a bunch of lesser prizes. THERE IS NO IF.
For a 5/12 Lotto game you can come up with Wheels where all the combinations of 4 (495), 3 (220) and 2 (66) are considered -
2if2
2if3
2if4
2if5
3if3
3if4
3if5
4if4
4if5
You can get them at Weef's site: -
http://www.weefs-lottosysteme.de/systeme,5,en.htm
or
La Jolla
http://www.ccrwest.org/cover.html
Once you play any of those Wheels in a 5/59 or 5/50 Lotto game the guarantee is gone.
Some like Professor Iliya Bluskov provide prize tables for the hypothetical 5/12 Lotto game with the obvious intention of deceiving the reader. There is no excuse for not using 5/59 or 5/50 Prize Tables. Using pure trickery and slight of hand phraseology they blend in an unhighlighted IF all the while inferring that the guarantees transfer to the 5/59 and 5/50 games.
Regarding Filters they are absolute nonsense and along with using previous history of Random Numbers or Draws are debunked at http://www.ColinFairbrother.com
Colin Fairbrother
alpi...@gmail.com
Jan 24, 2014, 1:48:08 AM1/24/14
to
Noroc Domn Profesor ,
sau buna dimineata ...i had studied extensively grammar -romanian and english in our soviet era,but a lot of it i ignore now in daily practice(not forgottent)because people here act more like animals ..i lived in Ny for last 13 years -14 yr. this coming june;i am pretty lucky i haven't gone totally crazy...and sometimes i prefer looking like a stupid dramatically illiterate russian ...and i also like to think in romanian .
Now let's get to our daily or weekly bread .
Q-i am not good with analyzing the way you do it-i use a totally different way (mostly logic and a few filters),so from the topic you work on , is this what you looking to achieve ?-find similar groups of at least 2/3/4/5 similar numbers on dif. lines and identify the lines ? btw.- like i said my lines that i input are not the drawings (They are draws from a different perspective ..you can call them "fake" ,but they are giving very good results.
Multumesc for very good message.I appreciate it and understand exactly what you mean -esp. the first few paragraphs !
S
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 5:24:04 PM UTC-5, Parpaluck wrote:
sau buna dimineata ...i had studied extensively grammar -romanian and english in our soviet era,but a lot of it i ignore now in daily practice(not forgottent)because people here act more like animals ..i lived in Ny for last 13 years -14 yr. this coming june;i am pretty lucky i haven't gone totally crazy...and sometimes i prefer looking like a stupid dramatically illiterate russian ...and i also like to think in romanian .
Now let's get to our daily or weekly bread .
Q-i am not good with analyzing the way you do it-i use a totally different way (mostly logic and a few filters),so from the topic you work on , is this what you looking to achieve ?-find similar groups of at least 2/3/4/5 similar numbers on dif. lines and identify the lines ? btw.- like i said my lines that i input are not the drawings (They are draws from a different perspective ..you can call them "fake" ,but they are giving very good results.
Multumesc for very good message.I appreciate it and understand exactly what you mean -esp. the first few paragraphs !
S
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 5:24:04 PM UTC-5, Parpaluck wrote:
nigel
Jan 24, 2014, 11:34:18 AM1/24/14
to
Colin Fairbrother wrote:
> Gail Howard claims to have first popularised the term "Wheel" in the
> USA and Canada in relation to sets of Lotto numbers played when she
> began flogging a booklet in 1983 called How to Win at Lotto & Pick 6
> written by an expatriate Bulgarian, Ivan Dimitrov, with some 65
> Wheels. Dimitrov was the first to introduce Wheeling Systems to the
> USA from Eastern Europe, where they were common - even given out by
> the Lottery operators.
I used wheels (called perms) on UK football pools in the sixties, and
> Gail Howard claims to have first popularised the term "Wheel" in the
> USA and Canada in relation to sets of Lotto numbers played when she
> began flogging a booklet in 1983 called How to Win at Lotto & Pick 6
> written by an expatriate Bulgarian, Ivan Dimitrov, with some 65
> Wheels. Dimitrov was the first to introduce Wheeling Systems to the
> USA from Eastern Europe, where they were common - even given out by
> the Lottery operators.
they'd been around for quite some time before that. But then
'popularised' isn't the same as 'discovered' or 'invented'.
> Some like Professor Iliya Bluskov provide prize tables for the
> hypothetical 5/12 Lotto game with the obvious intention of deceiving
> the reader.
UK football pools so that if a certain number of their selections were
correct, there would be a certain guaranteed prize level. No deceit of
the reader, just as no deceit from Professor Bluskov.
