Whacko Jacko Chow
Sheldon
permitted to wear his Dr. Dentins in the big House? Anyone think he's
going up the river?
Sheldon
Sandy
"Sheldon" <PENM...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1117850562....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
-L.
I'm sure I'm in the minority but I don't think he did anything. The
family "claiming" is rottener (is that a word?) than a nasty, wormy
apple.
-L.
OmManiPadmeOmelet
"-L." <gent...@peacemail.com> wrote:
I also think Jacko is guilty only of having extremely bad judgement. ;-)
He's no more a child molester than Sheldon is...
The families making the allegations are just after money IMHO.
--
Om.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
ms. tonya
I'm sure I'm in the minority but I don't think he did anything. The
family "claiming" is rottener (is that a word?) than a nasty, wormy
apple.
RESPONSE: I am no means a fan of Jackson but no I do not think he is
guilty either BUT he needs to grow up and put a stop to having young
children stay at his estate whether the kids are with their parents or
not.
-L.
>From what I understand, he hasn't been alone with a child since the
first allegations and has taken great strides to make sure he has
always been escorted around kids. The guy is wicked weird, and his
interview where he said he "shared his bed" with children hurt him.
What he needs is a better PR person. It makes me sad because I have
always been a fan of his music.
-L.
Bill
you know what's sad about our form of justice Sheldon? It only takes
one dipshit human being to lie their way onto the jury...and the jury
is either hung or in no way will they find anybody guilty of anything!
I have been on a jury where several people had their own agenda...such
as a healthy hatred for cops, disrespect for law and order...you could
put usama bin laden on trial in front of the right jury in America and
he would be found not guilty!
Bill
Sarah
Sarah
Becca
LOL!
Becca
> I'm sure I'm in the minority but I don't think he did anything.
If you had an 11 year old son, would you let him stay at Michael's house
and sleep in Michael's bed? What 45 year old man wants to sleep with
little boys instead of women? Oh yeah, child molesters.
Becca
Damsel
The voice of reason.
Snacks - Vienna sausages
Carol
--
CLICK DAILY TO FEED THE HUNGRY
United States:
http://www.stopthehunger.com/
International:
http://www.thehungersite.com/
cathyxyz
I think the old saying "where there's smoke, there's fire", is
appropriate here. I think his behaviour goes beyond "eccentric". Let's
see what the jury thinks....
Cathy
--
I don't suffer from insanity - I enjoy every minute of it
Sheldon
Bill wrote:
> On 3 Jun 2005 19:02:42 -0700, "Sheldon" <PENM...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >What're his favorite snackeroos, anyone know? Will Michael Jackson be
> >permitted to wear his Dr. Dentins in the big House? Anyone think he's
> >going up the river?
> >
> >Sheldon
>
> you know what's sad about our form of justice Sheldon? It only takes
> one dipshit human being to lie their way onto the jury...and the jury
> is either hung or in no way will they find anybody guilty of anything!
That's the beauty of the American judicial system... it's designed to
create doubt... because it maintains innocence as the default. Try to
remember that the majority of jurors are typically not the sharpest
tacks in the box so any one dissenter should carry the same weight as
all the rest collectively... yes the system is imperfect but then
nothing is. I really can't judge Jackson, I am not one of his
jurors... but from what I've heard from the media I would say if he's
found guilty of molestation than the child's parents/guardians are more
guilty... they may not have personally pulled the trigger but they are
just as guilty as a person who pays the hit man/woman. If law
enforcement agencies have knowledge of an impending/possible
molestation, same as any other crime, then they have not only the right
but a duty to enter the premises immediately... so not only do I blame
the parents, as guardians of the law I blame all those engaged in law
enforcement including the judge in this particular case... before this
judge can sentence Jackson he must first sentence himself and to a
stiffer penalty... he had prior knowlege of Jackson sleeping with young
boys and as a judge should know better and therefore is naturally
prejudiced. Personally I think it's a crime for adults to sleep with
minors... in fact I think it's a crime for adults to promote minors to
sleep with minors... and not just for sexual reasons... hospitals
separate newborns for a reason, so do day care centers. I don't want
my 12 year old in bed with your 12 year old... any adult who thinks
it's okay for young teens to sleep together is extremely naive... any
adult who thinks it's okay for young teens to sleep with adults is
extremely corrupt. Bottom line; from what I know, the boy's parent(s)
is guilty of pimping/trafficing a minor for sexual purposes.... law
enforcement is guilty of turning its back (gross dereliction of duty).
Sheldon
cathyxyz
some snipping here...
Bottom line; from what I know, the boy's parent(s)
> is guilty of pimping/trafficing a minor for sexual purposes.... law
> enforcement is guilty of turning its back (gross dereliction of duty).
