CASINO I SUED ILLEGAL! -WHO'S "FATUOUS" NOW?
DGVREIMAN
CASINO I SUED ILLEGAL! -WHO'S "FATUOUS" NOW?
© Copyright all materials written by Author DGV Reiman 2008, all rights
reserved. By posting or publishing this article and other copyrighted
articles on USENET and/or elsewhere, Author is expressly NOT granting
any implied authorization to reproduce his copyrighted work in any
manner. The Author further does not accept as "Fair Use" under U.S. Code
Title 17, nor will condone, the reproduction of any portion of his
copyrighted materials IN ANY MANNER for the purpose of harassing,
stalking or defaming the Author, or in conjunction with any violation of
any civil or criminal statutes. Violators will face legal action. If
anyone wishes to reproduce my copyrighted materials all they need to do
first is email me and receive back via email my written permission to do
so - such permission will not be unreasonably withheld. As I have often
stated, I post copyrighted articles on USENET for a pre-review by the
public prior to placing those articles in a book to be sold in
international commerce. All those that read these articles already know
or should already know my copyrighted articles cannot be infringed upon
in any manner simply because they were first posted on USENET. Moreover,
according to case law and expert answers in respect to this issue, the
general stated policy of newgroups, such as to invite comment, DOES NOT
preclude, supercede nor abrogate the author's right of copyright
protection. Moreover, case law has further provided a precedent that
"Fair Use" cannot be claimed by an infringer to disguise the spiteful
and defaming reproduction of an author's work.
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all of
my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please notify me of
your specific reasons for annoyance via email at legal...@comcast.net.
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain, and
to present articles to USENET readers prior to publication to determine
interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way cause anyone
emotional harm by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please note that
defending myself from harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has
been deemed a "lawful and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel.
If I am not attacked, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles
not interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP's and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site
or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
Arbitration Notice: If any person claims something I said about them in
this post is not true, then I invite them to email me and request
arbitration. The loser will pay for the arbitrator. I also invite
arbitration in respect to me claiming something someone said about me is
untrue. Again, the loser will pay for the arbitration. Truth as defined
in this offer will be statements in correct context and representing
original intent, and key omissions of fact will be considered
untruthful. Arbitrators will be selected from the American Association
of Arbitrators. This offer exclusively applies to all statements of fact
in this post.
CASINO I SUED ILLEGAL! -WHO'S "FATUOUS" NOW?
REBUTTAL TO NIGEL BROOKS' AND GANG ET AL "FATUOUS" FALSE ACCUSATIONS HE
AND HIS GANG HAVE FRAUDULENTLY POSTED ABOUT ME HUNDREDS OF TIMES ON
ALT.WAR.VIETNAM.
Nigel Brooks and his smear merchants have posted more than six hundred
posts on alt.war.vietnam falsely misrepresenting that I and about sixty
other plaintiffs filed a "frivolous" and "fatuous" lawsuit against the
Tropicana Casino in Atlantic City (parent company "Adamar").
The Nigel Brooks gang also fraudulently exploited our multifaceted
lawsuit against the Adamar corporation to fraudulently and absurdly
claim that some bewildering and incorrect "comments" of a Federal Judge
were being directed to me personally. I of course posted irrefutable
proof that Nigel Brooks and his Brownies' absurd and zany accusation the
Judge was addressing me personally in his comments about one element of
the case were fraudulent and blatantly false, as the following URL
clearly proves.
(In fact as the above Tiny URL proves, I was not even involved in the
element of the lawsuit the Judge negatively opined about. And in respect
to the corporate claims, which represented the element of the lawsuit I
WAS involved with, the Judge the gang likes to misquote said "had my
claims been brought within the statute of limitations they would have
had merit." (Or words to that effect - see the above Tiny URL). That
particular favorable comment by the Judge was one of the reasons our
lawsuit against the first law firm that failed to bring our complaint
within the required time limit was settled with a cash payment to the
Plaintiff group).
New Damaging Information About Adamar's Casino Revealed
Regardless of the past fraudulent activities of the smear and fraud gang
in this respect, what has been recently revealed by the NJ State Gaming
Commission is the main casino company we sued (Adamar) was a bad and
illegal company in respect to its casino ownership and operations. (I am
quoting below directly from the AP article. The URL for this AP article
is also listed below:)
Quotes from the AP Article URL listed below:
"The commission had stripped a Tropicana corporate affiliate (Adamar) of
its casino license after less than a year of operation here, determining
that it was incapable of running the type of first-class facility
required by state law."