> There is no excuse for not using 5/59 or 5/50 Prize
> Tables.
how many of your selections are correct and check the tables for your
wheel or perm. Not rocket science.
> Regarding Filters they are absolute nonsense and along with using
> previous history of Random Numbers or Draws are debunked at
> http://www.ColinFairbrother.com
claim you have debunked the principle fails Logic 101.
Evil Nigel
Message has been deleted
Parpaluck
Jan 24, 2014, 12:31:04 PM1/24/14
to
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:53:31 PM UTC-5, Colin Fairbrother Psycholin Zamzalasheep wrote crap typical of and consistent with deep insanity triggered by obsessive envy:
>
>
“Wheel is just another name for Cover or Covering.”
Mumbo-jumbo Psycholin! Now, you sound like professor Blu! Covers or coverings are Blushit… I mean bullshit! The books have covers, not the lotto combinations! The correct nomination is REDUCED SETS OF COMBINATIONS. That’s why ‘full lotto wheels’ is a contradiction in terms. You can’t have it both ways: ‘Full sets = reduced sets of combosnations’!
This term should be always used instead of ‘lotto wheels’ or ‘covers’: REDUCED LOTTO SYSTEMS for 100% accuracy. Or, ABBREVIATED LOTTO SYSTEMS ASSURING A MINIMUM GUARANTEE for 200% accuracy!
“Regarding Filters they are absolute nonsense and along with using previous history of Random Numbers or Draws are debunked at http://www.ColinFartbrothel.scum”
That’s when you fell deeper in that condition of insanity. You started to obsess grotesquely with Ion Saliu beginning 2003. You begged for my ideas and software code — the beggar(s) have never gotten it. But you still remained committed to your pathetic “lottery strategies”. Like “playing all integers in the lotto set provide a slight advantage, like 5%”.
Or offering that miserable online random generator for a $% subscription a year. That’s a loud indicator of insanity. All sane people know of so many FREE random generators. Not to mention that I even offer SOURCE CODE for the best possible random generator (including generating with random delays like in real lottery drawings) –
http://saliu.com/random-numbers.html
http://saliu.com/random-generator-algorithms.html
And look here how badly the lotto odds can be beaten by utilizing lottery filters – not only beat the house edge but MAKE A PROFIT!
http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-3.html#post2741
Or look how many combinations can be knocked off the total by applying a delta filter. There are no repeats of past drawings, including their delta derivatives, from thousands of combinations. There are NO repeats in thousands of combinations representing real drawings and randomly simulated combinations.
The filter is Del6 = all deltas in a 6-number lotto combination. It is a real-life example in Pennsylvania Lottery 6/49 lotto game. The lowest value for Del6 in 200 drawings was 85946. One unit of that filter eliminates an average of 5-6 combinations. So, some 400,000 – 500,000 combinations are automatically eliminated from playing.
ARE THE LOTTO ODDS THE SAME IF 400,000 COMBINATIONS ARE ELIMINATED FROM TOTAL COMBINATIONS OF 49 NUMBERS TAKEN 6 AT A TIME?
ONLY MONSTERS OF DISPROPORTIONATELY INSANE DIMENSIONS MOUTH-FOAMINGLY SCREAM THAT!!! “THE LOTTO ODDS ARE THE SAME!!!” As mad as they are, they know the DEGREE OF CERTAINTY is always changing. It’s only their unbearable obsessive envy that triggers the mouth-foaming. They wanted to do exactly what few others have done — but the psychotics were not born with the skills and tools. The Psychos can only mouth-foamingly scream…
* LOTTO-6 Winning Pattern - Layer 1 *
Line Sum Pot One Two Three Four Del4 Del5 Del6 Bun6
no. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Med.> 85 8 0 3 36 918 286 8011 780121 9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg.> 296 10 0 5 55 1282 480 17498 1286026 15