>
> Sheldon
>
I agree that the parent(s) need to share the blame. There is no way that
I would allow my child to spend time with an "alleged" child molester...
whether he/she is rich and famous or not. You just can't take that chance.
Maybe I am just becoming "an old fart" but I also think that children
are "growing up" too fast these days. Teenage sex, or worse, pre-Teen
sex, is a common thing now, I know, but that doesn't mean that its
"okay", IMHO.
Cathy - getting off her soap box
enigma
news:1117903300.9...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> so do day care centers. I don't want my 12 year old in bed
> with your 12 year old... any adult who thinks it's okay for
> young teens to sleep together is extremely naive... any
> adult who thinks it's okay for young teens to sleep with
> adults is extremely corrupt. Bottom line; from what I
> know, the boy's parent(s) is guilty of pimping/trafficing a
> minor for sexual purposes.... law enforcement is guilty of
> turning its back (gross dereliction of duty).
just a point of order, but most hospitals don't separate
newborns anymore, unless there is a problem or the parents
request it.
up until post WWII, most kids in a family didn't have thier
own rooms & many didn't even have thier own beds. they slept
with siblings.
i'm not making any excuses for Mr.Jackson, because what he
did he is certainly old enough to know better than to do,
innocent as he may think he was being. the image of
impropriety is enough to make it a bad idea.
but really, there is no reason for a parent not to sleep with
a child up through preschool age, or for siblings not to share
a room or bed, although that should apply to same gender
siblings after a certain point too. i shared a room with my
older brother until i was 8 or 9.
i do, however, agree the greedy-ass parents should be held
just as responsible in this case, if not *more* responsible.
they were just after (& still are) money.
Sheldon
enigma wrote:
> "Sheldon" <PENM...@aol.com> wrote in
> news:1117903300.9...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> >. hospitals separate newborns for a reason,
> > so do day care centers. I don't want my 12 year old in bed
> > with your 12 year old... any adult who thinks it's okay for
> > young teens to sleep together is extremely naive... any
> > adult who thinks it's okay for young teens to sleep with
> > adults is extremely corrupt. Bottom line; from what I
> > know, the boy's parent(s) is guilty of pimping/trafficing a
> > minor for sexual purposes.... law enforcement is guilty of
> > turning its back (gross dereliction of duty).
>
> just a point of order, but most hospitals don't separate
> newborns anymore.
Of course they do, all newborns are kept in separate bassinettes, for
various and sundry reasons many are kept further isolated.
Sheldon
enigma
news:1117927741....@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> enigma wrote:
>>
>> just a point of order, but most hospitals don't separate
>> newborns anymore.
>
> Of course they do, all newborns are kept in separate
> bassinettes, for various and sundry reasons many are kept
> further isolated.
my son wasn't. he slept in my bed in the hospital. i was told
he could have a bassinette or sleep with me, whichever i
preferred. my niece just had a baby in a different hospital &
it was the same deal.
lee
-L.
Bill wrote:
>
> you know what's sad about our form of justice Sheldon? It only takes
> one dipshit human being to lie their way onto the jury...and the jury
> is either hung or in no way will they find anybody guilty of anything!
> I have been on a jury where several people had their own agenda...such
> as a healthy hatred for cops,
Hey, a healthy hatred of cops will get you out of jury duty every time.
Trust me.
>disrespect for law and order...you could
> put usama bin laden on trial in front of the right jury in America and
> he would be found not guilty!
Guilty of what? It's all a matter of perspective.
-L.
Stan Horwitz
"Sheldon" <PENM...@aol.com> wrote:
Whacko Jacko will be acquitted. There are too many doubts regarding the
credibility of the prosecutor's witnesses against MJ. Even if MJ is
convicted in this trial, he is sure to appeal. MJ can afford to pay for
a lot of high powered legal resources, so if his money hasn't already
bought him an acquittal, there's always the appeal.
What would be best is if MJ fades into obscurity. Unfortunately, that's
not going to happen either, even if he is convicted. Every time I see MJ
on TV or in the press, he gives me the creeps. Any parent who allows his
or her child to spend time alone with that nut case should also be
prosecuted for negligence in my opinion.
Stan Horwitz
Bill <big...@carolina.rr.com> wrote:
Perhaps, but America's jails are full of people who couldn't find a
sympathetic juror.
Dave Smith
>
>
> Whacko Jacko will be acquitted. There are too many doubts regarding the
> credibility of the prosecutor's witnesses against MJ. Even if MJ is
> convicted in this trial, he is sure to appeal. MJ can afford to pay for
> a lot of high powered legal resources, so if his money hasn't already
> bought him an acquittal, there's always the appeal.