"If we found a company not sufficient to hold a gaming license in New
Jersey, they are for all intents and purposes a bad company," said
Commissioner Michael Epps.
"We found Adamar not qualified to own a casino," added Commissioner
Michael Fedorko.
Several other commissioners also said they could not abide returning
ownership of the Tropicana to a company they ran out of town last year"
End article excerpts:
Doug Says: (Extension to Article).
I and many others said just about the same thing about Adamar years ago
in our lawsuit.
I should also note that Adamar, which was the primary entity I and
others had sued, as usual, had a very close relationship with a State
Supreme Court Judge. But this time the rulings and opinions from the
Judge were closely scrutinized, and lo and behold, this Judge's
"conflicts of interest" (the casino providing him comps just like the
other Judge) and his false interpretations of the law, this time, were
exposed and ridiculed openly by the NJ CCC.
Here is what the NJ CCC said about the retired Justice's opinions in
respect to the casino operations:
"The commission also issued a series of surprising public rebukes to a
retired state Supreme Court justice it appointed to oversee the
Tropicana until it can be sold. (Note this was the same State Supreme
Court Judge that ruled in favor of Adamar in the past).
"In addition to rejecting Stein's request to help the Tropicana, the
commission also dealt the retired justice a series of rebukes. They
repeatedly said he had wrongly interpreted the law, prohibited him from
making any other applications to the commission without first getting
approval from Kassekert, questioned some of the $104,675 in bills his
law firm submitted for work in February, and even told him that if he
wishes to continue hiring a car service to take him to Atlantic City
from his Hackensack office, he must pay for it himself.
Stein declined comment after the meeting."
End excerpts:
Doug Says:
For some reason(s) that I cannot fathom completely (although I have my
suspicions as to the reasons) Federal and State Judges have a difficult
time in correctly interpreting the law in respect to casino operations
in New Jersey.
Although many casino agents and smear merchants love to quote (in
respect to our lawsuit against Adamar) a federal judge's opinions which
were later overturned by the NJ CCC and by every other expert on casino
games and law in the ENTIRE WORLD (see the above Tiny URL) - it appears
that doing so, is as usual, fraudulent, deceptive and deliberately
misleading, especially when the final rulings of the NJ CCC in respect
to our case against Adamar were "not even mentioned" by the smear gang
during their hundreds of fraudulent posts about our lawsuit against
Adamar.
It is abundantly clear the NJ CCC has the final authority and final word
on casino law in New Jersey. Quoting Judges that do not have the correct
mathematical understanding of casino games, while ignoring the final
rulings of the NJ CCC that directly contradict the opinions of such
uninformed Judges, is obviously a deliberate attempt to deceive and
misrepresent, which of course is the hallmark of the "fatuous" smear
gang, as I know it.
Also, the Nigel Brooks smear gang's support of the Judge's opinions
which were overruled and considered "ridiculous" by the NJ CCC and all
of the other experts on casino games, and the smear gang's open support
of casinos that cheat and are incapable to legally run a casino, such as
the company we sued, is beyond explainable. Why would Nigel Brooks take
such an opposing and converse position to the facts of our case, the
law, and the final rulings of the gaming commission in respect to our
case? Is he a complete drooling idiot? Or, is he supporting cheating
casinos and ridiculous opinions from uninformed judges simply to harass
and cyberstalk me? Or both perhaps? Who knows what his motives are? I
believe only a Doctor of psychiatry could possibly determine what makes
smear merchants like Nigel Brooks tick - er, tock.
Yet, regardless of his efforts to demonize me and others, his
unmistakable obsession to smear me with fraud and false accusations
seems to keep backfiring on Mr. Brooks and his Brownies.
I hate to post these rebuttals to defend myself from Nigel Brooks and
his smear gang. Nevertheless, it appears from his recent attack posts
that Mr. Brooks and some anonymous cyberstalking members of his gang
have yet to find a cure to their obvious psychopathic obsession to
defame and demonize me. Their use of cyberstalking, fraud, forgeries,
lies, bullshit, idiotic misrepresentations, and of course, false,
fraudulent, deceptive and misleading nonsense about my military
records - which represents, as we all are coming to know, the hallmark
of the Nigel Brooks smear gang, is something that I will defend myself
against item by item, smear by smear, lie by lie.
(AP Article providing excerpts)
Doug Grant (Tm)