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
StDv> 1544 6 1 6 53 1259 548 27637 1687394 16
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 146- 9- 0 2- 75+ 503- 185+ 19511+ 1032335- 5-
2 438+ 10+ 0 3+ 48+ 2900+ 40- 4351- 1253810- 6-
3 130+ 8- 0 1- 16+ 997- 122- 133862+ 1372670+ 9-
4 118+ 11- 0 5- 5- 2442+ 347+ 23982+ 390295- 73+
5 112+ 26+ 0 13+ 138+ 851- 189- 1457+ 744763- 52+
6 35- 9+ 0- 9+ 38- 1311+ 559- 723- 1405229- 8+
7 36- 4- 1+ 1- 105+ 1300+ 1899+ 24416+ 4531835+ 0-
8 123- 11- 0 2+ 9+ 145- 49- 11499- 85946- 9-
9 129+ 15+ 0 0- 7- 918+ 333- 32794+ 2263717+ 46-
10 18- 14- 0- 5- 311+ 807- 699+ 32593+ 772207- 56+
11 334+ 20+ 1+ 13+ 63+ 1613+ 51- 3098- 1268432- 7
12 254+ 16+ 0 2- 18- 1561- 1025- 17368- 1468240+ 7-
13 152- 9+ 0 3+ 20- 4010+ 1741+ 48289+ 853116+ 11+
14 410+ 7- 0 2+ 74+ 1456- 74- 10527+ 780121+ 6-
15 64- 9+ 0 1- 1- 4025+ 656+ 4551+ 416014- 10+
16 423+ 5- 0 2- 15+ 689- 481+ 1425- 700646- 4-
17 132+ 8+ 0 5- 10- 1211+ 378+ 17120+ 731326- 6-
18 24+ 3- 0 8+ 157+ 278- 42- 3267- 2466844+ 19-
19 5- 4- 0- 1- 21- 2207+ 155+ 3786- 1087359- 34+
20 315+ 6- 1+ 6- 88- 1508+ 113+ 46967+ 1512857- 14+
…
Ion Saliu,
>
>
“Wheel is just another name for Cover or Covering.”
Mumbo-jumbo Psycholin! Now, you sound like professor Blu! Covers or coverings are Blushit… I mean bullshit! The books have covers, not the lotto combinations! The correct nomination is REDUCED SETS OF COMBINATIONS. That’s why ‘full lotto wheels’ is a contradiction in terms. You can’t have it both ways: ‘Full sets = reduced sets of combosnations’!
This term should be always used instead of ‘lotto wheels’ or ‘covers’: REDUCED LOTTO SYSTEMS for 100% accuracy. Or, ABBREVIATED LOTTO SYSTEMS ASSURING A MINIMUM GUARANTEE for 200% accuracy!
“Regarding Filters they are absolute nonsense and along with using previous history of Random Numbers or Draws are debunked at http://www.ColinFartbrothel.scum”
That’s when you fell deeper in that condition of insanity. You started to obsess grotesquely with Ion Saliu beginning 2003. You begged for my ideas and software code — the beggar(s) have never gotten it. But you still remained committed to your pathetic “lottery strategies”. Like “playing all integers in the lotto set provide a slight advantage, like 5%”.
Or offering that miserable online random generator for a $% subscription a year. That’s a loud indicator of insanity. All sane people know of so many FREE random generators. Not to mention that I even offer SOURCE CODE for the best possible random generator (including generating with random delays like in real lottery drawings) –
http://saliu.com/random-numbers.html
http://saliu.com/random-generator-algorithms.html
And look here how badly the lotto odds can be beaten by utilizing lottery filters – not only beat the house edge but MAKE A PROFIT!
http://forums.saliu.com/lottery-lotto-software-systems/1562-major-upgrade-software-skip-systems-3.html#post2741
Or look how many combinations can be knocked off the total by applying a delta filter. There are no repeats of past drawings, including their delta derivatives, from thousands of combinations. There are NO repeats in thousands of combinations representing real drawings and randomly simulated combinations.
The filter is Del6 = all deltas in a 6-number lotto combination. It is a real-life example in Pennsylvania Lottery 6/49 lotto game. The lowest value for Del6 in 200 drawings was 85946. One unit of that filter eliminates an average of 5-6 combinations. So, some 400,000 – 500,000 combinations are automatically eliminated from playing.
ARE THE LOTTO ODDS THE SAME IF 400,000 COMBINATIONS ARE ELIMINATED FROM TOTAL COMBINATIONS OF 49 NUMBERS TAKEN 6 AT A TIME?