>
> What would be best is if MJ fades into obscurity. Unfortunately, that's
> not going to happen either, even if he is convicted. Every time I see MJ
> on TV or in the press, he gives me the creeps. Any parent who allows his
> or her child to spend time alone with that nut case should also be
> prosecuted for negligence in my opinion.
IF he is acquitted I expect that his next court experiences will be
malpractice suits against his psychiatrist and plastic surgeons. You gotta
wonder about a guy who spends so much money on cosmetic surgery and ends up
looking like a damned freak.
Dave Smith
They are having Michael Jackson sale at K Mart this week.
Boys pants half off.
Ken Davey
Not only is that not funny - it is in its self, perverted.
The Wolf
What does Michael Jackson like about 29-year-olds?
There's 20 of them!
The freak is finished, the lawyers will take everything.....
I would like one of you morons who think he is innocent to explain to me
why a 46-yea-old man would share his bed with little boys? (He's
admitted doing this several times)
Sheldon
enigma wrote:
>
> Sheldon wrote:
> > enigma wrote:
> >>
> >> just a point of order, but most hospitals don't separate
> >> newborns anymore.
> >
> > Of course they do, all newborns are kept in separate
> > bassinettes, for various and sundry reasons many are kept
> > further isolated.
>
> my son wasn't. he slept in my bed in the hospital. i was told
> he could have a bassinette or sleep with me, whichever i
> preferred. my niece just had a baby in a different hospital &
> it was the same deal.
> lee
Snork. Placed with the mother IS kept separate from other newborns...
what the heck, it was in your belly for some nine months. DUH! Unless
you consider yourself a newborn... intellectually, yes! Geeze,
unfortunately IQs are for the most part a product of genetics... poor
kid... I hope the daddy had a brain, do you even know who it was?
Sheldon
Nancy Young
"Stan Horwitz" <st...@temple.edu> wrote
> What would be best is if MJ fades into obscurity. Unfortunately, that's
> not going to happen either, even if he is convicted. Every time I see MJ
> on TV or in the press, he gives me the creeps. Any parent who allows his
> or her child to spend time alone with that nut case should also be
> prosecuted for negligence in my opinion.
I couldn't agree more, Stan. I got yelled at when I said, I wouldn't
leave my cat with him, for Pete's sake. Innocent until proven guilty,
blah blah blah.
That has nothing to do with it. There were questions before, never
mind what man sleeps with children, yucky, I would never ever
bring my kid over there for a sleepover. I don't care if he's guilty
or not. Common sense tells you just stay away from that.
Sorta tells me the parents had a motive of some sort.
nancy
Cathyxyz
Nancy Young wrote:
....That has nothing to do with it. There were questions before, never
> mind what man sleeps with children, yucky, I would never ever
> bring my kid over there for a sleepover. I don't care if he's guilty
> or not. Common sense tells you just stay away from that.
>
> Sorta tells me the parents had a motive of some sort.
Yeah they did. Its called "greed".
Cheers
Cathy
>
> nancy
Dave Smith
> I couldn't agree more, Stan. I got yelled at when I said, I wouldn't
> leave my cat with him, for Pete's sake. Innocent until proven guilty,
> blah blah blah.
Innocent until proven guilty?? In my books, sleeping with children would be
enough to get him committed to a mental institution. Inappropriate touching
would get him a trip to the big house, and no protective custody. Stick him
into a predator society so he can be on the other end of it for a while.
> That has nothing to do with it. There were questions before, never
> mind what man sleeps with children, yucky, I would never ever
> bring my kid over there for a sleepover. I don't care if he's guilty
> or not. Common sense tells you just stay away from that.
>
> Sorta tells me the parents had a motive of some sort.
Maybe after the parents finish suing Jackson the kids can turn around and sue
the parents.
enigma
news:1118159318.4...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> newborns... what the heck, it was in your belly for some
> nine months. DUH! Unless you consider yourself a
> newborn... intellectually, yes! Geeze, unfortunately IQs
> are for the most part a product of genetics... poor kid...
> I hope the daddy had a brain, do you even know who it was?
that's why we love you Sheldon. your personal attacks when
someone misunderstands an ambiguous post :)
ok, i agree that hospitals don't toss all the babies into one
bassinette, but they've never done that.
at any rate, my IQ is over 150. what's yours? Boo's daddy is
bright, around 130. Boo is autistic spectrum & not quite 5.
his IQ is up there but he's not really old enough or compliant
enough to test. thanks for asking :)
i just love when you have a crabby day.
lee <who noticed you didn't address the pre-WWII fact that
kids seldom had thier own rooms or beds>