ONLY MONSTERS OF DISPROPORTIONATELY INSANE DIMENSIONS MOUTH-FOAMINGLY SCREAM THAT!!! “THE LOTTO ODDS ARE THE SAME!!!” As mad as they are, they know the DEGREE OF CERTAINTY is always changing. It’s only their unbearable obsessive envy that triggers the mouth-foaming. They wanted to do exactly what few others have done — but the psychotics were not born with the skills and tools. The Psychos can only mouth-foamingly scream…
* LOTTO-6 Winning Pattern - Layer 1 *
Line Sum Pot One Two Three Four Del4 Del5 Del6 Bun6
no. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Med.> 85 8 0 3 36 918 286 8011 780121 9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg.> 296 10 0 5 55 1282 480 17498 1286026 15
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
StDv> 1544 6 1 6 53 1259 548 27637 1687394 16
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 146- 9- 0 2- 75+ 503- 185+ 19511+ 1032335- 5-
2 438+ 10+ 0 3+ 48+ 2900+ 40- 4351- 1253810- 6-
3 130+ 8- 0 1- 16+ 997- 122- 133862+ 1372670+ 9-
4 118+ 11- 0 5- 5- 2442+ 347+ 23982+ 390295- 73+
5 112+ 26+ 0 13+ 138+ 851- 189- 1457+ 744763- 52+
6 35- 9+ 0- 9+ 38- 1311+ 559- 723- 1405229- 8+
7 36- 4- 1+ 1- 105+ 1300+ 1899+ 24416+ 4531835+ 0-
8 123- 11- 0 2+ 9+ 145- 49- 11499- 85946- 9-
9 129+ 15+ 0 0- 7- 918+ 333- 32794+ 2263717+ 46-
10 18- 14- 0- 5- 311+ 807- 699+ 32593+ 772207- 56+
11 334+ 20+ 1+ 13+ 63+ 1613+ 51- 3098- 1268432- 7
12 254+ 16+ 0 2- 18- 1561- 1025- 17368- 1468240+ 7-
13 152- 9+ 0 3+ 20- 4010+ 1741+ 48289+ 853116+ 11+
14 410+ 7- 0 2+ 74+ 1456- 74- 10527+ 780121+ 6-
15 64- 9+ 0 1- 1- 4025+ 656+ 4551+ 416014- 10+
16 423+ 5- 0 2- 15+ 689- 481+ 1425- 700646- 4-
17 132+ 8+ 0 5- 10- 1211+ 378+ 17120+ 731326- 6-
18 24+ 3- 0 8+ 157+ 278- 42- 3267- 2466844+ 19-
19 5- 4- 0- 1- 21- 2207+ 155+ 3786- 1087359- 34+
20 315+ 6- 1+ 6- 88- 1508+ 113+ 46967+ 1512857- 14+
…
Ion Saliu,
Colin Fairbrother
Jan 24, 2014, 10:06:59 PM1/24/14
to
Someone call a nurse - he's foaming at the mouth again!
Parpaluck
Jan 25, 2014, 4:48:00 PM1/25/14
to
On Friday, January 24, 2014 10:06:59 PM UTC-5, Colin Fairbrother wrote:
> Someone call a nurse - he's foaming at the mouth again!
Mad as you are, imitating me has been your obsessive passion. That is, just those little things that can be imitated, like words: Mouth-foaming, lotto wheels are bad for the player… and just few more…
> Someone call a nurse - he's foaming at the mouth again!
Colin Farbrothel Psycholin Zamzalasheep, 8/27/13: “I have no desire or intention to dialogue with Ion Saliu”
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/rec.gambling.lottery/1qT7Z-b6Ed0
Quite so, psycho! You can’t get enough of Ion Saliu… especially his theories, source code, software. Ion Saliu has rejected many disgusting beggars like Psycholin Zamzalasheep. My rejection has always bruised overly-bloated egos to the point of plunging them in the abyss of insanity.
http://saliu.com/Ion_Saliu.html
Ion Saliu
Colin Fairbrother
Jan 25, 2014, 6:47:24 PM1/25/14
to
Insanity is something Ion Saliu is very familiar with. How dare he take umbrage at my accurate observation around 2004 that if a sane person read most of his work the prognosis would not be good for there own sanity.
It amuses me that the likes of Saliu are targeting readers less intelligent than themselves. Do they exist?
It amuses me that the likes of Saliu are targeting readers less intelligent than themselves. Do they exist?
Parpaluck
Jan 28, 2014, 10:43:30 AM1/28/14
to
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 6:47:24 PM UTC-5, Colin Fartbrothel Psycholin Zamzalasheep wrote:
>
>
"...the likes of Saliu are targeting readers less intelligent than themselves."
NO... NO... NO... Colin Fartbrothel Psycholin Zamzalasheep... First and foremost, I target INTELLIGENT people... you always come in second... but, hey, that's a great compliment for you... Kulai!
>
>
"...the likes of Saliu are targeting readers less intelligent than themselves."
NO... NO... NO... Colin Fartbrothel Psycholin Zamzalasheep... First and foremost, I target INTELLIGENT people... you always come in second... but, hey, that's a great compliment for you... Kulai!
0 new messages